The WebAssembly text and binary formats have different operand orders
for the "type" and "table" fields of call_indirect (and
return_call_indirect). In LLVM we use the binary order for the MCInstr,
but when we produce or consume the text format we should use the text
order. For compilation units targetting WebAssembly 1.0 (without the
reference types feature), we omit the table operand entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97761
This fixes two bugs in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` grouping, created by
D97247. These two bugs are not easy to split into two different CLs,
because tests that fail for one also tend to fail for the other.
- In D97247, when fixing `ExceptionInfo` grouping by taking out
the unwind destination' exception from the unwind src's exception, we
just iterated the BBs in the function order, but this was incorrect;
this changes it to dominator tree preorder. Please refer to the
comments in the code for the reason and an example.
- After this subexception-taking-out fix, there still can be remaining
BBs we have to take out. When Exception B is taken out of Exception A
(because EHPad B is the unwind destination of EHPad A), there can
still be BBs within Exception A that are reachable from Exception B,
which also should be taken out. Please refer to the comments in the
code for more detailed explanation on why this can happen. To make
this possible, this splits `WebAssemblyException::addBlock` into two
parts: adding to a set and adding to a vector. We need to iterate on
BBs within a `WebAssemblyException` to fix this, so we add BBs to sets
first. But we add BBs to vectors later after we fix all incorrectness
because deleting BBs from vectors is expensive. I considered removing
the vector from `WebAssemblyException`, but it was not easy because
this class has to maintain a similar interface with `MachineLoop` to
be wrapped into a single interface `SortRegion`, which is used in
CFGSort.
Other misc. drive-by fixes:
- Make `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` do not even run when wasm EH is not
used or the function doesn't have any EH pads, not to waste time
- Add `LLVM_DEBUG` lines for easy debugging
- Fix `preds` comments in cfg-stackify-eh.ll
- Fix `__cxa_throw`'s signature in cfg-stackify-eh.ll
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13554.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97677
In `LateEHPrepare::addCatchAlls`, the current code tries to get the
iterator's debug info even when it is `MachineBasicBlock::end()`. This
fixes the bug by adding empty debug info instead in that case.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97679
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via TABLE_NUMBER
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
D97247 added the reverse mapping from unwind destination to their
source, but it had a critical bug; sources can be multiple, because
multiple BBs can have a single BB as their unwind destination.
This changes `WasmEHFuncInfo::getUnwindSrc` to `getUnwindSrcs` and makes
it return a vector rather than a single BB. It does not return the const
reference to the existing vector but creates a new vector because
`WasmEHFuncInfo` stores not `BasicBlock*` or `MachineBasicBlock*` but
`PointerUnion` of them. Also I hoped to unify those methods for
`BasicBlock` and `MachineBasicBlock` into one using templates to reduce
duplication, but failed because various usages require `BasicBlock*` to
be `const` but it's hard to make it `const` for `MachineBasicBlock`
usages.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
(More precisely, fixes
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514#issuecomment-784708744)
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97583
This is a case D97178 tried to solve but missed. D97178 could not handle
the case when
multiple consecutive delegates are generated:
- Before:
```
block
br (a)
try
catch
end_try
end_block
<- (a)
```
- After
```
block
br (a)
try
...
try
try
catch
end_try
<- (a)
delegate
delegate
end_block
<- (b)
```
(The `br` should point to (b) now)
D97178 assumed `end_block` exists two BBs later than `end_try`, because
it assumed the order as `end_try` BB -> `delegate` BB -> `end_block` BB.
But it turned out there can be multiple `delegate`s in between. This
patch changes the logic so we just search from `end_try` BB until we
find `end_block`.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13515.
(More precisely, fixes
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13515#issuecomment-784711318.)
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97569
This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.
---
`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.
---
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.
This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```
So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.
But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.
---
CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.
`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.
Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.
One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.
So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)
When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.
---
This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247
In every catchpad except `catch (...)`, we add a call to
`_Unwind_CallPersonality`, which is a wapper to call the personality
function. (In most of other Itanium-based architectures the call is done
from libunwind, but in wasm we don't have the control over the VM.)
Because the personatlity function is called to figure out whether the
current exception is a type we should catch, such as `int` or
`SomeClass&`, `catch (...)` does not need the personality function call.
For the same reason, all cleanuppads don't need it.
When we call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`, we store some necessary info in
a data structure called `__wasm_lpad_context` of type
`_Unwind_LandingPadContext`, which is defined in the wasm's port of
libunwind in Emscripten. Also the personality wrapper function returns
some info (selector and the caught pointer) in that data structure, so
it is used as a medium for communication.
One of the info we need to store is the address for LSDA info for the
current function. `wasm.lsda()` intrinsic returns that address. (This
intrinsic will be lowered to a symbol that points to the LSDA address.)
The simpliest thing is call `wasm.lsda()` every time we need to call
`_Unwind_CallPersonality` and store that info in `__wasm_lpad_context`
data structure. But we tried to be better than that (D77423 and some
more previous CLs), so if catchpad A dominates catchpad B and catchpad A
is not `catch (...)`, we didn't insert `wasm.lsda()` call in catchpad B,
thinking that the LSDA address is the same for a single function and we
already visited catchpad A and `__wasm_lpad_context.lsda` field would
already have that value.
But this can be incorrect if there is a call to another function, which
also can have the personality function and LSDA, between catchpad A and
catchpad B, because `__wasm_lpad_context` is a globally defined
structure and the callee function will overwrite its `lsda` field.
So in this CL we don't try to do any optimizaions on adding
`wasm.lsda()` call; we store the result of `wasm.lsda()` every time we
call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`. We can do some complicated analysis,
like checking if there is a function call between the dominating
catchpad and the current catchpad, but at this time it seems overkill.
This deletes three tests because they all tested `wasm.ldsa()` call
optimization.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13548.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97309
This adds support for serialization of `WasmEHFuncInfo`, in the form of
<Source BB Number, Unwind destination BB number>. To make YAML mapping
work, we needed to make a copy of the existing `SrcToUnwindDest` map
within `yaml::WebAssemblyMachineFunctionInfo`.
It was hard to add EH MIR tests for CFGStackify because `WasmEHFuncInfo`
could not be read from test MIR files. This adds the serialization
support for that to make EH MIR tests easier.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97174
Currently exception.mir runs LateEHPrepare and CFGStackify, but some
tests I'm planning to add shouldn't be run with LateEHPrepare, because
it is convenient to only run CFGStackify when testing things like unwind
mismatches and it is easier to add tests that are in phase right before
CFGStackify. This splits existing exception.mir into two files;
cfg-stackify-eh.mir will only run CFGStackify. Note that
`eh_label_tests` tests both LateEHPrepare and CFGStackify, so it is
still in exception.mir. `rethrow_arg_tests` has been converted to the
post-LateEHPrepare form to be moved into cfg-stackify-eh.mir, like
removing `CATCHRET` and such, because it does not really test anything
in LateEHPrepare.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97175
- Fix `preds` comments
- Delete nonexistent attributes in instructions (They used to exist in
clang-generated files, but I removed most of them to make the tests
tidy. We have only `nounwind` and `noreturn` left here.)
- Add missing `Function Attrs` comments in function declarations
None of these affect test function semantics or test results for now.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97179
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via `TABLE_NUMBER`
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
We abuse the used-in-reloc flag on symbols to indicate which tables
should end up in the symbol table. We do this because unfortunately
older wasm-ld will carp if it see a table symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
Usually `EH_LABEL`s are placed in
- Before an `invoke` (which becomes calls in the backend)
- After an `invoke`
- At the start of an EH pad
I don't know exactly why, but I noticed there are cases of multiple, not
a single, `EH_LABEL` instructions in the beginning of an EH pad. In that
case `global.set` instruction placed to restore `__stack_pointer` ended
up between two `EH_LABEL` instructions before `CATCH`. It should follow
after the `EH_LABEL`s and `CATCH`. This CL fixes that case.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96970
Updating `EHPadStack` with respect to `TRY` and `CATCH` instructions
have to be done after checking all other conditions, not before. Because
we did this before checking other conditions, when we encounter `TRY`
and we want to record the current mismatching range, we already have
popped up the entry from `EHPadStack`, which we need to access to record
the range.
