The `__va_start` intrinsic for Windows ARM does not account for const
correctness when performing a check. All local qualifiers are ignored
when validating the invocation. This was exposed by building the swift
stdlib against the Windows 10586 SDK for ARM. Simply expand out the
check for the two parameters and ignore the qualifiers for the check.
llvm-svn: 314226
directives.
If the variable is used in the target-based region but is not found in
any private|mapping clause, then generate implicit firstprivate|map
clauses for these implicitly mapped variables.
llvm-svn: 314205
This commit fixes a bug in the handling of storage-only __fp16 vectors
where clang didn't promote __fp16 vector operands to float vectors.
Conceptually, it performs the following transformation on the AST in
CreateBuiltinBinOp and CreateBuiltinUnaryOp:
(Before)
typedef __fp16 half4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
typedef float float4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2, hv3;
hv0 = hv1 + hv2 + hv3;
(After)
float4 t0 = (float4)hv1 + (float4)hv2;
float4 t1 = t0 + (float4)hv3;
hv0 = (half4)t1;
Note that this commit fixes the bug for targets that set
HalfArgsAndReturns to true (ARM and ARM64). Targets using intrinsics
such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 to handle __fp16 are still broken.
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 314056
Summary:
It will move destructors and operators to the end of completion list.
Destructors and operators are currently very high on the completion
list, as they have the same priority as member functions. However,
they are clearly not something users usually choose in completion
lists.
Reviewers: arphaman, erikjv, bkramer, krasimir
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: eraman, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38081
llvm-svn: 314019
For the triple thumbv7-apple-ios8.0.0 ssize_t is long and size_t is unsigned long,
while NSInteger is int and NSUinteger is unsigned int. Following
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Strings/Articles/formatSpecifiers.html
Clang catches it and insert a cast to long, for example
printf("%zd", getNSInteger())
will be replaced with
printf("%zd", (long)getNSInteger())
but since the underlying type of ssize_t is long the specifier "%zd" is not getting replaced.
This diff changes this behavior to enable replacing the specifier "%zd" with the correct one.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38159
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 314011
This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33
This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds
enumeration value' ubsan error in that change.
llvm-svn: 313955
I've been unable to find any cases whose behavior is actually changed by this,
but only because an implicitly deleted destructor also results in it being
impossible to have a trivial (non-deleted) copy constructor, which the place
where this really matters (choosing whether to pass a class in registers)
happens to also check.
llvm-svn: 313948
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
This recommits r313722, which was reverted in r313725 because clang
couldn't build compiler-rt. It failed to build because there were
function declarations that were missing 'noescape'. That has been fixed
in r313929.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313945
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34692
A non-defined enum with a backing type was always defaulting to
being treated as a signed type. IN the case where it IS defined,
the signed-ness of the actual items is used.
This patch uses the underlying type's signed-ness in the non-defined
case to test signed-comparision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38145
llvm-svn: 313907
Sema::InstantiateClass should check only exception specs added during
class instantiation and ignore already present delayed specs. This fixes
a case where we instantiate a class before parsing member initializers,
check exceptions for a different class and fail to find a member
initializer. Which is required for comparing exception specs for
explicitly-defaulted and implicit default constructor. With the fix we
are still checking exception specs but only after member initializers
are present.
Removing errors in crash-unparsed-exception.cpp is acceptable according
to discussion in PR24000 because other compilers accept code in
crash-unparsed-exception.cpp as valid.
rdar://problem/34167492
Reviewers: davide, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: dim, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37881
llvm-svn: 313906
It fixes a crash in CodeGen when we are trying to generate code for
initializer expression created before template instantiation, like
CallExpr '<dependent type>'
|-UnresolvedLookupExpr '<overloaded function type>' lvalue (ADL) = 'parse'
`-DeclRefExpr 'Buffer<N>' lvalue ParmVar 'buffer' 'Buffer<N>'
rdar://problem/33888545
Reviewers: rsmith, ahatanak
Reviewed By: ahatanak
Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38009
llvm-svn: 313896
Fix for too aggressive error err_type_defined_in_enum introduced in
r313386. Defining tags inside enumerations is prohibited in C++ but
allowed in C.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: alberto_magni, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38109
llvm-svn: 313894
If the captured variable has some redeclarations we may run into the
situation where the redeclaration is used instead of the canonical
declaration and we may consider this variable as one not captured
before.
llvm-svn: 313880
__interface types are allowed in MSVC to have "property" data members
(marked with declspec property). This patch alters Sema to allow property
data members.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38092
llvm-svn: 313828
As Aaron Ballman has pointed out, that is not really correct.
So the key problem there is the invalidity of the testcase.
Revert r313747, and rework testcase in such a way, so these
details (platform-specific default enum sigdness) are
accounted for.
Also, add a C++-specific testcase.
llvm-svn: 313756
Hopefully fixes test-clang-msc-x64-on-i686-linux-RA build.
The underlying problem is that the enum is signed there.
