Commit Graph

1070 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov a0d2b0aa65 [Bitcode] Clarify that extractvalue/insertvalue constexprs are not supported
Bitcode currently cannot encode these. Throw a more obvious error
in this case, rather than failing an operand count assertion.
2022-03-11 16:50:24 +01:00
Nikita Popov b7585a08d5 [Bitcode] Enumerate constexpr GEP source element type in initializer
The constexpr source element type was enumerated if the GEP was
used as part of an instruction. However, things like global
initializers go through a different code path, and we need to
enumerate the type there as well.
2022-03-11 16:38:58 +01:00
Nikita Popov b190108693 [Bitcode] Encode alloca address space
Since D101045, allocas are no longer required to be part of the
default alloca address space. There may be allocas in multiple
different address spaces. However, the bitcode reader would
simply assume the default alloca address space, resulting in
either an error or incorrect IR.

Add an optional record for allocas which encodes the address
space.
2022-03-11 16:08:38 +01:00
Augie Fackler d664c4b73c Attributes: add a new allocalign attribute
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
2022-03-04 15:57:53 -05:00
Tong Zhang 17ce89fa80 [SanitizerBounds] Add support for NoSanitizeBounds function
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.

The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.

In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.

Reviewed By: melver

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
2022-03-01 18:47:02 +01:00
Fangrui Song 7aaf024dac [BitcodeWriter] Fix cases of some functions
`WriteIndexToFile` is used by external projects so I do not touch it.
2022-01-31 16:46:11 -08:00
Fangrui Song 85dfe19b36 [ModuleUtils] Move EmbedBufferInModule to LLVMTransformsUtils
D116542 adds EmbedBufferInModule which introduces a layer violation
(https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#library-layering).
See 2d5f857a1e for detail.

EmbedBufferInModule does not use BitcodeWriter functionality and should be moved
LLVMTransformsUtils. While here, change the function case to the prevailing
convention.

It seems that EmbedBufferInModule just follows the steps of
EmbedBitcodeInModule. EmbedBitcodeInModule calls WriteBitcodeToFile but has IR
update operations which ideally should be refactored to another library.

Reviewed By: jhuber6

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118666
2022-01-31 16:33:57 -08:00
Joseph Huber 4a780aa13e [LLVM] Resolve layer violation in BitcodeWriter
Summary:
The changes introduced in D116542 added a dependency on TransformUtils
to use the `appendToCompilerUsed` method. This created a circular
dependency. This patch simply copies the needed function locally to
remove the dependency.
2022-01-31 19:01:08 -05:00
Joseph Huber 551b177452 [OpenMP] Add a flag for embedding a file into the module
This patch adds support for a flag `-fembed-offload-binary` to embed a
file as an ELF section in the output by placing it in a global variable.
This can be used to bundle offloading files with the host binary so it
can be accessed by the linker. The section is named using the
`-fembed-offload-section` option.

Depends on D116541

Reviewed By: JonChesterfield

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116542
2022-01-31 15:56:00 -05:00
Nikita Popov 97916673d4 [IR] Support ifuncs in opaque pointer mode
Relax the type assertion for opaque pointers, and enumerate the
value type in TypeFinder and ValueEnumerator.
2022-01-27 13:01:33 +01:00
Chih-Ping Chen 28bfa57a73 [DebugInfo] Add stringLocationExp field to DIStringType
DIStringType is used to encode the debug info of a character object
in Fortran. A Fortran deferred-length character object is typically
implemented as a pair of the following two pieces of info: An address
of the raw storage of the characters, and the length of the object.
The stringLocationExp field contains the DIExpression to get to the
raw storage.

This patch also enables the emission of DW_AT_data_location attribute
in a DW_TAG_string_type debug info entry based on stringLocationExp
in DIStringType.

A test is also added to ensure that the bitcode reader is backward
compatible with the old DIStringType format.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117586
2022-01-26 11:56:57 -05:00
Nikita Popov aa97bc116d [NFC] Remove uses of PointerType::getElementType()
Instead use either Type::getPointerElementType() or
Type::getNonOpaquePointerElementType().

This is part of D117885, in preparation for deprecating the API.
2022-01-25 09:44:52 +01:00
Roman Lebedev 62b1682570
[Opaqueptrs][IR Serialization] Improve inlineasm [de]serialization
The bitcode reader expected that the pointers are typed,
so that it can extract the function type for the assembly
so `bitc::CST_CODE_INLINEASM` did not explicitly store said function type.

I'm not really sure how the upgrade path will look for existing bitcode,
but i think we can easily support opaque pointers going forward,
by simply storing the function type.

Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116341
2021-12-30 13:54:37 +03:00
Sami Tolvanen 5dc8aaac39 [llvm][IR] Add no_cfi constant
With Control-Flow Integrity (CFI), the LowerTypeTests pass replaces
function references with CFI jump table references, which is a problem
for low-level code that needs the address of the actual function body.

For example, in the Linux kernel, the code that sets up interrupt
handlers needs to take the address of the interrupt handler function
instead of the CFI jump table, as the jump table may not even be mapped
into memory when an interrupt is triggered.

This change adds the no_cfi constant type, which wraps function
references in a value that LowerTypeTestsModule::replaceCfiUses does not
replace.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1353

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, pcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108478
2021-12-20 12:55:32 -08:00
Mingming Liu 09a704c5ef [LTO] Ignore unreachable virtual functions in WPD in hybrid LTO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115492
2021-12-14 20:18:04 +00:00
Kazu Hirata 7787a8f1b7 [llvm] Use llvm::reverse (NFC) 2021-12-13 21:54:51 -08:00
Kazu Hirata 1457e78352 [llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-12-05 08:33:02 -08:00
Kazu Hirata ca2f53897a [CodeGen] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-12-04 08:48:05 -08:00
Kazu Hirata f6bce30cf9 [llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-11-20 18:42:10 -08:00
Kazu Hirata 7ca14f6044 [llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-11-18 09:09:52 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks 05963a3d66 Revert "[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes"
This reverts commit ee76525698.

Causes crashes, see comments in D104827.
2021-11-09 14:27:55 -08:00
Scott Linder ee76525698 [DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:

* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
  as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
  to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
  appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
  actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
  restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
  `distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
  DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
  along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
  ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
  general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
  support.

The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.

The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.

A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:

    !named = !{!0}
    !0 = !DIExpression()

Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:

    !named = !{!DIExpression()}

This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:

    !named = !{!0}
    ; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
    !0 = distinct !DIExpression()

Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.

Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
2021-11-09 18:19:11 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 89b57061f7 Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.

This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
2021-10-08 14:51:48 -07:00
Itay Bookstein 40ec1c0f16 [IR][NFC] Rename getBaseObject to getAliaseeObject
To better reflect the meaning of the now-disambiguated {GlobalValue,
GlobalAlias}::getBaseObject after breaking off GlobalIFunc::getResolverFunction
(D109792), the function is renamed to getAliaseeObject.
2021-10-06 19:33:10 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 05392466f0 Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
2021-10-06 13:29:23 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 569346f274 Revert "Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"
This reverts commit 8d64314ffe.
2021-10-06 11:38:11 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 8d64314ffe Reland [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
2021-10-06 11:03:51 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 72cf8b6044 Revert "[IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB"
This reverts commit df84c1fe78.

Breaks some bots
2021-10-06 10:21:35 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks df84c1fe78 [IR] Increase max alignment to 4GB
Currently the max alignment representable is 1GB, see D108661.
Setting the align of an object to 4GB is desirable in some cases to make sure the lower 32 bits are clear which can be used for some optimizations, e.g. https://crbug.com/1016945.

This uses an extra bit in instructions that carry an alignment. We can store 15 bits of "free" information, and with this change some instructions (e.g. AtomicCmpXchgInst) use 14 bits.
We can increase the max alignment representable above 4GB (up to 2^62) since we're only using 33 of the 64 values, but I've just limited it to 4GB for now.

The one place we have to update the bitcode format is for the alloca instruction. It stores its alignment into 5 bits of a 32 bit bitfield. I've added another field which is 8 bits and should be future proof for a while. For backward compatibility, we check if the old field has a value and use that, otherwise use the new field.

Updating clang's max allowed alignment will come in a future patch.

Reviewed By: hans

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110451
2021-10-06 09:54:14 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 3081de8c72 [llvm] Migrate from getNumArgOperands to arg_size (NFC)
Note that getNumArgOperands is considered a legacy name.  See
llvm/include/llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h for details.
2021-10-05 08:29:19 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks a7b4ce9cfd [NFC][AttributeList] Replace index_begin/end with an iterator
We expose the fact that we rely on unsigned wrapping to iterate through
all indexes. This can be confusing. Rather, keeping it as an
implementation detail through an iterator is less confusing and is less
code.

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110885
2021-10-01 10:17:41 -07:00
modimo 20faf78919 [ThinLTO] Add noRecurse and noUnwind thinlink function attribute propagation
Thinlink provides an opportunity to propagate function attributes across modules, enabling additional propagation opportunities.

