from its pass harness by providing a lambda to query for AA results.
This allows the legacy pass to easily provide a lambda that uses the
special helpers to construct function AA results from a legacy CGSCC
pass. With the new pass manager (the next patch) the lambda just
directly wraps the intuitive query API.
llvm-svn: 251715
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251689
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251685
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
llvm-svn: 251680
transformations in FunctionAttrs rather than building a new one each
time.
This isn't trivial because there are different heuristics from different
passes for exactly what set they want. The primary difference is whether
an *overridable* function completely disables the synthesis of
attributes. I've modeled this by directly testing for overridable, and
using the common set that excludes external and opt-none functions.
This does cause some changes by disabling more optimizations in the face
of opt-none. Specifically, we were still optimizing *calls* to opt-none
functions based on their attributes, just not the bodies. It seems
better to be conservative on both fronts given the intended semanticas
here (best effort to not assume or disturb anything). I've not tried to
test this change as it seems complex, brittle, and not important to the
implicit contract of opt-none. Instead, it seems more like a choice that
should be dictated by the simplified implementation and the change to be
acceptable differences within the space of opt-none.
A big benefit here is that these transformations no longer rely on the
legacy pass manager's SCC types, they just work on generic sets of
function pointers. This will make it easy to re-use their logic in the
new pass manager.
I've also made the transforms static functions instead of members where
trivial while I was touching the signatures.
llvm-svn: 251640
This patch unify the 39-bit and 42-bit mapping for aarch64 to use only
one instrumentation algorithm. This removes compiler flag
SANITIZER_AARCH64_VMA requirement for MSAN on aarch64.
The mapping to use now is for 39 and 42-bits:
0x00000000000ULL-0x01000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x01000000000ULL-0x02000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x02000000000ULL-0x03000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x03000000000ULL-0x04000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x04000000000ULL-0x05000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x05000000000ULL-0x06000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x06000000000ULL-0x07000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x07000000000ULL-0x08000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And only for 42-bits:
0x08000000000ULL-0x09000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x09000000000ULL-0x0A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x0A000000000ULL-0x0B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x0B000000000ULL-0x0F000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x0F000000000ULL-0x10000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x10000000000ULL-0x11000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x11000000000ULL-0x12000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x12000000000ULL-0x17000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x17000000000ULL-0x18000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x18000000000ULL-0x19000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x19000000000ULL-0x20000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x20000000000ULL-0x21000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x21000000000ULL-0x26000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x26000000000ULL-0x27000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x27000000000ULL-0x28000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x28000000000ULL-0x29000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x29000000000ULL-0x2A000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2A000000000ULL-0x2B000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2B000000000ULL-0x2C000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x2C000000000ULL-0x2D000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x2D000000000ULL-0x2E000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2E000000000ULL-0x2F000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2F000000000ULL-0x39000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x39000000000ULL-0x3A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3A000000000ULL-0x3B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3B000000000ULL-0x3C000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x3C000000000ULL-0x3D000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x3D000000000ULL-0x3E000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3E000000000ULL-0x3F000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3F000000000ULL-0x40000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And although complex it provides a better memory utilization that
previous one.
llvm-svn: 251624
Clang driver now injects -u<hook_var> flag in the linker
command line, in which case user function is not needed
any more.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14033
llvm-svn: 251612
Somewhat shockingly for an analysis pass which is computing constant ranges, LVI did not understand the ranges provided by range metadata.
As part of this change, I included a change to CVP primarily because doing so made it much easier to write small self contained test cases. CVP was previously only handling the non-local operand case, but given that LVI can sometimes figure out information about instructions standalone, I don't see any reason to restrict this. There could possibly be a compile time impact from this, but I suspect it should be minimal. If anyone has an example which substaintially regresses, please let me know. I could restrict the block local handling to ICmps feeding Terminator instructions if needed.
Note that this patch continues a somewhat bad practice in LVI. In many cases, we know facts about values, and separate context sensitive facts about values. LVI makes no effort to distinguish and will frequently cache the same value fact repeatedly for different contexts. I would like to change this, but that's a large enough change that I want it to go in separately with clear documentation of what's changing. Other examples of this include the non-null handling, and arguments.
