There are some calls to functions like `__alloca` that are missing
a regmask operand. Lack of a regmask operand means that all
registers that aren't mentioned by def operands are preserved.
__alloca only updates EAX and ESP and has def operands for
them so this is ok. Because there is no regmask the register
allocator won't spill the FP registers across the call. Assuming
we want to keep the FP stack untoched across these calls, we
need to handle this is in the FP stackifier.
We might want to add a proper regmask operand to the code that
creates these calls to indicate all registers are preserved, but we'd
still need this change to the FP stackifier to know to preserve the
FP stack for such a regmask.
The test is kind of long, but bugpoint wasn't able to reduce it
any further.
Fixes PR50782
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105762
This reverts commit 52aeacfbf5.
There isn't full agreement on a path forward yet, but there is agreement that
this shouldn't land as-is. See discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Also reverts unreviewed "[clang] Improve `-Wnull-dereference` diag to be more in-line with reality"
This reverts commit f4877c78c0.
And all the related changes to tests:
This reverts commit 9a0152799f.
This reverts commit 3f7c9cc274.
This reverts commit 329f8197ef.
This reverts commit aa9f58cc2c.
This reverts commit 2df37d5ddd.
This reverts commit a72a441812.
This reverts commit 4e413e1621,
which landed almost 10 months ago under premise that the original behavior
didn't match reality and was breaking users, even though it was correct as per
the LangRef. But the LangRef change still hasn't appeared, which might suggest
that the affected parties aren't really worried about this problem.
Please refer to discussion in:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D87399 (`Revert "[InstCombine] erase instructions leading up to unreachable"`)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184 (`[LangRef] Clarify semantics of volatile operations.`)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D87149 (`[InstCombine] erase instructions leading up to unreachable`)
clang has `-Wnull-dereference` which will diagnose the obvious cases
of null dereference, it was adjusted in f4877c78c0,
but it will only catch the cases where the pointer is a null literal,
it will not catch the cases where an arbitrary store is expected to trap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105338
Its proving tricky to move this to the generic legalizer code, so manually insert the v2i32 subvector into v4i32, insert the AssertSext/AssertZext node, then extract the subvector again.
This avoids masks in the truncation/pack code, which means we avoid a PSHUFB in the fp_to_sint/uint code for sub-128 bit types (specific targets can still combine the packs to a pshufb if they have fast variable per-lane shuffles).
This was noticed when I was trying to improve fp_to_sint/uint costs with D103695 (and some targets had very high fp_to_sint costs due to the PSHUFB), so we can then update the fp_to_uint codegen from D89697.
Revived D101297 in its original form + added some changes in X86
legalization cehcking for masked gathers.
This solution is the most stable and the most correct one. We have to
check the legality before trying to build the masked gather in SLP.
Without this check we have incorrect cost (for SLP) in case if the masked gather
is not legal/slower than the gather. And we're missing some
vectorization opportunities.
This can be fixed in the cost model, but in this case we need to add
special checks for the cost of GEPs for ScatterVectorize node, add
special check for small trees, etc., i.e. there are a lot of corner
cases here and there, which insrease code base and make it harder to
maintain the code.
> Can't we rely on cost model to deal with this? This can be profitable for futher vectorization, when we can start from such gather loads as seed.
The question from D101297. Actually, no, it can't. Actually, simple
gather may give us better result, especially after we started
vectorization of insertelements. Plus, like I said before, the cost for
non-legal masked gathers leads to missed vectorization opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105042
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
This patch fixes PR50823.
The shuffle mask should be twisted twice before gotten the correct one due to the difference between inner HOP and outer.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104903
Fixes bugs [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50580 | 50580 ]] and [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49446 | 49446 ]]
When compiling with -g "DBG_VALUE <reg>" instructions are added in the MIR, if such a instruction is inserted between instructions that use <reg> then MachineCopyPropagation invalidates <reg> , this causes some copies to not be propagated and causes differences in code generation (ex bugs 50580 and 49446 ). DBG_VALUE instructions should be ignored since they don't actually modify the register.