This change propagates (currently default off, turn on with `disable-thinlto-funcattrs=1`) noRecurse and noUnwind based off of function summaries of the prevailing functions in bottom-up call-graph order. Testing on clang self-build:
1. There's a 35-40% increase in noUnwind functions due to the additional propagation opportunities.
2. Throughput is measured at 10-15% increase in thinlink time which itself is 1.5% of E2E link time.

Implementation-wise this adds the following summary function attributes:
1. noUnwind: function is noUnwind
2. mayThrow: function contains a non-call instruction that `Instruction::mayThrow` returns true on (e.g. windows SEH instructions)
3. hasUnknownCall: function contains calls that don't make it into the summary call-graph thus should not be propagated from (e.g. indirect for now, could add no-opt functions as well)

Testing:
Clang self-build passes and 2nd stage build passes check-all
ninja check-all with newly added tests passing

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36850
2021-09-27 12:28:07 -07:00
Teresa Johnson 96cb97c453 [ThinLTO] Update combined index for SamplePGO indirect calls to locals
In ThinLTO for locals we normally compute the GUID from the name after
prepending the source path to get a unique global id. SamplePGO indirect
call profiles contain the target GUID without this uniquification,
however (unless compiling with -funique-internal-linkage-names).

In order to correctly handle the call edges added to the combined index
for these indirect calls, during importing and bitcode writing we
consult a map of original to full GUID to identify the actual callee.
However, for a large application this was consuming a lot of compile
time as we need to do this repeatedly (especially during importing where
we may traverse call edges multiple times).

To fix this implement a suggestion in one of the FIXME comments, and
actually modify the call edges during a single traversal after the index
is built to perform the fixups once. I combined this fixup with the dead
code analysis performed on the index in order to avoid adding an
additional walk of the index. The dead code analysis is the first
analysis performed on the index.

This reduced the time required for a large thin link with SamplePGO by
about 20%.

No new test added, but I confirmed that there are existing tests that
will fail when no fixup is performed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110374
2021-09-24 12:29:49 -07:00
Teresa Johnson 2c1defeee4 [ThinLTO] Don't emit original GUID for locals to distributed indexes
In ThinLTO for locals we normally compute the GUID from the name after
prepending the source path to get a unique global id. SamplePGO indirect
call profiles contain the target GUID without this uniquification,
however (unless compiling with -funique-internal-linkage-names).
Therefore, the index contains the original GUID of the local symbols
(without module path prepended to uniquify), in order to correctly
handle the call edges added for these indirect call profile targets
with SamplePGO.

We were emitting these to the combined index when writing it out as
bitcode, which is unnecessary and causes overhead when writing out the
indexes for distributed backends. The only use of the original GUID name
is in the thin link. Suppress it in that case. This reduced the thin
link time for a large distributed build by about 7%, and the aggregate
size of the serialized indexes by over 2%.

Continue to print it when writing out the full index, since that is just
used for debugging and testing.

Update a distributed thinlto index test to contain a local and ensure
that we don't get a COMBINED_ORIGINAL_NAME record.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110296
2021-09-23 17:35:47 -07:00
Alok Kumar Sharma a5b72abc9e [DebugInfo] Enhance DIImportedEntity to accept children entities
New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing
list of aliased entities.
This is needed to dump optimized debugging information where all names
in a module are imported, but a few names are imported with overriding
aliases.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109343
2021-09-16 10:41:55 +05:30
Nikita Popov f5832eaaad [UseListOrder] Fix use list order for function operands
Functions can have a personality function, as well as prefix and
prologue data as additional operands. Unused operands are assigned
a dummy value of i1* null. This patch addresses multiple issues in
use-list order preservation for these:

