Tested with gcc-10. Other compilers may generate additional warnings. This does not fix all warnings. There are a few extra ones in LLVMCore and MLIR.
* `OpEmitter::getAttrNameIndex`: -Wunused-function (function is private and not used anywhere)
* `PrintOpPass` copy constructor: -Wextra ("Base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor")
* `LegalizeForLLVMExport.cpp`: -Woverflow (overflow is expected, silence warning by making the cast explicit)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107525
After the MemRef has been split out of the Standard dialect, the
conversion to the LLVM dialect remained as a huge monolithic pass.
This is undesirable for the same complexity management reasons as having
a huge Standard dialect itself, and is even more confusing given the
existence of a separate dialect. Extract the conversion of the MemRef
dialect operations to LLVM into a separate library and a separate
conversion pass.
Reviewed By: herhut, silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105625
* Previously, we were only generating .h.inc files. We foresee the need to also generate implementations and this is a step towards that.
* Discussed in https://llvm.discourse.group/t/generating-cpp-inc-files-for-dialects/3732/2
* Deviates from the discussion above by generating a default constructor in the .cpp.inc file (and adding a tablegen bit that disables this in case if this is user provided).
* Generating the destructor started as a way to flush out the missing includes (produces a link error), but it is a strict improvement on its own that is worth doing (i.e. by emitting key methods in the .cpp file, we root vtables in one translation unit, which is a non-controversial improvement).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105070
In the long run, we want to unify the dot product codegen solutions between
all target architectures, but this intrinsic enables experimenting with AVX
specific implementations in the meantime.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100593
We will soon be adding non-AVX512 operations to MLIR, such as AVX's rsqrt. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D99818 several possibilities were discussed, namely to (1) add non-AVX512 ops to the AVX512 dialect, (2) add more dialects (e.g. AVX dialect for AVX rsqrt), and (3) expand the scope of the AVX512 to include these SIMD x86 ops, thereby renaming the dialect to something more accurate such as X86Vector.
Consensus was reached on option (3), which this patch implements.
Reviewed By: aartbik, ftynse, nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100119
Matthias Springer