Previously, ExecuteRegionOps with multiple return values would fail a round-trip test due to missing parenthesis around the types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108402
Simplify affine.min ops, enabling various other canonicalizations inside the peeled loop body.
affine.min ops such as:
```
map = affine_map<(d0)[s0, s1] -> (s0, -d0 + s1)>
%r = affine.min #affine.min #map(%iv)[%step, %ub]
```
are rewritten them into (in the case the peeled loop):
```
%r = %step
```
To determine how an affine.min op should be rewritten and to prove its correctness, FlatAffineConstraints is utilized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107222
Expand ParallelLoopTilingPass with an inbound_check mode.
In default mode, the upper bound of the inner loop is from the min op; in
inbound_check mode, the upper bound of the inner loop is the step of the outer
loop and an additional inbound check will be emitted inside of the inner loop.
This was 'FIXME' in the original codes and a typical usage is for GPU backends,
thus the outer loop and inner loop can be mapped to blocks/threads in seperate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105455
Replace some code snippets With scf::ForOp methods. Additionally,
share a listener at one more point (although this pattern is still
not safe to roll back currently)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107754
Add ForLoopBoundSpecialization pass, which specializes scf.for loops into a "main loop" where `step` divides the iteration space evenly and into an scf.if that handles the last iteration.
This transformation is useful for vectorization and loop tiling. E.g., when vectorizing loads/stores, programs will spend most of their time in the main loop, in which only unmasked loads/stores are used. Only the in the last iteration (scf.if), slower masked loads/stores are used.
Subsequent commits will apply this transformation in the SparseDialect and in Linalg's loop tiling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105804
This CL adds a new RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface to query information about operands that can be
passed to successor regions. Similar to the BranchOpInterface, it allows to freely define the
involved operands. However, in contrast to the BranchOpInterface, it expects an additional region
number to distinguish between various use cases which might require different operands passed to
different regions.
Moreover, we added new utility functions (namely getMutableRegionBranchSuccessorOperands and
getRegionBranchSuccessorOperands) to query (mutable) operand ranges for operations equiped with the
ReturnLike trait and/or implementing the newly added interface. This simplifies reasoning about
terminators in the scope of the nested regions.
We also adjusted the SCF.ConditionOp to benefit from the newly added capabilities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105018
This is the first step to support software pipeline for scf.for loops.
This is only the transformation to create pipelined kernel and
prologue/epilogue.
The scheduling needs to be given by user as many different algorithm
and heuristic could be applied.
This currently doesn't handle loop arguments, this will be added in a
follow up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105868
The executeregionop is used to allow multiple blocks within SCF constructs. If the container allows multiple blocks, inline the region
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104960
* Previously, we were only generating .h.inc files. We foresee the need to also generate implementations and this is a step towards that.
* Discussed in https://llvm.discourse.group/t/generating-cpp-inc-files-for-dialects/3732/2
* Deviates from the discussion above by generating a default constructor in the .cpp.inc file (and adding a tablegen bit that disables this in case if this is user provided).
* Generating the destructor started as a way to flush out the missing includes (produces a link error), but it is a strict improvement on its own that is worth doing (i.e. by emitting key methods in the .cpp file, we root vtables in one translation unit, which is a non-controversial improvement).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105070
The executeregionop is used to allow multiple blocks within SCF constructs. If the container allows multiple blocks, inline the region
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104960
In cases where arithmetic (addi/muli) ops are performed on an scf.for loops induction variable with a single use, we can fold those ops directly into the scf.for loop.
For example, in the following code:
```
scf.for %i = %c0 to %arg1 step %c1 {
%0 = addi %arg2, %i : index
%1 = muli %0, %c4 : index
%2 = memref.load %arg0[%1] : memref<?xi32>
%3 = muli %2, %2 : i32
memref.store %3, %arg0[%1] : memref<?xi32>
}
```
we can lift `%0` up into the scf.for loop range, as it is the only user of %i:
```
%lb = addi %arg2, %c0 : index
%ub = addi %arg2, %i : index
scf.for %i = %lb to %ub step %c1 {
%1 = muli %0, %c4 : index
%2 = memref.load %arg0[%1] : memref<?xi32>
%3 = muli %2, %2 : i32
memref.store %3, %arg0[%1] : memref<?xi32>
}
```
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, ftynse, Anthony
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104289
* Remove dependency: Standard --> MemRef
* Add dependencies: GPUToNVVMTransforms --> MemRef, Linalg --> MemRef, MemRef --> Tensor
* Note: The `subtensor_insert_propagate_dest_cast` test case in MemRef/canonicalize.mlir will be moved to Tensor/canonicalize.mlir in a subsequent commit, which moves over the remaining Tensor ops from the Standard dialect to the Tensor dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104506
Introduce the execute_region op that is able to hold a region which it
executes exactly once. The op encapsulates a CFG within itself while
isolating it from the surrounding control flow. Proposal discussed here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/introduce-std-inlined-call-op-proposal/282
execute_region enables one to inline a function without lowering out all
other higher level control flow constructs (affine.for/if, scf.for/if)
to the flat list of blocks / CFG form. It thus allows the benefit of
transforms on higher level control flow ops available in the presence of
the inlined calls. The inlined calls continue to benefit from
propagation of SSA values across their top boundary. Functions won’t
have to remain outlined until later than desired. Abstractions like
affine execute_regions, lambdas with implicit captures could be lowered
to this without first lowering out structured loops/ifs or outlining.