The `baz` call in the added test needs try-delegate because the previous
TRY marker placement for `quux` was placed before `baz`, because `baz`'s
return value was stackified in RegStackify. If this wasn't stackified
this try-delegate is not strictly necessary, but at the moment it is not
easy to identify cases like this. I plan to transfer `nounwind`
attributes from the LLVM IR to prevent cases like this. The call in the
test does not have `unwind` attribute in order to test this bug, but in
many cases of this pattern the previous call has `nounwind` attribute.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96711
D94835 added support for WinEH to export public symbols pointing to
basic blocks which are catchret targets for use with Windows CET.
Wasm currently doesn't support public symbols to non-function code
addresses (they get treated like new functions in asm but then don't
lower to object files correctly).
It created them unconditionally for all catchret targets.
This change disables those symbols unless the exceptionHandlingType
is WinEH (since they aren't used with ExceptionHandling::Wasm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96824
Previously we assumed `rethrow`'s argument was always 0, but it turned
out `rethrow` follows the same rule with `br` or `delegate`:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/pull/137https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/146#issuecomment-777349038
Currently `rethrow`s generated by our backend always rethrow the
exception caught by the innermost enclosing catch, so this adds a
function to compute that and replaces `rethrow`'s argument with its
computed result.
This also renames `EHPadStack` in `InstPrinter` to `TryStack`, because
in CFGStackify we use `EHPadStack` to mean the range between
`catch`~`end`, while in `InstPrinter` we used it to mean the range
between `try`~`catch`, so choosing different names would look clearer.
Doesn't contain any functional changes in `InstPrinter`.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96595
I previously assumed `delegate`'s immediate argument computation
followed a different rule than that of branches, but we agreed to make
it the same
(https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/issues/146). This
removes the need for a separate `DelegateStack` in both CFGStackify and
InstPrinter.
When computing the immediate argument, we use a different function for
`delegate` computation because in MIR `DELEGATE`'s instruction's
destination is the destination catch BB or delegate BB, and when it is a
catch BB, we need an additional step of getting its corresponding `end`
marker.
Reviewed By: tlively, dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96525
Terminate pads, cleanup pads with `__clang_call_terminate` call, have
`catch` instruction in them because `__clang_call_terminate` takes an
exception pointer. But these terminate pads should be reached also in
case of foreign exception. So this pass attaches an additional
`catch_all` BB after every terminate pad BB, with a call to
`std::terminate`.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94050
This fixes unwind destination mismatches caused by 'catch'es, which
occur when a foreign exception is not caught by the nearest `catch` and
the next outer `catch` is not the catch it should unwind to, or the next
unwind destination should be the caller instead. This kind of mismatches
didn't exist in the previous version of the spec, because in the
previous spec `catch` was effectively `catch_all`, catching all
exceptions.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94049
This adds `delegate` instruction and use it to fix unwind destination
mismatches created by marker placement in CFGStackify.
There are two kinds of unwind destination mismatches:
- Mismatches caused by throwing instructions (here we call it "call
unwind mismatches", even though `throw` and `rethrow` can also cause
mismatches)
- Mismatches caused by `catch`es, in case a foreign exception is not
caught by the nearest `catch` and the next outer `catch` is not the
catch it should unwind to. This kind of mismatches didn't exist in the
previous version of the spec, because in the previous spec `catch` was
effectively `catch_all`, catching all exceptions.
This implements routines to fix the first kind of unwind mismatches,
which we call "call unwind mismatches". The second mismatch (catch
unwind mismatches) will be fixed in a later CL.
This also reenables all previously disabled tests in cfg-stackify-eh.ll
and updates FileCheck lines to match the new spec. Two tests were
deleted because they specifically tested the way we fixed unwind
mismatches before using `exnref`s and branches, which we don't do
anymore.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94048
As mentioned in TODO comment, casting double to float causes NaNs to change bits.
To avoid the change, this patch adds support for single-floating-point immediate value on MachineCode.
Patch by Yuta Saito.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77384
This reverts commit 418df4a6ab.
This change broke emscripten tests, I believe because it started
generating 5-byte a wide table index in the call_indirect instruction.
Neither v8 nor wabt seem to be able to handle that. The spec
currently says that this is single 0x0 byte and:
"In future versions of WebAssembly, the zero byte occurring in the
encoding of the call_indirectcall_indirect instruction may be used to
index additional tables."
So we need to revisit this change. For backwards compat I guess
we need to guarantee that __indirect_function_table is always at
address zero. We could also consider making this a single-byte
relocation with and assert if have more than 127 tables (for now).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95005
This patch changes to make call_indirect explicitly refer to the
corresponding function table, residualizing TABLE_NUMBER relocs against
it.
With this change, wasm-ld now sees all references to tables, and can
link multiple tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
If SETO/SETUO aren't legal, they'll be expanded and we'll end up
with 3 comparisons.
SETONE is equivalent to (SETOGT || SETOLT)
so if one of those operations is supported use that expansion. We
don't need both since we can commute the operands to make the other.
SETUEQ can be implemented with !(SETOGT || SETOLT) or (SETULE && SETUGE).
I've only implemented the first because it didn't look like most of the
affected targets had legal SETULE/SETUGE.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, tlively, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94450
After placing markers, we removed some unnecessary branches, but it only
handled the simplest case. This makes more unnecessary branches to be
removed.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94047
This ensures every single terminate pad is a single BB in the form of:
```
%exn = catch $__cpp_exception
call @__clang_call_terminate(%exn)
unreachable
```
This is a preparation for HandleEHTerminatePads pass, which will be
added in a later CL and will run after CFGStackify. That pass duplicates
terminate pads with a `catch_all` instruction, and duplicating it
becomes simpler if we can ensure every terminate pad is a single BB.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94045
This removes unreachable EH pads in LateEHPrepare. This is not for
optimization but for preparation for CFGStackify. In CFGStackify, we
determine where to place `try` marker by computing the nearest common
dominator of all predecessors of an EH pad, but when an EH pad does not
have a predecessor, it becomes tricky. We can insert an empty dummy BB
before the EH pad and place the `try` there, but removing unreachable EH
pads is simpler.
This moves an existing exception label test from eh-label.mir to
exception.mir and adds a new test there.
This also adds some comments to existing methods.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94044
- Updates InstPrinter to handle `catch_all`.
- Makes `rethrow` condition an early exit from the function to make the
rest simpler.
- Unify label and catch counters. They don't need to be counted
separately and this will help `delegate` instruction later.
- Removes `LastSeenEHInst` field. This was first introduced to handle
when there are more than one `catch` blocks per `try`, but this was
not implemented correctly and not being used at the moment anyway.
- Reenables all tests in cfg-stackify-eh.ll that don't deal with unwind
destination mismatches, which will be handled in a later CL.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively, aardappel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94043
This removes `exnref` type and `br_on_exn` instruction. This is
effectively NFC because most uses of these were already removed in the
previous CLs.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94041
This implements basic instructions for the new spec.
- Adds new versions of instructions: `catch`, `catch_all`, and `rethrow`
- Adds support for instruction selection for the new instructions
- `catch` needs a custom routine for the same reason `throw` needs one,
to encode `__cpp_exception` tag symbol.
- Updates `WebAssembly::isCatch` utility function to include `catch_all`
and Change code that compares an instruction's opcode with `catch` to
use that function.
- LateEHPrepare
- Previously in LateEHPrepare we added `catch` instruction to both
`catchpad`s (for user catches) and `cleanuppad`s (for destructors).
In the new version `catch` is generated from `llvm.catch` intrinsic
in instruction selection phase, so we only need to add `catch_all`
to the beginning of cleanup pads.
- `catch` is generated from instruction selection, but we need to
hoist the `catch` instruction to the beginning of every EH pad,
because `catch` can be in the middle of the EH pad or even in a
split BB from it after various code transformations.
- Removes `addExceptionExtraction` function, which was used to
generate `br_on_exn` before.
