Currently, `hasUnaryOperand` fails for the overloaded `operator*`. This patch fixes the bug and
adds tests for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104389
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Required for capturing base specifier in matchers:
`cxxRecordDecl(hasDirectBase(cxxBaseSpecifier().bind("base")))`
Reviewed By: steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69218
Summary: Try to enable the support for C++20 coroutine keywords for AST
Matchers.
Reviewers: sammccall, njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96316
For example, before this patch we can use has() to get from a
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator to its operand, but hasParent doesn't get
back to the cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator. This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96113
With a matcher like
expr(anyOf(integerLiteral(equals(42)), unless(expr())))
and code such as
struct B {
B(int);
};
B func1() { return 42; }
the top-level expr() would match each of the nodes which are not spelled
in the source and then ignore-traverse to match the integerLiteral node.
This would result in multiple results reported for the integerLiteral.
Fix that by only running matching logic on nodes which are not skipped
with the top-level matcher.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95735
Because we don't know in ASTMatchFinder whether we're matching in AsIs
or IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode, we need to traverse the lambda
twice, but store whether we're matching in nodes spelled in source or
not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93688
traverse() predates the IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode. Update example
and test code to use the newer mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91917
Don't match Stmt or Decl nodes not spelled in the source when using
TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource. This prevents accidental modification
of source code at incorrect locations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90984
Update the ASTNodeTraverser to dump only nodes spelled in source. There
are only a few which need to be handled, but Decl nodes for which
isImplicit() is true are handled together.
Update the RAV instances used in ASTMatchFinder to ignore the nodes too.
As with handling of template instantiations, it is necessary to allow
the RAV to process the implicit nodes because they need to be visitable
before the first traverse() matcher is encountered. An exception to
this is in the MatchChildASTVisitor, because we sometimes wish to make a
node matchable but make its children not-matchable. This is the case
for defaulted CXXMethodDecls for example.
Extend TransformerTests to illustrate the kinds of problems that can
arise when performing source code rewriting due to matching implicit
nodes.
This change accounts for handling nodes not spelled in source when using
direct matching of nodes, and when using the has() and hasDescendant()
matchers. Other matchers such as
cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(cxxMethodDecl())) still succeed for
compiler-generated methods for example after this change. Updating the
implementations of hasMethod() and other matchers is for a follow-up
patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90982
Continue to dump and match on explicit template specializations, but
omit explicit instantiation declarations and definitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90763
Summary:
IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode should ignore these because they are
not written in the source. This matters for example when trying to
replace types or values which are templated. The new test in
TransformerTest.cpp in this commit demonstrates the problem.
In existing matcher code, users can write
`unless(isInTemplateInstantiation())` or `unless(isInstantiated())` (the
user must know which to use). The point of the
TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode is to allow the novice to avoid such
details. This patch changes the IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode to
skip over implicit template instantiations.
This patch does not change the TK_AsIs mode.
Note: An obvious attempt at an alternative implementation would simply
change the shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() in ASTMatchFinder.cpp to
return something conditional on the operational TraversalKind. That
does not work because shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() is called
before a possible top-level traverse() matcher changes the operational
TraversalKind.
Reviewers: sammccall, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, ymandel, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80961
Summary:
Skip over elidable nodes, and ensure that intermediate
CXXFunctionalCastExpr nodes are also skipped if they are semantic.
Reviewers: klimek, ymandel
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82278
//AST Matcher// `hasBody` is a polymorphic matcher that behaves
differently for loop statements and function declarations. The main
difference is the for functions declarations it does not only call
`FunctionDecl::getBody()` but first checks whether the declaration in
question is that specific declaration which has the body by calling
`FunctionDecl::doesThisDeclarationHaveABody()`. This is achieved by
specialization of the template `GetBodyMatcher`. Unfortunately template
specializations do not catch the descendants of the class for which the
template is specialized. Therefore it does not work correcly for the
descendants of `FunctionDecl`, such as `CXXMethodDecl`,
`CXXConstructorDecl`, `CXXDestructorDecl` etc. This patch fixes this
issue by using a template metaprogram.
The patch also introduces a new matcher `hasAnyBody` which matches
declarations which have a body present in the AST but not necessarily
belonging to that particular declaration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87527
The analysis for const-ness of local variables required a view generally useful
matchers that are extracted into its own patch.
They are decompositionDecl and forEachArgumentWithParamType, that works
for calls through function pointers as well.
This is a reupload of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72505, that already landed,
but had to be reverted due to a GCC crash on powerpc
(https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4c48ea68e491cb42f1b5d43ffba89f6a7f0dadc4)
Because this took a long time to adress, i decided to redo this patch and
have a clean workflow.
I try to coordinate with someone that has a PPC to apply this patch and
test for the crash. If everything is fine, I intend to just commit.
If the crash is still happening, i hope to at least find the cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87588
Summary:
In ASTMatcher, when we have `has(...)` and `hasParent(...)` called with the same internal matcher on the same node, the memoization process will mix-up the two calls because the direction of the traversal is not part of the memoization key.
This patch adds this information.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: Godin, njames93, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80025
Summary:
The unittest for AST matchers has its own way to specify language
standards. I unified it with the shared infrastructure from
libClangTesting.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, hlopko
Reviewed By: hlopko
Subscribers: mgorny, sstefan1, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81150
Force the unittests on c++ code for matchers to specify the correct standard.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80884
Summary: Adds a matcher called `hasOperands` for `BinaryOperator`'s when you need to match both sides but the order isn't important, usually on commutative operators.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80054
Summary:
Acts on `BinaryOperator` and `UnaryOperator` and functions the same as `anyOf(hasOperatorName(...), hasOperatorName(...), ...)`
Documentation generation isn't perfect but I feel that the python doc script needs updating for that
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75040
Sam McCall