As a meta comment: the entire motivation of this change was being able to write smaller (aka reasonable sized) test cases for a future patch teaching LVI about select instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13543
llvm-svn: 251606
The most common use case is when eliminating redundant range checks in an example like the following:
c = a[i+1] + a[i];
Note that all the smarts of the transform (the implication engine) is already in ValueTracking and is tested directly through InstructionSimplify.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040
llvm-svn: 251596
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
llvm-svn: 251592
This adds the flag -mllvm -sample-profile-check-coverage=N to the
SampleProfile pass. N is the percent of input sample records that the
user expects to apply. If the pass does not use N% (or more) of the
sample records in the input, it emits a warning.
This is useful to detect some forms of stale profiles. If the code has
drifted enough from the original profile, there will be records that do
not match the IR anymore.
This will not detect cases where a sample profile record for line L is
referring to some other instructions that also used to be at line L.
llvm-svn: 251568
Summary:
If P branches to Q conditional on C and Q branches to R conditional on
C' and C => C' then the branch conditional on C' can be folded to an
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13972
llvm-svn: 251557
The pass was keeping around a lot of per-function data (visited blocks,
edges, dominance, etc) that is just taking up memory for no reason. In
fact, from function to function it could potentially confuse the
propagator since some maps are indexed by line offsets which can be
common between functions.
llvm-svn: 251531
I think these were affected by a change way back when to stop printing newlines in Value::dump() by default. This change simply allows the debug output to be readable.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 251517
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
llvm-svn: 251492
CatchReturnInst has side-effects: it runs a destructor. This destructor
could conceivably run forever/call exit/etc. and should not be removed.
llvm-svn: 251461
Summary:
This change could be way off-piste, I'm looking for any feedback on whether it's an acceptable approach.
It never seems to be a problem to gobble up as many reduction values as can be found, and then to attempt to reduce the resulting tree. Some of the workloads I'm looking at have been aggressively unrolled by hand, and by selecting reduction widths that are not constrained by a vector register size, it becomes possible to profitably vectorize. My test case shows such an unrolling which SLP was not vectorizing (on neither ARM nor X86) before this patch, but with it does vectorize.
I measure no significant compile time impact of this change when combined with D13949 and D14063. There are also no significant performance regressions on ARM/AArch64 in SPEC or LNT.
The more principled approach I thought of was to generate several candidate tree's and use the cost model to pick the cheapest one. That seemed like quite a big design change (the algorithms seem very much one-shot), and would likely be a costly thing for compile time. This seemed to do the job at very little cost, but I'm worried I've misunderstood something!
Reviewers: nadav, jmolloy
Subscribers: mssimpso, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14116
llvm-svn: 251428
Summary:
Currently, when the SLP vectorizer considers whether a phi is part of a reduction, it dismisses phi's whose incoming blocks are not the same as the block containing the phi. For the patterns I'm looking at, extending this rule to allow phis whose incoming block is a containing loop latch allows me to vectorize certain workloads.
There is no significant compile-time impact, and combined with D13949, no performance improvement measured in ARM/AArch64 in any of SPEC2000, SPEC2006 or LNT.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mcrosier, nadav
Subscribers: mssimpso, nadav, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14063
llvm-svn: 251425
Summary:
Certain workloads, in particular sum-of-absdiff loops, can be vectorized using SLP if it can treat select instructions as reduction values.
The test case is a bit awkward. The AArch64 cost model needs some tuning to not be so pessimistic about selects. I've had to tweak the SLP threshold here.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mzolotukhin, spatel, nadav
Subscribers: nadav, mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13949
llvm-svn: 251424
When emitting a remark for a conditional branch annotation, the remark
uses the line location information of the conditional branch in the
message. In some cases, that information is unavailable and the
optimization would segfaul. I'm still not sure whether this is a bug or
WAI, but the optimizer should not die because of this.
llvm-svn: 251420
No functionality changed here, but the indentation is substantially
reduced and IMO the code is much easier to read. I've also added some
helpful comments.
This is just a clean-up I wrote while studying the code, and that has
been in my backlog for a while.
llvm-svn: 251381
We should remove noalias along with dereference and dereference_or_null attributes
because statepoint could potentially touch the entire heap including noalias objects.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14032
llvm-svn: 251333
This adds a couple of optimization remarks to the SamplePGO
transformation. When it decides to inline a hot function (to mimic the
inline stack and repeat useful inline decisions in the original build).