- CFGStackfiy: Deletes `fixUnwindMismatches` function. Running this
function on the new instruction causes crashes, and the new version
will be added in a later CL, whose contents will be completely
different. So deleting the whole function will make the diff easier to
read.
- Reenables all disabled tests in exception.ll and eh-lsda.ll and a
single basic test in cfg-stackify-eh.ll.
- Updates existing tests to use the new assembly format. And deletes
`br_on_exn` instructions from the tests and FileCheck lines.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94040
Clang generates `wasm.get.exception` and `wasm.get.ehselector`
intrinsics, which respectively return a caught exception value (a
pointer to some C++ exception struct) and a selector (an integer value
that tells which C++ `catch` clause the current exception matches, or
does not match any).
WasmEHPrepare is a pass that does some IR-level preparation before
instruction selection. Previously one of things we did in this pass was
to convert `wasm.get.exception` intrinsic calls to
`wasm.extract.exception` intrinsics. Their semantics were the same
except `wasm.extract.exception` did not have a token argument. We
maintained these two separate intrinsics with the same semantics because
instruction selection couldn't handle token arguments. This
`wasm.extract.exception` intrinsic was later converted to
`extract_exception` instruction in instruction selection, which was a
pseudo instruction to implement `br_on_exn`. Because `br_on_exn` pushed
an extracted value onto the value stack after the `end` instruction of a
`block`, but LLVM does not have a way of modeling that kind of behavior,
so this pseudo instruction was used to pull an extracted value out of
thin air, like this:
```
block $l0
...
br_on_exn $cpp_exception $l0
...
end
extract_exception ;; pushes values onto the stack
```
In the new spec, we don't need this pseudo instruction anymore because
`catch` itself returns a value and we don't have `br_on_exn` anymore. In
the spec `catch` returns multiple values (like `br_on_exn`), but here we
assume it only returns a single i32, which is sufficient to support C++.
So this renames `wasm.get.exception` intrinsic to `wasm.catch`. Because
this CL does not yet contain instruction selection for `wasm.catch`
intrinsic, all `RUN` lines in exception.ll, eh-lsda.ll, and
cfg-stackify-eh.ll, and a single `RUN` line in wasm-eh.cpp (which is an
end-to-end test from C++ source to assembly) fail. So this CL
temporarily disables those `RUN` lines, and for those test files without
any valid remaining `RUN` lines, adds a dummy `RUN` line to make them
pass. These tests will be reenabled in later CLs.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94039
`wasm_rethrow_in_catch` intrinsic and builtin are used in order to
rethrow an exception when the exception is caught but there is no
matching clause within the current `catch`. For example,
```
try {
foo();
} catch (int n) {
...
}
```
If the caught exception does not correspond to C++ `int` type, it should
be rethrown. These intrinsic/builtin were renamed `rethrow_in_catch`
because at the time I thought there would be another intrinsic for C++'s
`throw` keyword, which rethrows an exception. It turned out that `throw`
keyword doesn't require wasm's `rethrow` instruction, so we rename
`rethrow_in_catch` to just `rethrow` here.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94038
cfg-stackify-eh.ll contains many `CHECK` lines specifying label / catch
comments with numbers. These numbers are subject to change every time
any block/loop/try is added in the middle in existing functions or any
other function is added in the middle of the file, generating a large
number of lines in diffs. This change converts them to variables so they
can be more resistent to future changes.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94037
A struct in C passed by value did not get debug information. Such values are currently
lowered to a Wasm local even in -O0 (not to an alloca like on other archs), which becomes
a Target Index operand (TI_LOCAL). The DWARF writing code was not emitting locations
in for TI's specifically if the location is a single range (not a list).
In addition, the ExplicitLocals pass which removes the ARGUMENT pseudo instructions did
not update the associated DBG_VALUEs, and couldn't even find these values since the code
assumed such instructions are adjacent, which is not the case here.
Also fixed asm printing of TIs needed by a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94140
For wasm-ld table linking work to proceed, object files should indicate
if they use an indirect function table. In the future this will be done
by the usual symbols and relocations mechanism, but until that support
lands in the linker, the presence of an `__indirect_function_table` in
the object file's import section shows that the object file needs an
indirect function table.
Prior to https://reviews.llvm.org/D91637, this condition was met by all
object files residualizing an `__indirect_function_table` import.
Since https://reviews.llvm.org/D91637, the intention has been that only
those object files needing an indirect function table would have the
`__indirect_function_table` import. However, we missed the case of
object files which use the table via `call_indirect` but which
themselves do not declare any indirect functions.
This changeset makes it so that when we lower a call to `call_indirect`,
that we ensure that a `__indirect_function_table` symbol is present and
that it will be propagated to the linker.
A followup patch will revise this mechanism to make an explicit link
between `call_indirect` and its associated indirect function table; see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92840
As proposed in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/380. This commit makes
the new instructions available only via clang builtins and LLVM intrinsics to
make their use opt-in while they are still being evaluated for inclusion in the
SIMD proposal.
Depends on D93771.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93775
Current approach doesn't work well in cases when multiple paths are predicted to be "cold". By "cold" paths I mean those containing "unreachable" instruction, call marked with 'cold' attribute and 'unwind' handler of 'invoke' instruction. The issue is that heuristics are applied one by one until the first match and essentially ignores relative hotness/coldness
of other paths.
New approach unifies processing of "cold" paths by assigning predefined absolute weight to each block estimated to be "cold". Then we propagate these weights up/down IR similarly to existing approach. And finally set up edge probabilities based on estimated block weights.
One important difference is how we propagate weight up. Existing approach propagates the same weight to all blocks that are post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. This is useless at least because it always gives 50\50 distribution which is assumed by default anyway. Worse, it causes the algorithm to skip further heuristics and can miss setting more accurate probability. New algorithm propagates the weight up only to the blocks that dominates and post-dominated by a block with some "known" weight. In other words, those blocks that are either always executed or not executed together.
In addition new approach processes loops in an uniform way as well. Essentially loop exit edges are estimated as "cold" paths relative to back edges and should be considered uniformly with other coldness/hotness markers.
Reviewed By: yrouban
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485
The main this this test does is to add the `IsNotPIC` predicate to the
all the atomic instructions pattern that directly refer to
`tglobaladdr`.
This is because in PIC mode we need to generate separate instruction
sequence (either a direct global.get, or __memory_base + offset) for
accessing global addresses.
As part of this change I noticed that many of the `Requires` attributes
added to the instruction in `WebAssemblyInstrAtomics.td` were being
honored. This is because the wrapped in a `let Predicates =
[HasAtomics]` block and it seems that that outer wrapping overrides any
`Requires` on defs within it. As a workaround I removed the outer
`let` and added `HasAtomics` to all the inner `Requires`. I believe
that all the instrucitons that don't have `Requires` explicit bottom out
in `ATOMIC_I` and `ATOMIC_NRI` which have `HasAtomics` so this should
not remove this predicate from any patterns (at least that is the idea).
The alternative to this approach looks like implementing something
like `PredicateControl` in `Mips.td` where we can split the predicates
into groups so they don't clobber each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92744
TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal currently implies dso_local for
Static. Split some tests so that these `external dso_local global` will
align with the Clang behavior.
They are currently implicit because TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal implies
dso_local.
For external data, clang -fno-pic emits the dso_local specifier for ELF and
non-MinGW COFF. Adding explicit dso_local makes these tests in align with the
clang behavior and helps implementing an option to use GOT indirection for
external data access in -fno-pic mode (to avoid copy relocations).
When we produce an YAML output, we also print leading zeroes currently.
An output might look like this:
```
- Name: .dynsym
Type: SHT_DYNSYM
Address: 0x0000000000001000
EntSize: 0x0000000000000018
```
There are probably no reason to print leading zeroes.
It just makes harder to read values. This patch stops printing them.
The output becomes like:
```
- Name: .dynsym
Type: SHT_DYNSYM
Address: 0x1000
EntSize: 0x18
```
This affects obj2yaml mostly, but also dsymutil and llvm-xray tools output.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90930
These relocations represent offsets from the __tls_base symbol.
