There are several pieces of pattern rewriting infra in IR/ that really shouldn't be there. This revision moves those pieces to a better location such that they are easier to evolve in the future(e.g. with PDL). More concretely this revision does the following:
* Create a Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h and move the apply*andFold methods there.
The definitions for these methods are already in Transforms/ so it doesn't make sense for the declarations to be in IR.
* Create a new lib/Rewrite library and move PatternApplicator there.
This new library will be focused on applying rewrites, and will also include compiling rewrites with PDL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89103
This dialect contains various structured control flow operaitons, not only
loops, reflect this in the name. Drop the Ops suffix for consistency with other
dialects.
Note that this only moves the files and changes the C++ namespace from 'loop'
to 'scf'. The visible IR prefix remains the same and will be updated
separately. The conversions will also be updated separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79578
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
There were some unused CMakeFiles for Affine/IR and Affine/EDSC.
This change builds separate MLIRAffineOps and MLIRAffineEDSC libraries
using those CMakeFiles. This combination replaces the old MLIRAffine
library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78317
Summary:
Change AffineOps Dialect structure to better group both IR and Tranforms. This included extracting transforms directly related to AffineOps. Also move AffineOps to Affine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76161
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Summary:
MLIRAnalysis depended on MLIRVectorOps
MLIRVectorOps depended on MLIRAnalysis for Loop information.
Both of these can be solved by factoring out libraries related to loop
analysis into their own library. The new MLIRLoopAnalysis might be
better off with the Loop Dialect in the future.
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, rriddle!, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: Joonsoo, vchuravy, merge_guards_bot, mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73655
This defines a set of initial utilities for inlining a region(or a FuncOp), and defines a simple inliner pass for testing purposes.
A new dialect interface is defined, DialectInlinerInterface, that allows for dialects to override hooks controlling inlining legality. The interface currently provides the following hooks, but these are just premilinary and should be changed/added to/modified as necessary:
* isLegalToInline
- Determine if a region can be inlined into one of this dialect, *or* if an operation of this dialect can be inlined into a given region.
* shouldAnalyzeRecursively
- Determine if an operation with regions should be analyzed recursively for legality. This allows for child operations to be closed off from the legality checks for operations like lambdas.
* handleTerminator
- Process a terminator that has been inlined.
This cl adds support for inlining StandardOps, but other dialects will be added in followups as necessary.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 267426759
These ops should not belong to the std dialect.
This CL extracts them in their own dialect and updates the corresponding conversions and tests.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 258123853
Julian Gross