Reviewed By: lkail
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104394
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
This demonstrates a possible fix for PR48760 - for compares with constants, canonicalize the SGT/UGT condition code to use SGE/UGE which should reduce the number of EFLAGs bits we need to read.
As discussed on PR48760, some EFLAG bits are treated independently which can require additional uops to merge together for certain CMOVcc/SETcc/etc. modes.
I've limited this to cases where the constant increment doesn't result in a larger encoding or additional i64 constant materializations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101074
Suggested on D101074 - add a 'icmp sgt i64 %0, -2147483649' comparison that can fold to 'icmp sge i64 %0, -2147483648' on D101074 allowing i32 immediate folding
CMOV conversion first rewrites all CMOVs with memory load to branches.
Then runs a second pass to convert other CMOVs in loops if profitable.
But the first pass doesn't add new basic blocks to MachineLoopInfo,
CMOVs in these blocks are ignored in the subsequent pass.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104692
This intrinsic blocks floating point transformations by the optimizer.
Author: Pengfei
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke, Andy Kaylor, Craig Topper, kpn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99675
Don't allow vectors to split into GPRs for 'r' and other scalar
constraints. Prevents assertion in getCopyToPartsVector.
Makes PR50907 give a better error instead of crashing.
When set opt-bisect-limit to some value that is less than ISel pass
in command line and CurBisectNum expired, "DAG to DAG" pass lower
its opt level to O0. However "processimpdefs" and "X86 FP Stackifier"
is not stopped due to the CurBisectNum expiration. So undefined fp0
is generated. This cause crash in the "X86 FP Stackifier" pass,
because Stackifier doesn't expect any undefined fp value.
Here is the scenario that cause compiler crash.
successors: %bb.26
liveins: $r14
ST_FPrr $st0, implicit-def $fpsw, implicit $fpcw
renamable $rdi = MOV64ri @.str.3.16422
renamable $rdx = LEA64r %stack.6, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, 0, 0, implicit-def $rsp, implicit-def dead
$eflags, implicit-def $ssp, implicit $rsp, implicit $ssp
dead $esi = MOV32r0 implicit-def dead $eflags, implicit-def $rsi
CALL64pcrel32 @foo, implicit $rsp, implicit $ssp, implicit $rdi,
implicit $rsi, implicit $rdx, implicit-def dead $fp0
renamable $xmm0 = MOVSDrm_alt %stack.10, 1, $noreg, 0, $noreg :: (load 8
from %stack.10)
ADJCALLSTACKUP64 0, 0, implicit-def $rsp, implicit-def dead $eflags,
implicit-def $ssp, implicit $rsp, implicit $ssp
renamable $fp2 = CHS_Fp80 killed undef renamable $fp0, implicit-def
$fpsw
JMP_1 %bb.26
The CALL64pcrel32 mark fp0 dead, so llvm free the stack slot for fp0
and the stack become empty. In the late instruction CHS_Fp80, it use
undefined register fp0, the original code assume there must be a stack
slot for the src register (fp0) without respecting it is undefined,
so llvm report error.
We have some discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104440 and we
decide to fix it in fast ISel. The fix is to lower undefined fp value to
zero value, so that it release the burden of "X86 FP Stackifier" pass.
Thank Craig for the suggestion and the initial patch to fix it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104678
- When emitting libcalls, do not only pass the calling convention from the
function prototype but also the attributes.
- Do not pass attributes from e.g. libc memcpy to llvm.memcpy.
Review: Reid Kleckner, Eli Friedman, Arthur Eubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103992
It looks like the fold introduced in 63f3383ece can cause crashes
if the type of the bitcasted value is not a valid vector element type,
like x86_mmx.
To resolve the crash, reject invalid vector element types. The way it is
done in the patch is a bit clunky. Perhaps there's a better way to
check?