Previously we were just using normal MEMORY_ADDR relocations and relying
on the linker to select a segment-offset rather and absolute value in
Symbol::getVirtualAddress(). Using an explicit relocation type allows
allow us to clearly distinguish absolute from relative relocations based
on the relocation information alone.
One place this is useful is being able to reject absolute relocation in
the PIC case, but still accept TLS relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91276
When machine instructions are in the form of
```
%0 = CONST_I32 @str
%1 = ADD_I32 %stack.0, %0
%2 = LOAD 0, 0, %1
```
In the `ADD_I32` instruction, it is possible to fold it if `%0` is a
`CONST_I32` from an immediate number. But in this case it is a global
address, so we shouldn't do that. But we haven't checked if the operand
of `ADD` is an immediate so far. This fixes the problem. (The case
applies the same for `ADD_I64` and `CONST_I64` instructions.)
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47944.
Patch by Julien Jorge (jjorge@quarkslab.com)
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90577
This commit removes unused FileCheck prefixes from WebAssembly test files to
avoid causing test failures once FileCheck disallows unused prefixes by default.
See D90281 and the corresponding llvm-dev thread for context.
Reviewed By: aardappel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90416
As proposed in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/376. This commit
implements new builtin functions and intrinsics for these instructions, but does
not yet add them to wasm_simd128.h because they have not yet been merged to the
proposal. These are the first instructions with opcodes greater than 0xff, so
this commit updates the MC layer and disassembler to handle that correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90253
Prototype the newly proposed load_lane instructions, as specified in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/350. Since these instructions are not
available to origin trial users on Chrome stable, make them opt-in by only
selecting them from intrinsics rather than normal ISel patterns. Since we only
need rough prototypes to measure performance right now, this commit does not
implement all the load and store patterns that would be necessary to make full
use of the offset immediate. However, the full suite of offset tests is included
to make it easy to track improvements in the future.
Since these are the first instructions to have a memarg immediate as well as an
additional immediate, the disassembler needed some additional hacks to be able
to parse them correctly. Making that code more principled is left as future
work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89366
This reverts commit 432e4e56d3, which reverted 542523a61a. Two issues from
the original commit have been fixed. First, MSVC does not like when std::array
is initialized with only single braces, so this commit switches to using the
more portable double braces. Second, there was a subtle endianness bug that
prevented the original commit from working correctly on big-endian machines,
which has been fixed by switching to using endianness-agnostic bit twiddling
instead of type punning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88773
In LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj, `longjmp` used to be replaced with
`emscripten_longjmp_jmpbuf(jmp_buf*, i32)`, which will eventually be
lowered to `emscripten_longjmp(i32, i32)`. The reason we used two
different names was because they had different signatures in the IR
pass.
D88697 fixed this by only using `emscripten_longjmp(i32, i32)` and
adding a `ptrtoint` cast to its first argument, so
```
longjmp(buf, 0)
```
becomes
```
emscripten_longjmp((i32)buf, 0)
```
But this assumed all uses of `longjmp` was a direct call to it, which
was not the case. This patch handles indirect uses of `longjmp` by
replacing
```
longjmp
```
with
```
(i32(*)(jmp_buf*, i32))emscripten_longjmp
```
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89032
Renaming for some Emscripten EH functions has so far been done in
wasm-emscripten-finalize tool in Binaryen. But recently we decided to
make a compilation/linking path that does not rely on
wasm-emscripten-finalize for modifications, so here we move that
functionality to LLVM.
Invoke wrappers are generated in LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass, but final
wasm types are not available in the IR pass, we need to rename them at
the end of the pipeline.
This patch also removes uses of `emscripten_longjmp_jmpbuf` in
LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass, replacing that with `emscripten_longjmp`.
`emscripten_longjmp_jmpbuf` is lowered to `emscripten_longjmp`, but
previously we generated calls to `emscripten_longjmp_jmpbuf` in
LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass because it takes `jmp_buf*` instead of `i32`.
But we were able use `ptrtoint` to make it use `emscripten_longjmp`
directly here.
Addresses:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/issues/3043https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/issues/3081
Companions:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/3191https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/12399
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively, sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88697
v128.const was recently implemented in V8, but until it rolls into Chrome
stable, we can't enable it in the WebAssembly backend without breaking origin
trial users. So far we have been lowering build_vectors that would otherwise
have been lowered to v128.const to splats followed by sequences of replace_lane
instructions to initialize each lane individually. That produces large and
inefficient code, so this patch introduces new logic to lower integer vector
constants to a single i64x2.splat where possible, with at most a single
i64x2.replace_lane following it if necessary.
Adapted from a patch authored by @omnisip.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88591
1c5a3c4d38 updated the variables inserted by Emscripten SjLj lowering to be
thread-local, depending on the CoalesceFeaturesAndStripAtomics pass to downgrade
them to normal globals if the target features did not support TLS. However, this
had the unintended side effect of preventing all non-TLS-supporting objects from
being linked into modules with shared memory, because stripping TLS marks an
object as thread-unsafe. This patch fixes the problem by only making the SjLj
lowering variables thread-local if the target machine supports TLS so that it
never introduces new usage of TLS that will be stripped. Since SjLj lowering
works on Modules instead of Functions, this required that the
WebAssemblyTargetMachine have its feature string updated to reflect the
coalesced features collected from all the functions so that a
WebAssemblySubtarget can be created without using any particular function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88323
Emscripten's longjump and exception mechanism depends on two global variables,
`__THREW__` and `__threwValue`, which are changed to be defined as thread-local
in https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/12056. This patch updates
the corresponding code in the WebAssembly backend to properly declare these
globals as thread-local as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88262
When the function return type is non-void and `end` instructions are at
the very end of a function, CFGStackify's `fixEndsAtEndOfFunction`
function fixes the corresponding block/loop/try's type to match the
function's return type. This is applied to consecutive `end` markers at
the end of a function. For example, when the function return type is
`i32`,
```
block i32 ;; return type is fixed to i32
...
loop i32 ;; return type is fixed to i32
...
end_loop
end_block
end_function
```
But try-catch is a little different, because it consists of two parts:
a try part and a catch part, and both parts' return type should satisfy
the function's return type. Which means,
```
try i32 ;; return type is fixed to i32
...
block i32 ;; this should be changed i32 too!
...
end_block
catch
...
end_try
end_function
```
As you can see in this example, it is not sufficient to only `end`
instructions at the end of a function; in case of `try`, we should
check instructions before `catch`es, in case their corresponding `try`'s
type has been fixed.
This changes `fixEndsAtEndOfFunction`'s algorithm to use a worklist
that contains a reverse iterator, each of which is a starting point for
a new backward `end` instruction search.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47413.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87207
Fixes PR47375, in which an assertion was triggering because
WebAssemblyTargetLowering::isVectorLoadExtDesirable was improperly
assuming the use of simple value types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87110
Fixes PR47040, in which an assertion was improperly triggered during
FastISel's address computation. The issue was that an `Address` set to
be relative to the FrameIndex with offset zero was incorrectly
considered to have an unset base. When the left hand side of an add
set the Address to be 0 off the FrameIndex, the right side would not
detect that the Address base had already been set and could try to set
the Address to be relative to a register instead, triggering an
assertion.
This patch fixes the issue by explicitly tracking whether an `Address`
has been set rather than interpreting an offset of zero to mean the
`Address` has not been set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85581
Specified in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/237, these
instructions load the first vector lane from memory and zero the other
lanes. Since these instructions are not officially part of the SIMD
proposal, they are only available on an opt-in basis via LLVM
intrinsics and clang builtin functions. If these instructions are
merged to the proposal, this implementation will change so that the
instructions will be generated from normal IR. At that point the
intrinsics and builtin functions would be removed.
This PR also changes the opcodes for the experimental f32x4.qfm{a,s}
instructions because their opcodes conflicted with those of the
v128.load{32,64}_zero instructions. The new opcodes were chosen to
match those used in V8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84820
LLVM selection dag assumes "switch" indices are pointer sized, which causes problems for our 32-bit br_table. The new function ensures 32-bit operands don't get unnecessarily extended, and 64-bit operands get truncated.