But two potential early use cases are of: (1) an early inliner (which
can inline functions by introducing execute_region ops), (2) lowering of
an affine.execute_region, which cleanly maps to an scf.execute_region
when going from the affine dialect to the scf dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75837
Splitting the memref dialect lead to an introduction of several dependencies
to avoid compilation issues. The canonicalize pass also depends on the
memref dialect, but it shouldn't. This patch resolves the dependencies
and the unintuitive includes are removed. However, the dependency moves
to the constructor of the std dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102060
This covers the extremely common case of replacing all uses of a Value
with a new op that is itself a user of the original Value.
This should also be a little bit more efficient than the
`SmallPtrSet<Operation *, 1>{op}` idiom that was being used before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102373
Add two canoncalizations for scf.if.
1) A canonicalization that allows users of a condition within an if to assume the condition
is true if in the true region, etc.
2) A canonicalization that removes yielded statements that are equivalent to the condition
or its negation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101012
Break up the dependency between SCF ops and substituteMin helper and make a
more generic version of AffineMinSCFCanonicalization. This reduce dependencies
between linalg and SCF and will allow the logic to be used with other kind of
ops. (Like ID ops).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100321
This doesn't change APIs, this just cleans up the many in-tree uses of these
names to use the new preferred names. We'll keep the old names around for a
couple weeks to help transitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99127
This updates the codebase to pass the context when creating an instance of
OwningRewritePatternList, and starts removing extraneous MLIRContext
parameters. There are many many more to be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99028
* Do we need a threshold on maximum number of Yeild arguments processed (maximum number of SelectOp's to be generated)?
* Had to modify some old IfOp tests to not get optimized by this pattern
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98592
'ForOpIterArgsFolder' can now remove iterator arguments (and corresponding
results) with no use.
Example:
```
%cst = constant 32 : i32
%0:2 = scf.for %arg1 = %lb to %ub step %step iter_args(%arg2 = %arg0, %arg3 = %cst)
-> (i32, i32) {
%1 = addu %arg2, %cst : i32
scf.yield %1, %1 : i32, i32
}
use(%0#0)
```
%arg3 is not used in the block, and its corresponding result `%0#1` has no use,
thus remove the iter argument.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98711
Enhance 'ForOpIterArgsFolder' to remove unused iteration arguments in a
scf::ForOp. If the block argument corresponding to the given iterator has no
use and the yielded value equals the input, we fold it away.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98503
Canonicalize the iter_args of an scf::ForOp that involve a tensor_load and
for which only the last loop iteration is actually visible outside of the
loop. The canonicalization looks for a pattern such as:
```
%t0 = ... : tensor_type
%0 = scf.for ... iter_args(%bb0 : %t0) -> (tensor_type) {
...
// %m is either tensor_to_memref(%bb00) or defined above the loop
%m... : memref_type
... // uses of %m with potential inplace updates
%new_tensor = tensor_load %m : memref_type
...
scf.yield %new_tensor : tensor_type
}
```
`%bb0` may have either 0 or 1 use. If it has 1 use it must be exactly a
`%m = tensor_to_memref %bb0` op that feeds into the yielded `tensor_load`
op.
If no aliasing write of `%new_tensor` occurs between tensor_load and yield
then the value %0 visible outside of the loop is the last `tensor_load`
produced in the loop.
For now, we approximate the absence of aliasing by only supporting the case
when the tensor_load is the operation immediately preceding the yield.
The canonicalization rewrites the pattern as:
```
// %m is either a tensor_to_memref or defined above
%m... : memref_type
scf.for ... { // no iter_args
... // uses of %m with potential inplace updates
}
%0 = tensor_load %m : memref_type
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97953
This commit introduced a cyclic dependency:
Memref dialect depends on Standard because it used ConstantIndexOp.
Std depends on the MemRef dialect in its EDSC/Intrinsics.h
Working on a fix.
This reverts commit 8aa6c3765b.
Create the memref dialect and move several dialect-specific ops without
dependencies to other ops from std dialect to this dialect.
Moved ops:
AllocOp -> MemRef_AllocOp
AllocaOp -> MemRef_AllocaOp
DeallocOp -> MemRef_DeallocOp
MemRefCastOp -> MemRef_CastOp
GetGlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GetGlobalOp
GlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GlobalOp
PrefetchOp -> MemRef_PrefetchOp
ReshapeOp -> MemRef_ReshapeOp
StoreOp -> MemRef_StoreOp
TransposeOp -> MemRef_TransposeOp
ViewOp -> MemRef_ViewOp
The roadmap to split the memref dialect from std is discussed here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-memref-dialect-from-std/2667
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96425
Previously this might happen if there was no elseRegion and the method
was asked for all successor regions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96764
We should be check whether lb + step >= ub to determine
whether this is a single iteration. Previously we were
checking lb + lb >= ub.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95440
We should be check whether lb + step >= ub to determine
whether this is a single iteration. Previously we were
checking lb + lb >= ub.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95440
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure, is much simpler, and makes it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93432
Morten Borup Petersen