Rationale:
Since I made the argument that metadata helps with extra
verification checks, I better actually do that ;-)
Reviewed By: penpornk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95072
Resumed coroutine potentially can deallocate the token/value/group and destroy the mutex before the std::unique_ptr destructor.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95037
The runtime-wrappers depend on LLVMSupport, pulling in static initialization code (e.g. command line arguments). Dynamically loading multiple such libraries results in ODR violoations.
So far this has not been an issue, but in D94421, I would like to load both the async-runtime and the cuda-runtime-wrappers as part of a cuda-runner integration test. When doing this, code that asserts that an option category is only registered once fails (note that I've only experienced this in Google's bazel where the async-runtime depends on LLVMSupport, but a similar issue would happen in cmake if more than one runtime-wrapper starts to depend on LLVMSupport).
The underlying issue is that we have a mix of static and dynamic linking. If all dependencies were loaded as shared objects (i.e. if LLVMSupport was linked dynamically to the runtime wrappers), each dependency would only get loaded once. However, linking dependencies dynamically would require special attention to paths (one could dynamically load the dependencies first given explicit paths). The simpler approach seems to be to link all dependencies statically into a single shared object.
This change basically applies the same logic that we have in the c_runner_utils: we have a shared object target that can be loaded dynamically, and we have a static library target that can be linked to other runtime-wrapper shared object targets.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94399
Added the ability to read (an extended version of) the FROSTT
file format, so that we can now read in sparse tensors of arbitrary
rank. Generalized the API to deal with more than two dimensions.
Also added the ability to sort the indices of sparse tensors
lexicographically. This is an important step towards supporting
auto gen of initialization code, since sparse storage formats
are easier to initialize if the indices are sorted. Since most
external formats don't enforce such properties, it is convenient
to have this ability in our runtime support library.
Lastly, the re-entrant problem of the original implementation
is fixed by passing an opaque object around (rather than having
a single static variable, ugh!).
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94852
Use custom mlir runner init/destroy functions to safely init and destroy shared libraries loaded by the JitRunner.
This mechanism is ignored for Windows builds (for now) because init/destroy functions are not exported, and library unloading relies on static destructors.
Re-submit https://reviews.llvm.org/D94270 with a temporary workaround for windows
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94312
Continue the convergence between LLVM dialect and built-in types by replacing
the bfloat, half, float and double LLVM dialect types with their built-in
counterparts. At the API level, this is a direct replacement. At the syntax
level, we change the keywords to `bf16`, `f16`, `f32` and `f64`, respectively,
to be compatible with the built-in type syntax. The old keywords can still be
parsed but produce a deprecation warning and will be eventually removed.
Depends On D94178
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94179
Use custom mlir runner init/destroy functions to safely init and destroy shared libraries loaded by the JitRunner.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94270
The LLVM dialect type system has been closed until now, i.e. did not support
types from other dialects inside containers. While this has had obvious
benefits of deriving from a common base class, it has led to some simple types
being almost identical with the built-in types, namely integer and floating
point types. This in turn has led to a lot of larger-scale complexity: simple
types must still be converted, numerous operations that correspond to LLVM IR
intrinsics are replicated to produce versions operating on either LLVM dialect
or built-in types leading to quasi-duplicate dialects, lowering to the LLVM
dialect is essentially required to be one-shot because of type conversion, etc.
In this light, it is reasonable to trade off some local complexity in the
internal implementation of LLVM dialect types for removing larger-scale system
complexity. Previous commits to the LLVM dialect type system have adapted the
API to support types from other dialects.
Replace LLVMIntegerType with the built-in IntegerType plus additional checks
that such types are signless (these are isolated in a utility function that
replaced `isa<LLVMType>` and in the parser). Temporarily keep the possibility
to parse `!llvm.i32` as a synonym for `i32`, but add a deprecation notice.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94178
1. Add new methods to Async runtime API to support yielding async values
2. Add lowering from `async.yield` with value payload to the new runtime API calls
`async.value` lowering requires that payload type is convertible to LLVM and supported by `llvm.mlir.cast` (DialectCast) operation.