Note that the changes to the existing test test exactly that: the addition of -NEXT in 2 places ensures no extension is inserted (which the test previously ignored) and that the wrap is present (previously omitted in wasm64 mode).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84705
When it was first created, CFGSort only made sure BBs in each
`MachineLoop` are sorted together. After we added exception support,
CFGSort now also sorts BBs in each `WebAssemblyException`, which
represents a `catch` block, together, and
`Region` class was introduced to be a thin wrapper for both
`MachineLoop` and `WebAssemblyException`.
But how we compute those loops and exceptions is different.
`MachineLoopInfo` is constructed using the standard loop computation
algorithm in LLVM; the definition of loop is "a set of BBs that are
dominated by a loop header and have a path back to the loop header". So
even if some BBs are semantically contained by a loop in the original
program, or in other words dominated by a loop header, if they don't
have a path back to the loop header, they are not considered a part of
the loop. For example, if a BB is dominated by a loop header but
contains `call abort()` or `rethrow`, it wouldn't have a path back to
the header, so it is not included in the loop.
But `WebAssemblyException` is wasm-specific data structure, and its
algorithm is simple: a `WebAssemblyException` consists of an EH pad and
all BBs dominated by the EH pad. So this scenario is possible: (This is
also the situation in the newly added test in cfg-stackify-eh.ll)
```
Loop L: header, A, ehpad, latch
Exception E: ehpad, latch, B
```
(B contains `abort()`, so it does not have a path back to the loop
header, so it is not included in L.)
And it is sorted in this order:
```
header
A
ehpad
latch
B
```
And when CFGStackify places `end_loop` or `end_try` markers, it
previously used `WebAssembly::getBottom()`, which returns the latest BB
in the sorted order, and placed the marker there. So in this case the
marker placements will be like this:
```
loop
header
try
A
catch
ehpad
latch
end_loop <-- misplaced!
B
end_try
```
in which nesting between the loop and the exception is not correct.
`end_loop` marker has to be placed after `B`, and also after `end_try`.
Maybe the fundamental way to solve this problem is to come up with our
own algorithm for computing loop region too, in which we include all BBs
dominated by a loop header in a loop. But this takes a lot more effort.
The only thing we need to fix is actually, `getBottom()`. If we make it
return the right BB, which means in case of a loop, the latest BB of the
loop itself and all exceptions contained in there, we are good.
This renames `Region` and `RegionInfo` to `SortRegion` and
`SortRegionInfo` and extracts them into their own file. And add
`getBottom` to `SortRegionInfo` class, from which it can access
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo`, so that it can compute a correct bottom
block for loops.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84724
Instead, pattern match extends of extract_subvectors to generate
widening operations. Since extract_subvector is not a legal node, this
is implemented via a custom combine that recognizes extract_subvector
nodes before they are legalized. The combine produces custom ISD nodes
that are later pattern matched directly, just like the intrinsic was.
Also removes the clang builtins for these operations since the
instructions can now be generated from portable code sequences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84556
Rather than expanding truncating stores so that vectors are stored one
lane at a time, lower them to a sequence of instructions using
narrowing operations instead, when possible. Since the narrowing
operations have saturating semantics, but truncating stores require
truncation, mask the stored value to manually truncate it before
narrowing. Also, since narrowing is a binary operation, pass in the
original vector as the unused second argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84377
These tests were previously duplicates of the
unfolded_gep_negative_offset tests, and this change updates them to
test what they were meant to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84365
Implementing new functionality tested in this file requires adding new
tests for many IR addressing patterns, which can be a large
maintenance burden. This patch makes adding tests easier by switching
to using autogenerated checks. This patch also removes the testing
mode that has simd128 disabled because it would produce very large
checks and is not particularly interesting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84288
Accounting for the fact that Wasm function indices are 32-bit, but in wasm64 we want uniform 64-bit pointers.
Includes reloc types for 64-bit table indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83729
Although the SIMD spec proposal does not specifically include a
select instruction, the select instruction in MVP WebAssembly is
polymorphic over the selected types, so it is able to work on v128
values when they are enabled. This patch introduces a new variant of
the select instruction for each legal vector type. Additional ISel
patterns are adapted from the SELECT_I32 and SELECT_I64 patterns.
Depends on D83736.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83737
Updating the simd-select.ll tests manually with consistent named
regexps for the register numbers was taking more time than it was
worth, so this patch updates that test file to have autogenerated
output. This is not a significant readability regression because the
tests in that file are all very small.
Depends on D83734.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83736
We were previously expanding vselect and matching on the expansion to
generate bitselects, but in some cases the expansion would be further
combined and a bitselect would not get generated. This patch improves
codegen in those cases by legalizing vselect and lowering it to
v128.bitselect. The old pattern that matches the expansion is still
useful for lowering IR that already uses the expansion rather than a
select operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83734
The existing code already considered this case. Unfortunately a typo in
the condition prevents it from triggering. Also the existing code, had
it run, forgot to do the folding.
This fixes PR42876.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65802
In BUILD_VECTOR lowering, we used to generally prefer using splats
over v128.const instructions because v128.const has a very large
encoding. However, in d5b7a4e2e8 we switched to preferring consts
because they are expected to be more efficient in engines. This patch
updates the ISel patterns to match this current preference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83581
This patch builds on 0d7286a652 by simplifying the code for detecting
splat values and adding new tests demonstrating the lowering of
splatted absolute value shift amounts, which are common in code
generated by Halide. The lowering is very bad right now, but
subsequent patches will improve it considerably. The tests will be
useful for evaluating the improvements in those patches.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83493
`__stack_chk_fail` does not return, but `unreachable` was not generated
following `call __stack_chk_fail`. This had a possibility to generate an
invalid binary for functions with a return type, because
`__stack_chk_fail`'s return type is void and `call __stack_chk_fail` can
be the last instruction in the function whose return type is non-void.
Generating `unreachable` after it makes sure CFGStackify's
`fixEndsAtEndOfFunction` handles it correctly.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83277
Since WebAssembly's vector shift instructions take a scalar shift
amount rather than a vector shift amount, we have to check in ISel
that the vector shift amount is a splat. Previously, we were checking
explicitly for splat BUILD_VECTOR nodes, but this change uses the
standard utilities for detecting splat values that can handle more
complex splat patterns. Since the C++ ISel lowering is now more
general than the ISel patterns, this change also simplifies shift
lowering by using the C++ lowering for all SIMD shifts rather than
mixing C++ and normal pattern-based lowering.
This change improves ISel for shifts to the point that the
simd-shift-unroll.ll regression test no longer tests the code path it
was originally meant to test. The bug corresponding to that regression
test is no longer reproducible with its original reported reproducer,
so rather than try to fix the regression test, this change just
removes it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83278
This covers both the existing memory functions as well as the new bulk memory proposal.
Added new test files since changes where also required in the inputs.
Also removes unused init/drop intrinsics rather than trying to make them work for 64-bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82821
Summary:
Since the br_table instruction takes an i32, switches over i64s (and
larger integers) must use the i32.wrap_i64 instruction to truncate the
table index. This truncation makes numbers just over 2^32
indistinguishable from small numbers, so it was a miscompilation to
omit the range check preceding these br_tables. This change fixes the
problem by skipping the "fixing" of the br_table when the range check
is an i64 instruction.
Fixes PR46447.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, kripken
Reviewed By: kripken
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83017
When created in RegStackify pass, `TEE` has two destinations, where
op0 is stackified and op1 is not. But it is possible that
op0 becomes unstackified in `fixUnwindMismatches` function in
CFGStackify pass when a nested try-catch-end is introduced, violating
the invariant of `TEE`s destinations.
In this case we convert the `TEE` into two `COPY`s, which will
eventually be resolved in ExplicitLocals.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81851
Summary:
This commit fixes a bug in the FixBrTables pass in which an
unconditional branch from the switch header block to the jump table
block was not removed before the blocks were combined. The result was
an invalid CFG in the MachineFunction. This commit also switches from
using bespoke branch analysis and deletion code to using the standard
utilities for the same.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81909
Context: https://github.com/WebAssembly/memory64/blob/master/proposals/memory64/Overview.md
This is just a first step, adding the new instruction variants while keeping the existing 32-bit functionality working.
