there is no reason to align them higher.
- This roughly matches llvm-gcc's r126913.
- It is an open question whether or not we should do this for cstring's in
general (code size vs optimization potential), for now we just match llvm-gcc
until someone wants to run some experiments.
llvm-svn: 129410
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Daniel Dunbar