With spilling into AGPRs enabled we cannot reliably predict
if we need to save FP or not. We may finally spill everything
into AGPRs and never touch stack. In this case we still may
save FP. This is deficiency but not an error, so avoid the
assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107404
If no scratch or flat instructions are used, we do not need to
initialize the flat scratch hardware register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105920
AMDGPU normally spills SGPRs to VGPRs. Previously, since all register
classes are handled at the same time, this was problematic. We don't
know ahead of time how many registers will be needed to be reserved to
handle the spilling. If no VGPRs were left for spilling, we would have
to try to spill to memory. If the spilled SGPRs were required for exec
mask manipulation, it is highly problematic because the lanes active
at the point of spill are not necessarily the same as at the restore
point.
Avoid this problem by fully allocating SGPRs in a separate regalloc
run from VGPRs. This way we know the exact number of VGPRs needed, and
can reserve them for a second run. This fixes the most serious
issues, but it is still possible using inline asm to make all VGPRs
unavailable. Start erroring in the case where we ever would require
memory for an SGPR spill.
This is implemented by giving each regalloc pass a callback which
reports if a register class should be handled or not. A few passes
need some small changes to deal with leftover virtual registers.
In the AMDGPU implementation, a new pass is introduced to take the
place of PrologEpilogInserter for SGPR spills emitted during the first
run.
One disadvantage of this is currently StackSlotColoring is no longer
used for SGPR spills. It would need to be run again, which will
require more work.
Error if the standard -regalloc option is used. Introduce new separate
-sgpr-regalloc and -vgpr-regalloc flags, so the two runs can be
controlled individually. PBQB is not currently supported, so this also
prevents using the unhandled allocator.
This allows to convert the add instruction to s_addk_i32 and
v_add_nc_u32 instead of needing v_add_co_u32 when converting to a VALU
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103322
This patch adds TargetStackID::WasmLocal. This stack holds locations of
values that are only addressable by name -- not via a pointer to memory.
For the WebAssembly target, these objects are lowered to WebAssembly
local variables, which are managed by the WebAssembly run-time and are
not addressable by linear memory.
For the WebAssembly target IR indicates that an AllocaInst should be put
on TargetStackID::WasmLocal by putting it in the non-integral address
space WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_WASM_VAR, with value 1. SROA will mostly lift
these allocations to SSA locals, but any alloca that reaches instruction
selection (usually in non-optimized builds) will be assigned the new
TargetStackID there. Loads and stores to those values are transformed
to new WebAssemblyISD::LOCAL_GET / WebAssemblyISD::LOCAL_SET nodes,
which then lower to the type-specific LOCAL_GET_I32 etc instructions via
tablegen patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101140
This patch adds TargetStackID::WasmLocal. This stack holds locations of
values that are only addressable by name -- not via a pointer to memory.
For the WebAssembly target, these objects are lowered to WebAssembly
local variables, which are managed by the WebAssembly run-time and are
not addressable by linear memory.
For the WebAssembly target IR indicates that an AllocaInst should be put
on TargetStackID::WasmLocal by putting it in the non-integral address
space WASM_ADDRESS_SPACE_WASM_VAR, with value 1. SROA will mostly lift
these allocations to SSA locals, but any alloca that reaches instruction
selection (usually in non-optimized builds) will be assigned the new
TargetStackID there. Loads and stores to those values are transformed
to new WebAssemblyISD::LOCAL_GET / WebAssemblyISD::LOCAL_SET nodes,
which then lower to the type-specific LOCAL_GET_I32 etc instructions via
tablegen patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101140
Since ca5f07f8c4 already reverted
the cause for this warning, this commit now causes warnings about
a default label in a switch that covers the enum.
This reverts commit cf2eeb114c.
Retrying after revert and fix (removed implicit def flag from operand). Now
passes with expensive_checks enabled.
Since there is a single scratch resource descriptor for all shaders, if there is
a wave32 and a wave64 shader (for instance for VsFs pairs)
then the const_index_stride will be incorrect for wave32 shaders.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101830
Change-Id: Ie3b8b2921237968caca91527dd0c97b1b0cc0360
Since there is a single scratch resource descriptor for all shaders, if there is
a wave32 and a wave64 shader (for instance for VsFs pairs)
then the const_index_stride will be incorrect for wave32 shaders.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101830
Change-Id: Id8de5566b0d1a07a814e2e7db016df9d20bf6d2c
This allows calling buildSpillLoadStore for an empty basic block, where
MI points at the end of the block instead of to an instruction.
This only happens with downstream CFI changes, so I was not able to
create a testcase that works with upstream LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101356
The values of registers in inactive lanes needs to be saved during
function calls.
Save all registers used for whole wave mode, similar to how it is done
for VGPRs that are used for SGPR spilling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99429
Reapply with fixed tests on window.
The values of registers in inactive lanes needs to be saved during
function calls.
Save all registers used for whole wave mode, similar to how it is done
for VGPRs that are used for SGPR spilling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99429
Spilling the fp or bp to scratch could overwrite VGPRs of inactive
lanes. Fix that by using only the active lanes of the scavenged VGPR.
This builds on the assumptions that
1. a function is never called with exec=0
2. lanes do not die in a function, i.e. exec!=0 in the function epilog
3. no new lanes are active when exiting the function, i.e. exec in the
epilog is a subset of exec in the prolog.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96869
Spilling SGPRs to scratch uses a temporary VGPR. LLVM currently cannot
determine if a VGPR is used in other lanes or not, so we need to save
all lanes of the VGPR. We even need to save the VGPR if it is marked as
dead.