Some of the basic load/store tests have new wasm64 versions that show that the basics of the target are working.
Further features need implementation, but these will be added in followups to keep things reviewable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80769
Summary:
After their range checks were removed in 7f50c15be5, br_tables
started being duplicated into their predecessors by tail
folding. Unfortunately, when the br_tables were in loops this
transformation introduced bad irreducible control flow which was later
expanded into even more br_tables. This commit abuses the
`isNotDuplicable` property to prevent this irreducible control flow
from being introduced. This change saves a few dozen bytes of code
size and has a negligible affect on performance for most of the large
Emscripten benchmarks, but can improve performance significantly on
microbenchmarks of switches in loops.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81628
Summary:
The natural alignments for extending and splatting loads had not
previously been tested. It is good to have them tested because they
are non-obvious details in the SIMD spec proposal.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81303
Summary:
As specified in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/232. These
instructions are implemented as LLVM intrinsics for now rather than
normal ISel patterns to make these instructions opt-in. Once the
instructions are merged to the spec proposal, the intrinsics will be
replaced with proper ISel patterns.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81222
There's two properties we want to verify:
1. That the successors returned by analyzeBranch are in the CFG
successor list, and
2. That there are no extraneous successors are in the CFG successor
list.
The previous implementation mostly accomplished this, but in a very
convoluted manner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79793
Summary:
Unlike normal traps, debug traps are allowed to return and can have
additional instructions in the same basic block. Without explicit
backend support for debug traps, they are lowered in ISel as normal
traps. Since normal traps are lowered in the WebAssembly backend to
the UNREACHABLE instruction, which is a terminator, using debug traps
could lead to invalid MBBs when there are additional instructions
after the trap. This patch fixes the issue by lowering debug traps to
a new version of the UNREACHABLE instruction, DEBUG_UNREACHABLE, that
is not a terminator.
An alternative approach would have been to make UNREACHABLE not a
terminator, but that breaks a large number of tests. In particular, it
would require removing the traps inserted after noreturn calls to
@llvm.wasm.throw because otherwise the terminator throw would be
followed by a non-terminator UNREACHABLE and we would be back to
having invalid MBBs. Overall the approach in this patch seems simpler.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81055
Summary:
The code previously assumed that the index of a vector extract was
constant, but this was not always true. This patch fixes the problem
by bailing out of the lowering if the index is nonconstant and also
replaces `static_cast`s in the lowering function with `cast`s because
the latter contain type-checking asserts that would make similar
issues easier to find and debug.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81025
This reverts commit 755a895915.
Although I was not able to reproduce any test failures locally,
aheejin was able to reproduce them and found a fix, applied here.
Summary:
Jump tables for most targets cannot handle out of range indices by
themselves, so LLVM emits range checks to guard the jump
tables. WebAssembly, on the other hand, implements jump tables using
the br_table instruction, which takes a default branch target as an
operand, making the range checks redundant. This patch introduces a
new MachineFunction pass in the WebAssembly backend to find and
eliminate the redundant range checks.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80863
Summary:
`getMatchingEHPad()` in LateEHPrepare is a function to find the nearest
EH pad that dominates the given instruction. This intends to be
lightweight so it does not use full WebAssemblyException scope analysis
or dominator analysis. It simply does backward BFS to its predecessors
and stops at the first EH pad each search path encounters. All search
should end up at the same EH pad, and if not, it returns null.
But it didn't take into account that when there are inner scopes within
the current scope, some path in BFS can hit an inner EH pad first. For
example, in the given diagram, `Inst` belongs to the outer scope and
`getMathingEHPad()` should return 'EHPad 1', but some search path can go
into the inner scope and end up with 'EHPad 2'. The search will return
null because different paths end up with different EH pads.
```
--- EHPad 1 ---
| - EHPad 2 - |
| | | |
| ----------- |
| Inst |
---------------
```
So far this was OK because we haven't tested a case in which a given
instruction is far from its EH pad. Also, this bug does not happen when
the inner EH scope is a cleanup scope, because a cleanup scope ends with
a `cleanupret` whose successor is an EH pad, so the search encounters
that EH pad first before going into the child scope. But this can happen
when the child scope is a catch scope that ends with `catchret`. So this
patch, when doing backward BFS, does not search predecessors that ends
with `catchret`. Because `catchret`s are replaced with `br`s during this
pass, this records BBs that have `catchret`s in the beginning, before
doing any other transformations.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80571
Summary:
One of the things `removeUnnecessaryInstrs()` in CFGStackify does is to
remove an unnecessary unconditinal branch before an EH pad. When there
is an unconditional branch right before a catch instruction and it
branches to the end of `end_try` marker, we don't need the branch,
because it there is no exception, the control flow transfers to
that point anyway.
```
bb0:
try
...
br bb2 <- Not necessary
bb1:
catch
...
bb2:
end
```
This applies when we have a conditional branch followed by an
unconditional one, in which case we should only remove the unconditional
branch. For example:
```
bb0:
try
...
br_if someplace_else
br bb2 <- Not necessary
bb1:
catch
...
bb2:
end
```
But `TargetInstrInfo::removeBranch` we used removed all existing
branches when there are multiple ones. This patch fixes it by only
deleting the last (= unconditional) branch manually.
Also fixes some `preds` comments in the test file.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80572
Summary:
The code previously assumed the source of the bitcast in the combined
pattern was a vector type, but this is not always true. This patch
adds a check to avoid an assertion failure in that case.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80164
Summary:
This reflects changes in the spec proposal made since basic arithmetic
was first implemented.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80174
Summary:
This new custom DAG combine fixes a codegen issue with the
wasm_simd128.h intrinsics. Clang lowers the
return (v128_t)(__f32x4){__a, __a, __a, __a};
body of f32x4_splat to a splat shuffle of a bitcasted vector, as seen
in the new simd-shuffle-bitcast.ll test. The bitcast interfered with
the target-independent DAG combine that combines splat shuffles into
BUILD_VECTOR nodes, so this patch introduces a new custom DAG combine
to hoist the bitcast out of the shuffle, allowing the
target-independent combine to work as intended.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80021
Summary:
Move instructions that have recently been implemented in V8 from the
`unimplemented-simd128` target feature to the `simd128` target
feature. The updated instructions match the update at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/223.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79973
Summary:
As proposed in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/122. Since
these instructions are not yet merged to the SIMD spec proposal, this
patch makes them entirely opt-in by surfacing them only through LLVM
intrinsics and clang builtins. If these instructions are made
official, these intrinsics and builtins should be replaced with simple
instruction patterns.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79742
Summary:
Although using `__builtin_shufflevector` and the `shufflevector`
instruction works fine, they are not opaque to the optimizer. As a
result, DAGCombine can potentially reduce the number of shuffles and
change the shuffle masks. This is unexpected behavior for users of the
WebAssembly SIMD intrinsics who have crafted their shuffles to
optimize the code generated by engines. This patch solves the problem
by adding a new shuffle intrinsic that is opaque to the optimizers in
line with the decision of the WebAssembly SIMD contributors at
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/issues/196#issuecomment-622494748. In
the future we may implement custom DAG combines to properly optimize
shuffles and replace this solution.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66983
Summary:
The WebAssembly backend automatically lowers atomic operations and TLS
to nonatomic operations and non-TLS data when either are present and
the atomics or bulk-memory features are not present, respectively. The
resulting object is no longer thread-safe, so the linker has to be
told not to allow it to be linked into a module with shared
memory. This was previously done by disallowing the 'atomics' feature,
which prevented any objct with its atomic operations or TLS removed
from being linked with any object containing atomics or TLS, and
therefore preventing it from being linked into a module with shared
memory since shared memory requires atomics.
