Similar to what we do for other loads/stores, use the intrinsic
version that we already have custom isel for.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121166
vslide1up/down have this flag set, but the value isn't a splat.
Rename for clarity.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121037
This lowers VECTOR_SPLICE of scalable vectors to a slidedown follow by a slideup.
Fixed vectors are encouraged to use shufflevector instruction. The equivalent patch
for fixed vectors is D119039.
I've used a tail agnostic slidedown and limited the VL to only the
elements that will not be overwritten by the slideup. The slideup
uses VLMax for its VL. It unfortunately uses tail undisturbed policy
but it isn't required as there is no tail. We just need the merge
operand to carry the bits for the lower portion of the result.
Care was taken to ensure that either the slideup or slidedown will
be able to use a .vi instruction when the immediate is small. Which
one uses the immediate depends on the sign of the immediate.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119303
Add a new ISD opcode to represent the sign extending behavior of
vmv.x.h. Keep the previous anyext opcode to allow the existing
(fmv_x_anyexth (fmv_h_x X)) combine to keep working without needing
to generate a sign extend.
For fmv.x.w we are able to match the sext_inreg in an isel pattern,
but a 16-bit sext_inreg is lowered to a shift pair before isel. This
seemed like a larger match than we should do in isel.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118974
Internally to DAGCombiner the SDValues were passed by non-const
reference despite not being modified. They were then passed by
const reference to TLI.
This patch passes them by value which is consistent with the vast
majority of code.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120420
Add the passthru operand for
VMV_V_X_VL, VFMV_V_F_VL and SPLAT_VECTOR_SPLIT_I64_VL also.
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119688
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Add passthru operand for VSLIDE1UP_VL and VSLIDE1DOWN_VL to support
i64 scalar in rv32.
The masked VSLIDE1 would only emit mask undisturbed policy regardless
of giving mask agnostic policy until InsertVSETVLI supports mask agnostic.
Reviewed by: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117989
Add a new ISD opcode to represent the sign extending behavior of
vmv.x.h. Keep the previous anyext opcode to allow the existing
(fmv_x_anyexth (fmv_h_x X)) combine to keep working without needing
to generate a sign extend.
For fmv.x.w we are able to match the sext_inreg in an isel pattern,
but a 16-bit sext_inreg is lowered to a shift pair before isel. This
seemed like a larger match than we should do in isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118974
SPLAT_VECTOR_I64 has the same semantics as RISCVISD::VMV_V_X_VL, it
just assumed VLMax instead of carrying a VL operand.
Include order of RISCVInstrInfoVSDPatterns.td and RISCVInstrInfoVVLPatterns.td
has been swapped to avoid moving riscv_vmv_v_x_vl into
RISCVInstrInfoVSDPatterns.td and to allow moving other "_vl" SDNodes back to
RISCVInstrInfoVVLPatterns.td
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118841
This adds or reuses ISD opcodes for vadd.wv, vaddu.wv, vadd.vv, vaddu.vv
and a similar set for sub.
I've included support for narrowing scalar splats that have known
sign/zero bits similar to what was done for MUL_VL.
The conversion to vwadd.vv proceeds in two phases. First we'll form
a vwadd.wv by narrowing one of the operands. Then we'll visit the
vwadd.wv to try to narrow the other operand. This turned out to be
simpler than catching all the cases in one step. The forming of of
vwadd.wv can happen for either operand for add, but only the right
hand side for sub since sub isn't commutable.
An interesting quirk is that ADD_VL and VZEXT_VL/VSEXT_VL are formed
during vector op legalization, but VMV_V_X_VL isn't usually formed
until op legalization when BUILD_VECTORS are handled. This leads to
VWADD_W_VL forming in one DAG combine round, and then a later DAG combine
round sees the VMV_V_X_VL and needs to commute the operands to get the
splat in position. This alone necessitated a VWADD_W_VL combine function
which made forming vwadd.vv in two stages an easy choice.
I've left out trying hard to form vwadd.wx instructions for now. It would
only save an extend in the scalar domain which isn't as interesting.
