Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joe Loser d2baefae68
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
2022-03-13 12:32:06 -04:00
Louis Dionne 368faacac7 [libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
2022-03-01 08:20:24 -05:00
Christopher Di Bella 5aaefa510e [libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
2022-02-26 09:00:25 +00:00
Arthur O'Dwyer fa6b9e4010 [libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
2022-02-04 12:27:19 -05:00
Louis Dionne f4c1258d56 [libc++] Add an option to disable wide character support in libc++
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.

Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
2021-10-12 06:08:23 -04:00
Louis Dionne 64184b4af0 [libc++][NFC] Remove useless _LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS
Only files that actually use min/max are required to do this dance.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108778
2021-08-27 12:41:55 -04:00
Mark de Wever 1123100a16 [libcxx] Remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED
All supported compilers should support
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED so this can be removed.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107239
2021-08-10 18:59:55 +02:00
Mark de Wever b49961987f [lbc++][nfc] Use _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
This replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY with _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI. It's
not intended to do for other parts of libc++. This change makes it easy
to search and replace all occurrences of the patches in review.
2021-07-21 08:02:15 +02:00
Mark de Wever 963495f0d4 [libc++][format] Adds availability macros for std::format.
This prevents std::format to be available until there's an ABI stable
version. (This only impacts the Apple platform.)

Depends on D102703

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102705
2021-05-26 17:54:33 +02:00
Mark de Wever de9df3f5b9 [libc++][NFC] Move basic_format_parse_context to its own header.
This is a preparation to split the format header in smaller parts for the
upcoming patches.

Depends on D101723

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102703
2021-05-26 17:50:09 +02:00