1. Splitted out some parts of R600 target to separate modules/headers.
2. Reduced some include lists in headers.
3. Found and fixed issue with override `GCNTargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl()`
and `R600TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl()` had different return value type
than base class.
4. Minor forward declarations cleanup.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108596
I'm not sure this is the best way to approach this,
but the situation is rather not very detectable unless we explicitly call it out when refusing to advise to unroll.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107271
I have added a new FastMathFlags parameter to getArithmeticReductionCost
to indicate what type of reduction we are performing:
1. Tree-wise. This is the typical fast-math reduction that involves
continually splitting a vector up into halves and adding each
half together until we get a scalar result. This is the default
behaviour for integers, whereas for floating point we only do this
if reassociation is allowed.
2. Ordered. This now allows us to estimate the cost of performing
a strict vector reduction by treating it as a series of scalar
operations in lane order. This is the case when FP reassociation
is not permitted. For scalable vectors this is more difficult
because at compile time we do not know how many lanes there are,
and so we use the worst case maximum vscale value.
I have also fixed getTypeBasedIntrinsicInstrCost to pass in the
FastMathFlags, which meant fixing up some X86 tests where we always
assumed the vector.reduce.fadd/mul intrinsics were 'fast'.
New tests have been added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/reduce-fadd.ll
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-intrinsics.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd-cost.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-strict-fadd-cost.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105432
This patch removes the IsPairwiseForm flag from the Reduction Cost TTI
hooks, along with some accompanying code for pattern matching reductions
from trees starting at extract elements. IsPairWise is now assumed to be
false, which was the predominant way that the value was used from both
the Loop and SLP vectorizers. Since the adjustments such as D93860, the
SLP vectorizer has not relied upon this distinction between paiwise and
non-pairwise reductions.
This also removes some code that was detecting reductions trees starting
from extract elements inside the costmodel. This case was
double-counting costs though, adding the individual costs on the
individual instruction _and_ the total cost of the reduction. Removing
it changes the costs in llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduction.ll to
not double count. The cost of reduction intrinsics is still tested
through the various tests in
llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduce-xyz.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105484
Details: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96805 changed the GCNTTIImpl::getCFInstrCost to return 1 for the PHI nodes
for the TTI::TCK_CodeSize and TTI::TCK_SizeAndLatency. This is incorrect because the value moves that are the
result of the PHI lowering are inserted into the basic block predecessors - not into the block itself.
As a result of this change LoopRotate and LoopUnroll were broken because of the incorrect Loop header and loop
body size/cost estimation.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105104
Added an extra analysis for better choosing of shuffle kind in
getShuffleCost functions for better cost estimation if mask was
provided.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100865
Added an extra analysis for better choosing of shuffle kind in
getShuffleCost functions for better cost estimation if mask was
provided.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100865
Added cost estimation for switch instruction, updated costs of branches, fixed
phi cost.
Had to increase `-amdgpu-unroll-threshold-if` default value since conditional
branch cost (size) was corrected to higher value.
Test renamed to "control-flow.ll".
Removed redundant code in `X86TTIImpl::getCFInstrCost()` and
`PPCTTIImpl::getCFInstrCost()`.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96805
This patch changes the interface to take a RegisterKind, to indicate
whether the register bitwidth of a scalar register, fixed-width vector
register, or scalable vector register must be returned.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98874
This adds an Mask ArrayRef to getShuffleCost, so that if an exact mask
can be provided a more accurate cost can be provided by the backend.
For example VREV costs could be returned by the ARM backend. This should
be an NFC until then, laying the groundwork for that to be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98206
Honor always_inline attribute when processing -amdgpu-inline-max-bb.
It was lost during the ports of the heuristic. There is no reason
to honor inline hint, but not always inline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97790
-amdgpu-inline-max-bb option could lead to a suboptimal
codegen preventing inlining of really simple functions
including pure wrapper calls. Relax the cutoff by allowing
to call a function with a single block on the grounds
that it will not increase total number of blocks after
inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97744
As a followup to D95291, getOperandsScalarizationOverhead was still
using a VF as a vector factor if the arguments were scalar, and would
assert on certain matrix intrinsics with differently sized vector
arguments. This patch removes the VF arg, instead passing the Types
through directly. This should allow it to more accurately compute the
cost without having to guess at which operands will be vectorized,
something difficult with more complex intrinsics.
This adjusts one SVE test as it is now calling the wrong intrinsic vs
veccall. Without invalid InstructCosts the cost of the scalarized
intrinsic is too low. This should get fixed when the cost of
scalarization is accounted for with scalable types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96287
getIntrinsicInstrCost takes a IntrinsicCostAttributes holding various
parameters of the intrinsic being costed. It can either be called with a
scalar intrinsic (RetTy==Scalar, VF==1), with a vector instruction
(RetTy==Vector, VF==1) or from the vectorizer with a scalar type and
vector width (RetTy==Scalar, VF>1). A RetTy==Vector, VF>1 is considered
an error. Both of the vector modes are expected to be treated the same,
but because this is confusing many backends end up getting it wrong.
Instead of trying work with those two values separately this removes the
VF parameter, widening the RetTy/ArgTys by VF used called from the
vectorizer. This keeps things simpler, but does require some other
modifications to keep things consistent.