Yet still, it is invalid for it to contain negative values,
so the comparison is always tautological in this case.
No differential, but related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313747
Recommit. Original commit was reverted because buildbots broke.
The error was only reproducible in the build with assertions.
The problem was that the diagnostic expected true/false as
bool, while it was provided as string "true"/"false".
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313745
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This reverts commit r313722.
It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be
compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match
the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape').
llvm-svn: 313725
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313722
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 313720
overridden methods when compiling for non-ARC.
Previously, clang would error out when compiling for ARC, but didn't
print any diagnostics when compiling for non-ARC.
This was pointed out in the patch review for attribute noescape:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313717
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
When the value specified for n in ordered(n) is larger than the number of loops a segmentation fault can occur in one of two ways when attempting to print out a diagnostic for an associated depend(sink : vec):
1) The iteration vector vec contains less than n items
2) The iteration vector vec contains a variable that is not a loop control variable
This patch addresses both of these issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38049
llvm-svn: 313675
Summary:
According to C99 6.3.2.1p1, structs and unions with nested
const-qualified fields (that is, const-qualified fields
declared at some recursive level of the aggregate) are not
modifiable lvalues. However, Clang permits assignments of
these lvalues.
With this patch, we both prohibit the assignment of records
with const-qualified fields and emit a best-effort diagnostic.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31796 .
Committing on behalf of bevinh (Bevin Hansson).
Reviewers: rtrieu, rsmith, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, rogfer01, bjope, fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37254
llvm-svn: 313628
error'ed field for a template class' default ctor.
The two examples in the test would both cause a compiler assert when attempting
to calculate the exception specifier for the default constructor for the
template classes. The problem was that dependents of this function expect that
Field->getInClassInitializer (including canThrow) is not nullptr. However, if
the template's initializer has an error, exactly that situation happens.
This patch simply sets the field to be invalid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37865
llvm-svn: 313569
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34266
For e.g.
struct A {
void f(int);
static void f(char);
};
struct B {
auto foo() {
return [&] (auto a) {
A::f(a); // this should not cause a capture of '*this'
};
}
};
The patch does the following:
1) It moves the check to attempt an implicit capture of '*this' by reference into the more logical location of when the call is actually built within ActOnCallExpr (as opposed to when the unresolved-member-lookup node is created).
- Reminder: A capture of '*this' by value has to always be an explicit capture.
2) It additionally checks whether the naming class of the UnresolvedMemberExpr ('A' in the example above) is related to the enclosing class ('B' above).
P.S. If you have access to ISO-C++'s CWG reflector, see this thread for some potentially related discussion: http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2017/08/2851.php
llvm-svn: 313487
This fixes PR28903 by avoiding access check for inner enum constant. We
are performing access check because one enum constant references another
and because enum is defined in CXXRecordDecl. But access check doesn't
work because FindDeclaringClass doesn't expect more than one EnumDecl
and because inner enum has access AS_none due to not being an immediate
child of a record.
The change detects an enum is defined in wrong place and allows to skip
parsing its body. Access check is skipped together with body parsing.
There was no crash in C, added test case to cover the new error.
rdar://problem/28530809
Reviewers: rnk, doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
llvm-svn: 313386
__interface objects in MSVC are permitted to inherit from __interface types,
and interface-like types.
Additionally, there are two default interface-like types
(IUnknown and IDispatch) that all interface-like
types must inherit from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37308
llvm-svn: 313364
Specifically, typo correction should be done before dispatching between
different kinds of binary operations like pseudo-object assignment,
overloaded binary operation, etc.
Without this change we hit an assertion
Assertion failed: (!LHSExpr->hasPlaceholderType(BuiltinType::PseudoObject)), function CheckAssignmentOperands
when in Objective-C we reference a property without `self` and there are
2 equally good typo correction candidates: ivar and a class name. In
this case LHS expression in `BuildBinOp` is
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr
`-TypoExpr
and instead of handling Obj-C property assignment as pseudo-object
assignment, we call `CreateBuiltinBinOp` which corrects typo to
ObjCPropertyRefExpr '<pseudo-object type>'
but cannot handle pseudo-objects and asserts about it (indirectly,
through `CheckAssignmentOperands`).
rdar://problem/33102722
Reviewers: rsmith, ahatanak, majnemer
Reviewed By: ahatanak
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37322
llvm-svn: 313323
When a static_assert fails, dig out a specific condition to diagnose,
using the same logic that we use to find the enable_if condition to
diagnose.
llvm-svn: 313315
Treat typedef enum as named enums instead of anonymous enums. Anonymous enums
are ignored by the warning, so previously, typedef enums were ignored as well.
llvm-svn: 312842
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
In case of copy constructor is implicitly deleted it's still shown.
PR34402 describes a way to reproduce that.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37435
llvm-svn: 312785
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
Block captures can have different physical locations
in memory segments depending on the use case (as a function
call or as a kernel enqueue) and in different vendor
implementations.