It will also report branch destinations. For instance, given the code
fragment:
6 if (i < 1000)
7 sum -= i;
8 else
9 sum += -i * rand();
If the 'else' branch is taken most of the time, building this code with
-Rpass=sample-profile will produce:
a.cc:9:14: remark: most popular destination for conditional branches at small.cc:6:9 [-Rpass=sample-profile]
sum += -i * rand();
^
llvm-svn: 251330
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
The previous iteration of this change was reverted in r250461. This
version leaves the generic, compiler-rt based implementation in
SafeStack.cpp instead of moving it to TargetLoweringBase in order to
allow testing without a TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 251324
Vectorization of memory instruction (Load/Store) is possible when the pointer is coming from GEP. The GEP analysis allows to estimate the profit.
In some cases we have a "bitcast" between GEP and memory instruction.
I added code that skips the "bitcast".
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13886
llvm-svn: 251291
Summary:
InstCombine tries to transform GEP(PHI(GEP1, GEP2, ..)) into GEP(GEP(PHI(...))
when possible. However, this may leave the old PHI node around. Even if we
do end up folding the GEPs, having an extra PHI node might not be beneficial.
This change makes the transformation more conservative. We now only do this if
the PHI has only one use, and can therefore be removed after the transformation.
Reviewers: jmolloy, majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13887
llvm-svn: 251281
First, the motivation: LLVM currently does not realize that:
((2072 >> (L == 0)) >> 7) & 1 == 0
where L is some arbitrary value. Whether you right-shift 2072 by 7 or by 8, the
lowest-order bit is always zero. There are obviously several ways to go about
fixing this, but the generic solution pursued in this patch is to teach
computeKnownBits something about shifts by a non-constant amount. Previously,
we would give up completely on these. Instead, in cases where we know something
about the low-order bits of the shift-amount operand, we can combine (and
together) the associated restrictions for all shift amounts consistent with
that knowledge. As a further generalization, I refactored all of the logic for
all three kinds of shifts to have this capability. This works well in the above
case, for example, because the dynamic shift amount can only be 0 or 1, and
thus we can say a lot about the known bits of the result.
This brings us to the second part of this change: Even when we know all of the
bits of a value via computeKnownBits, nothing used to constant-fold the result.
This introduces the necessary code into InstCombine and InstSimplify. I've
added it into both because:
1. InstCombine won't automatically pick up the associated logic in
InstSimplify (InstCombine uses InstSimplify, but not via the API that
passes in the original instruction).
2. Putting the logic in InstCombine allows the resulting simplifications to become
part of the iterative worklist
3. Putting the logic in InstSimplify allows the resulting simplifications to be
used by everywhere else that calls SimplifyInstruction (inlining, unrolling,
and many others).
And this requires a small change to our definition of an ephemeral value so
that we don't break the rest case from r246696 (where the icmp feeding the
@llvm.assume, is also feeding a br). Under the old definition, the icmp would
not be considered ephemeral (because it is used by the br), but this causes the
assume to remove itself (in addition to simplifying the branch structure), and
it seems more-useful to prevent that from happening.
llvm-svn: 251146
After some look-ahead PRE was added for GEPs, an instruction could end
up in the table of candidates before it was actually inspected. When
this happened the pass might decide it was the best candidate to
replace itself. This didn't go well.
Should fix PR25291
llvm-svn: 251145
Summary:
This change teaches the LLVM inliner to not inline through callsites
with unknown operand bundles. Currently all operand bundles are
"unknown" operand bundles but in the near future we will add support for
inlining through some select kinds of operand bundles.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14001
llvm-svn: 251141
This patch converts the remaining references to literal
strings for names of profile runtime entites (such as
profile runtime hook, runtime hook use function, profile
init method, register function etc).
Also added documentation for all the new interfaces.
llvm-svn: 251093
The insertLoop() API is only used to add new loops, and has confusing
ownership semantics. Simplify it by replacing it with addLoop().
llvm-svn: 251064
Summary: Currently SimplifyResume can convert an invoke instruction to a call instruction if its landing pad is trivial. In practice we could have several invoke instructions with trivial landing pads and share a common rethrow block, and in the common rethrow block, all the landing pads join to a phi node. The patch extends SimplifyResume to check the phi of landing pad and their incoming blocks. If any of them is trivial, remove it from the phi node and convert the invoke instruction to a call instruction.
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13718
llvm-svn: 251061
This is a clean up patch that defines instr prof section and variable
name prefixes in a common header with access helper functions.
clang FE change will be done as a follow up once this patch is in.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13919
llvm-svn: 251058
As an invariant, BasicBlocks cannot be empty when passed to a transform.