Reviewed By: csigg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93592
LLVMType contains multiple instance methods that were introduced initially for
compatibility with LLVM API. These methods boil down to `cast` followed by
type-specific call. Arguably, they are mostly used in an LLVM cast-follows-isa
anti-pattern. This doesn't connect nicely to the rest of the MLIR
infrastructure and actively prevents it from making the LLVM dialect type
system more open, e.g., reusing built-in types when appropriate. Remove such
instance methods and replaces their uses with apporpriate casts and methods on
derived classes. In some cases, the result may look slightly more verbose, but
most cases should actually use a stricter subtype of LLVMType anyway and avoid
the isa/cast.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93680
Define Async runtime related typedefs in the `mlir::runtime` namespace.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93391
This is part of a larger refactoring the better congregates the builtin structures under the BuiltinDialect. This also removes the problematic "standard" naming that clashes with the "standard" dialect, which is not defined within IR/. A temporary forward is placed in StandardTypes.h to allow time for downstream users to replaced references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92435
ExecutionEngine/LLJIT do not run globals destructors in loaded dynamic libraries when destroyed, and threads managed by ThreadPool can race with program termination, and it leads to segfaults.
TODO: Re-enable threading after fixing a problem with destructors, or removing static globals from dynamic library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92368
1. Move ThreadPool ownership to the runtime, and wait for the async tasks completion in the destructor.
2. Remove MLIR_ASYNCRUNTIME_EXPORT from method definitions because they are unnecessary in .cpp files, as only function declarations need to be exported, not their definitions.
3. Fix concurrency bugs in group emplace and potential use-after-free in token emplace.
Tested internally 10k runs in `async.mlir` and `async-group.mlir`.
Fixed: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48267
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91988
All these potential null pointer dereferences are reported by my static analyzer for null smart pointer dereferences, which has a different implementation from `alpha.cplusplus.SmartPtr`.
The checked pointers in this patch are initialized by Target::createXXX functions. When the creator function pointer is not correctly set, a null pointer will be returned, or the creator function may originally return a null pointer.
Some of them may not make sense as they may be checked before entering the function, but I fixed them all in this patch. I submit this fix because 1) similar checks are found in some other places in the LLVM codebase for the same return value of the function; and, 2) some of the pointers are dereferenced before they are checked, which may definitely trigger a null pointer dereference if the return value is nullptr.
Reviewed By: tejohnson, MaskRay, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410
Depends On D89963
**Automatic reference counting algorithm outline:**
1. `ReturnLike` operations forward the reference counted values without
modifying the reference count.
2. Use liveness analysis to find blocks in the CFG where the lifetime of
reference counted values ends, and insert `drop_ref` operations after
the last use of the value.
3. Insert `add_ref` before the `async.execute` operation capturing the
value, and pairing `drop_ref` before the async body region terminator,
to release the captured reference counted value when execution
completes.
4. If the reference counted value is passed only to some of the block
successors, insert `drop_ref` operations in the beginning of the blocks
that do not have reference coutned value uses.
Reviewed By: silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90716
These includes have been deprecated in favor of BuiltinDialect.h, which contains the definitions of ModuleOp and FuncOp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91572
Depends On D89958
1. Adds `async.group`/`async.awaitall` to group together multiple async tokens/values
2. Rewrite scf.parallel operation into multiple concurrent async.execute operations over non overlapping subranges of the original loop.
Example:
```
scf.for (%i, %j) = (%lbi, %lbj) to (%ubi, %ubj) step (%si, %sj) {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
```
Converted to:
```
%c0 = constant 0 : index
%c1 = constant 1 : index
// Compute blocks sizes for each induction variable.
%num_blocks_i = ... : index
%num_blocks_j = ... : index
%block_size_i = ... : index
%block_size_j = ... : index
// Create an async group to track async execute ops.
%group = async.create_group
scf.for %bi = %c0 to %num_blocks_i step %c1 {
%block_start_i = ... : index
%block_end_i = ... : index
scf.for %bj = %c0 t0 %num_blocks_j step %c1 {
%block_start_j = ... : index
%block_end_j = ... : index
// Execute the body of original parallel operation for the current
// block.