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104792
select (cmpeq Cond0, Cond1), LHS, (select (cmpugt Cond0, Cond1), LHS, Y) --> (select (cmpuge Cond0, Cond1), LHS, Y)
etc,
We already perform this fold in DAGCombiner for MVT::i1 comparison results, but these can still appear after legalization (in x86 case with MVT::i8 results), where we need to be more careful about generating new comparison codes.
Pulled out of D101074 to help address the remaining regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104707
When inserting UnregisterFn, if there is a musttail call, we must insert before the call so that we don't break the musttail call contract.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104807
When inserting UnregisterFn, if there is a musttail call, we must insert before the call so that we don't break the musttail call contract.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104807
According to IR LangRef, the FMF flag:
contract
Allow floating-point contraction (e.g. fusing a multiply followed by an
addition into a fused multiply-and-add).
reassoc
Allow reassociation transformations for floating-point instructions.
This may dramatically change results in floating-point.
My understanding is that these two flags shouldn't imply each other,
as we might have a SDNode that can be reassociated with others, but
not contractble.
eg: We may want following fmul/fad/fsub to freely reassoc, but don't
want fma being generated here.
%F = fmul reassoc double %A, %B ; <double> [#uses=1]
%G = fmul reassoc double %C, %D ; <double> [#uses=1]
%H = fadd reassoc double %F, %G ; <double> [#uses=1]
%I = fsub reassoc double %H, %E ; <double> [#uses=1]
Before https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710, `reassoc` flag actually
did not imply isContratable either.
The current implementation also only check the flag in fadd node,
ignoring fmul node, this patch update that as well.
Reviewed By: spatel, qiucf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104247
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
This was broken in ba1509da7b. The Win64
frame would not perform the setup of the Swift async context parameter
but would tear down the setup in the epilogue resulting in crashes.
This ensures that we do the full setup when we do the tear down.
Although this is non-conforming to the Win64 calling convention, it
corrects the setup and exposes the actual issue that the change
introduced: incorrect frame setup.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104246
We create flag variable "__llvm_fs_discriminator__" in the binary
to indicate that FSAFDO hierarchical discriminators are used.
This variable might be GC'ed by the linker since it is not explicitly
reference. I initially added the var to the use list in pass
MIRFSDiscriminator but it did not work. It turned out the used global
list is collected in lowering (before MIR pass) and then emitted in
the end of pass pipeline.
In this patch, we use a "common" linkage for this variable so that
it will be GC'ed by the linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103988
Fixes:
- PR36507 Floating point varargs are not handled correctly with
-mno-implicit-float
- PR48528 __builtin_va_start assumes it can pass SSE registers
when using -Xclang -msoft-float -Xclang -no-implicit-float
On x86_64, floating-point parameters are normally passed in XMM
registers. For va_start, we spill those to memory so va_arg can
find them. There is an interaction here with -msoft-float and
-no-implicit-float:
When -msoft-float is in effect, instead of passing floating-point
parameters in XMM registers, they are passed in general-purpose
registers.
When -no-implicit-float is in effect, it "disables implicit
floating-point instructions" (per the LangRef). The intended
effect is to not have the compiler generate floating-point code
unless explicit floating-point operations are present in the
source code, but what exactly counts as an explicit floating-point
operation is not specified. The existing behavior of LLVM here has
led to some surprises and PRs.
This change modifies the behavior as follows:
| soft | no-implicit | old behavior | new behavior |
| no | no | spill XMM regs | spill XMM regs |
| yes | no | don't spill XMM | don't spill XMM |
| no | yes | don't spill XMM | spill XMM regs |
| yes | yes | assert | don't spill XMM |
In particular, this avoids the assert that happens when
-msoft-float and -no-implicit-float are both in effect. This
seems like a perfectly reasonable combination: If we don't want
to rely on hardware floating-point support, we want to both
avoid using float registers to pass parameters and avoid having
the compiler generate floating-point code that wasn't in the
original program. Instead of crashing the compiler, the new
behavior is to not synthesize floating-point code in this
case. This fixes PR48528.
