Some FP compares expand to a sequence ending with (xor X, 1) to invert the result. If
the consumer is a select_cc we can likely get rid of this xor by fixing
up the select_cc condition.
This patch combines (select_cc (xor X, 1), 0, setne, trueV, falseV) -
(select_cc X, 0, seteq, trueV, falseV) if we can prove X is 0/1.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94546
If SETO/SETUO aren't legal, they'll be expanded and we'll end up
with 3 comparisons.
SETONE is equivalent to (SETOGT || SETOLT)
so if one of those operations is supported use that expansion. We
don't need both since we can commute the operands to make the other.
SETUEQ can be implemented with !(SETOGT || SETOLT) or (SETULE && SETUGE).
I've only implemented the first because it didn't look like most of the
affected targets had legal SETULE/SETUGE.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, tlively, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94450
If SETUNE isn't legal, UO can use the NOT of the SETO expansion.
Removes some complex isel patterns. Most of the test changes are
from using XORI instead of SEQZ.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92008
Craig Topper