However, as of https://github.com/WebAssembly/threads/issues/144, the
validation rules are relaxed to allow atomic operations to validate
with unshared memories, which makes it perfectly safe to link an
object with stripped atomics and TLS with another object that still
contains TLS and atomics as long as the resulting module has an
unshared memory. To allow this kind of link, this patch disallows a
pseudo-feature 'shared-mem' rather than 'atomics' to communicate to
the linker that the object is not thread-safe. This means that the
'atomics' feature is available to accurately reflect whether or not an
object has atomics enabled.
As a drive-by tweak, this change also requires that bulk-memory be
enabled in addition to atomics in order to use shared memory. This is
because initializing shared memories requires bulk-memory operations.
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79542
Summary:
This fixes a few things that are connected. It is very hard to provide
an independent test case for each of those fixes, because they are
interconnected and sometimes one masks another. The provided test case
triggers some of those bugs below but not all.
---
1. Background:
`placeBlockMarker` takes a BB, and if the BB is a destination of some
branch, it places `end_block` marker there, and computes the nearest
common dominator of all predecessors (what we call 'header') and places
a `block` marker there.
When we first place markers, we traverse BBs from top to bottom. For
example, when there are 5 BBs A, B, C, D, and E and B, D, and E are
branch destinations, if mark the BB given to `placeBlockMarker` with `*`
and draw a rectangle representing the border of `block` and `end_block`
markers, the process is going to look like
```
-------
----- |-----|
--- |---| ||---||
|A| ||A|| |||A|||
--- --> |---| --> ||---||
*B | B | || B ||
C | C | || C ||
D ----- |-----|
E *D | D |
E -------
*E
```
which means when we first place markers, we go from inner to outer
scopes. So when we place a `block` marker, if the header already
contains other `block` or `try` marker, it has to belong to an inner
scope, so the existing `block`/`try` markers should go _after_ the new
marker. This was the assumption we had.
But after placing all markers we run `fixUnwindMismatches` function.
There we do some control flow transformation and create some branches,
and we call `placeBlockMarker` again to place `block`/`end_block`
markers for those newly created branches. We can't assume that we are
traversing branch destination BBs from top to bottom now because we are
basically inserting some new markers in the middle of existing markers.
Fix:
In `placeBlockMarker`, we don't have the assumption that the BB given is
in the order of top to bottom, and when placing `block` markers,
calculates whether existing `block` or `try` markers are inner or
outer scopes with respect to the current scope.
---
2. Background:
In `fixUnwindMismatches`, when there is a call whose correct unwind
destination mismatches the current destination after initially placing
`try` markers, we wrap that with a new nested `try`/`catch`/`end` and
jump to the correct handler within the new `catch`. The correct handler
code is split as a separate BB from its original EH pad so it can be
branched to. Here's an example:
- Before
```
mbb:
call @foo <- Unwind destination mismatch!
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
[handler code]
```
- After
```
mbb:
try (new)
call @foo
nested-ehpad: (new)
catch (new)
local.set n / drop (new)
br %handleri (new)
nested-end: (new)
end_try (new)
wrong-ehpad:
catch
...
cont:
end_try
...
correct-ehpad:
catch
local.set n / drop (new)
handler: (new)
end_try
[handler code]
```
Note that after this transformation, it is possible there are no calls
to actually unwind to `correct-ehpad` here. `call @foo` now
branches to `handler`, and there can be no other calls to unwind to
`correct-ehpad`. In this case `correct-ehpad` does not have any
predecessors anymore.
This can cause a bug in `placeBlockMarker`, because we may need to place
`end_block` marker in `handler`, and `placeBlockMarker` computes the
nearest common dominator of all predecessors. If one of `handler`'s
predecessor (here `correct-ehpad`) does not have any predecessors, i.e.,
no way of reaching it, we cannot correctly compute the common dominator
of predecessors of `handler`, and end up placing no `block`/`end`
markers. This bug actually sometimes masks the bug 1.
Fix:
When we have an EH pad that does not have any predecessors after this
transformation, deletes all its successors, so that its successors don't
have any dangling predecessors.
---
3. Background:
Actually the `handler` BB in the example shown in bug 2 doesn't need
`end_block` marker, despite it being a new branch destination, because
it already has `end_try` marker which can serve the same purpose. I just
put that example there for an illustration purpose. There is a case we
actually need to place `end_block` marker: when the branch dest is the
appendix BB. The appendix BB is created when there is a call that is
supposed to unwind to the caller ends up unwinding to a wrong EH pad. In
this case we also wrap the call with a nested `try`/`catch`/`end`,
create an 'appendix' BB at the very end of the function, and branch to
that BB, where we rethrow the exception to the caller.
Fix:
When we don't actually need to place block markers, we don't.
---
4. In case we fall through to the continuation BB after the catch block,
after extracting handler code in `fixUnwindMismatches` (refer to bug 2
for an example), we now have to add a branch to it to bypass the
handler.
- Before
```
try
...
(falls through to 'cont')
catch
handler body
end
<-- cont
```
- After
```
try
...
br %cont (new)
catch
end
handler body
<-- cont
```
The problem is, we haven't been placing a new `end_block` marker in the
`cont` BB in this case. We should, and this fixes it. But it is hard to
provide a test case that triggers this bug, because the current
compilation pipeline from .ll to .s does not generate this kind of code;
we always have a `br` after `invoke`. But code without `br` is still
valid, and we can have that kind of code if we have some pipeline
changes or optimizations later. Even mir test cases cannot trigger this
part for now, because we don't encode auxiliary EH-related data
structures (such as `WasmEHFuncInfo`) in mir now. Those functionalities
can be added later, but I don't think we should block this fix on that.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79324
We allocated a suitably aligned frame index so we know that all the values
have ABI alignment.
For MIPS this avoids using pair of lwl + lwr instructions instead of a
single lw. I found this when compiling CHERI pure capability code where
we can't use the lwl/lwr unaligned loads/stores and and were to falling
back to a byte load + shift + or sequence.
This should save a few instructions for MIPS and possibly other backends
that don't have fast unaligned loads/stores.
It also improves code generation for CodeGen/X86/pr34653.ll and
CodeGen/WebAssembly/offset.ll since they can now use aligned loads.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78999
Summary:
As described in https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/209. This is
the final reorganization of the SIMD opcode space before
standardization. It has been landed in concert with corresponding
changes in other projects in the WebAssembly SIMD ecosystem.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79224
Summary:
In CFGStackify, `fixUnwindMismatches` function fixes unwind destination
mismatches created by `try` marker placement. For example,
```
try
...
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
When `call @qux` is supposed to throw to the caller, it is possible that
it is wrapped inside a `catch` so in case it throws it ends up unwinding
there incorrectly. (Also it is possible `call @qux` is supposed to
unwind to another `catch` within the same function.)
To fix this, we wrap this inner `call @qux` with a nested
`try`-`catch`-`end` sequence, and within the nested `catch` body, branch
to the right destination:
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; new nested try
call @qux
catch ;; new nested catch
local.set n ;; store exnref to a local
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n ;; retrieve exnref back
rethrow ;; rethrow to the caller
```
The previous algorithm placed the nested `try` right before the `call`.
But it is possible that there are stackified instructions before the
call from which the call takes arguments.
```
try
...
i32.const 5
call @qux ;; This should throw to the caller!
catch
...
end
```
In this case we have to place `try` before those stackified
instructions.
```
block $l0
try
...
try ;; this should go *before* 'i32.const 5'
i32.const 5
call @qux
catch
local.set n
br $l0
end
catch
...
end
end
local.get n
rethrow
```
We correctly handle this in the first normal `try` placement phase
(`placeTryMarker` function), but failed to handle this in this
`fixUnwindMismatches`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77950
Summary:
D74269 added debug info to newly created instructions, including calls
to `malloc` and `free`, by taking debug info from existing instructions
around, whose debug info may or may not be empty.
But there are cases debug info is required by the IR verifier: when both
the caller and the callee functions have DISubprograms, meaning we
already have declarations to `malloc` or `free` with a DISubprogram
attached, newly created calls to `malloc` and `free` should have
non-empty debug info. This patch creates a non-empty dummy debug info in
this case to those calls to make the IR verifier pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45461.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: aprantl, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77784
Summary:
When we insert a call to the personality function wrapper
(`_Unwind_CallPersonality`) for a catch pad, we store some necessary
info in `__wasm_lpad_context` struct and pass it. One of the info is the
LSDA address for the function. For this, we insert a call to
`wasm.lsda()`, which will be lowered down to the address of LSDA, and
store it in a field in `__wasm_lpad_context`.