The other interesting case is when -no-implicit-float is in
effect, but -msoft-float is not. In that case, any floating-point
parameters that are present will be in XMM registers, and so we
have to spill them to correctly handle those. This fixes
PR36507. The spill is conditional on %al indicating that
parameters are present in XMM registers, so no floating-point
code will be executed unless the function is called with
floating-point parameters.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104001
Changing vector element type doesn't work for v6i32->v6i16 now
that v6i32 is an MVT and v6i16 is not.
I would like to fix this in changeVectorElementType, but you
need a LLVMContext to call getVectorVT which we can't get from
an MVT.
Fixes PR50709.
Iff we have `SCALAR_TO_VECTOR` (and we demand it's only defined 0'th element),
and said scalar was produced by `EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT` from the 0'th element
of some vector, then we can just continue traversal into said source vector.
This comes up in X86 vector uniform shift lowering.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104250
The sorting, obviously, must be stable, else we will have random assembly fluctuations.
Apparently there was no test coverage that would benefit from that,
so i've added one test.
The sorting consists of two parts - just sort the input vectors,
and recompute the shuffle mask -> input vector mapping.
I don't believe we need to do anything else.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104187
For CMP imm instruction, when the operand 1 is symbol address we should
check if it is immediate first. Here is the example code.
`CMP64mi32 $noreg, 8, killed renamable $rcx, @d, $noreg, @a, implicit-def
$eflags`
Many thanks to Craig, Topper for the test case to reproduce this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104037
For CMP imm instruction, when the operand 1 is symbol address we should
check if it is immediate first. Here is the example code.
`CMP64mi32 $noreg, 8, killed renamable $rcx, @d, $noreg, @a, implicit-def
$eflags`
Many thanks to Craig, Topper for the test case to reproduce this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104037
This reverts commit f35bcea1d4 because it
depends on 1b748faf2b, which breaks
building the llvm-test-suite with -verify-machineinstrs on X86.
See 154adc0f135cff3f8a8861c335d2b88c8049d098 for more details.
The motivation is that the update script has at least two deviations
(`<...>@GOT`/`<...>@PLT`/ and not hiding pointer arithmetics) from
what pretty much all the checklines were generated with,
and most of the tests are still not updated, so each time one of the
non-up-to-date tests is updated to see the effect of the code change,
there is a lot of noise. Instead of having to deal with that each
time, let's just deal with everything at once.
This has been done via:
```
cd llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86
grep -rl "; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py" | xargs -L1 <...>/llvm-project/llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py --llc-binary <...>/llvm-project/build/bin/llc
```
Not all tests were regenerated, however.
Register allocation may spill virtual registers to the stack, which can
increase alignment requirements of the stack frame. If the the function
did not require stack realignment before register allocation, the
registers required to do so may not be reserved/available. This results
in a stack frame that requires realignment but can not be realigned.
Instead, only increase the alignment of the stack if we are still able
to realign.
The register SpillAlignment will be ignored if we can't realign, and the
backend will be responsible for emitting the correct unaligned loads and
stores. This seems to be the assumed behaviour already, e.g.
ARMBaseInstrInfo::storeRegToStackSlot and X86InstrInfo::storeRegToStackSlot
are both `canRealignStack` aware.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103602
-Wframe-larger-than= is an interesting warning; we can't know the frame
size until PrologueEpilogueInsertion (PEI); very late in the compilation
pipeline.
-Wframe-larger-than= was propagated through CC1 as an -mllvm flag, then
was a cl::opt in LLVM's PEI pass; this meant it was dropped during LTO
and needed to be re-specified via -plugin-opt.
Instead, make it part of the IR proper as a module level attribute,
similar to D103048. Introduce -fwarn-stack-size CC1 option.
