This is the one more patch for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
It fixes how we print an information for the Generic model. With this patch
we are able to read values from `.ARM.extab` and dump proper personality routines names/addresses.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88478
This is a part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47581.
We have the following computation:
```
(1) uint64_t Location = Address & 0x7fffffff;
(2) if (Location & 0x04000000)
(3) Location |= (uint64_t) ~0x7fffffff;
(4) return Location + Place;
```
At line 2 there is a mistype. The constant should be `0x40000000`,
not `0x04000000`, because the intention here is to sign extend the `Location`,
which is the 31 bit signed value.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88407
This is the first patch for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47581.
Currently -u does not compute function addresses correctly and
dumps broken addresses for non-relocatable objects.
ARM spec says:
"An index table entry consists of 2 words.
The first word contains a prel31 offset (see Relocations) to the start of a function, with bit 31 clear."
...
"The relocated 31 bits form a place-relative signed offset to the referenced entity.
For brevity, this document will refer to the results of these relocations as "prel31 offsets"."
(https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0038/c/?lang=en#index-table-entries)
(https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0038/c/?lang=en#relocations)
Currently we use an address of the SHT_ARM_EXIDX section instead of an address of an entry
in computations. As a result we compute an offset that is not really "place-relative",
but section relative, what is wrong.
The patch fixes this issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88076
Georgii Rymar