I asked Devang to do back on Sep 27. Instead of going through the
MetadataContext class with methods like getMD() and getMDs(), just
ask the instruction directly for its metadata with getMetadata()
and getAllMetadata().
This includes a variety of other fixes and improvements: previously
all Value*'s were bloated because the HasMetadata bit was thrown into
value, adding a 9th bit to a byte. Now this is properly sunk down to
the Instruction class (the only place where it makes sense) and it
will be folded away somewhere soon.
This also fixes some confusion in getMDs and its clients about
whether the returned list is indexed by the MDID or densely packed.
This is now returned sorted and densely packed and the comments make
this clear.
This introduces a number of fixme's which I'll follow up on.
llvm-svn: 92235
The semantics of llvm.dbg.value are that starting from where it is executed, an offset into the specified user source variable is specified to get a new value.
An example:
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{ i32 7 }, i64 0, metadata !2)
Here the user source variable associated with metadata #2 gets the value "i32 7" at offset 0.
llvm-svn: 90788
This allows StringRef to skip controversial if(str) check in constructor.
Buildbots, wait for corresponding clang and llvm-gcc FE check-ins!
llvm-svn: 86914
question, can we get rid of the BasicBlock versions of all inserters
and use Head == 0 to indicate the old case when GetInsertBlock == 0?
llvm-svn: 83216
information. This allows arbitrary code involving DW_OP_plus_uconst
and DW_OP_deref. The scheme allows for easy extention to include,
any, or all of the DW_OP_ opcodes. I thought about just exposing all
of them, but, wasn't sure if people wanted the dwarf opcodes exposed
in the api. Is that a layering violation?
With this scheme, the entire existing block scheme used by llvm-gcc
can be switched over to the new scheme. I think that would be
cleaner, as then the compiler specific bits are not present in llvm
proper. Before the old code can be yanked however, similar code in
clang would have to be removed.
Next up, more testing.
llvm-svn: 83120
This involves temporarily hard wiring some parts to use the global context. This isn't ideal, but it's
the only way I could figure out to make this process vaguely incremental.
llvm-svn: 75445
checking for bcopy... no
checking for getc_unlocked... Assertion failed: (0 && "Unknown SCEV kind!"), function operator(), file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/src/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp, line 511.
/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/src/libdecnumber/decUtility.c:360: internal compiler error: Abort trap
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter> for instructions.
make[4]: *** [decUtility.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Assertion failed: (0 && "Unknown SCEV kind!"), function operator(), file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/src/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp, line 511.
/Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/full-llvm/build/llvmgcc42.roots/llvmgcc42~obj/src/libdecnumber/decNumber.c:5591: internal compiler error: Abort trap
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter> for instructions.
make[4]: *** [decNumber.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-stage2-libdecnumber] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
llvm-svn: 71165
to obtain debug info about them.
Introduce helpers to access debug info for global variables. Also introduce a
helper that works for both local and global variables.
llvm-svn: 66541
and extern_weak_odr. These are the same as the non-odr versions,
except that they indicate that the global will only be overridden
by an *equivalent* global. In C, a function with weak linkage can
be overridden by a function which behaves completely differently.
This means that IP passes have to skip weak functions, since any
deductions made from the function definition might be wrong, since
the definition could be replaced by something completely different
at link time. This is not allowed in C++, thanks to the ODR
(One-Definition-Rule): if a function is replaced by another at
link-time, then the new function must be the same as the original
function. If a language knows that a function or other global can
only be overridden by an equivalent global, it can give it the
weak_odr linkage type, and the optimizers will understand that it
is alright to make deductions based on the function body. The
code generators on the other hand map weak and weak_odr linkage
to the same thing.
llvm-svn: 66339
Chris Lattner