This relaxes the VMLAV and VADDV reduction recognition code to handle
smaller than legal types, extending them as needed. That was already
handled for some reductions, this extends it to more types in a more
generic way. If a smaller than legal value is found it is extended to
the legal type as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106051
This expands the VMOVRRD(extract(..(build_vector(a, b, c, d)))) pattern,
to also handle insert_vectors. Providing we can find the correct insert,
this helps further simplify patterns by removing the redundant VMOVRRD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100245
This adds a combine for extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2). This allows two vector lanes to be moved at the
same time in a single instruction, and thanks to the other VMOVRRD folds
we have added recently can help reduce the amount of executed
instructions. Floating point types are very similar, but will include a
bitcast to an integer type.
This also adds a shouldRewriteCopySrc, to prevent copy propagation from
DPR to SPR, which can break as not all DPR regs can be extracted from
directly. Otherwise the machine verifier is unhappy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100244
This allows the peephole optimizer to know that a MVE_VMOV_to_lane_32 is
the same as an insert subreg, allowing it to optimize some redundant
lane moves.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95433
A v4i32 insert of an extract can become a simple lane move, as opposed
to round-tripping via a GPR. This adds a patterns that turns an v4i32
insert-extract pair into a EXTRACT_SUBREG/INSERT_SUBREG, with the
required COPY_TO_REGCLASS. These get better optimized into a simple lane
move by the rest of the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95428
This adds a DAG combine for converting sext_inreg of VGetLaneu into
VGetLanes, providing the types match correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95073
The lowering of a <4 x i16> or <4 x i8> vecreduce.add into an i64 would
previously be expanded, due to the i64 not being legal. This patch
adjusts our reduction matchers, making it produce a VADDLV(sext A to
v4i32) instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93622
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
This is a recommit of 6cc3d80a84 after
fixing the backward instruction definitions.
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92553
This adds patterns for v16i16's vecreduce, using all the existing code
to go via an i32 VADDV/VMLAV and truncating the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85452
In the original batch of MVE VMOVimm code generation VMOV.i64 was left
out due to the way it was done downstream. It turns out that it's fairly
simple though. This adds the codegen for it, similar to NEON.
Bigendian is technically incorrect in this version, which John is fixing
in a Neon patch.
Following on from the extra VADDV lowering, this extends things to
handle VADDLV which allows summing values into a pair of i32 registers,
together treated as a i64. This needs to be done in DAGCombine too as
the types are otherwise illegal, which is a fairly simple addition on
top of the existing code.
There is also a VADDLVA instruction handled here, that adds the incoming
values from the two general purpose registers. As opposed to the
non-long version where we could just add patterns for add(x, VADDV), the
long version needs to handle this early before the i64 has being split
into too many pieces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74224
We already make use of the VADDV vector reduction instruction for cases
where the input and the output start out at the same type. The MVE
instruction however will sum into an i32, so if we are summing a v16i8
into an i32, we can still use the same instructions. In terms of IR,
this looks like a sext of a legal type (v16i8) into a very illegal type
(v16i32) and a vecreduce.add of that into the result. This means we have
to catch the pattern early in a DAG combine, producing a target VADDVs/u
node, where the signedness is now important.
This is the first part, handling VADDV and VADDVA. There are also
VADDVL/VADDVLA instructions, which are interesting because they sum into
a 64bit value. And VMLAV and VMLALV, which are interesting because they
also do a multiply of two values. It may look a little odd in places as
a result.
On it's own this will probably not do very much, as the vectorizer will
not produce this IR yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74218
David Green