While the changes are extensive, they basically fall into a few
categories:
1) Moving the TestDialect itself.
2) Updating C++ code in tablegen to explicitly use ::mlir, since it
will be put in a headers that shouldn't expect a 'using'.
3) Updating some generic MLIR Interface definitions to do the same thing.
4) Updating the Tablegen generator in a few places to be explicit about
namespaces
5) Doing the same thing for llvm references, since we no longer pick
up the definitions from mlir/Support/LLVM.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88251
Store both interfaceID and objectID as key for interface registration callback.
Otherwise the implementation allows to register only one external model per one object in the single dialect.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107274
Historically the builtin dialect has had an empty namespace. This has unfortunately created a very awkward situation, where many utilities either have to special case the empty namespace, or just don't work at all right now. This revision adds a namespace to the builtin dialect, and starts to cleanup some of the utilities to no longer handle empty namespaces. For now, the assembly form of builtin operations does not require the `builtin.` prefix. (This should likely be re-evaluated though)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105149
This functionality is similar to delayed registration of dialect interfaces. It
allows external interface models to be registered before the dialect containing
the attribute/operation/type interface is loaded, or even before the context is
created.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104397
This is similar to attribute and type interfaces and mostly the same mechanism
(FallbackModel / ExternalModel, ODS generation). There are minor differences in
how the concept-based polymorphism is implemented for operations that are
accounted for by ODS backends, and this essentially adds a test and exposes the
API.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104294
It may be desirable to provide an interface implementation for an attribute or
a type without modifying the definition of said attribute or type. Notably,
this allows to implement interfaces for attributes and types outside of the
dialect that defines them and, in particular, provide interfaces for built-in
types. Provide the mechanism to do so.
Currently, separable registration requires the attribute or type to have been
registered with the context, i.e. for the dialect containing the attribute or
type to be loaded. This can be relaxed in the future using a mechanism similar
to delayed dialect interface registration.
See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-separable-attribute-type-interfaces/3637
Depends On D104233
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104234
Stephen Neuendorffer