Therefore it's unclear how to add address space to capture
addresses uniformly. Currently it has been decided to disallow
taking addresses of captured variables until further
clarifications in the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36410
llvm-svn: 312728
The implementation is in AnalysisDeclContext.cpp and the class is called
AnalysisDeclContext.
Making those match up has numerous benefits, including:
- Easier jump from header to/from implementation.
- Easily identify filename from class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37500
llvm-svn: 312671
move constructor.
Previously user-defined reduction initializer was considered as an
assignment expression, not as initializer. Fixed this by treating the
initializer expression as an initializer.
llvm-svn: 312638
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
step>1.
If the loop is a loot with random access iterators and the iteration
construct is represented it += n, then the compiler crashed because of
reusing of the same MaterializedTemporaryExpr around N. Patch fixes it
by using the expression as written, without any special kind of
wrappings.
llvm-svn: 312292
r312167 made it so that we emit Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor from delete statements
that are in system headers (e.g. std::unique_ptr). That works great on Linux
and macOS, but on Windows there are non-final classes that are defined in
system headers that have virtual methods but non-virtual destructors and yet
get deleted through a base class pointer (e.g. ATL::CAccessToken::CRevert). So
paddle back a bit and don't emit the warning if it's about a class defined in a
system header.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37324
llvm-svn: 312216
Makes the warning useful again in a std::unique_ptr world, PR28460.
Also make the warning not fire in unevaluated contexts, since system libraries
(e.g. libc++) do do that. This would've been a good change before we started
emitting this warning in system headers too, but "normal" code seems to be less
template-heavy, so we didn't notice until now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37235
llvm-svn: 312167
Capturing of the global variables occurs only in target regions. Patch
fixes it and allows capturing of globals in all target executable
directives.
llvm-svn: 312024
Prior to this patch clang would not error here:
template <class T> struct B;
template <class T> struct A {
void foo();
void foo2();
void test1() {
B<T>::foo(); // OK, foo is declared in A<int> - matches type of 'this'.
B<T>::foo2(); // This should be an error!
// foo2 is found in B<int>, 'base unrelated' to 'this'.
}
};
template <class T> struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::foo2;
};
llvm-svn: 311851
Prior to this patch, clang would do the wrong thing here (see inline comments for pre-patch behavior):
struct A {
void bar(int) { }
static void bar(double) { }
void g(int*);
static void g(char *);
};
struct B {
void f() {
A::bar(3); // selects (double) ??!!
A::g((int*)0); // Instead of no object argument, states conversion error?!!
}
};
The fix is as follows: When we detect that what appears to be an implicit member function call (A::bar) is actually a call to a member of a class (A) unrelated to the type (B) that contains the member function (B::f) from which the call is being made, don't treat it (A::bar) as an Implicit Member Call Expression.
P.S. I wonder if there is an existing bug report related to this? (Surprisingly, a cursory search did not find one).
llvm-svn: 311839
-Wobjc-messaging-id is a new, non-default warning that warns about
message sends to unqualified id in Objective-C. This warning is useful
for projects that would like to avoid any potential future compiler
errors/warnings, as the system frameworks might add a method with the same
selector which could make the message send to id ambiguous.
rdar://33303354
llvm-svn: 311779
Summary:
If await_suspend returns a coroutine_handle, as in the example below:
```
coroutine_handle<> await_suspend(coroutine_handle<> h) {
coro.promise().waiter = h;
return coro;
}
```
suspensionExpression processing will resume the coroutine pointed at by that handle.
Related LLVM change rL311751 makes resume calls of this kind `musttail` at any optimization level.
This enables unlimited symmetric control transfer from coroutine to coroutine without blowing up the stack.
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rsmith, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37131
llvm-svn: 311762
of class fails to map class static variable.
If the global variable is captured and it has several redeclarations,
sometimes it may lead to a compiler crash. Patch fixes this by working
only with canonical declarations.
llvm-svn: 311479
This commit fixes a bug introduced in r307903. The attribute ambiguity checker
that was introduced in r307903 checked all property attributes, which caused
errors for source-compatible properties, like:
@property (nonatomic, readonly) NSObject *prop;
@property (nonatomic, readwrite) NSObject *prop;
because the readwrite property would get implicit 'strong' attribute. The
ambiguity checker should be concerned about explicitly specified attributes
only.
rdar://33748089
llvm-svn: 311443
This patch, by hamzasood, implements P0409R2, and allows [=, this] pre-C++2a as an extension (with appropriate warnings) for consistency.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36572
Thanks Hamza!
llvm-svn: 311224
This made it awkward to switch over an enum where some entries
are partial and is unlikley to catch any bugs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36777
llvm-svn: 311191
Base::TraverseStmt when visiting the then/else branches of if statements
This ensures that the statement stack is correctly tracked and correct
multi-statement fixit is generated inside of an if (@available)
llvm-svn: 311088
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
the class becoming complete and its inline methods being parsed.
