Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536
Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde
The requested register class priorities weren't respected
globally. Not sure why this is a target option, and not just the
expected behavior (recently added in
1a6dc92be7). This avoids an allocation
failure when many wide tuple spills are introduced. I think this is a
workaround since I would not expect the allocation priority to be
required, and only a performance hint. The allocator should be smarter
about when only a subregister needs to be spilled and restored.
This does regress a couple of degenerate store stress lit tests which
shouldn't be too important.
the compilation time and there is no case for which we see any improvement in
performance. This patch removes this pass and its associated test cases from
the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101313
Change-Id: I0599169a7609c19a887f8d847a71e664030cc141
If the result of an atomic operation is not used then it can be more
efficient to build a reduction across all lanes instead of a scan. Do
this for GFX10, where the permlanex16 instruction makes it viable. For
wave64 this saves a couple of dpp operations. For wave32 it saves one
readlane (which are generally bad for performance) and one dpp
operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98953
Reuse the existing KnownBits multiplication code to handle the 'extend + multiply + extract high bits' pattern for multiply-high ops.
Noticed while looking at the codegen for D88785 / D98587 - the patch helps division-by-constant expansion code in particular, which suggests that we might have some further KnownBits div/rem cases we could handle - but this was far easier to implement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98857
Add some atomic optimizer tests where there is no use of the result of
the atomic operation, which is a common case in real code. NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98952
The hazard where a VMEM reads an SGPR written by a VALU counts as a data
dependency hazard, so no nops are required on GFX10. Tested with Vulkan
CTS on GFX10.1 and GFX10.3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97926
Prefer to keep uniform (non-divergent) multiplies on the scalar ALU when
possible. This significantly improves some game cases by eliminating
v_readfirstlane instructions when the result feeds into a scalar
operation, like the address calculation for a scalar load or store.
Since isDivergent is only an approximation of whether a value is in
SGPRs, it can potentially regress some situations where a uniform value
ends up in a VGPR. These should be rare in real code, although the test
changes do contain a number of examples.
Most of the test changes are just using s_mul instead of v_mul/mad which
is generally better for both register pressure and latency (at least on
GFX10 where sgpr pressure doesn't affect occupancy and vector ALU
instructions have significantly longer latency than scalar ALU). Some
R600 tests now use MULLO_INT instead of MUL_UINT24.
GlobalISel appears to handle more scenarios in the desirable way,
although it can also be thrown off and fails to select the 24-bit
multiplies in some cases.
Alternative solution considered and rejected was to allow selecting
MUL_[UI]24 to S_MUL_I32. I've rejected this because the definition of
those SD operations works is don't-care on the most significant 8 bits,
and this fact is used in some combines via SimplifyDemandedBits.
Based on a patch by Nicolai Hähnle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97063
Enabled "bound_ctrl:1" and disabled "bound_ctrl:-1" syntax.
Corrected printer to output "bound_ctrl:1" instead of "bound_ctrl:0".
See bug 35397 for detailed issue description.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97048
The AMD GPU SIMemoryLegalizer was using the ordering address space
rather than the instruction address space when determining the
s_waitcnt to generate to ensure that a read-modify-write atomic has
completed. This resulted in additional unnecessary counters being
waited on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96743
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Exec mask manipulation inserted by SIWholeQuadMode barriers to
instruction scheduling. Move the entire pass after the machine
instruction scheduler and make changes so pass is correct for
non-SSA operation. These changes should leave the pass still
usable pre-scheduler, although tests have be updated to reflect
post-scheduler results.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88081
Passes that are run after the post-RA scheduler may insert instructions like
waitcnt which eliminate the need for certain noops. After this patch the
scheduler is still aware of possible latency from hazards but noops will
not be inserted until the dedicated hazard recognizer pass is run.
Depends on D89753.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89754
This is the slowest operation in the already slow pass.
Instead of sorting just put a stall list into an ordered
map.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86253
This was assumed to be a simple move, and interpreting the immediate
modifier operand as a materialized immediate. Apparently the SDWA pass
never produces these, but GlobalISel does emit these for some vector
shuffles.
Enable clausing of memory loads on gfx10 by adding a new pass to insert
the s_clause instructions that mark the start of each hard clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79792
Add a new llvm.amdgcn.ballot intrinsic modeled on the ballot function
in GLSL and other shader languages. It returns a bitfield containing the
result of its boolean argument in all active lanes, and zero in all
inactive lanes.
