We normally select these when the root node is a sext_inreg, but
SimplifyDemandedBits can sometimes bypass the sext_inreg for some
users. This can create situation where sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl
is selected to a W instruction, and then the add/sub/mul/shl is
separately selected to a non-W instruction with the same inputs.
This patch tries to detect when it would still be ok to use a W
instruction without the sext_inreg by checking the direct users.
This can allow the W instruction to CSE with one created for a
sext_inreg+add/sub/mul/shl. To minimize complexity and cost of
checking, we make no attempt to determine if the CSE will happen
and just always use a W instruction when we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107658
Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
I thought this might help with another optimization I was
thinking about, but I don't think it will. So it just wastes
compile time calling computeKnownBits for no benefit.
This reverts commit 81b2f95971.
In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
In 0.9 these were defined to leave elements other than 0 in the
destination unmodified. They were changed to use the tail policy
in 0.10. I missed that update.
I assume no one has noticed because in order cores treat tail
agnostic the same as tail undisturbed. I believe Spike and QEMU do
the same.
Reviewed By: arcbbb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103736
This patch addresses an issue in which fixed-length (VLS) vector RVV
code could fail to reserve an emergency spill slot for their frame index
elimination. This is because we were previously only reserving a spill
slot when there were `scalable-vector` frame indices being used.
However, fixed-length codegen uses regular-type frame indices if it
needs to spill.
This patch does the fairly brute-force method of checking ahead of time
whether the function contains any RVV spill instructions, in which case
it reserves one slot. Note that the second RVV slot is still only
reserved for `scalable-vector` frame indices.
This unfortunately causes quite a bit of churn in existing tests, where
we chop and change stack offsets for spill slots.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103269
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
This patch extends D102737 to allow VL/VTYPE changes to be taken
into account before adding an explicit vsetvli.
We do this by using a data flow analysis to propagate VL/VTYPE
information from predecessors until we've determined a value for
every value in the function.
We use this information to determine if a vsetvli needs to be
inserted before the first vector instruction the block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102739
This is a replacement for D101938 for inserting vsetvli
instructions where needed. This new version changes how
we track the information in such a way that we can extend
it to be aware of VL/VTYPE changes in other blocks. Given
how much it changes the previous patch, I've decided to
abandon the previous patch and post this from scratch.
For now the pass consists of a single phase that assumes
the incoming state from other basic blocks is unknown. A
follow up patch will extend this with a phase to collect
information about how VL/VTYPE change in each block and
a second phase to propagate this information to the entire
function. This will be used by a third phase to do the
vsetvli insertion.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102737
This adds a special operand type that is allowed to be either
an immediate or register. By giving it a unique operand type the
machine verifier will ignore it.
This perturbs a lot of tests but mostly it is just slightly different
instruction orders. Something bad did happen to some min/max reduction
tests. We're spilling vector registers when we weren't before.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101246
I'm not sure how I failed to notice this before, but when optimizing
dominant-element BUILD_VECTORs we would lower via the scalable container type,
which lost us the information about the fixed length of the vector types. By
lowering via the fixed-length type we can preserve that information and
eliminate redundant vsetvli instructions.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98938
This patch adds an optimization path for BUILD_VECTOR nodes where the
majority of the elements are identical. These can be splatted, with the
remaining elements patched up with INSERT_VECTOR_ELTs. The threshold can
be tweaked as required - it is currently conservative. Undef elements
are disregarded when judging the dominance of a particular element. This
allows them to be covered by the splat value.
In addition, vectors of 2 elements are always optimized to a splat (for
the upper element) and an insert at element zero.
This optimization is disabled when optimizing for size.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98700
Craig Topper