This replaces the hack of using the "late parsed template" flag to track member
functions with bodies we've not parsed yet; instead we now use the "will have
body" flag, which carries the desired implication that the function declaration
*is* a definition, and that we've just not parsed its body yet.
llvm-svn: 310776
declarations that are made visible after the dummy is parsed and ODR verified
Prior to this commit the
"(getContainingDC(DC) == CurContext && "The next DeclContext should be lexically contained in the current one."),"
assertion failure was triggered during semantic analysis of the dummy
tag declaration that was declared in another tag declaration because its
lexical context did not point to the outer tag decl.
rdar://32292196
llvm-svn: 310706
This reverts commit rL310403, which caused spurious warnings in libc++,
because it didn't properly handle templated scoped lockable types.
llvm-svn: 310698
We do not meaningfully track object const-ness of Objective-C object
types. Silence the -Wcast-qual warning that is issued when casting to or
from Objective-C object types results in losing const qualification.
rdar://problem/33807915
llvm-svn: 310672
This patch adds support for __builtin_cpu_is. I've tried to match the strings supported to the latest version of gcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449
llvm-svn: 310657
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
We noticed when implementing a new pragma that the TableGen-generated function
getAttributeSpellingListIndex() did not work for pragma attributes. It relies
on the values in the enum AttributeList::Syntax and a new value
AS_ContextSensitiveKeyword was added changing the value for AS_Pragma.
Apparently no tests failed since no pragmas currently make use of the
generated function.
To fix this we can move AS_Pragma back to the value that TableGen code expects.
Also to prevent changes in the enum from breaking that routine again I added
calls to getAttributeSpellingListIndex() in the unroll pragma code. That will
cause some lit test failures if the order is changed. I added a comment to
remind of this issue in the future.
This assumes we don’t need/want full TableGen support for
AS_ContextSensitiveKeyword. It currently only appears in getAttrKind and no
other TableGen-generated routines.
Patch by: mikerice
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36473
llvm-svn: 310483
C++14 added user-defined literal support for complex numbers so that you
can write something like "complex<double> val = 2i". However, there is
an existing GNU extension supporting this syntax and interpreting the
result as a _Complex type.
This changes parsing so that such literals are interpreted in terms of
C++14's operators if an overload is present but otherwise falls back to
the original GNU extension.
(We now have more robust diagnostics for implicit conversions so the
libc++ test that caused the original revert still passes).
llvm-svn: 310478
MS InlineAsm Dot operator accepts "Bases" such as "this" (cpp) and class/struct pointer typedef.
This patch enhance its implementation with this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36450
llvm-svn: 310472
Do not discard invalid Decl when searching for the operator delete function.
The lookup for this function always expects to find a result, so sometimes the
invalid Decl is the only choice possible. This fixes PR34109.
llvm-svn: 310435
Converting a _Complex type to a real one simply discards the imaginary part.
This can easily lead to loss of information so for safety (and GCC
compatibility) this patch disallows that when the conversion would be implicit.
The one exception is bool, which actually compares both real and imaginary
parts and so is safe.
llvm-svn: 310427
Add warnings in cases where an implicit `this` argument is expected to
attributes because either `this` doesn't exist because the attribute is
on a free function, or because `this` is on a type that doesn't have a
corresponding capability/lockable/scoped_lockable attribute.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310403
Delete the test that was broken by rL309725, and add it back in a
follow up commit. Also, improve the tests a bit.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310402
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
An ABI change was introduced in r254596 that modified structure layouts when the 'packed' attribute was used on one-byte bitfields. Since the PS4 target needs to maintain backwards compatibility for all structure layouts, this change reintroduces the old behavior for PS4 targets only. It also introduces PS4 specific cases to the relevant test.
Patch by Matthew Voss.
llvm-svn: 310388
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310387
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310377
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310360
Arguments, passed to the outlined function, must have correct address
space info for proper Debug info support. Patch sets global address
space for arguments that are mapped and passed by reference.
Also, cuda-gdb does not handle reference types correctly, so reference
arguments are represented as pointers.
llvm-svn: 310104
OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions have a scope argument which is ideally
represented as synchronization scope argument in LLVM atomic instructions.
Clang supports translating Clang atomic builtin functions to LLVM atomic
instructions. However it currently does not support synchronization scope
of LLVM atomic instructions. Without this, users have to use LLVM assembly
code to implement OpenCL atomic builtin functions.
This patch adds OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions as Clang builtin
functions, which supports generating LLVM atomic instructions with
synchronization scope operand.
Currently only constant memory scope argument is supported. Support of
non-constant memory scope argument will be added later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28691
llvm-svn: 310082
Summary:
The mis-compile is triggered by internal code, but I haven't reduced it to a small piece of code. Add a FIXME here, since a decent fix doesn't seem to be trivial.
