Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
- Removed fix-it hints from template instaniations since changes to the
templates are rarely helpful.
- Changed the caret in template instaniations from the class/struct name to the
class/struct keyword, matching the other warnings.
- Do not offer fix-it hints when multiple declarations disagree. Warnings are
still given.
- Once a definition is found, offer a fix-it hint to all previous declarations
with wrong tag.
- Declarations that disagree with a previous definition will get a fix-it hint
to change the declaration.
llvm-svn: 132831
__builtin_astype(): Used to reinterpreted as another data type of the same size using for both scalar and vector data types.
Added test case.
llvm-svn: 132612
I tried to use an assert to prove that I could remove each of the
arguments I did, but ended up writing my assert with inverted logic.
Doh! Reported by Xi Wang on cfe-dev. I have manually verified the source
locations and ranges for these using -ast-dump. I tried writing a test
case that would catch these, but these expressions aren't exposed in the
c-index-test's token annotation utility.
llvm-svn: 132284
traits which uses the information embedded in the expression. Use this
to simplify several interfaces which repeated information embedded in
the expression through explicit arguments. I added an assertion that the
only extra piece of data to come in from the parser matches what is
stored in the expression. No functionality change intended here.
Also cleaned up the doxygen comments for some of these methods and some
formatting oddities.
llvm-svn: 132115
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
parameter node and use this to correctly mangle parameter
references in function template signatures.
A follow-up patch will improve the storage usage of these
fields; here I've just done the lazy thing.
llvm-svn: 130669
Patch authored by John Wiegley.
These are array type traits used for parsing code that employs certain
features of the Embarcadero C++ compiler: __array_rank(T) and
__array_extent(T, Dim).
llvm-svn: 130351
Patch authored by David Abrahams.
These two expression traits (__is_lvalue_expr, __is_rvalue_expr) are used for
parsing code that employs certain features of the Embarcadero C++ compiler.
llvm-svn: 130122
instantiation), be sure to add the transformed declaration into the
current DeclContext. Also, remove the -Wuninitialized hack that works
around this bug. Fixes <rdar://problem/9200676>.
llvm-svn: 129544
This patch authored by Eric Niebler.
Many methods on the Sema class (e.g. ConvertPropertyForRValue) take Expr
pointers as in/out parameters (Expr *&). This is especially true for the
routines that apply implicit conversions to nodes in-place. This design is
workable only as long as those conversions cannot fail. If they are allowed
to fail, they need a way to report their failures. The typical way of doing
this in clang is to use an ExprResult, which has an extra bit to signal a
valid/invalid state. Returning ExprResult is de riguour elsewhere in the Sema
interface. We suggest changing the Expr *& parameters in the Sema interface
to ExprResult &. This increases interface consistency and maintainability.
This interface change is important for work supporting MS-style C++
properties. For reasons explained here
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013180.html>,
seemingly trivial operations like rvalue/lvalue conversions that formerly
could not fail now can. (The reason is that given the semantics of the
feature, getter/setter method lookup cannot happen until the point of use, at
which point it may be found that the method does not exist, or it may have the
wrong type, or overload resolution may fail, or it may be inaccessible.)
llvm-svn: 129143
location into a TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc. These were found using
a hand-written program to inspect every source location in
TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs and Valgrind. I don't know of any way to
test them in Clang's existing test suite sadly.
Example code that triggers the ElaboratedType case:
template <typename T> struct X1 {
template <typename U> struct X1_1 {
int x;
};
};
template <typename T, typename U> struct X2 {
typename X1<T>::template X1_1<U> B;
};
X2<char, int> x2;
The other fix was simply spotted by inspection. I audited all constructions of
[Dependent]TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in TreeTransform.h, and the rest set
the TemplateNameLoc properly.
llvm-svn: 128702
to set the source-location information for the template arguments to
the *transformed* source-location information, not the original
source-location information. Fixes <rdar://problem/8986308> (a libc++
SFINAE issue) and the Boost.Polygon failure.
llvm-svn: 127150
transform the type that replaces the template type parameter. In the
vast majority of cases, there's nothing to do, because most template
type parameters are replaced with something non-dependent that doesn't
need further transformation. However, when we're dealing with the
default template arguments of template template parameters, we might
end up replacing a template parameter (of the template template
parameter) with a template parameter of the enclosing template.
This addresses part of PR9016, but not within function
templates. That's a separate issue.
llvm-svn: 127091
DependentTemplateSpecializationType during tree transformation, retain
the NestedNameSpecifierLoc as it was used to translate the template
name, rather than reconstructing it from the template name.
Fixes PR9401.
llvm-svn: 127015
parameter, save the instantiated default template arguments along with
the explicitly-specified template argument list. That way, we prefer
the default template template arguments corresponding to the template
template parameter rather than those of its template template argument.
This addresses the likely direction of C++ core issue 150, and fixes
PR9353/<rdar://problem/9069136>, bringing us closer to the behavior of
EDG and GCC.
llvm-svn: 126920
TreeTransform::TransformDependentTemplateSpecializationType() with
poor source-location information handling. All of the
CXXScopeSpec::MakeTrivial() and
NestedNameSpecifierLocBuilder::MakeTrivial() callers actually make
sense now.
llvm-svn: 126856
source-location-preserving
TreeTransform::TranformNestedNameSpecifierLoc(). No functionality
change: the victim had no callers (that themselves had callers) anyway.
llvm-svn: 126853
template arguments. I believe that this is the last place in the AST
where we were storing a source range for a nested-name-specifier
rather than a proper nested-name-specifier location structure. (Yay!)
