This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
There are already matchers for type template parameters and non-type template
parameters, but somehow no matcher exists for template template parameters
and I need it to write unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85536
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
This implements the default(firstprivate) clause as defined in OpenMP
Technical Report 8 (2.22.4).
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75591
Added new Macros `AST(_POLYMORPHIC)_MATCHER_REGEX(_OVERLOAD)` that define a matchers that take a regular expression string and optionally regular expression flags. This lets users match against nodes while ignoring the case without having to manually use `[Aa]` or `[A-Fa-f]` in their regex. The other point this addresses is in the current state, matchers that use regular expressions have to compile them for each node they try to match on, Now the regular expression is compiled once when you define the matcher and used for every node that it tries to match against. If there is an error while compiling the regular expression an error will be logged to stderr showing the bad regex string and the reason it couldn't be compiled. The old behaviour of this was down to the Matcher implementation and some would assert, whereas others just would never match. Support for this has been added to the documentation script as well. Support for this has been added to dynamic matchers ensuring functionality is the same between the 2 use cases.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82706
Summary:
Previously, AST Matchers tests were using a custom way to run a test
with a specific C++ standard version. I'm migrating them to a shared
infrastructure to specify a Clang target from libClangTesting. I'm also
changing tests for AST Matchers to run in multiple language standards
versions, and under multiple triples that have different behavior with
regards to templates.
To keep the size of the patch manageable, in this patch I'm only
migrating one file to get the process started and get feedback on this
approach.
One caveat is that increasing the number of test configuration does
significantly increase the runtime of AST Matchers tests. On my machine,
the test runtime increases from 2.0 to 6.0s. I think it is worth the
improved test coverage.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, ymandel
Reviewed By: ymandel
Subscribers: gribozavr2, jfb, sstefan1, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82179
Summary:
The unittest for AST matchers has its own way to specify language
standards. I unified it with the shared infrastructure from
libClangTesting.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, hlopko
Reviewed By: hlopko
Subscribers: mgorny, sstefan1, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81150
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
`OMPClause` is the base class, it is not descendant from **any**
other class, therefore for it to work with e.g.
`VariadicDynCastAllOfMatcher<>`, it needs to be handled here.
Reviewers: sbenza, bkramer, pcc, klimek, hokein, gribozavr, aaron.ballman, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: gribozavr, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, alexfh, ABataev, cfe-commits
Tags: #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57112
llvm-svn: 356675
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
This was originally reviewed and approved in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292 and submitted as r354832. It was
reverted in r354839 due to failures on the Windows CI builds.
This version fixes the test failures on Windows, which were caused by
differences in template expansion between versions of clang on different
OSes. The version of clang built with MSVC and running on Windows never
expands the template in the C++ test in ImportExpr.ImportChooseExpr in
clang/unittests/AST/ASTImporter.cpp, but the version on Linux does for
the empty arguments and -fms-compatibility.
So, this version of the patch drops the C++ test for
__builtin_choose_expr, since that version was written to catch
regressions of the logic for isConditionTrue() in the AST import code
for ChooseExpr, and those regressions are also caught by
ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase.ImportChooseExpr, which does work on
Windows.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman, rnk, a.sidorin
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, rnkovacs, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58663
llvm-svn: 354916
Summary:
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain ChooseExpr (the GNU
__builtin_choose_expr construction). This is needed, for example, for
cross-CTU analysis of C code that makes use of __builtin_choose_expr.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter.
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, martong, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58292
llvm-svn: 354832
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary:
This patch introduces a new matcher for `DecltypeType` and its underlying type
in order to fix a bug in clang-tidy, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for more.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, NoQ, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48759
llvm-svn: 337703
This allows matchers like:
friendDecl(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(...)))
friendDecl(hasType(asString(...)))
It seems that hasType is probably the most reasonable narrowing matcher to
overload, since it is already used to narrow to other declaration kinds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48242
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 334930
The specifiesTypeLoc() matcher narrows a nestedNameSpecifier matcher based on a
typeloc within the NNS. However, the matcher does not guard against NNS which
are a namespace, and cause getTypeLoc to assert-fail.
llvm-svn: 334929
HasDeclarationMatcher did not handle DeducedType, it always returned false for deduced types.
So with code like this:
struct X{};
auto x = X{};
This did no longer match:
varDecl(hasType(recordDecl(hasName("X"))))
Because HasDeclarationMatcher didn't resolve the DeducedType of x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36308
llvm-svn: 310095
documentation.
Trying to match integerLiteral(-1) will silently fail, because an numeric
literal is always positive.
- Update the documentation to explain how to match negative numeric
literals.
- Add a unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35196
llvm-svn: 307663
Summary:
This adds a new ASTMatcher for CXXStdInitializerListExprs that matches C++ initializer list expressions.
The primary motivation is to use it to fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]] (review here [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767 | D32767 ]]).
Reviewers: alexfh, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32810
llvm-svn: 302287
It was failing because it had an explicit check for whether we're on
Windows.
There are a few other similar explicit checks in this file which I
didn't remove because they serve as reasonable documentation that the
test doesn't work with a Windows triple.
llvm-svn: 274269
Sam McCall