Reviewed By: rsmith, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103928
Fixes crash reported here https://reviews.llvm.org/D73607
Using a store to keep the trunc intact. Returning v16i24 would
cause the trunc to be optimized away in SelectionDAGBuilder.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103940
As shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50623
...and the similar tests here, we were not accounting for
store merging of different sizes that do not cover the
entire range of the wide value to be stored.
This is the easy fix: just make sure that all of the
original stores are the same size, so when we calculate
the wide width, it's a simple N * M check.
This still allows all of the motivating optimizations from:
D86420 / 54a5dd485c
D87112 / 7a06b166b1
We could enhance this code to track individual bytes and
allow merging multiple sizes.
shuffle(concat(x,undef),concat(y,undef)) -> concat(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(x,y))
If the original shuffle references any of the upper (undef) subvector elements, ensure the split shuffle masks uses undef instead of an out-of-bounds value.
Fixes PR50609
Needs to be discussed more.
This reverts commit 255a5c1baa6020c009934b4fa342f9f6dbbcc46
This reverts commit df2056ff3730316f376f29d9986c9913b95ceb1
This reverts commit faff79b7ca144e505da6bc74aa2b2f7cffbbf23
This reverts commit d2a9020785c6e02afebc876aa2778fa64c5cafd
So far, support for x86_64-linux-gnux32 has been handled by explicit
comparisons of Triple.getEnvironment() to GNUX32. This worked as long as
x86_64-linux-gnux32 was the only X32 environment to worry about, but we
now have x86_64-linux-muslx32 as well. To support this, this change adds
an isX32() function and uses it. It replaces all checks for GNUX32 or
MuslX32 by isX32(), except for the following:
- Triple::isGNUEnvironment() and Triple::isMusl() are supposed to treat
GNUX32 and MuslX32 differently.
- computeTargetTriple() needs to be able to transform triples to add or
remove X32 from the environment and needs to map GNU to GNUX32, and
Musl to MuslX32.
- getMultiarchTriple() completely lacks any Musl support and retains the
explicit check for GNUX32 as it can only return x86_64-linux-gnux32.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103777
We were hitting an issue when the scalar_to_vector source was being implicitly truncated (in this case to i8 to vXi1) but we were also using the i8 source in a broadcast to a vXi8 value.
Fixes PR50374
This extends 434c8e013a and ede3982792 to handle signed
predicates by sign-extending the setcc operands.
This is not shown directly in https://llvm.org/PR50055 ,
but the pattern is visible by changing the unsigned convert
to signed in the source code.
This is a follow-up to D103280 that eases the use restrictions,
so we can handle the motivating case from:
https://llvm.org/PR50055
The loop code is adapted from similar use checks in
ExtendUsesToFormExtLoad() and SliceUpLoad(). I did not see an
easier way to filter out non-chain uses of load values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103462
This patch transforms the sequence
lea (reg1, reg2), reg3
sub reg3, reg4
to two sub instructions
sub reg1, reg4
sub reg2, reg4
Similar optimization can also be applied to LEA/ADD sequence.
The modifications to TwoAddressInstructionPass is to ensure the operands of ADD
instruction has expected order (the dest register of LEA should be src register of ADD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101970
Currently, X86 backend only has a global one-size-fits-all `FeatureFastVariableShuffle` feature,
which controls profitability of both the cross-lane and per-lane variable shuffles.
I guess, this has been fine so far.
But at least on AMD Zen 3, while per-line variable shuffles (e.g. `VPSHUFB`)
are as fast as as shuffles with fixed/immediate mask,
while lane-crossing shuffles, e.g. `VPERMPS` is performing worse.
So to get the benefits of variable-mask shuffles, but not the drawbacks of lane-crossing shuffles,
as suggested by @RKSimon, split the feature flag into two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103274
It breaks up the function pass manager in the codegen pipeline.