This is not the case for MachineBasicBlocks and the Sink pass was ported
from the MachineSink pass which would explain the check's existence.
llvm-svn: 251057
* Don't instrument promotable dynamic allocas:
We already have a test that checks that promotable dynamic allocas are
ignored, as well as static promotable allocas. Make sure this test will
still pass if/when we enable dynamic alloca instrumentation by default.
* Handle lifetime intrinsics before handling dynamic allocas:
lifetime intrinsics may refer to dynamic allocas, so we need to emit
instrumentation before these dynamic allocas would be replaced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12704
llvm-svn: 251045
SimplifyTerminatorOnSelect didn't consider the possibility that the
condition might be related to one of PHI nodes.
This fixes PR25267.
llvm-svn: 250922
In some cases (as illustrated in the unittest), lineno can be less than the heade_lineno because the function body are included from some other files. In this case, offset will be negative. This patch makes clang still able to match the profile to IR in this situation.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13914
llvm-svn: 250873
It is now possible to infer intrinsic modref behaviour purely from intrinsic attributes.
This change will allow to completely remove GET_INTRINSIC_MODREF_BEHAVIOR table.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13907
llvm-svn: 250860
Summary: In r231241, TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass was added to
`getAnalysisUsage` for `AddressSanitizer`, but the corresponding
`INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY` was not added.
Reviewers: dvyukov, chandlerc, kcc
Subscribers: kcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13629
llvm-svn: 250813
`normalizeForInvokeSafepoint` in RewriteStatepointsForGC.cpp, as it is
written today, deals with `gc.relocate` and `gc.result` uses of a
statepoint equally well. This change documents this fact and adds a
test case.
There is no functional change here -- only documentation of existing
functionality.
llvm-svn: 250784
Allow LLVM to optimize the sequence like the following:
%inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp slt %n, %inc
into:
%cmp = icmp sle i32 %n, %i
The case is not handled previously due to the complexity of compuation of %n.
Hence, LLVM cannot swap operands of icmp accordingly.
llvm-svn: 250746
Besides the usual, I finally added an overload to
`BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock()` that accepts an `Instruction*` instead
of `BasicBlock::iterator`. Someone can go back and remove this overload
later (after updating the callers I'm going to skip going forward), but
the most common call seems to be
`BB->splitBasicBlock(BB->getTerminator(), ...)` and I'm not sure it's
better to add `->getIterator()` to every one than have the overload.
It's pretty hard to get the usage wrong.
llvm-svn: 250745
Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case.
Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850
llvm-svn: 250686
This patch improves support for combining the SSE4A EXTRQ(I) and INSERTQ(I) intrinsics:
1 - Converts INSERTQ/EXTRQ calls to INSERTQI/EXTRQI if the 'bit index' and 'length' operands are constant
2 - Converts INSERTQI/EXTRQI calls to shufflevector if the bit index/length are both byte aligned (we can already lower shuffles to INSERTQI/EXTRQI if its useful)
3 - Constant folding support
4 - Add zeroinitializer handling
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13348
llvm-svn: 250609
The `"statepoint-id"` and `"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"` attributes are
used solely to determine properties of the `gc.statepoint` being
created. Once the `gc.statepoint` is in place, these should be removed.
llvm-svn: 250491
Summary:
This is a step towards using operand bundles to carry deopt state till
RewriteStatepointsForGC. The change adds a flag to
RewriteStatepointsForGC that teaches it to pick up deopt state from a
`"deopt"` operand bundle attached to the `call` or `invoke` it is
wrapping.
The command line flag added, `-rs4gc-use-deopt-bundles`, will only exist
for a short while. Once we are able to pipe deopt bundle state through
the full optimization pipeline without problems, we will "constant fold"
`-rs4gc-use-deopt-bundles` to `true`.
Reviewers: swaroop.sridhar, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13372
llvm-svn: 250489
Summary:
`cloneArithmeticIVUser` currently trips over expression like `add %iv,
-1` when `%iv` is being zero extended -- it tries to construct the
widened use as `add %iv.zext, zext(-1)` and (correctly) fails to prove
equivalence to `zext(add %iv, -1)` (here the SCEV for `%iv` is
`{1,+,1}`).
This change teaches `IndVars` to try sign extending the non-IV operand
if that makes the newly constructed IV use equivalent to the widened
narrow IV use.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13717
llvm-svn: 250483
Summary:
This NFC splitting is intended to make a later diff easier to follow.