%token = async.execute {
scf.for %i = %block_start_i to %block_end_i step %si {
scf.for %j = %block_start_j to %block_end_j step %sj {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
}
}
// Add produced async token to the group.
async.add_to_group %token, %group
}
}
// Await completion of all async.execute operations.
async.await_all %group
```
In this example outer loop launches inner block level loops as separate async
execute operations which will be executed concurrently.
At the end it waits for the completiom of all async execute operations.
Reviewed By: ftynse, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89963
Exposing the C versions of the methods of the sparse runtime support lib
through header files will enable using the same methods in an MLIR program
as well as a C++ program, which will simplify future benchmarking comparisons
(e.g. comparing MLIR generated code with eigen for Matrix Market sparse matrices).
Reviewed By: penpornk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91316
The MLIR_ASYNCRUNTIME_EXPORT macro was being defined to be either
__declspec(dllexport) or __declspec(dllimport), depending on whether
mlir_c_runner_utils_EXPORTS is defined. The latter was a copy/paste
error and should have been mlir_async_runtime_EXPORTS.
Additionally, the uses of that macro in the .cpp file were unnecessary,
as only function declarations need to be exported, not their definitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91196
This patch introduces a SPIR-V runner. The aim is to run a gpu
kernel on a CPU via GPU -> SPIRV -> LLVM conversions. This is a first
prototype, so more features will be added in due time.
- Overview
The runner follows similar flow as the other runners in-tree. However,
having converted the kernel to SPIR-V, we encode the bind attributes of
global variables that represent kernel arguments. Then SPIR-V module is
converted to LLVM. On the host side, we emulate passing the data to device
by creating in main module globals with the same symbolic name as in kernel
module. These global variables are later linked with ones from the nested
module. We copy data from kernel arguments to globals, call the kernel
function from nested module and then copy the data back.
- Current state
At the moment, the runner is capable of running 2 modules, nested one in
another. The kernel module must contain exactly one kernel function. Also,
the runner supports rank 1 integer memref types as arguments (to be scaled).
- Enhancement of JitRunner and ExecutionEngine
To translate nested modules to LLVM IR, JitRunner and ExecutionEngine were
altered to take an optional (default to `nullptr`) function reference that
is a custom LLVM IR module builder. This allows to customize LLVM IR module
creation from MLIR modules.
Reviewed By: ftynse, mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86108
This dependency was already existing indirectly, but is now more direct
since the registration relies on a inline function. This fixes the
link of the tools with BFD.
This reverts commit 4986d5eaff with
proper patches to CMakeLists.txt:
- Add MLIRAsync as a dependency to MLIRAsyncToLLVM
- Add Coroutines as a dependency to MLIRExecutionEngine
Lower from Async dialect to LLVM by converting async regions attached to `async.execute` operations into LLVM coroutines (https://llvm.org/docs/Coroutines.html):
1. Outline all async regions to functions
2. Add LLVM coro intrinsics to mark coroutine begin/end
3. Use MLIR conversion framework to convert all remaining async types and ops to LLVM + Async runtime function calls
All `async.await` operations inside async regions converted to coroutine suspension points. Await operation outside of a coroutine converted to the blocking wait operations.
Implement simple runtime to support concurrent execution of coroutines.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89292
Rationale:
More consistent with the other names. Also forward looking to reading
in other kinds of matrices. Also fixes lint issue on hard-coded %llu.
Reviewed By: penpornk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89005
Setting up input data for benchmarks and integration tests can be tedious in
pure MLIR. With more sparse tensor work planned, this convenience library
simplifies reading sparse matrices in the popular Matrix Market Exchange
Format (see https://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket). Note that this library
is *not* part of core MLIR. It is merely intended as a convenience library
for benchmarking and integration testing.
Reviewed By: penpornk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88856
(1) simplify integer printing logic by always using 64-bit print
(2) add index support (since vector<16xindex> is planned to be added)
(3) adjust naming convention print_x -> printX
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88436
This generalizes printing beyond just i1,i32,i64 and also accounts
for signed and unsigned interpretation in the output.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88290
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
registry.insert<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
registry.insert<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally
registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly
on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them
during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load
them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from
(Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into
the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only
need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is
self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial,
the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others
(linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the
optimization pipeline enabled.
To adjust to this change, stop using the existing dialect registration: the
global registry will be removed soon.