With empty parameters, it looks at the -mllvm flag -rewrite-map-file.
This is likely not in use.
Add a check that we only have one function pass manager in the codegen
pipeline.
Some tests relied on the fact that we had a module pass somewhere in the
codegen pipeline.
addr-label.ll crashes on ARM due to this change. This is because a
ARMConstantPoolConstant containing a BasicBlock to represent a
blockaddress may hold an invalid pointer to a BasicBlock if the
blockaddress is invalidated by its BasicBlock getting removed. In that
case all referencing blockaddresses are RAUW a constant int. Making
ARMConstantPoolConstant::CVal a WeakVH fixes the crash, but I'm not sure
that's the right fix. As a workaround, create a barrier right before
ISel so that IR optimizations can't happen while a
ARMConstantPoolConstant has been created.
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99707
I accidentaly pushed a draft of D103280 that was discussed
during the review, but it was not supposed to be the final
version.
Rather than revert and recommit, I'm updating the existing
code. This way we have a record of the codegen diff that
would result if we decide to remove this predicate in the
future.
sext (vsetcc X, Y) --> vsetcc (zext X), (zext Y) --
(when the zexts are free and a bunch of other conditions)
We have a couple of similar folds to this already for vector selects,
but this pattern slips through because it is only a setcc.
The tests are based on the motivating case from:
https://llvm.org/PR50055
...but we need extra logic to get that example, so I've left that as
a TODO for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103280
extractelement is poison if the index is out-of-bounds, so just
scalarizing the load may introduce an out-of-bounds load, which is UB.
To avoid introducing new UB, we can mask the index so it only contains
valid indices.
Fixes PR50382.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103077
Follow the same strategy used for atomic loads/stores by converting the operands to equally-sized integer types.
This change prevents the atomic expansion pass from generating illegal LL/SC pairs when targeting AArch64: `expand-atomicrmw-xchg-fp.ll` would previously instantiate intrinsics such as `llvm.aarch64.ldaxr.p0f32` that cannot be lowered.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103232
SwiftTailCC has a different set of requirements than the C calling convention
for a tail call. The exact argument sequence doesn't have to match, but fewer
ABI-affecting attributes are allowed.
Also make sure the musttail diagnostic triggers if a musttail call isn't
actually a tail call.
Now that i've reimplemented the testcase generator
to produce actual IR (https://godbolt.org/z/s7PM8E6v9),
it turns out that this was the only discrepancy
from what the LV would produce.
We could previously do this by accident through the later
call to getTargetConstantBitsFromNode I think, but that only worked
if N0 had a single use. This patch makes it explicit for undef and
doesn't have a use count check.
I think this is needed to move the (shl X, 1)->(add X, X)
fold to isel for PR50468. We need to be sure X won't be IMPLICIT_DEF
which might prevent the same vreg from being used for both operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103192
Matching the costmodel coverage.
We want them both because they simplify coming up with the patterns
to check their cost, and to track their codegen.
Tests for loads can be fully autogenerated: https://godbolt.org/z/o1fncqo9n
For stores, however, i have done that semi-manually: https://godbolt.org/z/KPzTnvsh1
The previous code detect if a MBB is bottom block to determine if it is
a backedge of a loop. We should check latch block instead of bottom
block and we should check the header and the bottom block are in the
same loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103145
Global values imply flags such as readable, writable, executable for the
sections that they will be placed in. Currently MC places all such
entries into the same section, using the first set of flags seen. This
can lead to situations in LTO where a writable global is placed in the
same named section as a readable global from another file, and the
section may not be marked writable.
D72194 ensures that mergeable globals with explicit sections are placed
in separate sections with compatible entry size, by emitting the
`unique` assembly syntax where appropriate. This change extends that
approach to include section flags, so that globals with different
section flags are emitted in separate unique sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100944
- When memory intrinsics, such as memcpy, the attached scoped AA
metadata is not passed down to the backend. As a result, the backend
cannot schedule relevant memory operations around them following that
hint. In this patch, SelectionDAG is enhanced to propagate that
metadata (scoped AA only) when they are lowered into loads and stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102215
In D102742, I mistakenly put the split file designator above a bunch of
CHECK lines, which unintentionally removed the CHECKs from actually
being verified.
