If a resource can be held for multiple cycles in the schedule model
then an instruction can be placed into the available queue, another
instruction can be scheduled, but the first will not be taken back out if
the two instructions hazard. To fix this make sure that we update the
available queue even on the first MOp of a cycle, pushing available
instructions back into the pending queue if they now conflict.
This happens with some downstream schedules we have around MVE
instruction scheduling where we use ResourceCycles=[2] to show the
instruction executing over two beats. Apparently the test changes here
are OK too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76909
Summary:
Appears identical to powerpc64{,le}.
Regenerate test that is being affected by upcoming patch.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62339
llvm-svn: 361543
`llc -march` is problematic because it only switches the target
architecture, but leaves the operating system unchanged. This
occasionally leads to indeterministic tests because the OS from
LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE is used.
However we can simply always use `llc -mtriple` instead. This changes
all the tests to do this to avoid people using -march when they copy and
paste parts of tests.
This patch:
- Removes -march if the .ll file already has a matching `target triple`
directive or -mtriple argument.
- In all other cases changes -march=ppc32/-march=ppc64 to
-mtriple=ppc32--/-mtriple=ppc64--
See also the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D35287
llvm-svn: 309754
Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs.
To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the
exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps
track of this failures.
No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 277624
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
llvm-svn: 72897
type as the vector element type: allow them to be of
a wider integer type than the element type all the way
through the system, and not just as far as LegalizeDAG.
This should be safe because it used to be this way
(the old type legalizer would produce such nodes), so
backends should be able to handle it. In fact only
targets which have legal vector types with an illegal
promoted element type will ever see this (eg: <4 x i16>
on ppc). This fixes a regression with the new type
legalizer (vec_splat.ll). Also, treat SCALAR_TO_VECTOR
the same as BUILD_VECTOR. After all, it is just a
special case of BUILD_VECTOR.
llvm-svn: 69467
Mircea Trofin