Most backends look like this will be an improvement (or were not using
getIntrinsicInstrCost). AMDGPU needed the most changes to keep the code
from c230965ccf working. ARM removed the fix in
dfac521da1, webassembly happens to get a fixup for an SLP cost
issue and both X86 and AArch64 seem to now be using better costs from
the vectorizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95291
This reverts commit 502a67dd7f.
This expose a failure in test-suite build on PowerPC,
revert to unblock buildbot first,
Dave will re-commit in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96287.
Thanks Dave.
getIntrinsicInstrCost takes a IntrinsicCostAttributes holding various
parameters of the intrinsic being costed. It can either be called with a
scalar intrinsic (RetTy==Scalar, VF==1), with a vector instruction
(RetTy==Vector, VF==1) or from the vectorizer with a scalar type and
vector width (RetTy==Scalar, VF>1). A RetTy==Vector, VF>1 is considered
an error. Both of the vector modes are expected to be treated the same,
but because this is confusing many backends end up getting it wrong.
Instead of trying work with those two values separately this removes the
VF parameter, widening the RetTy/ArgTys by VF used called from the
vectorizer. This keeps things simpler, but does require some other
modifications to keep things consistent.
Most backends look like this will be an improvement (or were not using
getIntrinsicInstrCost). AMDGPU needed the most changes to keep the code
from c230965ccf working. ARM removed the fix in
dfac521da1, webassembly happens to get a fixup for an SLP cost
issue and both X86 and AArch64 seem to now be using better costs from
the vectorizer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95291
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.
amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)
These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.
This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.
This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
D82227 has added a proper check to limit PHI vectorization to the
maximum vector register size. That unfortunately resulted in at
least a couple of regressions on SystemZ and x86.
This change reverts PHI handling from D82227 and replaces it with
a more general check in SLPVectorizerPass::tryToVectorizeList().
Moved to tryToVectorizeList() it allows to restart vectorization
if initial chunk fails.
However, this function is more general and handles not only PHI
but everything which SLP handles. If vectorization factor would
be limited to maximum vector register size it would limit much
more vectorization than before leading to further regressions.
Therefore a new TTI callback getMaximumVF() is added with the
default 0 to preserve current behavior and limit nothing. Then
targets can decide what is better for them.
The callback gets ElementSize just like a similar getMinimumVF()
function and the main opcode of the chain. The latter is to avoid
regressions at least on the AMDGPU. We can have loads and stores
up to 128 bit wide, and <2 x 16> bit vector math on some
subtargets, where the rest shall not be vectorized. I.e. we need
to differentiate based on the element size and operation itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92059
This patch replaces the attribute `unsigned VF` in the class
IntrinsicCostAttributes by `ElementCount VF`.
This is a non-functional change to help upcoming patches to compute the cost
model for scalable vector inside this class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91532
Add a calling convention called amdgpu_gfx for real function calls
within graphics shaders. For the moment, this uses the same calling
convention as other calls in amdgpu, with registers excluded for return
address, stack pointer and stack buffer descriptor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88540
1. Throughput and codesize costs estimations was separated and updated.
2. Updated fdiv cost estimation for different cases.
3. Added scalarization processing for types that are treated as !isSimple() to
improve codesize estimation in getArithmeticInstrCost() and
getArithmeticInstrCost(). The code was borrowed from TCK_RecipThroughput path
of base implementation.
Next step is unify scalarization part in base class that is currently works for
TCK_RecipThroughput path only.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89973
Add new loop metadata amdgpu.loop.unroll.threshold to allow the initial AMDGPU
specific unroll threshold value to be specified on a loop by loop basis.
The intention is to be able to to allow more nuanced hints, e.g. specifying a
low threshold value to indicate that a loop may be unrolled if cheap enough
rather than using the all or nothing llvm.loop.unroll.disable metadata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84779
Use forward declarations and move the include down to dependent files that actually use it.
This also exposes a number of implicit dependencies on KnownBits.h
The `UnrollMaxBlockToAnalyze` parameter is used at the stage when we have no
information about a loop body BB cost. In some cases, e.g. for simple loop
```
for(int i=0; i<32; ++i){
D = Arr2[i*8 + C1];
Arr1[i*64 + C2] += C3 * D;
Arr1[i*64 + C2 + 2048] += C4 * D;
}
```
current default parameter value is not enough to run deeper cost analyze so the
loop is not completely unrolled.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86248
Add cases of fused fmul+fadd/fsub with f16 and f64 operands to cost model.
Also added operations with contract attribute.
Fixed line endings in test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84995
Summary:
If result of fmul(b,c) has one use, in almost all cases (except denormals are
IEEE) the pair of operations will be fused in one fma/mad/mac/etc.
Reviewers: rampitec
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kerbowa
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83919
Summary:
This patch separates the peeling specific parameters from the UnrollingPreferences,
and creates a new struct called PeelingPreferences. Functions which used the
UnrollingPreferences struct for peeling have been updated to use the PeelingPreferences struct.
Author: sidbav (Sidharth Baveja)
Reviewers: Whitney (Whitney Tsang), Meinersbur (Michael Kruse), skatkov (Serguei Katkov), ashlykov (Arkady Shlykov), bogner (Justin Bogner), hfinkel (Hal Finkel), anhtuyen (Anh Tuyen Tran), nikic (Nikita Popov)
Reviewed By: Meinersbur (Michael Kruse)
Subscribers: fhahn (Florian Hahn), hiraditya (Aditya Kumar), llvm-commits, LLVM
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80580
This is practically NFC at the moment because nothing really
asks the real number or does anything useful with it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82202
Jay Foad