The data layout strings do not have any effect on llc tests and will become
misleadingly out of date as we continue to update the canonical data layout, so
remove them from the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105842
The WebAssembly text and binary formats have different operand orders
for the "type" and "table" fields of call_indirect (and
return_call_indirect). In LLVM we use the binary order for the MCInstr,
but when we produce or consume the text format we should use the text
order. For compilation units targetting WebAssembly 1.0 (without the
reference types feature), we omit the table operand entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97761
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via TABLE_NUMBER
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via `TABLE_NUMBER`
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
We abuse the used-in-reloc flag on symbols to indicate which tables
should end up in the symbol table. We do this because unfortunately
older wasm-ld will carp if it see a table symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
This reverts commit 418df4a6ab.
This change broke emscripten tests, I believe because it started
generating 5-byte a wide table index in the call_indirect instruction.
Neither v8 nor wabt seem to be able to handle that. The spec
currently says that this is single 0x0 byte and:
"In future versions of WebAssembly, the zero byte occurring in the
encoding of the call_indirectcall_indirect instruction may be used to
index additional tables."
So we need to revisit this change. For backwards compat I guess
we need to guarantee that __indirect_function_table is always at
address zero. We could also consider making this a single-byte
relocation with and assert if have more than 127 tables (for now).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95005
This patch changes to make call_indirect explicitly refer to the
corresponding function table, residualizing TABLE_NUMBER relocs against
it.
With this change, wasm-ld now sees all references to tables, and can
link multiple tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
Summary:
Extends the multivalue call infrastructure to tail calls, removes all
legacy calls specialized for particular result types, and removes the
CallIndirectFixup pass, since all indirect call arguments are now
fixed up directly in the post-insertion hook.
In order to keep supporting pretty-printed defs and uses in test
expectations, MCInstLower now inserts an immediate containing the
number of defs for each call and call_indirect. The InstPrinter is
updated to query this immediate if it is present and determine which
MCOperands are defs and uses accordingly.
Depends on D72902.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192
Summary:
There is still room for improvement in the handling of multivalue
nodes in both passes, but the current algorithm is at least correct
and optimizes some simpler cases. In order to make future
optimizations of these passes easier and build confidence that the
current algorithms are correct, this CL also adds a script that
automatically and exhaustively generates interesting multivalue test
cases.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72902
Summary:
Unlike normal calls, call_indirects have immediate arguments that
caused a MachineVerifier failure without a small tweak to loosen the
verifier's requirements for variadicOpsAreDefs instructions.
One nice thing about the new call_indirects is that they do not need
to participate in the PCALL_INDIRECT mechanism because their post-isel
hook handles moving the function pointer argument and adding the flags
and typeindex arguments itself.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74191
This reverts commit 649aba93a2, now that
the approach started there has been shown to be workable in the patch
series culminating in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
Summary:
This reverts commit 3ef169e586. The
purpose of this commit was to allow stack machines to perform
instruction selection for instructions with variadic defs. However,
MachineInstrs fundamentally cannot support variadic defs right now, so
this change does not turn out to be useful.
Depends on D73927.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73928
Summary:
WebAssembly is unique among upstream targets in that it does not at
any point use physical registers to store values. Instead, it uses
virtual registers to model positions in its value stack. This means
that some target-independent lowering activities that would use
physical registers need to use virtual registers instead for
WebAssembly and similar downstream targets. This CL generalizes the
existing `usesPhysRegsForPEI` lowering hook to
`usesPhysRegsForValues` in preparation for using it in more places.
One such place is in InstrEmitter for instructions that have variadic
defs. On register machines, it only makes sense for these defs to be
physical registers, but for WebAssembly they must be virtual registers
like any other values. This CL changes InstrEmitter to check the new
target lowering hook to determine whether variadic defs should be
physical or virtual registers.
These changes are necessary to support a generalized CALL instruction
for WebAssembly that is capable of returning an arbitrary number of
arguments. Fully implementing that instruction will require additional
changes that are described in comments here but left for a follow up
commit.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, qcolombet
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71484
Summary:
Also changes the wasm YAML format to reflect the possibility of having
multiple return types and to put the returns after the params for
consistency with the binary encoding.
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, arphaman, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69156
llvm-svn: 375283
Summary:
Renames `ExprType` to the more apt `BlockType` and adds a variant for
multivalue blocks. Currently non-void blocks are only generated at the
end of functions where the block return type needs to agree with the
function return type, and that remains true for multivalue
blocks. That invariant means that the actual signature does not need
to be stored in the block signature `MachineOperand` because it can be
inferred by `WebAssemblyMCInstLower` from the return type of the
parent function. `WebAssemblyMCInstLower` continues to lower block
signature operands to immediates when possible but lowers multivalue
signatures to function type symbols. The AsmParser and Disassembler
are updated to handle multivalue block types as well.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, aardappel
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68889
llvm-svn: 374933
Summary:
This is necessary and sufficient to get simple cases of multiple
return working with multivalue enabled. More complex cases will
require block and loop signatures to be generalized to potentially be
type indices as well.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68684
llvm-svn: 374235
Summary:
These features will both be implemented soon, so I thought I would
save time by adding the boilerplate for both of them at the same time.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62047
llvm-svn: 361516
Thomas Lively