The decent fix can be changing Decl::Init to PointerUnion<Stmt *, EvaluatedStmt *, ParamVarDecl *>, and make setUninstantiatedDefaultArg take a ParamVarDecl *, which contains the Expr * as the default argument. This way, getTemplateInstantiationArgs can take that ParamVarDecl and do the right thing.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: sanjoy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36253
llvm-svn: 309908
r282968 introduced a regression due to the lack of proper testing.
Re-add lax conversion support between non ext vectors for compound
assignments and add a test for that.
rdar://problem/28639467
llvm-svn: 309722
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
void g(int a) {}
A() { int a; }
};
}
3 : <source>:3:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
void g(int a) {}
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
4 : <source>:4:15: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
A() { int a; }
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
2 warnings generated.
The local variable `a` of the function `f` can't be accessed from a method of
the function-local class A, thus no shadowing occurs and no diagnostic is
needed.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, arphaman, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: rnk, Quuxplusone
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941
llvm-svn: 309569
Summary:
Previously Clang was not considering operator declarations that occur at function scope. This is incorrect according to [over.match.oper]p3
> The set of non-member candidates is the result of the unqualified lookup of operator@ in the context of the expression according to the usual rules for name lookup in unqualified function calls.
This patch changes operator name lookup to consider block scope declarations.
This patch fixes PR27027.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35297
llvm-svn: 309530
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This patch adds support for the `long_call`, `far`, and `near` attributes
for MIPS targets. The `long_call` and `far` attributes are synonyms. All
these attributes override `-mlong-calls` / `-mno-long-calls` command
line options for particular function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35479
llvm-svn: 308667
If the member declaration is captured in the OMPCapturedExprDecl, we may
loose data-sharing attribute info for this declaration. Patch fixes this
bug.
llvm-svn: 308629
allocation functions.
This changes the error message Sema prints when an unavailable C++17
aligned allocation function is selected.
Original message: "... possibly unavailable on x86_64-apple-macos10.12"
New message: "... only available on macOS 10.13 or newer"
This is a follow-up to r306722.
rdar://problem/32664169
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35520
llvm-svn: 308496
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
Append optional chunks with their default values. For example:
before - "int i", after - "int i = 10"
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33644
llvm-svn: 308433
Summary: When in incremental processing mode, we should never set `TUScope` to a nullptr otherwise any future lookups fail. We already have similar checks in the rest of the code, but we never hit this one because so far we didn't try to generate a module from the AST that Cling generates.
Reviewers: rsmith, v.g.vassilev
Reviewed By: v.g.vassilev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35536
llvm-svn: 308333
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Move builtins from the x86 specific scope into the global
scope. Their use is still limited to x86_64 and aarch64 though.
This allows wine on aarch64 to properly handle variadic functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34475
llvm-svn: 308218
This patch extends the -fzvector language feature to enable the new
"vector float" data type when compiling at -march=z14. This matches
the updated extension definition implemented by other compilers for
the platform, which is indicated to applications by pre-defining
__VEC__ to 10302 (instead of 10301).
llvm-svn: 308198
This patch series adds support for the IBM z14 processor. This part includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
Support for the -fzvector extension to vector float and the new
high-level vector intrinsics is provided by separate patches.
llvm-svn: 308197
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
I will also directly update some extra clang tooling that is broken by the change from Argument to Parameter.
Hopefully the bots will stay appeased.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308190
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308157
be shared without warnings. Build AttributedTypes to leave breadcrumbs
for tools like the static analyzer. Warn about attempting to use the
attribute with incompatible return types.
llvm-svn: 308092
property and check for incompatible attributes
This commit changes the way ambiguous property synthesis (i.e. when synthesizing
a property that's declared in multiple protocols) is performed. Previously,
Clang synthesized the first property that was found. This lead to problems when
the property was synthesized in a class that conformed to two protocols that
declared that property and a second protocols had a 'readwrite' declaration -
the setter was not synthesized so the class didn't really conform to the second
protocol and user's code would crash at runtime when they would try to set the
property.
This commit ensures that a first readwrite property is selected. This is a
semantic change that changes users code in this manner:
```
@protocol P @property(readonly) int p; @end
@protocol P2 @property(readwrite) id p; @end
@interface I <P2> @end
@implementation I
@syntesize p; // Users previously got a warning here, and Clang synthesized
// readonly 'int p' here. Now Clang synthesizes readwrite 'id' p..
@end
```
To ensure that this change is safe, the warning about incompatible types is
promoted to an error when this kind of readonly/readwrite ambiguity is detected
in the @implementation. This will ensure that previous code that had this subtle
bug and ignored the warning now will fail to compile with an error, and users
should not get suprises at runtime once they resolve the error.
The commit also extends the ambiguity checker, and now it can detect conflicts
among the different property attributes. An error diagnostic is used for
conflicting attributes, to ensure that the user won't get "suprises" at runtime.
ProtocolPropertyMap is removed in favour of a a set + vector because the map's
order of iteration is non-deterministic, so it couldn't be used to select the
readwrite property.
rdar://31579994
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35268
llvm-svn: 307903
devirtualized.