There is still a lot of cleanup to do in the TreeTransform, which
doesn't take advantage of nested-name-specifiers with source-location
information everywhere it could.
llvm-svn: 126844
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.
llvm-svn: 126776
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.
Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.
llvm-svn: 126729
source-location information. We don't actually preserve this
information in any of the resulting TypeLocs (yet), so it doesn't
matter.
llvm-svn: 126693
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.
Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation).
llvm-svn: 126681
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.
llvm-svn: 126663
dependent template names. There is still a lot of redundant code in
TreeTransform to cope with TemplateSpecializationTypes, which I'll
remove in stages.
llvm-svn: 126656
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.
llvm-svn: 126358
with another component in the nested-name-specifiers, updating its
representation (a NestedNameSpecifier) and source-location information
(currently a SourceRange) simultaneously. This is groundwork for
adding source-location information to nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126346
making them be template instantiated in a more normal way and
make them handle attributes like other decls.
This fixes the used/unused label handling stuff, making it use
the same infrastructure as other decls.
llvm-svn: 125771
class and to bind the shared value using OpaqueValueExpr. This fixes an
unnoticed problem with deserialization of these expressions where the
deserialized form would lose the vital pointer-equality trait; or rather,
it fixes it because this patch also does the right thing for deserializing
OVEs.
Change OVEs to not be a "temporary object" in the sense that copy elision is
permitted.
This new representation is not totally unawkward to work with, but I think
that's really part and parcel with the semantics we're modelling here. In
particular, it's much easier to fix things like the copy elision bug and to
make the CFG look right.
I've tried to update the analyzer to deal with this in at least some
obvious cases, and I think we get a much better CFG out, but the printing
of OpaqueValueExprs probably needs some work.
llvm-svn: 125744
LabelDecl and LabelStmt. There is a 1-1 correspondence between the
two, but this simplifies a bunch of code by itself. This is because
labels are the only place where we previously had references to random
other statements, causing grief for AST serialization and other stuff.
This does cause one regression (attr(unused) doesn't silence unused
label warnings) which I'll address next.
This does fix some minor bugs:
1. "The only valid attribute " diagnostic was capitalized.
2. Various diagnostics printed as ''labelname'' instead of 'labelname'
3. This reduces duplication of label checking between functions and blocks.
Review appreciated, particularly for the cindex and template bits.
llvm-svn: 125733
there were only three virtual methods of any significance.
The primary way to grab child iterators now is with
Stmt::child_range children();
Stmt::const_child_range children() const;
where a child_range is just a std::pair of iterators suitable for
being llvm::tie'd to some locals. I've left the old child_begin()
and child_end() accessors in place, but it's probably a substantial
penalty to grab the iterators individually now, since the
switch-based dispatch is kindof inherently slower than vtable
dispatch. Grabbing them together is probably a slight win over the
status quo, although of course we could've achieved that with vtables, too.
I also reclassified SwitchCase (correctly) as an abstract Stmt
class, which (as the first such class that wasn't an Expr subclass)
required some fiddling in a few places.
There are somewhat gross metaprogramming hooks in place to ensure
that new statements/expressions continue to implement
getSourceRange() and children(). I had to work around a recent clang
bug; dgregor actually fixed it already, but I didn't want to
introduce a selfhosting dependency on ToT.
llvm-svn: 125183
- BlockDeclRefExprs always store VarDecls
- BDREs no longer store copy expressions
- BlockDecls now store a list of captured variables, information about
how they're captured, and a copy expression if necessary
With that in hand, change IR generation to use the captures data in
blocks instead of walking the block independently.
Additionally, optimize block layout by emitting fields in descending
alignment order, with a heuristic for filling in words when alignment
of the end of the block header is insufficient for the most aligned
field.
llvm-svn: 125005
- Add ref-qualifiers to the type system; they are part of the
canonical type. Print & profile ref-qualifiers
- Translate the ref-qualifier from the Declarator chunk for
functions to the function type.
- Diagnose mis-uses of ref-qualifiers w.r.t. static member
functions, free functions, constructors, destructors, etc.
- Add serialization and deserialization of ref-qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 124281
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
llvm-svn: 124211
during template instantiation. This code needs to eventually die, but
this little tweak fixes PR8629, where bad location information slipped
through to the location of a class template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 124199
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
outermost array types and not on the element type. Move the CanonicalType
member from Type to ExtQualsTypeCommonBase; the canonical type on an ExtQuals
node includes the qualifiers on the ExtQuals. Assorted optimizations enabled
by this change.
getQualifiers(), hasQualifiers(), etc. should all now implicitly look through
array types.
llvm-svn: 123817
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
pack expansions in template argument lists and function parameter
lists. The implementation of this paragraph should be complete
*except* for cases where we're substituting into one of the unexpanded
packs in a pack expansion; that's a general issue I haven't solved yet.
llvm-svn: 123188
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
parameters into parameter types, so that substitution of
explicitly-specified function template arguments uses the same
path. This enables the use of explicitly-specified function template
arguments with variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 122986
The initial TreeTransform is a cop-out, but it's more-or-less equivalent
to what we were doing before, or rather what we're doing now and might
eventually stop doing in favor of using this type.
I am simultaneously intrigued by the possibilities of rebuilding a
dependent Attri
llvm-svn: 122942
TypeSourceInfo when transforming a function parameter. The callees of
this routine already assume that TypeSourceInfo will be present, and
we want to always be sure that it exists.
llvm-svn: 122927
John McCall