This is analogous to D86156 (which preserves "lossy" BFI in loop
passes). Lossy means that the analysis preserved may not be up to date
with regards to new blocks that are added in loop passes, but BPI will
not contain stale pointers to basic blocks that are deleted by the loop
passes.
This is achieved through BasicBlockCallbackVH in BPI, which calls
eraseBlock that updates the data structures in BPI whenever a basic
block is deleted.
This patch does not have any changes in the upstream pipeline, since
none of the loop passes in the pipeline use BPI currently.
However, since BPI wasn't previously preserved in loop passes, the loop
predication pass was invoking BPI *on the entire
function* every time it ran in an LPM. This caused massive compile time
in our downstream LPM invocation which contained loop predication.
See updated test with an invocation of a loop-pipeline containing loop
predication and -debug-pass turned ON.
Reviewed-By: asbirlea, modimo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110438
This patch enables debug info salvaging for truncating/extending ptr
int conversions. The testcase uncovered a bug in adce, which is
addressed separately.
rdar://80227769
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110461
With improved analysis in determining CFG equivalence that does
not require strict dominance and post-dominance conditions, we
now relax isSafeToMoveBefore() such that an instruction I can
be moved before InsertPoint even if they do not strictly dominate
each other, as long as they follow the same control flow path.
For example, we can move Instruction 0 before Instruction 1,
and vice versa.
```
if (cond1)
// Instruction 0: %add = add i32 1, 2
if (cond1)
// Instruction 1: %add2 = add i32 2, 1
```
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110456
When moving an entire basic block BB before InsertPoint, currently
we check for all instructions whether the operands dominates
InsertPoint, however, this can be improved such that even an
operand does not dominate InsertPoint, as long as it appears as
a previous instruction in the same BB, it is safe to move.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110378
While both GlobalAlias and GlobalIFunc are GlobalIndirectSymbol, their
`getIndirectSymbol()` usage is quite different (GlobalIFunc's resolver
is an entity different from GlobalIFunc itself).
As discussed on https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/144904.html
("[IR] Modelling of GlobalIFunc"), the name `getBaseObject` is confusing when
used with GlobalIFunc.
To resolve the confusion:
* Move GloalIndirectSymol::getBaseObject to GlobalAlias:: (GlobalIFunc should use `getResolver` instead)
* Change GlobalValue::getBaseObject not to inspect GlobalIFunc. Note: the function has 7 references.
* Add GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction to peel off potential ConstantExpr indirection
(`strlen` in `test/LTO/Resolution/X86/ifunc.ll`)
Note: GlobalIFunc::getResolver (like GlobalAlias::getAliasee which does not peel
off ConstantExpr indirection) is kept to be used by ValueEnumerator.
Reviewed By: ibookstein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109792
The NFC commit e5692a564a changed the logic for
DomTreeUpdates to use the range [succ_begin, succ_begin) when
looking for SuccsOfPredBB rather than using [succ_begin, succ_end).
As the commit was NFC this is identified as a typo (it has been
discussed briefly in phabricator).
The typo was found when inspecting the code, so I've got no idea if
changing back to the old range has any significant impact (such as
solving any PR:s or causing some new problems). But at least this
restores the code to the originally indented behavior.
When determining whether to fold branches to a common destination by
merging two blocks, SimplifyCFG will count the number of instructions to
be moved into the first basic block. However, there's no reason to count
free instructions like bitcasts and other similar instructions.
This resolves missed branch foldings with -fstrict-vtable-pointers in
llvm-test-suite's lambda benchmark.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108837
When following a case of a switch instruction is guaranteed to lead to
UB, we can safely break these edges and redirect those cases into a newly
created unreachable block. As result, CFG will become simpler and we can
remove some of Phi inputs to make further analyzes easier.
Patch by Dmitry Bakunevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109428
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
getMetadata() currently uses a weird API where it populates a
structure passed to it, and optionally merges into it. Instead,
we can return the AAMDNodes and provide a separate merge() API.
This makes usages more compact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109852
This makes some tests in vector-reductions-logical.ll more stable when
applying D108837.
The cost of branching is higher when vector ops are involved due to
potential SLP transformations.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108935
In particular, it couldn't handle cases where lookup table constant
expressions involved bitcasts. This does not seem to come up
frequently in C++, but comes up reasonably often in Rust via
`#[derive(Debug)]`.