The code to detect devirtualized calls is already in IRGen, so move the
code to lib/AST and make it a shared utility between Sema and IRGen.
This commit fixes a linkage error I was seeing when compiling the
following code:
$ cat test1.cpp
struct Base {
virtual void operator()() {}
};
template<class T>
struct Derived final : Base {
void operator()() override {}
};
Derived<int> *d;
int main() {
if (d)
(*d)();
return 0;
}
rdar://problem/33195657
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34301
llvm-svn: 307883
In the OpenMP mode, we don't need to call BuildMemberExpr() only to discard its
return value. BuildDeclRefExpr() is called instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35201
llvm-svn: 307697
Added checks for the reduction clauses in the taskloop directives:
1. Only addressable items must be used in reduction clauses.
2. Reduction clauses cannot be used with nogroup clauses.
llvm-svn: 307693
Objective-C subscript expressions report errors when a subscript method is not
declared in the base class. However, prior to this commit, qualified id types
were not checked. This commit ensures that an appropriate error is reported
when a subscript method is not declared in any of the protocols that are
included in the qualified id type.
rdar://33213924
llvm-svn: 307642
Summary:
r306137 made dllimport pointers to member functions non-constant. This
is correct because a load must be executed to resolve any dllimported
data. However, r306137 did not account for the use of dllimport member
function pointers used as template arguments.
This change re-lands r306137 with a template instantiation fix.
This fixes PR33570.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34714
llvm-svn: 307446
requirements in protocol/class/category declarations
The unguarded availability warnings in the protocol requirements of a protocol
/class/category declaration can be avoided. This matches the behaviour of
Swift's diagnostics. The warnings for deprecated/unavailable protocols are
preserved.
rdar://33156429
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35061
llvm-svn: 307368
When enable_if disables a particular overload resolution candidate,
rummage through the enable_if condition to find the specific condition
that caused the failure. For example, if we have something like:
template<
typename Iter,
typename = std::enable_if_t<Random_access_iterator<Iter> &&
Comparable<Iterator_value_type<Iter>>>>
void mysort(Iter first, Iter last) {}
and we call "mysort" with "std::list<int>" iterators, we'll get a
diagnostic saying that the "Random_access_iterator<Iter>" requirement
failed. If we call "mysort" with
"std::vector<something_not_comparable>", we'll get a diagnostic saying
that the "Comparable<...>" requirement failed.
llvm-svn: 307196
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 307045
In C mode clang fails to merge the textually included definition with the one imported from a module. The C lookup rules fail to find the imported definition because its linkage is internal in non C++ mode.
This patch reinstates some of the ODR merging rules for typedefs of anonymous tags for languages other than C++.
Patch by Raphael Isemann and me (D34510).
llvm-svn: 306964
Combined directives like 'target parallel' have two captured statements.
Sema has to check the right one from the right direction.
Previously, Sema::IsOpenMPCapturedByRef would return false for mapped
scalars on combined directives. This results in a wrong signature of
the outlined function which triggers an assertion:
void llvm::CallInst::init(llvm::FunctionType *, llvm::Value *, ArrayRef<llvm::Value *>, ArrayRef<OperandBundleDef>, const llvm::Twine &): Assertion `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"' failed.
Fixes PR30975 (and PR31985). New function was taken from clang-ykt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34888
llvm-svn: 306956
Allow ODR for ObjC/C in the sense that we won't keep more that
one definition around (merge them). However, ensure the decl
pass the structural compatibility check in C11 6.2.7/1, for that,
reuse the structural equivalence checks used by the ASTImporter.
Few other considerations:
- Create error diagnostics for tag types mismatches and thread
them into the structural equivalence checks.
- Note that by doing this we only support redefinition between types
that are considered "compatible types" by C.
This is mixed approach of the suggestions discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053257.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31778
rdar://problem/31909368
llvm-svn: 306918
a c++17 aligned allocation/deallocation function that is unavailable in
the standard library on Apple platforms.
The aligned functions are implemented only in the following versions or
later versions of the OSes, so clang issues diagnostics if the deployment
target being targeted is older than these:
macosx: 10.13
ios: 11.0
tvos: 11.0
watchos: 4.0
The diagnostics are issued whenever the aligned functions are selected
except when the selected function has a definition in the same file.
If there is a user-defined function available somewhere else, option
-Wno-aligned-allocation-unavailable can be used to silence the
diagnostics.
rdar://problem/32664169
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34574
llvm-svn: 306722
...as introduced with recent <https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333> "Emit warning
when throw exception in destruct or dealloc functions which has a (possible
implicit) noexcept specifier". (The equivalent of the goodReference case hit
when building LibreOffice.)
