In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
Compares are considered a narrowing operation for register overlap.
I believe for LMUL<=1 they meet this exception to allow overlap
"The destination EEW is smaller than the source EEW and the overlap is in the
lowest-numbered part of the source register group"
Both the result and the sources will occupy a single register for
LMUL<=1 so the overlap would always be in the "lowest-numbered part".
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103336
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
My thought process is that if v2i64 is an LMUL=1 type then v2i32
should be an LMUL=1/2 type. We limit the fractional LMUL so that
SEW=64 clips to LMUL=1, SEW=32 clips to LMUL=1/2, etc. This
ensures there's always a fractional LMUL available to truncate a type.
This does reduce the number of vsetvlis in some cases.
Some tests increase vsetvlis because the best container type for a
mask type is dependent on the LMUL+SEW that the mask was produced
from, but you can't tell that from the type. I think this is
something we need to solve this in the machine IR when optimizing
vsetvlis.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101215
This patch adds more optimized codegen for the above SETCC forms,
by matching the '.vi' vector forms when the immediate is a 5-bit signed
immediate plus 1. The immediate can be decremented and the corresponding
SET[U]LE or SET[U]GT forms can be matched.
This work was left as a TODO from D94168.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100096
We always create the VL operand using a register, but if we can
determine that it came from an ADDI X0, imm with a sufficiently
small immediate, we can use VSETIVLI.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97332
Due to vXi64 on RV32, I've directly emitted this using _VL ISD
opcodes. If it wasn't for that we could just use fixed vector
BUILD_VECTOR and VSELECT and let those each be legalized.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96910
I believe I've covered all orderings of splat operands here. Better
canonicalization in lowering might help reduce this. I did not handle
the immediate adjustments needed for set(u)gt/set(u)lt.
Testing here is limited to byte types because the scalable vector
type used for masks for the store is calculated assuming 8 byte
elements. But for the setcc its based on the element count of the
container type for the setcc input. So they don't agree. We'll need
to enhanced D96352 to handle this I think.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96443
Jim Lin