It just tail duplicates `cloneIVUser` into `cloneArithmeticIVUser` and
`cloneBitwiseIVUser`.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13716
llvm-svn: 250481
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
llvm-svn: 250456
Turns out this approach is buggy. In discussion about follow on work, Sanjoy pointed out that we could be subject to circular logic problems.
Consider:
if (i u< L) leave()
if ((i + 1) u< L) leave()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
If we know that L is less than UINT_MAX, we could possible prove (in a control dependent way) that i + 1 does not overflow. This gives us:
if (i u< L) leave()
if ((i +nuw 1) u< L) leave()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
If we now do the transform this patch proposed, we end up with:
if ((i +nuw 1) u< L) leave_appropriately()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
That would be a miscompile when i==-1. The problem here is that the control dependent nuw bits got used to prove something about the first condition. That's obviously invalid.
This won't happen today, but since I plan to enhance LVI/CVP with exactly that transform at some point in the not too distant future...
llvm-svn: 250430
This adjusts all integers in the reader/writer to reflect the types
stored on profile files. They should all be unsigned 32-bit or 64-bit
values. Changed all associated internal types to be uint32_t or
uint64_t.
The only place that needed some adjustments is in the sample profile
transformation. Altough the weight read from the profile are 64-bit
values, the internal API for branch weights only accepts 32-bit values.
The pass now saturates weights that overflow uint32_t.
llvm-svn: 250427
With r250345 and r250343, we start to observe the following failure
when bootstrap clang with lto and pgo:
PHI node entries do not match predecessors!
%.sroa.029.3.i = phi %"class.llvm::SDNode.13298"* [ null, %30953 ], [ null, %31017 ], [ null, %30998 ], [ null, %_ZN4llvm8dyn_castINS_14ConstantSDNodeENS_7SDValueEEENS_10cast_rettyIT_T0_E8ret_typeERS5_.exit.i.1804 ], [ null, %30975 ], [ null, %30991 ], [ null, %_ZNK4llvm3EVT13getScalarTypeEv.exit.i.1812 ], [ %..sroa.029.0.i, %_ZN4llvm11SmallVectorIiLj8EED1Ev.exit.i.1826 ], !dbg !451895
label %30998
label %_ZNK4llvm3EVTeqES0_.exit19.thread.i
LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted!
I will re-commit this if the bot does not recover.
llvm-svn: 250366
Currently in JumpThreading pass, the branch weight metadata is not updated after CFG modification. Consider the jump threading on PredBB, BB, and SuccBB. After jump threading, the weight on BB->SuccBB should be adjusted as some of it is contributed by the edge PredBB->BB, which doesn't exist anymore. This patch tries to update the edge weight in metadata on BB->SuccBB by scaling it by 1 - Freq(PredBB->BB) / Freq(BB->SuccBB).
This is the third attempt to submit this patch, while the first two led to failures in some FDO tests. After investigation, it is the edge weight normalization that caused those failures. In this patch the edge weight normalization is fixed so that there is no zero weight in the output and the sum of all weights can fit in 32-bit integer. Several unit tests are added.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10979
llvm-svn: 250345
If we have a series of branches which are all unlikely to fail, we can possibly combine them into a single check on the fastpath combined with a bit of dispatch logic on the slowpath. We don't want to do this unconditionally since it requires speculating instructions past a branch, but if the profiling metadata on the branch indicates profitability, this can reduce the number of checks needed along the fast path.
The canonical example this is trying to handle is removing the second bounds check implied by the Java code: a[i] + a[i+1]. Note that it can currently only do so for really simple conditions and the values of a[i] can't be used anywhere except in the addition. (i.e. the load has to have been sunk already and not prevent speculation.) I plan on extending this transform over the next few days to handle alternate sequences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13070
llvm-svn: 250343
We forgot to append the terminatepad's arguments which resulted in us
treating the old terminatepad as an argument to the new terminatepad
causing us to crash immediately. Instead, add the old terminatepad's
arguments to the new terminatepad.
This fixes PR25155.
llvm-svn: 250234
Remove remaining `ilist_iterator` implicit conversions from
LLVMScalarOpts.
This change exposed some scary behaviour in
lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp around line 1770. This patch changes a
call from `Function::begin()` to `&Function::front()`, since the return
was immediately being passed into another function that takes a
`Function*`. `Function::front()` started to assert, since the function
was empty. Note that `Function::end()` does not point at a legal
`Function*` -- it points at an `ilist_half_node` -- so the other
function was getting garbage before. (I added the missing check for
`Function::isDeclaration()`.)
Otherwise, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 250211
Justin Bogner