Originally reported by pcwalton.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109565
Fix build bot failure in rG4ac4e521 caused due to assumeBundleBuilder
using new API (getUniqueUndroppableUser).
We now continue using the existing API for AssumeBundleBuilder
(getSingleUndroppableUser).
Sorry for the noise here.
Tests-Run: failing testcase passes.
This patch allows sinking an instruction which can have multiple uses in a
single user. We were previously over-restrictive by looking for exactly one use,
rather than one user.
Also, the API for retrieving undroppable user has been updated accordingly since
in both usecases (Attributor and InstCombine), we seem to care about the user,
rather than the use.
Reviewed-By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109700
Added '-print-pipeline-passes' printing of parameters for those passes
declared with *_WITH_PARAMS macro in PassRegistry.def.
Note that it only prints the parameters declared inside *_WITH_PARAMS as
in a few cases there appear to be additional parameters not parsable.
The following passes are now covered (i.e. all of those with *_WITH_PARAMS in
PassRegistry.def).
LoopExtractorPass - loop-extract
HWAddressSanitizerPass - hwsan
EarlyCSEPass - early-cse
EntryExitInstrumenterPass - ee-instrument
LowerMatrixIntrinsicsPass - lower-matrix-intrinsics
LoopUnrollPass - loop-unroll
AddressSanitizerPass - asan
MemorySanitizerPass - msan
SimplifyCFGPass - simplifycfg
LoopVectorizePass - loop-vectorize
MergedLoadStoreMotionPass - mldst-motion
GVN - gvn
StackLifetimePrinterPass - print<stack-lifetime>
SimpleLoopUnswitchPass - simple-loop-unswitch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109310
This reapplies commit 7dbba3376f, or, put
differently, this reverts commit d9a8d20827.
The test now requires the amdgpu and nvptx backend explicitly as it
won't work without properly.
Not all address spaces support initializers for globals and we can
therefore not set them without checking if they are allowed. This
patch adds a hook into TTI to check if an AS allows non-undef
initializers. We disable it for all but address space 0 by default,
NVPTX and AMDGPU targets allow all but address space 3.
Reviewed By: tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109337
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
I can't seem to wrap my head around the proper fix here,
we should be fine without this requirement, iff we can form this form,
but the naive attempt (https://reviews.llvm.org/D106317) has failed.
So just to unblock the release, put up a restriction.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
Previously the CodeExtractor created exit stubs, and the subsequent return value of the outlined function based on the order of out-of-region blocks after splitting any phi nodes, and collecting the blocks to be outlined. This could cause differences in order if there was a difference of exit block phi nodes between the two regions. This patch moves the collection of the output target blocks to be before this occurs, so that the assignment of target block to output value will be the same, regardless of the contents of the output block.
Reviewers: paquette, roelofs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108657
Make the following changes in order to support opaque pointers in SROA:
* Generate i8 GEPs for opaque pointers.
* Explicitly enforce that promotable allocas only have stores of
the alloca type -- previously this was implicitly enforced.
* Replace a check for pointer element type with load/store type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109259
integer 0/1 for the operand of bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102996 changes the operand of bundle
"clang.arc.attachedcall". This patch makes changes to llvm that are
needed to handle the new IR.
This should make it easier to understand what the IR is doing and also
simplify some of the passes as they no longer have to translate the
integer values to the runtime functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103000
This improvement adds "assume" after removal of branch basing on UB in successor block.
Consider the following example:
```
pred:
x = ...
cond = x > 10
br cond, bb, other.succ
bb:
phi [nullptr, pred], ... // other possible preds
load(phi) // UB if we came from pred
other.succ:
// here we know that x <= 10, but this knowledge is lost
// after the branch is turned to unconditional unless we
// preserve it with assume.
```
If we remove the branch basing on knowledge about UB in a successor block,
then the fact that x <= 10 is other.succ might be lost if this condition is
not inferrable from any dominating condition. To preserve this knowledge, we
can add assume intrinsic with (possibly inverted) branch condition.
Patch by Dmitry Bakunevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109054
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Copying IR during linking causes a type mismatch due to the field being missing in IRMover/Valuemapper. Adds the full range of typed attributes including elementtype attribute in the copy functions.
