Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith be7ea19b58 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 87b7eb9d0f Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
2014-10-01 18:55:02 +00:00
Adrian Prantl b458dc2eee Revert r218778 while investigating buldbot breakage.
"Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra"

llvm-svn: 218782
2014-10-01 18:10:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 25a7174e7a Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

llvm-svn: 218778
2014-10-01 17:55:39 +00:00
Alp Toker cb40291100 Fix known typos
Sweep the codebase for common typos. Includes some changes to visible function
names that were misspelt.

llvm-svn: 200018
2014-01-24 17:20:08 +00:00
Michael Gottesman e67f40c514 [objc-arc] KnownSafe does not imply that it is safe to perform code motion across CFG edges since even if it is safe to remove RR pairs, we may still be able to move a retain/release into a loop.
rdar://13949644

llvm-svn: 182670
2013-05-24 20:44:05 +00:00
Michael Gottesman 5a91bbf33a [objc-arc] Make sure that multiple owners is propogated correctly through the pass via the usage of a global data structure.
rdar://13750319

llvm-svn: 182669
2013-05-24 20:44:02 +00:00
Michael Gottesman a76143eeee [objc-arc-opts] In the presense of an alloca unconditionally remove RR pairs if and only if we are both KnownSafeBU/KnownSafeTD rather than just either or.
In the presense of a block being initialized, the frontend will emit the
objc_retain on the original pointer and the release on the pointer loaded from
the alloca. The optimizer will through the provenance analysis realize that the
two are related (albiet different), but since we only require KnownSafe in one
direction, will match the inner retain on the original pointer with the guard
release on the original pointer. This is fixed by ensuring that in the presense
of allocas we only unconditionally remove pointers if both our retain and our
release are KnownSafe (i.e. we are KnownSafe in both directions) since we must
deal with the possibility that the frontend will emit what (to the optimizer)
appears to be unbalanced retain/releases.

An example of the miscompile is:

  %A = alloca
  retain(%x)
  retain(%x) <--- Inner Retain
  store %x, %A
  %y = load %A
  ... DO STUFF ...
  release(%y)
  call void @use(%x)
  release(%x) <--- Guarding Release

getting optimized to:

  %A = alloca
  retain(%x)
  store %x, %A
  %y = load %A
  ... DO STUFF ...
  release(%y)
  call void @use(%x)

rdar://13750319

llvm-svn: 181743
2013-05-13 23:49:42 +00:00