This is intended to replace the existing llvm.amdgcn.icmp and
llvm.amdgcn.fcmp intrinsics after a suitable transition period.
Use the new intrinsic in the atomic optimizer pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65088
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
This reverts commit fe23ed2c68.
It was never really clear this was responsible for the performance
regressions that caused this to be reverted. It's been a long time,
and we need to have scalar patterns for this to get GlobalISel
working.
We are relying on atrificial DAG edges inserted by the
MemOpClusterMutation to keep loads and stores together in the
post-RA scheduler. This does not work all the time since it
allows to schedule a completely independent instruction in the
middle of the cluster.
Removed the DAG mutation and added pass to bundle already
clustered instructions. These bundles are unpacked before the
memory legalizer because it does not work with bundles but also
because it allows to insert waitcounts in the middle of a store
cluster.
Removing artificial edges also allows a more relaxed scheduling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72737
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
Summary:
- `dead-mi-elimination` assumes MIR in the SSA form and cannot be
arranged after phi elimination or DeSSA. It's enhanced to handle the
dead register definition by skipping use check on it. Once a register
def is `dead`, all its uses, if any, should be `undef`.
- Re-arrange the DIE in RA phase for AMDGPU by placing it directly after
`detect-dead-lanes`.
- Many relevant tests are refined due to different register assignment.
Reviewers: rampitec, qcolombet, sunfish
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72709
This defaults to zero fi operand, but we do not expose it
anyway. Should we expose it later it needs to be added to
the pseudo.
This enables dpp combining on gfx10.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68888
llvm-svn: 374604
Summary:
Add support for gfx10, where all DPP operations are confined to work
within a single row of 16 lanes, and wave32.
Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, jfb, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65644
llvm-svn: 369745
Summary:
Extend the atomic optimizer to handle signed and unsigned max and min
operations, as well as add and subtract.
Reviewers: arsenm, sheredom, critson, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64328
llvm-svn: 366235
Summary:
r363675 changed the exec modification helper function, now called
execMayBeModifiedBeforeUse, so that if no UseMI is specified it checks
all instructions in the basic block, even beyond the last use. That
meant that the DPP combiner no longer worked in any basic block that
ended with a control flow instruction, and in particular it didn't work
on code sequences generated by the atomic optimizer.
Fix it by reinstating the old behaviour but in a new helper function
execMayBeModifiedBeforeAnyUse, and limiting the number of instructions
scanned.
Reviewers: arsenm, vpykhtin
Subscribers: kzhuravl, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64393
llvm-svn: 365910
This change incorporates an effort by Connor Abbot to change how we deal
with WWM operations potentially trashing valid values in inactive lanes.
Previously, the SIFixWWMLiveness pass would work out which registers
were being trashed within WWM regions, and ensure that the register
allocator did not have any values it was depending on resident in those
registers if the WWM section would trash them. This worked perfectly
well, but would cause sometimes severe register pressure when the WWM
section resided before divergent control flow (or at least that is where
I mostly observed it).
This fix instead runs through the WWM sections and pre allocates some
registers for WWM. It then reserves these registers so that the register
allocator cannot use them. This results in a significant register
saving on some WWM shaders I'm working with (130 -> 104 VGPRs, with just
this change!).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59295
llvm-svn: 357400
This commit fixes the DPP sequence in the atomic optimizer (which was
previously missing the row_shr:3 step), and works around a read_register
exec bug by using a ballot instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57737
llvm-svn: 353703
This commit adds a new IR level pass to the AMDGPU backend to perform
atomic optimizations. It works by:
- Running through a function and finding atomicrmw add/sub or uses of
the atomic buffer intrinsics for add/sub.
- If all arguments except the value to be added/subtracted are uniform,
record the value to be optimized.
- Run through the atomic operations we can optimize and, depending on
whether the value is uniform/divergent use wavefront wide operations
(DPP in the divergent case) to calculate the total amount to be
atomically added/subtracted.
- Then let only a single lane of each wavefront perform the atomic
operation, reducing the total number of atomic operations in flight.
- Lastly we recombine the result from the single lane to each lane of
the wavefront, and calculate our individual lanes offset into the
final result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51969
llvm-svn: 343973
Joe Nash