1) For passes, you need to override the method:
virtual void getDependentDialects(DialectRegistry ®istry) const {}
and registery on the provided registry any dialect that this pass can produce.
Passes defined in TableGen can provide this list in the dependentDialects list
field.
2) For dialects, on construction you can register dependent dialects using the
provided MLIRContext: `context.getOrLoadDialect<DialectName>()`
This is useful if a dialect may canonicalize or have interfaces involving
another dialect.
3) For loading IR, dialect that can be in the input file must be explicitly
registered with the context. `MlirOptMain()` is taking an explicit registry for
this purpose. See how the standalone-opt.cpp example is setup:
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::standalone::StandaloneDialect>();
mlir::registerDialect<mlir::StandardOpsDialect>();
Only operations from these two dialects can be in the input file. To include all
of the dialects in MLIR Core, you can populate the registry this way:
mlir::registerAllDialects(registry);
4) For `mlir-translate` callback, as well as frontend, Dialects can be loaded in
the context before emitting the IR: context.getOrLoadDialect<ToyDialect>()
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85622
This changes the behavior of constructing MLIRContext to no longer load globally registered dialects on construction. Instead Dialects are only loaded explicitly on demand:
- the Parser is lazily loading Dialects in the context as it encounters them during parsing. This is the only purpose for registering dialects and not load them in the context.
- Passes are expected to declare the dialects they will create entity from (Operations, Attributes, or Types), and the PassManager is loading Dialects into the Context when starting a pipeline.
This changes simplifies the configuration of the registration: a compiler only need to load the dialect for the IR it will emit, and the optimizer is self-contained and load the required Dialects. For example in the Toy tutorial, the compiler only needs to load the Toy dialect in the Context, all the others (linalg, affine, std, LLVM, ...) are automatically loaded depending on the optimization pipeline enabled.
Due to the original type system implementation, LLVMDialect in MLIR contains an
LLVMContext in which the relevant objects (types, metadata) are created. When
an MLIR module using the LLVM dialect (and related intrinsic-based dialects
NVVM, ROCDL, AVX512) is converted to LLVM IR, it could only live in the
LLVMContext owned by the dialect. The type system no longer relies on the
LLVMContext, so this limitation can be removed. Instead, translation functions
now take a reference to an LLVMContext in which the LLVM IR module should be
constructed. The caller of the translation functions is responsible for
ensuring the same LLVMContext is not used concurrently as the translation no
longer uses a dialect-wide context lock.
As an additional bonus, this change removes the need to recreate the LLVM IR
module in a different LLVMContext through printing and parsing back, decreasing
the compilation overhead in JIT and GPU-kernel-to-blob passes.
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85443
Summary:
The "i1" (viz. bool) type does not have a proper equivalent on the "C"
size. So, to avoid any ABIs issues, we simply use print_i32 on an i32
value of one or zero for true and false. This has the added advantage
that one less function needs to be implemented when porting the runtime
support library.
Reviewers: ftynse, bkramer, nicolasvasilache
Reviewed By: ftynse
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes
Tags: #mlir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82048
Summary:
Two integration tests focused on i1 vectors, which exposed omissions
in the llvm backend which have since then been fixed. Note that this also
exposed an inaccuracy for print_i1 which has been fixed in this CL:
for a pure C ABI, int should be used rather than bool.
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, ftynse, reidtatge, andydavis1, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes
Tags: #mlir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81957
Summary:
Add DynamicMemRefType which can reference one of the statically ranked StridedMemRefType or a UnrankedMemRefType so that runner utils only need to be implemented once.
There is definitely room for more clean up and unification, but I will keep that for follow-ups.
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80513
MLIR tests in "mlir/test/mlir-cpu-runner" fails in SystemZ (z14) because
of incompatible datalayout error. This patch fixes it by setting host
CPU name in createTargetMachine()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80130
Generally:
1) don't use target_link_libraries() and add_mlir_library() on the same target, use LINK_LIBS PUBLIC instead.
