Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov fa48ff3fc9 [CodeGen] Fix neutral value of vecreduce fadd in tests (NFC)
The neutral value is -0.0, not 0.0. This doesn't matter for "fast"
reductions due to nsz, but does matter for reassoc-only and seq
reductions.

Change tests to mostly use -0.0 where the neutral value was intended,
and add some additional test coverage in some places. Also update
LangRef to use the right value.
2020-10-29 21:26:14 +01:00
Amara Emerson 322d0afd87 [llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.
This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.

Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787
2020-10-07 10:36:44 -07:00
Nikita Popov 53f36f06af [Legalize][ARM][X86] Add float legalization for VECREDUCE
This adds SoftenFloatRes, PromoteFloatRes and SoftPromoteHalfRes
legalizations for VECREDUCE, to fill the remaining hole in the SDAG
legalization. These legalizations simply expand the reduction and
let it be recursively legalized. For the PromoteFloatRes case at
least it is possible to do better than that, but it's pretty tricky
(because we need to consider the interaction of three different
vector legalizations and the type promotion) and probably not
really worthwhile.

I haven't added ExpandFloatRes support, as I am not familiar with
ppc_fp128.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87569
2020-09-14 20:42:09 +02:00
Nikita Popov bdd1eba37b [ARM] Add additional vecreduce float legalization test (NFC) 2020-09-12 22:40:39 +02:00
Nikita Popov 1cc4f8d172 [ARM] Expand vector reduction intrinsics on soft float
Followup to D73135. If the target doesn't have hard float (default
for ARM), then we assert when trying to soften the result of vector
reduction intrinsics. This patch marks these for expansion as well.
(A bit odd to use vectors on a target without hard float ... but
that's where you end up if you expose target-independent vector types.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73854
2020-02-03 18:49:12 +01:00