Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Green 211ce51f27 [ARM] Clean up some tests, removing dead instructions. NFC 2021-05-22 13:38:00 +01:00
David Green b2ac9681a7 [ARM] Alter t2DoLoopStart to define lr
This changes the definition of t2DoLoopStart from
t2DoLoopStart rGPR
to
GPRlr = t2DoLoopStart rGPR

This will hopefully mean that low overhead loops are more tied together,
and we can more reliably generate loops without reverting or being at
the whims of the register allocator.

This is a fairly simple change in itself, but leads to a number of other
required alterations.

 - The hardware loop pass, if UsePhi is set, now generates loops of the
   form:
       %start = llvm.start.loop.iterations(%N)
     loop:
       %p = phi [%start], [%dec]
       %dec = llvm.loop.decrement.reg(%p, 1)
       %c = icmp ne %dec, 0
       br %c, loop, exit
 - For this a new llvm.start.loop.iterations intrinsic was added, identical
   to llvm.set.loop.iterations but produces a value as seen above, gluing
   the loop together more through def-use chains.
 - This new instrinsic conceptually produces the same output as input,
   which is taught to SCEV so that the checks in MVETailPredication are not
   affected.
 - Some minor changes are needed to the ARMLowOverheadLoop pass, but it has
   been left mostly as before. We should now more reliably be able to tell
   that the t2DoLoopStart is correct without having to prove it, but
   t2WhileLoopStart and tail-predicated loops will remain the same.
 - And all the tests have been updated. There are a lot of them!

This patch on it's own might cause more trouble that it helps, with more
tail-predicated loops being reverted, but some additional patches can
hopefully improve upon that to get to something that is better overall.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89881
2020-11-10 15:57:58 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer f39f92c1f6 [ARM][MVE] tail-predication: overflow checks for elementcount, cont'd
This is a reimplementation of the overflow checks for the elementcount,
i.e. the 2nd argument of intrinsic get.active.lane.mask. The element
count is lowered in each iteration of the tail-predicated loop, and
we must prove that this expression doesn't overflow.

Many thanks to Eli Friedman and Sam Parker for all their help with
this work.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88086
2020-09-28 09:20:51 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer 487412988c [MVE] Rename of tests making them consistent with tail-predication tests. NFC. 2020-09-15 09:24:22 +01:00