Some test systems do not use lit for test discovery but only for its
substitution and test selection because they use another way of managing
test collections, e.g. CTest. This forces those tests to be invoked with
lit --no-indirectly-run-check. When a mix of lit version is in use, it
requires to detect the availability of that option.
This commit provides a new config option standalone_tests to signal a
directory made of tests meant to run as standalone. When this option is
set, lit skips test discovery and the indirectly run check. It also adds
the missing documentation for --no-indirectly-run-check.
Reviewed By: jdenny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94766
Currently, a LIT test named directly (on the command line) will
be run even if the name of the test file does not meet the rules
to be considered a test in the LIT test configuration files for
its test suite. For example, if the test does not have a
recognised file extension.
This makes it relatively easy to write a LIT test that won't
actually be run. I did in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82567
This patch adds an error to avoid users doing that. There is a
small performance overhead for this check. A command line option
has been added so that users can opt into the old behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83069
We already print available features, and it can be useful to print
substitutions as well since those are a pretty fundamental part of
a test suite. We could also consider printing other things like the
test environment, however the need doesn't appear to be as strong.
As a fly-by fix, we also always print available features, even when
there are none.
Before:
$ lit -sv libcxx/test --show-suites
-- Test Suites --
libc++ - 6350 tests
Source Root: [...]
Exec Root : [...]
Available Features : -faligned-allocation -fsized-deallocation [...]
After:
$ lit -sv libcxx/test --show-suites
-- Test Suites --
libc++ - 6350 tests
Source Root: [...]
Exec Root : [...]
Available Features: -faligned-allocation -fsized-deallocation [...]
Available Substitutions: %{build_module} => [...]
%{build} => %{cxx} -o [...]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77818
In the past, lit used threads to run tests in parallel. Today we use
`multiprocessing.Pool`, which uses processes. Let's stay more abstract
and use "worker" everywhere.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68475
llvm-svn: 373794
This has gone back and forth, but it seems this is necessary
after all. realpath is not sufficient because if you have a
file named 'C:\foo.txt', then both realpath('c:\foo.txt') and
realpath(C:\foo.txt') return the string that was passed to them
exactly as is, meaning the case of the drive-letter won't match.
The problem before was not that we were normalizing the case of
items going into the config map, but rather that we were
normalizing the case of something we needed to print. The value
that is used to key on the config map should never be printed.
llvm-svn: 313918
This makes all paths lowercase on Windows, which seemed like a
good idea at the time, but it means that tests can't properly
use FileCheck to match expected path names.
llvm-svn: 313889
Config map is not exposed through the command line, so testing this
is somewhat tricky. But basically we need a test that if a custom
driver builds a config map and passes it to main, it gets respected.
A config map allows config files in the source tree to be mapped
to alternate config files in the build tree. This particular test
works by having two config files in separate directories, and
setting up a config map to have that redirects A/lit.site.cfg
to B/altconfig. Then, we print a message in A/lit.site.cfg
and B/altconfig and check that we do see the output from B
but don't see the output from A. Additionally we test that
the test suite specified by A's config map is properly discovered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38105
llvm-svn: 313887
Many editors and Python-related diagnostics tools such as
debuggers break or fail in mysterious ways when python files
don't end in .py. This is especially true on Windows, but
still exists on other platforms. I don't want to be too heavy
handed in changing everything across the board, but I do want
to at least *allow* lit configs to have .py extensions. This
patch makes the discovery process first look for a config file
with a .py extension, and if one is not found, then looks for
a config file using the old method. So for existing users, there
should be no functional change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37838
llvm-svn: 313849
Summary:
rL257221 attempted to run lit's own test suite continuously, but that
commit was reverted because lit's test suite does not pass on Windows.
Because lit's tests do not run continuously, they often regress.
In order to un-revert rL257221, mark lit tests that fail as XFAIL for
Windows platforms.
Test Plan:
On a Windows development environment, follow the instructions in
utils/lit/README.txt to run lit's test suite:
```
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```
Verify that the test suite is run and a successful exit code is
returned.
Reviewers: mgorny, rnk, delcypher, beanz
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35879
llvm-svn: 309123
Summary:
I spend some time trying to get the LIT test suite passing. Here are the changes that I needed to make on my machine.
I made the following changes for the following reasons.
1. google-test.py: The Google test format now checks for "[ PASSED ] 1 test." to check if a test passes.
2. discovery.py: The output appears in a different order on my machine than it did in the test.
3. unittest-adaptor.py: The output appears in a different order on my machine than it did in the test.
4. The classname is now formed differently in `getJUnitXML(...)`.
I'm not sure what is causing the output order to differ in discovery.py and unittest-adaptor.py. Does anybody have any thoughts?
Reviewers: ddunbar, danalbert, jroelofs
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9864
llvm-svn: 239663
Thomas Preud'homme