Patch by Chenyang Liu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108796
This patch adds support for unrolling inner loops using epilogue unrolling. The basic issue is that the original latch exit block of the inner loop could be outside the outer loop. When we clone the inner loop and split the latch exit, the cloned blocks need to be in the outer loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108476
This is a followup to D104662 to generate slightly nicer code for
pointer overflow checks. Bypass expandAddToGEP and instead
explicitly generate i8 GEPs. This saves some bitcasts and negates
the value in a more obvious way. In particular, this prevents SCEV
from looking through the umul.with.overflow, same as in the integer
case.
The wrapping-pointer-ni.ll test deserves a comment: Previously,
this generated a typed GEP which used the umulo argument rather
than the multiplication result. This results in more compact IR in
that case, but effectively does the multiplication twice, the
second one is just hidden in the GEP. Reusing the umulo result
seems pretty reasonable to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109093
This is a case I'd missed in 6a8237. The odd bit here is that missing the edge removal update seems to produce MemorySSA which verifies, but is still corrupt in a way which bothers following passes. I wasn't able to reduce a single pass test case, which is why the reported test case is taken as is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109068
We'd special cased this logic to use pointer types for non-integral pointers, but there's no reason we can't do that for all pointer types. Doing it this was has a few advantages:
a) The code itself becomes more straight forward, and easier to test.
b) We avoid introducing ptrtoint into programs which didn't have them in the source.
c) The resulting codegen is easier to analyze and simplify (mostly due to lack of ptrtoint).
Note that there are some test diffs, but a) running them through instcombine helps a ton, and b) there's enough missing obvious transforms on both before and after IR that it's clear this isn't performance sensitive.
This is mostly motivated by cleaning up mentions of non-integrals to have a clearer idea of what we actually need to support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104662
The runtime unroller will try to produce a non-loop if the unroll count is 2 and thus the prolog/epilog loop would only run at most one iteration. The old implementation did this by avoiding loop construction entirely. This patches instead constructs the trivial loop and then explicitly breaks the backedge and simplifies. This does result in some additional code churn when triggered, but a) results in better quality code and b) removes a codepath which didn't work properly for multiple exit epilogs.
One oddity that I want to draw to reviewer attention is that this somehow changes revisit order. The new order looks equivalent to me, but I don't understand how creating and erasing an extra loop here creates this effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108521
Previously, we'd expand *ALL* the SCEV's eagerly, because we needed to
check with `isValidRewrite()`, and discard bad rewrite candidates,
but now that we do not do that, we also don't need to always expand.
In particular, this avoids expanding potentially-huge SCEV's that we
would discard anyways because they are high-cost and we aren't
rewriting aggressively.
`isValidRewrite()` checks that the both the original SCEV,
and the rewrite SCEV have the same base pointer.
I //believe//, after all the recent SCEV improvements,
this invariant is already enforced by SCEV itself.
I originally tried changing it into an assert in D108043,
but that showed that it triggers on e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D108043#2946621,
where SCEV manages to forward the store to load,
test added.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108655
ExposePointerBase() in SCEVExpander implements basically the same
functionality as removePointerBase() in SCEV, so reuse it.
The SCEVExpander code assumes that the pointer operand on adds is
the last one -- I'm not sure that always holds. As such this might
not be strictly NFC.
There can only be one pointer operand in an add expression, and
we have sorted operands to guarantee that it is the first. As
such, the pointer check for other operands is dead code.
Changes since aec08e:
* Adjust placement of a closing brace so that the general case actually runs. Turns out we had *no* coverage of the switch case. I added one in eae90fd.
* Drop .llvm.loop.* metadata from the new branch as there is no longer a loop to annotate.
Original commit message:
This special cases an unconditional latch and a conditional branch latch exit to improve codegen and test readability. I am hoping to reuse this function in the runtime unroll code, but without this change, the test diffs are far too complex to assess.
The Code Extractor does not provide an easy mechanism for determining the
inputs and outputs after extraction has occurred, this patch gives the
ability to pass in empty SetVectors to be filled with the inputs and
outputs if they need to be analyzed.
Added Tests:
- InputOutputMonitoring in unittests/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractorTests.cpp
Reviewers: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106991
Kazu Hirata