 * Fix verify-uselistorder to also enumerate the dummy values.
   This means that now use-list order values of these values are
   shuffled even if there is no other mention of i1* null in the
   module. This results in failures of Assembler/call-arg-is-callee.ll,
   Assembler/opaque-ptr.ll and Bitcode/use-list-order2.ll.
 * The use-list order prediction in ValueEnumerator does not take
   into account the fact that a global may use a value more than
   once and leaves uses in the same global effectively unordered.
   We should be comparing the operand number here, as we do for
   the more general case.
 * While we enumerate all operands of a function together (which
   seems sensible to me), the bitcode reader would first resolve
   prefix data for all function, then prologue data for all
   functions, then personality functions for all functions. Change
   this to resolve all operands for a given function together
   instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109282
2021-09-07 20:59:12 +02:00
Yonghong Song 1bebc31c61 [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for func parameters
Generate btf_tag annotations for function parameters.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DILocalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
    distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "info",, arg: 1, ..., annotations: !10)
    !10 = !{!11, !12}
    !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
    !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106620
2021-08-26 14:18:30 -07:00
Yonghong Song 30c288489a [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIGlobalVariable, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
    distinct !DIGlobalVariable(..., annotations: !10)
    !10 = !{!11, !12}
    !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
    !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106619
2021-08-26 10:03:44 -07:00
Yonghong Song d383df32c0 [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprogram types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DISubprogram, and
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates how
annotations are encoded in IR:
    distinct !DISubprogram(..., annotations: !10)
    !10 = !{!11, !12}
    !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
    !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106618
2021-08-26 08:24:19 -07:00
Yonghong Song 430e223881 [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIDerived types
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIDrived types. More specifically,
clang frontend generates the btf_tag annotations for record
fields. The annotations are represented as an DINodeArray
in DebugInfo. The following example illustrate how
annotations are encoded in IR:
      distinct !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_member, ..., annotations: !10)
      !10 = !{!11, !12}
      !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
      !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106616
2021-08-20 12:06:37 -07:00
Alexander Potapenko b0391dfc73 [clang][Codegen] Introduce the disable_sanitizer_instrumentation attribute
The purpose of __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is to
prevent all kinds of sanitizer instrumentation applied to a certain
function, Objective-C method, or global variable.

The no_sanitize(...) attribute drops instrumentation checks, but may
still insert code preventing false positive reports. In some cases
though (e.g. when building Linux kernel with -fsanitize=kernel-memory
or -fsanitize=thread) the users may want to avoid any kind of
instrumentation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108029
2021-08-20 14:01:06 +02:00
Yonghong Song 0b32dca12e Reland [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates
how annotations are encoded in IR:
  distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10)
  !10 = !{!11, !12}
  !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
  !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.

Reland with additional fixes for llvm/unittests/IR/DebugTypeODRUniquingTest.cpp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
2021-08-19 17:33:50 -07:00
Yonghong Song c1169b8bd3 Revert "[DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types"
This reverts commit 2fded193e7.

Builtbot reports some test failures. Revert now so I can take time
to fix the issues.
2021-08-19 15:54:38 -07:00
Yonghong Song 2fded193e7 [DebugInfo] generate btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
A field "annotations" is introduced to DIComposite, and the
annotations are represented as an DINodeArray, similar to
DIComposite elements. The following example illustrates
how annotations are encoded in IR:
  distinct !DICompositeType(..., annotations: !10)
  !10 = !{!11, !12}
  !11 = !{!"btf_tag", !"a"}
  !12 = !{!"btf_tag", !"b"}
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations, as in the above example.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
2021-08-19 15:37:44 -07:00
Kazu Hirata e0ff1e9659 [Bitcode] Remove unused declaration writeGlobalVariableMetadataAttachment (NFC)
The declaration was introduced without a corresponding definition on
May 31, 2016 in commit cceae7feda.
2021-08-18 09:16:05 -07:00
Kazu Hirata a14920c002 [Bitcode] Remove unused declaration writeBitcodeHeader (NFC)
The corresponding definition was removed on Nov 29, 2016 in commit
5a0a2e648c.
2021-08-17 07:10:51 -07:00
Fangrui Song 3924877932 [IR] Rename `comdat noduplicates` to `comdat nodeduplicate`
In the textual format, `noduplicates` means no COMDAT/section group
deduplication is performed. Therefore, if both sets of sections are retained, and
they happen to define strong external symbols with the same names,
there will be a duplicate definition linker error.

In PE/COFF, the selection kind lowers to `IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_NODUPLICATES`.
The name describes the corollary instead of the immediate semantics.  The name
can cause confusion to other binary formats (ELF, wasm) which have implemented/
want to implement the "no deduplication" selection kind. Rename it to be clearer.

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106319
2021-07-20 12:47:10 -07:00
Nikita Popov c191035f42 [IR] Add elementtype attribute
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
2021-07-15 18:04:26 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 52b5491a21 Revert "[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on `distinct` MDNodes"
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854.

It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
2021-07-02 15:57:07 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks cb3580e7ad [OpaquePtr][BitcodeWriter] Handle attributes with types
For example, byval.

Skip the type attribute auto-upgrade if we already have the type.

I've actually seen this error of the ValueEnumerator missing a type
attribute's type in a non-opaque pointer context.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105138
2021-06-29 14:47:29 -07:00