Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
Fix the ARM backend's analyzeBranch so it doesn't ignore predicated
return instructions, and make the MachineVerifier rule more strict.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40061
Summary:
Relate bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37472
The shrink wrapping pass prematurally restores the stack, at a point where the stack might still be accessed.
Taking an exception can cause the stack to be corrupted.
As a first approach, this patch is overly conservative, assuming that any instruction that may load or store could access
the stack.
Reviewers: dmgreen, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: simpal01, efriedma, eli.friedman, javed.absar, llvm-commits, eugenis, chill, carwil, thegameg
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63152
llvm-svn: 363265
The original code attempted to do this, but the std::abs() call didn't
actually do anything due to implicit type conversions. Fix the type
conversions, and perform the correct check for negative immediates.
This probably has very little practical impact, but it's worth fixing
just to avoid confusion in the future, I think.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48907
llvm-svn: 336742
The benchmarking summarized in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113525.html showed
this is beneficial for a wide range of cores.
As is to be expected, quite a few small adaptations are needed to the
regressions tests, as the difference in scheduling results in:
- Quite a few small instruction schedule differences.
- A few changes in register allocation decisions caused by different
instruction schedules.
- A few changes in IfConversion decisions, due to a difference in
instruction schedule and/or the estimated cost of a branch mispredict.
llvm-svn: 306514
The post-dominance property is not sufficient to guarantee that a restore point
inside a loop is safe.
E.g.,
while(1) {
Save
Restore
if (...)
break;
use/def CSRs
}
All the uses/defs of CSRs are dominated by Save and post-dominated
by Restore. However, the CSRs uses are still reachable after
Restore and before Save are executed.
This fixes PR25824
llvm-svn: 255613
Petr Hosek