(These warnings are apparently only emitted when no errors have yet been
encountered, so it didn't work to add the test code to the end of the existing
clang/test/SemaCXX/exceptions.cpp.)
llvm-svn: 306715
Summary:
does it make sense to enable K&R function declaration style for OpenCL?
clang throws following error message for the declaration w/o arguments:
```
int my_func();
error: function with no prototype cannot use the spir_function calling convention
```
Current way to fix this issue is to specify that parameter list is empty by using 'void':
```
int my_func(void);
```
Let me know what do you think about this patch.
Reviewers: Anastasia, yaxunl
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: cfe-commits, echuraev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33681
llvm-svn: 306653
Fix crash in clang when an array of unknown bounds of an incomplete type is passed to __has_trivial_destructor.
Patch by Puneetha
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34198
llvm-svn: 306519
This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.
So, the following code is now legal:
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int);
void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));
In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.
This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332
llvm-svn: 306467
dependent initializer
This commit fixes incorrect source positions of dependent c'tor initializers
like in the following code:
template<typename MyBase>
struct Derived: MyBase::InnerIterator
{
Derived() : MyBase::InnerIterator() {} /// This line is problematic: all positions point to InnerIterator and nothing points to MyBase
};
Patch by Serge Preis!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32439
llvm-svn: 306392
Also add testcases for a bunch of expression forms that cause our evaluator to
crash. See PR33140 and PR32864 for crashes that this was causing.
This reverts r305287, which reverted r305239, which reverted r301742. The
previous revert claimed that buildbots were broken, but did not add any
testcases and the buildbots have lost all memory of what was wrong here.
Changes to test/OpenMP are not reverted; another change has triggered those
tests to change their output in the same way that r301742 did.
llvm-svn: 306346
definition or non-reference class type.
The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that
is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a
struct. For example:
class C0 {
public:
template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket
struct S0 {};
C0() : m(new S0<int>) {}
S0<int> *m;
};
This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the
enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results
in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later.
This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing
file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in
template parameter lists.
rdar://problem/31783961
rdar://problem/19570630
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606
llvm-svn: 306317
(possible implicit) noexcept specifier
Throwing in the destructor is not good (C++11 change try to not allow see below).
But in reality, those codes are exist.
C++11 [class.dtor]p3:
A declaration of a destructor that does not have an exception-specification is
implicitly considered to have the same exception specification as an implicit
declaration.
With this change, the application worked before may now run into runtime
termination. My goal here is to emit a warning to provide only possible info to
where the code may need to be changed.
First there is no way, in compile time to identify the “throw” really throw out
of the function. Things like the call which throw out… To keep this simple,
when “throw” is seen, checking its enclosing function(only destructor and
dealloc functions) with noexcept(true) specifier emit warning.
Here is implementation detail:
A new member function CheckCXXThrowInNonThrowingFunc is added for class Sema
in Sema.h. It is used in the call to both BuildCXXThrow and
TransformCXXThrowExpr.
The function basic check if the enclosing function with non-throwing noexcept
specifer, if so emit warning for it.
The example of warning message like:
k1.cpp:18:3: warning: ''~dependent_warn'' has a (possible implicit) non-throwing
noexcept specifier. Throwing exception may cause termination.
[-Wthrow-in-dtor]
throw 1;
^
k1.cpp:43:30: note: in instantiation of member function
'dependent_warn<noexcept_fun>::~dependent_warn' requested here
dependent_warn<noexcept_fun> f; // cause warning
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333
llvm-svn: 306149
This commit fixes incorrect source positions of dependent c'tor initializers
like in the following code:
template<typename MyBase>
struct Derived: MyBase::InnerIterator
{
Derived() : MyBase::InnerIterator() {} /// This line is problematic: all positions point to InnerIterator and nothing points to MyBase
};
Patch by Serge Preis!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32439
llvm-svn: 306103
declarations that are owned but unconditionally visible.
This allows us to set declarations as visible even if they have a local owning
module, without losing information. In turn, that means that our Objective-C
support can keep on incorrectly assuming the "hidden" bit on the declaration is
the whole story with regard to name visibility. This will also be useful once
we support the C++ Modules TS export semantics.
Objective-C name visibility is still incorrect in any case where the "hidden"
bit is not the complete story: for instance, in Objective-C++ the set of
visible categories will be wrong during template instantiation, and with local
submodule visibility enabled it will be wrong when building modules. Fixing that
will require a major overhaul of how visibility is handled for Objective-C (and
particularly for categories).
llvm-svn: 306075
The new compiler warning -Wunguarded-availability-new is a subset of
-Wunguarded-availability. It is on by default. It only warns about uses of APIs
that have been introduced in macOS >= 10.13, iOS >= 11, watchOS >= 4 and
tvOS >= 11. We decided to use this kind of solution as we didn't want to turn
on -Wunguarded-availability by default, because we didn't want our users to get
warnings about uses of old APIs in their existing projects.
rdar://31054725
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34264
llvm-svn: 306033
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
This is a recommit of 305379, reverted in 305381, with small changes.
llvm-svn: 305903
As the bug report says,
struct A
{
template<typename T> operator T();
};
void foo()
{
A().operator auto();
}
causes: "undeduced type in IR-generation
UNREACHABLE executed at llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp:208!"
