Added '-print-pipeline-passes' printing of parameters for those passes
declared with *_WITH_PARAMS macro in PassRegistry.def.
Note that it only prints the parameters declared inside *_WITH_PARAMS as
in a few cases there appear to be additional parameters not parsable.
The following passes are now covered (i.e. all of those with *_WITH_PARAMS in
PassRegistry.def).
LoopExtractorPass - loop-extract
HWAddressSanitizerPass - hwsan
EarlyCSEPass - early-cse
EntryExitInstrumenterPass - ee-instrument
LowerMatrixIntrinsicsPass - lower-matrix-intrinsics
LoopUnrollPass - loop-unroll
AddressSanitizerPass - asan
MemorySanitizerPass - msan
SimplifyCFGPass - simplifycfg
LoopVectorizePass - loop-vectorize
MergedLoadStoreMotionPass - mldst-motion
GVN - gvn
StackLifetimePrinterPass - print<stack-lifetime>
SimpleLoopUnswitchPass - simple-loop-unswitch
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109310
According to the langref, it is valid to have multiple consecutive
lifetime start or end intrinsics on the same object.
For llvm.lifetime.start:
"If ptr [...] is a stack object that is already alive, it simply
fills all bytes of the object with poison."
For llvm.lifetime.end:
"Calling llvm.lifetime.end on an already dead alloca is no-op."
However, we currently fail an assertion in such cases. I've observed
the assertion failure when the loop vectorization pass duplicates
the intrinsic.
We can conservatively handle these intrinsics by ignoring all but
the first one, which can be implemented by removing the assertions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108337
log:
BB [7, 8): begin {}, end {}, livein {}, liveout {}
BB [1, 2): begin {}, end {}, livein {}, liveout {}
...
But it is not convenient to know what the basic block is.
So I add the basic block name to it.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
TestPlan: check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87152
If we can't identify alloca used in lifetime marker we
need to assume to worst case scenario.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84630
If we can't identify alloca used in lifetime marker we
need to assume to worst case scenario.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84630
Code does not track terminators and do not expose them through interface.
State there is just a state of the last instruction or entry.
So this information is just redundant and doesn't need to be tested.
Summary:
Extend StackLifetime with option to calculate liveliness
where alloca is only considered alive on basic block entry
if all non-dead predecessors had it alive at terminators.
Depends on D82043.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82124
Summary:
This code is going to be used in StackSafety.
This patch is file move with minimal changes. Identifiers
will be fixed in the followup patch.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81831
serge-sans-paille