The generated code depends on two things:
- Can we scavenge an SGPR to save EXEC?
- And can we scavenge a VGPR?
If we can scavenge an SGPR, we
- save EXEC into the SGPR
- set the needed lane mask
- save the temporary VGPR
- write the spilled SGPR into VGPR lanes
- save the VGPR again to the target stack slot
- restore the VGPR
- restore EXEC
If we were not able to scavenge an SGPR, we do the same operations, but
everytime the temporary VGPR is written to memory, we
- write VGPR to memory
- flip exec (s_not exec, exec)
- write VGPR again (previously inactive lanes)
Surprisingly often, we are able to scavenge an SGPR, even though we are
at the brink of running out of SGPRs.
Scavenging a VGPR does not have a great effect (saves three instructions
if no SGPR was scavenged), but we need to know if the VGPR we use is
live before or not, otherwise the machine verifier complains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96336
Use SIInstrFlags to differentiate between the different
variants of flat instructions (flat, global and scratch).
This should make it easier to bundle the immediate offset logic in a
single place and implement restrictions and bug workarounds.
Fixed version of D99587, which does not rely on the address space.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99743
ScratchExecCopy needs to be marked as live, we cannot use that register
while EXEC is stored in there.
Marking SGPRForFPSaveRestoreCopy and SGPRForBPSaveRestoreCopy as
available is unnecessary, they should not be live at that point anway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100098
The struct is used for both, callee and caller-save registers now.
The frame index is not set for entrypoints, as we do not need to save
the registers then.
Update the struct name to reflect that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99722
Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.
This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:
- shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
realigned
- canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)
- hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
customisable)
Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.
This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716
Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
When SGPRs are spilled to VGPRs, they can overwrite any lane. We need
to preserve the value of inactive lanes in function calls, so we save
the register even if it is marked as caller saved.
Also, teach buildPrologSpill to work when no registers are free like in
CodeGen/AMDGPU/pei-scavenge-vgpr-spill.mir and update the comment on
findScratchNonCalleeSaveRegister as it is not used anymore to realign
the stack pointer since D95865.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95946
The temporary register is only used to compute the frame pointer.
The frame pointer is overwritten and not used in between, so we
can reuse the frame pointer for the computation, saving one register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95865
Saving callee-save registers happens in whole wave mode. Exec is saved
to a free register, which can be reused to save the frame pointer.
Therefore, saving the fp needs to happen after saving csrs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95861
I guess instructions were marked as frame-setup by accident, they are
restores as part of the epilog.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95783
This would assert with amdgpu-spill-sgpr-to-vgpr disabled when trying to
spill the FP.
Fixes: SWDEV-262704
Reviewed By: RamNalamothu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95768
If a function has stack objects, and a call, we require an FP. If we
did not initially have any stack objects, and only introduced them
during PrologEpilogInserter for CSR VGPR spills, SILowerSGPRSpills
would end up spilling the FP register as if it were a normal
register. This would result in an assert in a debug build, or
redundant handling of the FP register in a release build.
Try to predict that we will have an FP later, although this is ugly.
Extract the scratch offset from the scratch buffer descriptor that is
stored in the global table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91701
To accommodate frame layouts that have both fixed and scalable objects
on the stack, describing a stack location or offset using a pointer + uint64_t
is not sufficient. For this reason, we've introduced the StackOffset class,
which models both the fixed- and scalable sized offsets.
The TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference is made to return a StackOffset,
so that this can be used in other interfaces, such as to eliminate frame indices
in PEI or to emit Debug locations for variables on the stack.
This patch is purely mechanical and doesn't change the behaviour of how
the result of this function is used for fixed-sized offsets. The patch adds
various checks to assert that the offset has no scalable component, as frame
offsets with a scalable component are not yet supported in various places.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90018
This reverts r227987 "R600/SI: Determine target-specific encoding of READLANE and WRITELANE early v2".
All the codegen changes are caused by the post-RA scheduler no longer
treating readlane/writelane as scheduling barriers due to having
unmodelled side effects. (The pseudos are hasSideEffects = 0, but the
real instructions are hasSideEffects = ? which TableGen conservatively
treats as 1.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90401
The support is disabled by default. So far there is instruction
selection, spilling, and frame elimination. It also changes SP
from unswizzled to swizzled as used by flat scratch instructions,
so it cannot be mixed with MUBUF stack access.
At the very least missing:
- GlobalISel;
- Some optimizations in frame elimination in between vector
and scalar ALU;
- It shall finally allow to always materialize frame index
as an SGPR, but that is not implemented and frame elimination
cannot handle it yet;
- Unaligned and/or multidword flat scratch shall work, but it
is legalized now for MUBUF;
- Operand folding cannot optimize FI like with MUBUF yet;
- It will need scaling the value of the SP/FP in the DWARF
expression to recover the unswizzled scratch address;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89170
During the PEI pass, the dead TargetStackID::SGPRSpill spill slots
are not being removed while spilling the FP/BP to memory.
Fixes: SWDEV-250393
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87032
The SGPR spills happen in SILowerSGPRSpills() and allSGPRSpillsAreDead()
make sure there are no SGPR spills pending during PEI. But the FP/BP
spills happen during PEI and are exceptions.
Use actual frame indices of FP/BP in allSGPRSpillsAreDead() to
accommodate the exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86291
If we need a scratch register for the spill don't use the same scratch
register that is being used for the MBUF offset.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85772
Stanislav Mekhanoshin