In most of cases, it has a single space after comma in assembly operands.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103790
Writes of a mask result are always tail agnostic.
Unfortunately, this seems to have made codegen worse. I can only
think this must be because the vsetvli was acting as some sort
of barrier that prevented some code movement in the scheduler.
Reviewed By: arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103331
All that really matters is that the VLMAX of the preceding
instructions is the same as the VLMAX required by the mask
operation.
Also update the vmsge(u) handling to use the SEW/LMUL we use for
other mask register operations. We were matching it to the compare
before. Some cases will be improve if we fix masked compares to
use tail agnostic policy. I think they ignore the tail policy
anyway.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103299
Compares are considered a narrowing operation for register overlap.
I believe for LMUL<=1 they meet this exception to allow overlap
"The destination EEW is smaller than the source EEW and the overlap is in the
lowest-numbered part of the source register group"
Both the result and the sources will occupy a single register for
LMUL<=1 so the overlap would always be in the "lowest-numbered part".
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103336
This can help avoid needing a virtual register for the vsetvl output
when the AVL is X0. For other register AVLs it can shorter the live
range of the AVL register if it isn't needed later.
There's probably no advantage when AVL is a 5 bit immediate that
can use vsetivli. But do it anyway for consistency.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103215
We aren't going to connect the result to anything so we might
as well avoid allocating a register.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102031
Theses instructions are allowed to write v0 when they are masked.
We'll still never use v0 because of the earlyclobber constraint so
this doesn't really help anything. It just makes the definitions
correct.
While I was there remove an unused multiclass I noticed.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101118
These instructions don't really exist, but we have ways we can
emulate them.
.vv will swap operands and use vmsle().vv. .vi will adjust the
immediate and use .vmsgt(u).vi when possible. For .vx we need to
use some of the multiple instruction sequences from the V extension
spec.
For unmasked vmsge(u).vx we use:
vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x; vmnand.mm vd, vd, vd
For cases where mask and maskedoff are the same value then we have
vmsge{u}.vx v0, va, x, v0.t which is the vd==v0 case that
requires a temporary so we use:
vmslt{u}.vx vt, va, x; vmandnot.mm vd, vd, vt
For other masked cases we use this sequence:
vmslt{u}.vx vd, va, x, v0.t; vmxor.mm vd, vd, v0
We trust that register allocation will prevent vd in vmslt{u}.vx
from being v0 since v0 is still needed by the vmxor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100925
Jim Lin