Might need to review the test coverage a bit. Most of the vwadd.wv
instructions are coming from vXi64 tests on rv64. The tests were
copy pasted from the existing multiply tests.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117954
We already have an ISD opcode for the more general GREV/GREVI
instructon. We can just use it with the encoding that corresponds
to the behavior of brev8. This is similar to what we do for orc.b
where we use the GORC ISD opcode.
According to riscv-v-spec-1.0, widening signed(vs2)-unsigned integer multiply
vwmulsu.vv vd, vs2, vs1, vm # vector-vector
vwmulsu.vx vd, vs2, rs1, vm # vector-scalar
It is worth noting that signed op is only for vs2.
For vwmulsu.vv, we can swap two ops, and don't care which is sign extension,
but for vwmulsu.vx signExt can not be a vector extended from scalar (rs1).
I specifically added two functions ending with _swap in the test case.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118215
This patch adds lowering of the llvm.vp.merge.* intrinsic
(ISD::VP_MERGE) to RVV vmerge/vfmerge instructions. It introduces a
special pseudo form of vmerge which allows a tied merge operand,
allowing us to specify the tail elements as being equal to the "on
false" operand, using a tied-def constraint and a "tail undisturbed"
policy.
While this strategy allows us to often lower the intrinsic to just one
instruction, it may be less efficient in fixed-vector types as the
number of tail elements may extend far beyond the length of the fixed
vector. Another strategy could be to use a vmerge/vfmerge instruction
with an AVL equal to the length of the vector type, and manipulate the
condition operand such that mask elements greater than the operation's
EVL are false.
I've also observed inefficient codegen in which our 'VF' patterns don't
match raw floating-point SPLAT_VECTORs, which occur in scalable-vector
code.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117561
RISCV only has a unary shuffle that requires places indices in a
register. For interleaving two vectors this means we need at least
two vrgathers and a vmerge to do a shuffle of two vectors.
This patch teaches shuffle lowering to use a widening addu followed
by a widening vmaccu to implement the interleave. First we extract
the low half of both V1 and V2. Then we implement
(zext(V1) + zext(V2)) + (zext(V2) * zext(2^eltbits - 1)) which
simplifies to (zext(V1) + zext(V2) * 2^eltbits). This further
simplifies to (zext(V1) + zext(V2) << eltbits). Then we bitcast the
result back to the original type splitting the wide elements in half.
We can only do this if we have a type with wider elements available.
Because we're using extends we also have to be careful with fractional
lmuls. Floating point types are supported by bitcasting to/from integer.
The tests test a varied combination of LMULs split across VLEN>=128 and
VLEN>=512 tests. There a few tests with shuffle indices commuted as well
as tests for undef indices. There's one test for a vXi64/vXf64 vector which
we can't optimize, but verifies we don't crash.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117743
This reverts the revert commit e328385739.
Accidental demanded bits change has been removed. The demanded bits
code itself was remove in a pre-commit since it isn't tested.
Original commit message:
Previous we used the fshl/fshr operand ordering for simplicity. This
made things confusing when D117468 proposed adding intrinsics for
the instructions. We can't just use the generic funnel shifting
intrinsics because fsl/fsr have different functionality that should
be exposed to software.
Now we use rs1, rs3, rs2/shamt order which matches the instruction
printing order and the order used in this intrinsic header
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/main-history/cproofs/rvintrin.h
Previous we used the fshl/fshr operand ordering for simplicity. This
made things confusing when D117468 proposed adding intrinsics for
the instructions. We can't just use the generic funnel shifting
intrinsics because fsl/fsr have different functionality that should
be exposed to software.
Now we use rs1, rs3, rs2/shamt order which matches the instruction
printing order and the order used in this intrinsic header
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/main-history/cproofs/rvintrin.h
Currently, users expected VL is the last operand. However, since some
intrinsics has tail policy in the last operand, this rule cannot be used
anymore.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117452
Current SplatOperand starts from 1 because operand 0 (or 1) is intrinsic
id in SelectionDAG.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117453
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/dag-numsignbits.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
The code can only address the whole RV32 address space or the lower 2 GiB
of the RV64 address space in small code model, so 32 bits entry is enough.
Cache hit ratio and code size have some improvements.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116435
When `Zbt` is enabled, we can generate SELECT for division by power
of 2, so that there is no data dependency.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114856
For large integers (for example, magic numbers generated by
TargetLowering::BuildSDIV when dividing by constant), we may
need about 4~8 instructions to build them.
