This adds a combine for extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2). This allows two vector lanes to be moved at the
same time in a single instruction, and thanks to the other VMOVRRD folds
we have added recently can help reduce the amount of executed
instructions. Floating point types are very similar, but will include a
bitcast to an integer type.
This also adds a shouldRewriteCopySrc, to prevent copy propagation from
DPR to SPR, which can break as not all DPR regs can be extracted from
directly. Otherwise the machine verifier is unhappy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100244
This adds some simple known bits handling for the three CSINC/NEG/INV
instructions. From the operands known bits we can compute the common
bits of the first operand and incremented/negated/inverted second
operand. The first, especially CSINC ZR, ZR, comes up fair amount in the
tests. The others are more rare so a unit test for them is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97788
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
This is a recommit of 6cc3d80a84 after
fixing the backward instruction definitions.
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92553
Summary:
As well as vector/vector compare instructions, MVE also has a family
of comparisons taking a vector and a scalar, which compare every lane
of the vector against the same value. We generate those at isel time
using isel patterns that match `(ARMvcmp vector, (ARMvdup scalar))`.
This commit adds corresponding patterns for the operand-reversed form
`(ARMvcmp (ARMvdup scalar), vector)`, with condition codes swapped as
necessary. That way, we can still generate the vector/scalar compare
instruction if the IR happens to have been rearranged to put the
operands the other way round, which can happen in some optimization
phases. Previously, a vcmp the other way round was handled by emitting
a `vdup` instruction to //explicitly// replicate the scalar input into
a vector, and then doing a vector/vector comparison.
I haven't added a new test, because it turned out that several
existing tests were already exhibiting that failure mode. So just
updating the expected output in the existing MVE codegen tests
demonstrates what's been improved.
Reviewers: ostannard, MarkMurrayARM, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70296
The code here seems to date back to r134705, when tablegen lowering was first
being added. I don't believe that we need to include CPSR implicit operands on
the MCInst. This now works more like other backends (like AArch64), where all
implicit registers are skipped.
This allows the AliasInst for CSEL's to match correctly, as can be seen in the
test changes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66703
llvm-svn: 370745
Arm 8.1-M adds a number of related CSEL instructions, including CSINC, CSNEG and CSINV. These choose between two values given the content in CPSR and a condition, performing an increment, negation or inverse of the false value.
This adds some selection for them, either from constant values or patterns. It does not include CSEL directly, which is currently not always making code better. It is still useful, but we will have to check more carefully where it should and shouldn't be used.
Code by Ranjeet Singh and Simon Tatham, with some modifications from me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66483
llvm-svn: 370739
MVE VCMP instructions can use a general purpose register as the second operand.
This adds the combines for it, selecting from a compare of a vdup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65061
llvm-svn: 366924
David Green