This can be verified by observing:
<build dir>/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/stack-protector-3.ll.tmp/main.ll
D29668 enabled to avoid a useless copy of the argument value into an alloca if the caller places it in memory (as it often happens on x86) by directly forwarding the pointer to it. This optimization is illegal if the type contains padding bytes: if a truncating store into the alloca is replaced the upper bits are filled with garbage and produce code misbehaving at runtime.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102153
True is a bad default: the useful symbol names and `@GOTPCREL` are scrubbed.
Change the default and add global variable tests to x86-basic.ll
(renamed from x86_function_name.ll since we now also test variables).
I updated some tests to show the differences.
Updated LCPI regex to include Darwin style `LCPI_[0-9]+_[0-9]+` (no
leading dot).
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102588
D88631 added initial support for:
- -mstack-protector-guard=
- -mstack-protector-guard-reg=
- -mstack-protector-guard-offset=
flags, and D100919 extended these to AArch64. Unfortunately, these flags
aren't retained for LTO. Make them module attributes rather than
TargetOptions.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1378
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102742
This patch adds support for lowering function calls with the
`clang.arc.attachedcall` bundle. The goal is to expand such calls to the
following sequence of instructions:
callq @fn
movq %rax, %rdi
callq _objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue / _objc_unsafeClaimAutoreleasedReturnValue
This sequence of instructions triggers Objective-C runtime optimizations,
hence we want to ensure no instructions get moved in between them.
This patch achieves that by adding a new CALL_RVMARKER ISD node,
which gets turned into the CALL64_RVMARKER pseudo, which eventually gets
expanded into the sequence mentioned above.
The ObjC runtime function to call is determined by the
argument in the bundle, which is passed through as a
target constant to the pseudo.
@ahatanak is working on using this attribute in the front- & middle-end.
Together with the front- & middle-end changes, this should address
PR31925 for X86.
This is the X86 version of 46bc40e502,
which added similar support for AArch64.
Reviewed By: ab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94597
Similar to 8854b27 -
All of the CHECK lines should be identical to before,
but without any of the x86-specific calls that were
replaced with generic FMA long ago.
The file still has value because it shows a miscompile
as demonstrated in D90901, but we probably need to
add tests with FMF to make that explicit without
losing coverage.
The current implementation assumes the destination type of shuffle is the same as the decomposed ones. Add the check to avoid crush when the condition is not satisfied.
This fixes PR37616.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102751
Generalize the fix from rGd0902a8665b1 by ensuring we widen/narrow the indices subvector first and then perform the ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG (if necessary), which should allow us to perform the variable permutes with source/destination/indices vectors of any widths.
This is a step towards relying more on node-level FMF rather than function-wide
or target settings.
I think it was just an oversight that we didn't get this path in D87361
or follow-on patches.
The lack of FMF propagation is blocking D90901 from converting tests to IR-level FMF.
We can't do much more than this currently because we also fail to propagate flags
from x86-specific node to generic FMA node. That would be another patch, so the
test just verifies that we can transfer from IR to initial SDAG node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102725
The current implementation assumes the destination type of shuffle is the same as the decomposed ones. Add the check to avoid crush when the condition is not satisfied.
This fixes PR37616.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102751
This patch transforms the sequence
lea (reg1, reg2), reg3
sub reg3, reg4
to two sub instructions
sub reg1, reg4
sub reg2, reg4
Similar optimization can also be applied to LEA/ADD sequence.
The modifications to TwoAddressInstructionPass is to ensure the operands of ADD
instruction has expected order (the dest register of LEA should be src register
of ADD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101970
This patch implements first part of Flow Sensitive SampleFDO (FSAFDO).