There are exceptions to this personality call insertion: catchpads for
`catch (...)` and cleanuppads (for destructors) don't need personality
function calls, because we don't need to figure out whether the current
exception should be caught or not. (They always should.)
There was a little optimization to `wasm.lsda()` call insertion. Because
the LSDA address is the same throughout a function, we don't need to
insert a store of `wasm.lsda()` return value in every catchpad. For
example:
```
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are inserted here, like, in
// pseudocode,
// %lsda = wasm.lsda();
// store %lsda to a field in __wasm_lpad_context
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We don't need to insert the wasm.lsda() and store again, because
// to arrive here, we have already stored the LSDA address to
// __wasm_lpad_context in the outer catch.
}
}
```
So the previous algorithm checked if the current catch has a parent EH
pad, we didn't insert a call to `wasm.lsda()` and its store.
But this was incorrect, because what if the outer catch is `catch (...)`
or a cleanuppad?
```
try {
foo();
} catch (...) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are NOT inserted here
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We need wasm.lsda() here!
}
}
```
In this case we need to insert `wasm.lsda()` in the inner catchpad,
because the outer catchpad does not have one.
To minimize the number of inserted `wasm.lsda()` calls and stores, we
need a way to figure out whether we have encountered `wasm.lsda()` call
in any of EH pads that dominates the current EH pad. To figure that
out, we now visit EH pads in BFS order in the dominator tree so that we
visit parent BBs first before visiting its child BBs in the domtree.
We keep a set named `ExecutedLSDA`, which basically means "Do we have
`wasm.lsda()` either in the current EH pad or any of its parent EH
pads in the dominator tree?". This is to prevent scanning the domtree up
to the root in the worst case every time we examine an EH pad: each EH
pad only needs to examine its immediate parent EH pad.
- If any of its parent EH pads in the domtree has `wasm.lsda()`, this
means we don't need `wasm.lsda()` in the current EH pad. We also insert
the current EH pad in `ExecutedLSDA` set.
- If none of its parent EH pad has `wasm.lsda()`
- If the current EH pad is a `catch (...)` or a cleanuppad, done.
- If the current EH pad is neither a `catch (...)` nor a cleanuppad,
add `wasm.lsda()` and the store in the current EH pad, and add the
current EH pad to `ExecutedLSDA` set.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77423
This means the linker will be expect them be undefined at link time an
will generate imports from the `env` module rather than reporting
undefined externals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77192
Summary:
The previous code for determining the innermost region in CFGSort was
not correct. We determine subregion relationship by domination of their
headers, i.e., if region A's header dominates region B's header, B is a
subregion of A. Previously we assumed that if a BB belongs to both a
loop and an exception, the region with fewer number of BBs is the
innermost one. This may not be true, because while WebAssemblyException
contains BBs in all its subregions (loops or exceptions), MachineLoop
may not, because MachineLoop does not contain BBs that don't have a path
to its header even if they are dominated by its header.
Loop header <---|
| |
Exception header |
| \ |
A B |
| \ |
| C |
| |
Loop latch |
| |
-------------|
For example, in this CFG, the loop does not contain B and C, because
they don't have a path back to the loops header. But for CFGSort we
consider the exception here belongs to the loop and the exception should
be a subregion of the loop and scheduled together.
So here we should use `WE->contains(ML->getHeader())` (but not
`ML->contains(WE->getHeader())`, for the stated region above).
This also fixes some comments and deletes `Regions` vector in
`RegionInfo` class, which was not used anywere.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77181
Fix the LowerGlobalDtors pass to run destructors in the same order as the
regular LLVM destructor lowering -- in reverse order. Adjacent
destructors with the same associated object are grouped, but destructors
are not reordered based on associated objects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70685
Summary:
Swift ABI is based on basic C ABI described here https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/blob/master/BasicCABI.md
Swift Calling Convention on WebAssembly is a little deffer from swiftcc
on another architectures.
On non WebAssembly arch, swiftcc accepts extra parameters that are
attributed with swifterror or swiftself by caller. Even if callee
doesn't have these parameters, the invocation succeed ignoring extra
parameters.
But WebAssembly strictly checks that callee and caller signatures are
same. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/Semantics.md#calls
So at WebAssembly level, all swiftcc functions end up extra arguments
and all function definitions and invocations explicitly have additional
parameters to fill swifterror and swiftself.
This patch support signature difference for swiftself and swifterror cc
is swiftcc.
e.g.
```
declare swiftcc void @foo(i32, i32)
@data = global i8* bitcast (void (i32, i32)* @foo to i8*)
define swiftcc void @bar() {
%1 = load i8*, i8** @data
%2 = bitcast i8* %1 to void (i32, i32, i32)*
call swiftcc void %2(i32 1, i32 2, i32 swiftself 3)
ret void
}
```
For swiftcc, emit additional swiftself and swifterror parameters
if there aren't while lowering. These additional parameters are added
for both callee and caller.
They are necessary to match callee and caller signature for direct and
indirect function call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76049
Summary:
These were merged to the SIMD proposal in
https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/pull/128.
Depends on D76397 to avoid merge conflicts.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76399
Summary:
Using the default DAG.UnrollVectorOp on v16i8 and v8i16 vectors
results in i8 or i16 nodes being inserted into the SelectionDAG. Since
those are illegal types, this causes a legalization assertion failure
for some code patterns, as uncovered by PR45178. This change unrolls
shifts manually to avoid this issue by adding and using a new optional
EVT argument to DAG.ExtractVectorElements to control the type of the
extract_element nodes.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76043
Summary:
Removes patterns that were not doing useful work, changes the
default extract instructions to be the unsigned versions now that
they are enabled by default, fixes PR44988, and adds tests for
sext_inreg lowering.
Reviewers: aheejin
Reviewed By: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75005
Summary:
Extends the multivalue call infrastructure to tail calls, removes all
legacy calls specialized for particular result types, and removes the
CallIndirectFixup pass, since all indirect call arguments are now
fixed up directly in the post-insertion hook.
In order to keep supporting pretty-printed defs and uses in test
expectations, MCInstLower now inserts an immediate containing the
number of defs for each call and call_indirect. The InstPrinter is
updated to query this immediate if it is present and determine which
MCOperands are defs and uses accordingly.
Depends on D72902.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192
Summary:
There is still room for improvement in the handling of multivalue
nodes in both passes, but the current algorithm is at least correct
and optimizes some simpler cases. In order to make future
optimizations of these passes easier and build confidence that the
current algorithms are correct, this CL also adds a script that
automatically and exhaustively generates interesting multivalue test
cases.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72902
Summary:
Unlike normal calls, call_indirects have immediate arguments that
caused a MachineVerifier failure without a small tweak to loosen the
verifier's requirements for variadicOpsAreDefs instructions.
One nice thing about the new call_indirects is that they do not need
to participate in the PCALL_INDIRECT mechanism because their post-isel
hook handles moving the function pointer argument and adding the flags
and typeindex arguments itself.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74191
This reverts commit 649aba93a2, now that
the approach started there has been shown to be workable in the patch
series culminating in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
Summary:
Backends should fold the subtraction into the comparison, but not all
seem to. Moreover, on targets where pointers are not integers, such as
CHERI, an integer subtraction is not appropriate. Instead we should just
compare the two pointers directly, as this should work everywhere and
potentially generate more efficient code.
Reviewers: bogner, lebedev.ri, efriedma, t.p.northover, uweigand, sunfish
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74454
Summary:
Also make return calls terminator instructions so epilogues are
inserted before them rather than after them. Together, these changes
make WebAssembly's tail call optimization more stack-safe.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73943
Summary:
Fixes a crash in the backend where optimizations produce calls to the
cbrt runtime functions. Fixes PR 44227.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74259
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.
Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
Andy Wingo