The problem is that in this case, "T" is being deduced as "auto",
which I believe is incorrect.
The 'operator auto' implementation in Clang is standards compliant, however
there is a defect report against core (1670).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34370
llvm-svn: 305812
Produce an error if variables qualified with a local or
a constant address space are not declared in the outermost
scope of a kernel.
Patch by Simon Perretta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34024
llvm-svn: 305798
Summary:
Before this change, we couldn't capture the `this` pointer that's
implicitly the first argument of class member functions. There are some
interesting things we can do with capturing even just this single
argument for zero-argument member functions.
Reviewers: rnk, pelikan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34052
llvm-svn: 305544
This commit is a follow up to r302797 which added support for dependent
completions after the '.' and '->' operators. This commit adds support for
dependent completions after the '::' operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34173
llvm-svn: 305511
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
Summary:
Currently we build the co_await expressions on the wrong implicit statements of the implicit ranged for; Specifically we build the co_await expression wrapping the range declaration, but it should wrap the begin expression.
This patch fixes co_await on range for.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34021
llvm-svn: 305363
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 305147
n the current local-submodule-visibility mode, as soon as we discover a virtual
destructor, we declare on demand a global delete operator. However, this causes
that this delete operator is owned by the submodule which contains said virtual
destructor. This means that other modules no longer can see the global delete
operator which is hidden inside another submodule and fail to compile.
This patch unhides those global allocation function once they're created to
prevent this issue.
Patch by Raphael Isemann (D33366)!
llvm-svn: 305118
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
The only use in-tree I can find for BuiltinTypes.ResultTy is a single
store to it. We otherwise just recompute what it should be later on (and
sometimes do things like argument conversions in the process of
recomputing it).
Since it's impossible to test if the value stored there is sane, and we
don't use it anyway, we should probably just drop the field.
I'll do a follow-up patch to rename BuiltinTypes.ParamTypes ->
BuiltinParamTypes in a bit. Wanted to keep this patch relatively
minimal.
Thanks to Petr Kudryavtsev for bringing this up!
llvm-svn: 304996
A function declared in a friend declaration may have declarations prior
to the containing class definition. If such declaration defines default
argument, the friend function declaration inherits them. This behavior
causes problems if the class where the friend is declared is a template:
during the class instantiation the friend function looks like if it had
default arguments, so error is triggered.
With this change friend functions declared in class templates do not
inherit default arguments. Actual set of them will be defined at the
point where the containing class is instantiated.
This change fixes PR12724.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30393
llvm-svn: 304965
Clang makes check for function redefinition after it merged the new
declaration with the existing one. As a result, it produces poor
diagnostics in the case of a friend function defined inline, as in
the code:
```
void func() {}
class C { friend void func() {} };
```
Error message in this case states that `inline declaration of 'func'
follows non-inline definition`, which is misleading, as `func` does
not have explicit `inline` specifier.
With this changes compiler reports function redefinition if the new
function is a friend defined inline and it does not have explicit
`inline` specifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26065
llvm-svn: 304964
Bitwise complement applied to vector of floats described with
attribute `ext_vector_type` is not diagnosed as error. Attempt to
compile such construct causes assertion violation in Instruction.cpp.
With this change the complement is treated similar to the case of
vector type described with attribute `vector_size`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33732
llvm-svn: 304963
This is not required by the standard (yet), but there seems to be reasonable
support for this being a defect according to CWG discussion, and libstdc++ 7.1
relies on it working.
llvm-svn: 304946
RecursiveASTVisitor was not properly recursing through a
SubstTemplateTypeParmTypes, resulting in crashes in pack expansion where we
couldn't always find an unexpanded pack within a pack expansion.
We also have an issue where substitution of deduced template arguments for an
implicit deduction guide creates the "impossible" case of naming a
non-dependent member of the current instantiation, but within a specialization
that is actually instantiated from a different (partial/explicit)
specialization of the template. We resolve this by declaring that constructors
that do so can only be used to deduce specializations of the primary template.
I'm running this past CWG to see if people agree this is the right thing to do.
llvm-svn: 304862
template is valid with or without it (with different meanings).
If we see "dependent.x<...", and what follows the '<' is a valid expression,
we must parse the '<' as a comparison rather than a template angle bracket.
When we later come to instantiate, if we find that the LHS of the '<' actually
names an overload set containing function templates, produce a diagnostic
suggesting that the 'template' keyword was missed rather than producing a
mysterious diagnostic saying that the function must be called (and pointing
at what looks to already be a function call!).
llvm-svn: 304852
replaced by visible decls.
Make sure that all paths through checkCorrectionVisibility set the
RequiresImport flag appropriately, so we don't end up using a stale value.
Patch by Jorge Gorbe!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30963
llvm-svn: 304745
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
Saleem Abdulrasool