In the same time, it just takes two instructions to load
constants (with extra cycles to access memory), so it may be
profitable to put these integers into constant pool.
Reviewed By: asb, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114950
For fixed and scalable vectors, each intrinsic x is lowered to vmx.mm,
dropping the mask, which is safe to do as masked-off elements are
undef anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115339
This adds support for strict conversions between fp types and between
integer and fp.
NOTE: RISCV has static rounding mode instructions, but the constrainted
intrinsic metadata is not used to select static rounding modes. Dynamic
rounding mode is always used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115997
Enable transform (X & Y) == Y ---> (~X & Y) == 0 and (X & Y) != Y ---> (~X & Y) != 0 when have Zbb extension to use more andn instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115922
In order to support constrained FP intrinsics we need to model FRM
dependency. Whether or not a instruction uses FRM is based on a 3
bit field in the instruction. Because of this we can't add
'Uses = [FRM]' to the tablegen descriptions.
This patch examines the immediate after isel and adds an implicit
use of FRM. This idea came from Roger Ferrer Ibanez.
Other ideas:
We could be overly conservative and just pretend all instructions with
frm field read the FRM register. Or we could have pseudoinstructions
for CodeGen with rounding mode.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck, arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115555
This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
to be handled similarly.
A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
behaviour.
This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
naturally saturate the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
It causes builds to fail with this assert:
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:990:
bool llvm::APInt::operator==(const llvm::APInt &) const:
Assertion `BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && "Comparison requires equal bit widths"' failed.
See comment on the code review.
> This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
> smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
> the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
> it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
> ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
> to be handled similarly.
>
> A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
> be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
> than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
> behaviour.
>
> This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
> naturally saturate the result.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
This reverts commit 52ff3b0093.
This adds a fold in DAGCombine to create fptosi_sat from sequences for
smin(smax(fptosi(x))) nodes, where the min/max saturate the output of
the fp convert to a specific bitwidth (say INT_MIN and INT_MAX). Because
it is dealing with smin(/smax) in DAG they may currently be ISD::SMIN,
ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes which need
to be handled similarly.
A shouldConvertFpToSat method was added to control when converting may
be profitable. The original fptosi will have a less strict semantics
than the fptosisat, with less values that need to produce defined
behaviour.
This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
naturally saturate the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111976
On RISC-V, icmp is not sunk (as the following snippet shows) which
generates the following suboptimal branch pattern:
```
core_list_find:
lh a2, 2(a1)
seqz a3, a0 <<
bltz a2, .LBB0_5
bnez a3, .LBB0_9 << should sink the seqz
[...]
j .LBB0_9
.LBB0_5:
bnez a3, .LBB0_9 << should sink the seqz
lh a1, 0(a1)
[...]
```
due to an icmp not being sunk.
The blocks after `codegenprepare` look as follows:
```
define dso_local %struct.list_head_s* @core_list_find(%struct.list_head_s* readonly %list, %struct.list_data_s* nocapture readonly %info) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%idx = getelementptr inbounds %struct.list_data_s, %struct.list_data_s* %info, i64 0, i32 1
%0 = load i16, i16* %idx, align 2, !tbaa !4
%cmp = icmp sgt i16 %0, -1
%tobool.not37 = icmp eq %struct.list_head_s* %list, null
br i1 %cmp, label %while.cond.preheader, label %while.cond9.preheader
while.cond9.preheader: ; preds = %entry
br i1 %tobool.not37, label %return, label %land.rhs11.lr.ph
```
where the `%tobool.not37` is the result of the icmp that is not sunk.
Note that it is computed in the basic-block up until what becomes the
`bltz` instruction and the `bnez` is a basic-block of its own.
