Under MVE we can use VADDV/VADDVA's to perform integer add reductions,
so it can be beneficial to use more reductions than summing subvectors
and reducing once. Especially for VMLAV/VMLAVA the mul can be
incorporated into the reduction, producing less instructions.
Some of the test cases currently get larger due to extra integer adds,
but will be improved in a followup patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106531
This relaxes the VMLAV and VADDV reduction recognition code to handle
smaller than legal types, extending them as needed. That was already
handled for some reductions, this extends it to more types in a more
generic way. If a smaller than legal value is found it is extended to
the legal type as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106051
For i64 reductions we currently try and convert add(VMLALV(X, Y), B) to
VMLALVA(B, X, Y), incorporating the addition into the VMLALVA. If we
have an add of an existing VMLALVA, this patch pushes the add up above
the VMLALVA so that it may potentially be simplified further, for
example being folded into another VMLALV.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105686
MVE does not have a VMLALV instruction that can perform v16i8 -> i64
reductions, like it does for v8i16->i64 and v4i32->i64 reductions. That
means that the pattern to create them will be spilt up by type
legalization, creating a lot of instructions.
This extends the patterns for matching i64 reductions a little to handle
the v16i8->i64 case. We need to turn them into a pair of v8i16->i64
VMLALVs that each perform half of the reduction and are summed together
(so the later is a VMLALVA). The order of the lanes does not matter for
the reduction so we generate a MVEEXT for the extension, that will
either be folded into a extending load or can be optimized to a
VREV/VMOVL. Some of the resulting codegen isn't optimal, but will be
improved in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105680
Similar to D91921 (and D104515) this introduces two MVESEXT and MVEZEXT
nodes that larger-than-legal sext and zext are lowered to. These either
get optimized away or end up becoming a series of stack loads/store, in
order to perform the extending whilst keeping the order of the lanes
correct. They are generated from v8i16->v8i32, v16i8->v16i16 and
v16i8->v16i32 extends, potentially with a intermediate extend for the
larger v16i8->v16i32 extend. A number of combines have been added for
obvious cases that come up in tests, notably MVEEXT of shuffles. More
may be needed in the future, but this seems to cover most of the cases
that come up in the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105090
This expands the VMOVRRD(extract(..(build_vector(a, b, c, d)))) pattern,
to also handle insert_vectors. Providing we can find the correct insert,
this helps further simplify patterns by removing the redundant VMOVRRD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100245
This adds a combine for extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2). This allows two vector lanes to be moved at the
same time in a single instruction, and thanks to the other VMOVRRD folds
we have added recently can help reduce the amount of executed
instructions. Floating point types are very similar, but will include a
bitcast to an integer type.
This also adds a shouldRewriteCopySrc, to prevent copy propagation from
DPR to SPR, which can break as not all DPR regs can be extracted from
directly. Otherwise the machine verifier is unhappy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100244
Reuse the existing KnownBits multiplication code to handle the 'extend + multiply + extract high bits' pattern for multiply-high ops.
Noticed while looking at the codegen for D88785 / D98587 - the patch helps division-by-constant expansion code in particular, which suggests that we might have some further KnownBits div/rem cases we could handle - but this was far easier to implement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98857
This allows the peephole optimizer to know that a MVE_VMOV_to_lane_32 is
the same as an insert subreg, allowing it to optimize some redundant
lane moves.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95433
This adds a DAG combine for converting sext_inreg of VGetLaneu into
VGetLanes, providing the types match correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95073
The lowering of a <4 x i16> or <4 x i8> vecreduce.add into an i64 would
previously be expanded, due to the i64 not being legal. This patch
adjusts our reduction matchers, making it produce a VADDLV(sext A to
v4i32) instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93622
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
This is a recommit of 6cc3d80a84 after
fixing the backward instruction definitions.
MVE has a dual lane vector move instruction, capable of moving two
general purpose registers into lanes of a vector register. They look
like one of:
vmov q0[2], q0[0], r2, r0
vmov q0[3], q0[1], r3, r1
They only accept these lane indices though (and only insert into an
i32), either moving lanes 1 and 3, or 0 and 2.
This patch adds some tablegen patterns for them, selecting from vector
inserts elements. Because the insert_elements are know to be
canonicalized to ascending order there are several patterns that we need
to select. These lane indices are:
3 2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 31; vmovqrr 20
3 2 1 -> vmovqrr 31; vmov 2
3 1 -> vmovqrr 31
2 1 0 -> vmovqrr 20; vmov 1
2 0 -> vmovqrr 20
With the top one being the most common. All other potential patterns of
lane indices will be matched by a combination of these and the
individual vmov pattern already present. This does mean that we are
selecting several machine instructions at once due to the need to
re-arrange the inserts, but in this case there is nothing else that will
attempt to match an insert_vector_elt node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92553
This fixes a complication on top of D87276. If we are sign extending
around a mul with the two operands that are the same, instcombine will
helpfully convert one of the sext to a zext. Reverse that so that we
again generate a reduction.
Differnetial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87287
We can sometimes get code that does:
xe = zext i16 x to i32
ye = zext i16 y to i32
m = mul i32 xe, ye
me = zext i32 m to i64
r = vecreduce.add(me)
This "double extend" can trip up the reduction identification, but
should give identical results.
This extends the pattern matching to handle them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87276
This adds patterns for v16i16's vecreduce, using all the existing code
to go via an i32 VADDV/VMLAV and truncating the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85452
These patterns for i8 and i16 VMLA's were missing. They end up from
legalized vector.reduce.add.v8i16 and vector.reduce.add.v16i8, and
although the instruction works differently (the mul and add are
performed in a higher precision), I believe it is OK because only an
i8/i16 are demanded from them, and so the results will be the same. At
least, they pass any testing I can think to run on them.
There are some tests that end up looking worse, but are quite artificial
due to passing half vector types through a call boundary. I would not
expect the vmull to realistically come up like that, and a vmlava is
likely better a lot of the time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80524
This adds MVE vmull patterns, which are conceptually the same as
mul(vmovl, vmovl), and so the tablegen patterns follow the same
structure.
For i8 and i16 this is simple enough, but in the i32 version the
multiply (in 64bits) is illegal, meaning we need to catch the pattern
earlier in a dag fold. Because bitcasts are involved in the zext
versions and the patterns are a little different in little and big
endian. I have only added little endian support in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76740
In the original batch of MVE VMOVimm code generation VMOV.i64 was left
out due to the way it was done downstream. It turns out that it's fairly
simple though. This adds the codegen for it, similar to NEON.
Bigendian is technically incorrect in this version, which John is fixing
in a Neon patch.
Similar to VADDV and VADDLV that have been added recently, this adds
lowering and patterns for VMLAV, VMLAVA, VMLALV and VMLALVA. They
perform the same roles as the add's, just folding a mul into the same
instruction (and so taking two inputs). As such, they need to be lowered
in the same way as the types are often not legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74390
David Green