On one test this seems to have given more chance for DAG combine to do other INSERT_SUBVECTOR/EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR combines before the BLENDI was created. Looks like we can still improve more by teaching DAG combine to optimize INSERT_SUBVECTOR/EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR with BLENDI.
llvm-svn: 293944
This is a first attempt at using the MOVMSK instructions to replace all_of/any_of reduction patterns (i.e. an and/or + shuffle chain).
So far this only matches patterns where we are reducing an all/none bits source vector (i.e. a comparison result) but we should be able to expand on this in conjunction with improvements to 'bool vector' handling both in the x86 backend as well as the vectorizers etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28810
llvm-svn: 293880
This moves creation of SUBV_BROADCAST and merging of adjacent loads that are being inserted together.
This is a step towards removing legalizing of INSERT_SUBVECTOR except for vXi1 cases.
llvm-svn: 293872
Also add the ability to recognise PINSR(Vex, 0, Idx).
Targets shuffle combines won't replace multiple insertions with a bit mask until a depth of 3 or more, so we avoid codesize bloat.
The unnecessary vpblendw in clearupper8xi16a will be fixed in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 293627
combineX86ShufflesRecursively can still only handle a maximum of 2 shuffle inputs but everything before it now supports any number of shuffle inputs.
This will be necessary for combining OR(SHUFFLE, SHUFFLE) patterns.
llvm-svn: 293560
Previously this test case fired an assertion in getNode because we tried to create an insert_subvector with both input types the same size and the index pointing to half the vector width.
llvm-svn: 293446
Replaces an xor+movd/movq with an xorps which will be shorter in codesize, avoid an int-fpu transfer, allow modern cores to fast path the result during decode and helps other combines recognise an all-zero vector.
The only reason I can think of that we'd want to keep scalar_to_vector in this case is to help recognise the upper elts are undef but this doesn't seem to be a problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29097
llvm-svn: 293438
PACKUSWB converts Signed word to Unsigned byte, (the same about DW) and it can't be used for umin+truncate pattern.
AVX-512 VPMOVUS* instructions fit the pattern since they convert Unsigned to Unsigned.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29196
llvm-svn: 293431
Pulled out code that removed unused inputs from a target shuffle mask into a helper function to allow it to be reused in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 293175
As discussed on D28219 - it is profitable to combine trunc(binop (s/zext(x), s/zext(y)) to binop(trunc(s/zext(x)), trunc(s/zext(y))) assuming the trunc(ext()) will simplify further
llvm-svn: 292493
Summary:
Currently we expand and scalarize these operations, but I think we should be able to implement ADD/SUB with KXOR and MUL with KAND.
We already do this for scalar i1 operations so I just extended it to vectors of i1.
Reviewers: zvi, delena
Reviewed By: delena
Subscribers: guyblank, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28888
llvm-svn: 292474
r291670 doesn't crash on the original testcase from PR31589,
but it crashes on a slightly more complex one.
PR31589 has the new reproducer.
llvm-svn: 292444
This patch improves the mul instruction combine function (combineMul)
by adding new layer of logic.
In this patch, we are adding the ability to fold (mul x, -((1 << c) -1))
or (mul x, -((1 << c) +1)) into (neg(X << c) -x) or (neg((x << c) + x) respective.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28232
llvm-svn: 292358
Craig Topper