QingShan Zhang
|
4eeb56d088
|
[PowerPC] Don't do the folding if the operand is R0/X0
We have this transformation in PowerPC peephole:
Replace instruction:
renamable $x28 = ADDI8 renamable $x7, -8
renamable $x28 = ADD8 killed renamable $x28, renamable $x0
STFD killed renamable $f0, -8, killed renamable $x28 :: (store 8 into %ir._ind_cast99.epil)
with:
renamable $x28 = ADDI8 renamable $x7, -16
STFDX killed renamable $f0, $x0, killed $x28 :: (store 8 into %ir._ind_cast99.epil)
It is invalid as the '$x0' in STFDX is constant 0, not register r0.
Reviewed By: Nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77034
|
2020-03-31 02:50:19 +00:00 |
|
czhengsz
|
822059147b
|
[PowerPC] [Peephole] fold frame offset by using index form to save add.
renamable $x6 = ADDI8 $x1, -80 ;;; 0 is replaced with -80
renamable $x6 = ADD8 killed renamable $x6, renamable $x5
STW killed renamable $r3, 4, killed renamable $x6 :: (store 4 into %ir.14, !tbaa !2)
After PEI there is a peephole opt opportunity to combine above -80 in ADDI8 with 4 in the STW to eliminate unnecessary ADD8.
Expected result:
renamable $x6 = ADDI8 $x1, -76
STWX killed renamable $r3, renamable $x5, killed renamable $x6 :: (store 4 into %ir.6, !tbaa !2)
Reviewed by: stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66329
|
2019-10-25 04:13:30 -04:00 |