Compare this to what happens on AArch64 (where the icmp is correctly sunk):
```
define dso_local %struct.list_head_s* @core_list_find(%struct.list_head_s* readonly %list, %struct.list_data_s* nocapture readonly %info) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%idx = getelementptr inbounds %struct.list_data_s, %struct.list_data_s* %info, i64 0, i32 1
%0 = load i16, i16* %idx, align 2, !tbaa !6
%cmp = icmp sgt i16 %0, -1
br i1 %cmp, label %while.cond.preheader, label %while.cond9.preheader
while.cond9.preheader: ; preds = %entry
%1 = icmp eq %struct.list_head_s* %list, null
br i1 %1, label %return, label %land.rhs11.lr.ph
```
This is caused by sinkCmpExpression() being skipped, if multiple
condition registers are supported.
Given that the check for multiple condition registers affect only
sinkCmpExpression() and shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(), this change
adjusts the RISC-V target as follows:
* we no longer signal multiple condition registers (thus changing
the behaviour of sinkCmpExpression() back to sinking the icmp)
* we override shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence() to let always select
the preferred normalisation strategy for our backend
With both changes, the test results remain unchanged. Note that without
the target-specific override to shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(), there
is worse code (more branches) generated for select-and.ll and select-or.ll.
The original test case changes as expected:
```
core_list_find:
lh a2, 2(a1)
bltz a2, .LBB0_5
beqz a0, .LBB0_9 <<
[...]
j .LBB0_9
.LBB0_5:
beqz a0, .LBB0_9 <<
lh a1, 0(a1)
[...]
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98932
This patch adds codegen support for lowering the vector-predicated
reduction intrinsics to RVV instructions. The process is similar to that
of the other reduction intrinsics, save for the fact that every VP
reduction has a start value. We reuse the existing custom "VL" nodes,
adding extra patterns where required to handle non-true masks.
To support these nodes, the `RISCVISD::VECREDUCE_*_VL` nodes have been
given an explicit "merge" operand. This is to faciliate the VP
reductions, where we must be careful to ensure that even if no operation
is performed (when VL=0) we still produce the start value. The RVV
reductions don't update the destination register under these conditions,
so we tie the splatted start value to the output register.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107657
For strided accesses the loop vectorizer seems to prefer creating a
vector induction variable with a start value of the form
<i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, ...>. This value will be incremented each
loop iteration by a splat constant equal to the length of the vector.
Within the loop, arithmetic using splat values will be done on this
vector induction variable to produce indices for a vector GEP.
This pass attempts to dig through the arithmetic back to the phi
to create a new scalar induction variable and a stride. We push
all of the arithmetic out of the loop by folding it into the start,
step, and stride values. Then we create a scalar GEP to use as the
base pointer for a strided load or store using the computed stride.
Loop strength reduce will run after this pass and can do some
cleanups to the scalar GEP and induction variable.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107790
LICM may have pulled out a splat, but with .vx instructions we
can fold it into an operation.
This patch enables CGP to reverse the LICM transform and move the
splat back into the loop.
I've started with the commutable integer operations and shifts, but we can
extend this with more operations in future patches.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109394
This patch adds support for the vector-predicated `VP_STORE` and
`VP_LOAD` nodes. We do this in the same way we lower `MSTORE` and
`MLOAD`: to regular load/store instructions via intrinsics.
One necessary change was made to `SelectionDAGLegalize` so that
`VP_STORE` nodes' operation actions are taken from the stored "value"
operands, in the same vein as `STORE` or `MSTORE`.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108999
This patch adds support for the `VP_SCATTER` and `VP_GATHER` nodes by
lowering them to RVV's `vsox`/`vlux` instructions, respectively. This
process is almost identical to the existing `MSCATTER`/`MGATHER` support.
One extra change was made to `SelectionDAGLegalize` so that
`VP_SCATTER`'s operation action is derived from its stored "value"
operand rather than its return type (which is always the chain).
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108987
The fcvt fp to integer instructions saturate if their input is
infinity or out of range, but the instructions produce a maximum
integer for nan instead of 0 required for the ISD opcodes.
This means we can use the instructions to do the saturating
conversion, but we'll need to fix up the nan case at the end.
We can probably improve the i8 and i16 default codegen as well,
but I'll leave that for a follow up.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107230
This patch adds support for lowering the saturating vector add/sub
intrinsics to RVV instructions, for both fixed-length and
scalable-vector forms alike.
Note that some of the DAG combines are still not triggering for the
scalable-vector tests. These require a bit more work in the DAGCombiner
itself.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106651
Lehua Ding