2) don't use LINK_LIBS to specify LLVM libraries. Use LINK_COMPONENTS instead
3) no need to link against LLVMSupport. We pull it in by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80076
The JitRunner library is logically very close to the execution engine,
and shares similar dependencies.
find -name "*.cpp" -exec sed -i "s/Support\/JitRunner/ExecutionEngine\/JitRunner/" "{}" \;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79899
Portions of MLIR which depend on LLVMIR generally need to depend on
intrinsics_gen, to ensure that tablegen'd header files from LLVM are built
first. Without this, we get errors, typically about llvm/IR/Attributes.inc
not being found.
Note that previously the Linalg Dialect depended on intrinsics_gen, but it
doesn't need to, since it doesn't use LLVMIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79389
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
This change makes the ModuleTranslation threadsafe by locking on the
LLVMContext. Furthermore, we now clone the llvm module into a new
context when compiling to PTX similar to what the OrcJit does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78207
This fixes a number of warnings, where a function is re-defined after it is tagged as "being imported":
D:\llvm-project\mlir\lib\ExecutionEngine\CRunnerUtils.cpp(24,17): warning: 'print_i32' redeclared without 'dllimport' attribute: 'dllexport' attribute added [-Winconsistent-dllimport]
extern "C" void print_i32(int32_t i) { fprintf(stdout, "%" PRId32, i); }
^
D:\llvm-project\mlir\include\mlir/ExecutionEngine/CRunnerUtils.h(168,42): note: previous declaration is here
extern "C" MLIR_CRUNNERUTILS_EXPORT void print_i32(int32_t i);
^
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76654
Summary:
The C runner utils API was still not vanilla enough for certain use
cases on embedded ARM SDKs, this enables such cases.
Adding people more widely for historical Windows related build issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76031
Summary:
This patch add some builtin operation for the gpu.all_reduce ops.
- for Integer only: `and`, `or`, `xor`
- for Float and Integer: `min`, `max`
This is useful for higher level dialect like OpenACC or OpenMP that can lower to the GPU dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75766
Summary:
This patch add some builtin operation for the gpu.all_reduce ops.
- for Integer only: `and`, `or`, `xor`
- for Float and Integer: `min`, `max`
This is useful for higher level dialect like OpenACC or OpenMP that can lower to the GPU dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75766
Summary:
This way, clients can opt-out of the GDB notification listener. Also, this
changes the semantics of enabling the object cache, which seemed the wrong
way around.
Reviewers: rriddle, nicolasvasilache, ftynse, andydavis1
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75787
Summary:
On Windows, building `mlir_c_runner_utils` doesn't properly export
symbols, thus resulting in an implib not being created, which causes
an error when consuming LLVM from external projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75769
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
MLIR ExecutionEngine and derived tools (e.g., mlir-cpu-runner) would trigger an
assertion inside ORC JIT while ExecutionEngine is being destructed after a
failed linking due to a missing function definition. The reason for this is the
JIT lookup that may return an Error referring to strings stored internally by
the JIT. If the Error outlives the ExecutionEngine, it would want have a
dangling reference, which is currently caught by an assertion inside JIT thanks
to hand-rolled reference counting. Rewrap the error message into a string
before returning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75508
This revision adds a static `mlir_c_runner_utils_static` library
for the sole purpose of being linked into `mlir_runner_utils` on
Windows.
It was previously reported that:
```
`add_llvm_library(mlir_c_runner_utils SHARED CRunnerUtils.cpp)`
produces *only* a dll on windows, the linking of mlir_runner_utils fails
because target_link_libraries is looking for a .lib file as opposed to a
.dll file. I think this may be a case where either we need to use
LINK_LIBS or explicitly build a static lib as well, but I haven't tried
either yet.
```
This revision adds a static `mlir_c_runner_utils_static` library
for the sole purpose of being linked into `mlir_runner_utils` on
Windows.
It was previously reported that:
```
`add_llvm_library(mlir_c_runner_utils SHARED CRunnerUtils.cpp)`
produces *only* a dll on windows, the linking of mlir_runner_utils fails
because target_link_libraries is looking for a .lib file as opposed to a
.dll file. I think this may be a case where either we need to use
LINK_LIBS or explicitly build a static lib as well, but I haven't tried
either yet.
```
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Summary:
This revision split out a new CRunnerUtils library that supports
MLIR execution on targets without a C++ runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75257
Christian Sigg