It has the following changes:
(1) disable current discriminator encoding scheme,
(2) new hierarchical discriminator for FSAFDO.
For this patch, option "-enable-fs-discriminator=true" turns on the new
functionality. Option "-enable-fs-discriminator=false" (the default)
keeps the current SampleFDO behavior. When the fs-discriminator is
enabled, we insert a flag variable, namely, llvm_fs_discriminator, to
the object. This symbol will checked by create_llvm_prof tool, and used
to generate a profile with FS-AFDO discriminators enabled. If this
happens, for an extbinary format profile, create_llvm_prof tool
will add a flag to profile summary section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102246
X86 NaCl generally requires the stack to be aligned to 16 bytes.
This change was already implemented in two downstream NaCl compilers
based on llvm.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102610
D101838 incorrectly handled indices vectors of the same size but with higher element counts to just bitcast to the target indices type instead of performing a ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG
This adds support to the X86 backend for the newly committed swiftasync
function parameter. If such a (pointer) parameter is present it gets stored
into an augmented frame record (populated in IR, but generally containing
enhanced backtrace for coroutines using lots of tail calls back and forth).
The context frame is identical to AArch64 (primarily so that unwinders etc
don't get extra complexity). Specfically, the new frame record is [AsyncCtx,
%rbp, ReturnAddr], and its presence is signalled by bit 60 of the stored %rbp
being set to 1. %rbp still points to the frame pointer in memory for backwards
compatibility (only partial on x86, but OTOH the weird AsyncCtx before the rest
of the record is because of x86).
Recommited with a fix for unwind info when i386 pc-rel thunks are
adjacent to a prologue.
All of the CHECK lines should be identical to before,
but without any of the x86-specific calls that were
replaced with generic FMA long ago.
The file still has value because it shows a miscompile
as demonstrated in D90901, but we probably need to
add tests with FMF to make that explicit without
losing coverage.
This adds support to the X86 backend for the newly committed swiftasync
function parameter. If such a (pointer) parameter is present it gets stored
into an augmented frame record (populated in IR, but generally containing
enhanced backtrace for coroutines using lots of tail calls back and forth).
The context frame is identical to AArch64 (primarily so that unwinders etc
don't get extra complexity). Specfically, the new frame record is [AsyncCtx,
%rbp, ReturnAddr], and its presence is signalled by bit 60 of the stored %rbp
being set to 1. %rbp still points to the frame pointer in memory for backwards
compatibility (only partial on x86, but OTOH the weird AsyncCtx before the rest
of the record is because of x86).
Ensure we tell getShiftAmountTy that we're working with pre-legalized types to prevent cases where the (legalized) shift type can no longer handle the (non-legalized) type width.
Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34366
Swift's new concurrency features are going to require guaranteed tail calls so
that they don't consume excessive amounts of stack space. This would normally
mean "tailcc", but there are also Swift-specific ABI desires that don't
naturally go along with "tailcc" so this adds another calling convention that's
the combination of "swiftcc" and "tailcc".
Support is added for AArch64 and X86 for now.
I've taken the following steps to add unwinding support from inline assembly:
1) Add a new `unwind` "attribute" (like `sideeffect`) to the asm syntax:
```
invoke void asm sideeffect unwind "call thrower", "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"()
to label %exit unwind label %uexit
```
2.) Add Bitcode writing/reading support + LLVM-IR parsing.
3.) Emit EHLabels around inline assembly lowering (SelectionDAGBuilder + GlobalISel) when `InlineAsm::canThrow` is enabled.
4.) Tweak InstCombineCalls/InlineFunction pass to not mark inline assembly "calls" as nounwind.
5.) Add clang support by introducing a new clobber: "unwind", which lower to the `canThrow` being enabled.
6.) Don't allow unwinding callbr.
Reviewed By: Amanieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95745
Simon Pilgrim