Reorganizes the DWARF consumer to derive the string offsets table
contribution's format from the contribution header instead of
(incorrectly) from the unit's format.
Reviewers: JDevliegehere, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41146
llvm-svn: 321295
Adds missing support for DW_FORM_data16.
Update of r320852/r320886, fixing the unittest again, this time use a
raw char string for the test data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41090
llvm-svn: 321011
This patch introduce a switch to control splitting of non-whole-alloca slices with default off.
The switch will be default on again after fixing an issue reported in PR35657.
llvm-svn: 320958
Adds missing support for DW_FORM_data16.
Update of r320852, fixing the unittest to use a hand-coded struct
instead of std::array to guarantee data layout.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41090
llvm-svn: 320886
While investigating LLVM PR22316 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22316)
I started wondering if it were not always preferable to emit the
initial DBG_VALUEs for stack arguments as FI locations instead of
describing the first register they get copied into. The advantage of
doing this is that the arguments will be available as soon as the
stack is setup. As illustrated by the testcase in the PR, the first
copy of the FI into a register may be sunk by MachineSink.cpp into a
later basic block. By describing the argument on the stack, we nicely
circumvent this problem.
<rdar://problem/19583723>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41135
llvm-svn: 320758
Summary:
Add isRenamable() predicate to MachineOperand. This predicate can be
used by machine passes after register allocation to determine whether it
is safe to rename a given register operand. Register operands that
aren't marked as renamable may be required to be assigned their current
register to satisfy constraints that are not captured by the machine
IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, hfinkel
Subscribers: nemanjai, mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39400
llvm-svn: 320503
dsymutil doesn't yet understand the new format and the change,
among others, breaks a large fraction of the debugger tests on
mac OS.
rdar://problem/35856354
llvm-svn: 319995
Set the .debug_line version to match the requested DWARF version,
except with a maximum of v4 because we don't support v5 yet.
Previously Chromium had issues with this patch; see PR31407. Chromium
tool issues have been addressed, so hopefully this will go through
this time.
Patch by Katya Romanova!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38002
llvm-svn: 319699
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
Currently, SROA splits loads and stores only when they are accessing the whole alloca.
This patch relaxes this limitation to allow splitting a load/store if all other loads and stores to the alloca are disjoint to or fully included in the current load/store. If there is no other load or store that crosses the boundary of the current load/store, the current splitting implementation works as is.
The whole-alloca loads and stores meet this new condition and so they are still splittable.
Here is a simplified motivating example.
struct record {
long long a;
int b;
int c;
};
int func(struct record r) {
for (int i = 0; i < r.c; i++)
r.b++;
return r.b;
}
When updating r.b (or r.c as well), LLVM generates redundant instructions on some platforms (such as x86_64, ppc64); here, r.b and r.c are packed into one 64-bit GPR when the struct is passed as a method argument.
With this patch, the above example is compiled into only few instructions without loop.
Without the patch, unnecessary loop-carried dependency is introduced by SROA and the loop cannot be eliminated by the later optimizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32998
llvm-svn: 319407
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only.
The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address.
If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered.
The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP).
The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism.
The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT.
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223
Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4
llvm-svn: 318996
As a side effect, the .debug_line section will be dumped in physical
order, rather than in the order that compile units refer to their
associated portions of the .debug_line section. These are probably
always the same order anyway, and no tests noticed the difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39854
llvm-svn: 318839
In 2010 a commit with no testcase and no further explanation
explicitly disabled the handling of inlined variables in
EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue(). I don't think there is a good reason for
this any more and re-enabling this adds debug locations for variables
associated with an LLVM function argument in functions that are
inlined into the first basic block. The only downside of doing this is
that we may insert a DBG_VALUE before the inlined scope, but (1) this
could be filtered out later, and (2) LiveDebugValues will not
propagate it into subsequent basic blocks if they don't dominate the
variable's lexical scope, so this seems like a small price to pay.
rdar://problem/26228128
llvm-svn: 317702
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
This patch adds printing for DW_AT_type DIEs like it is already the case
for DW_AT_specification DIEs. This is a rather naive approach and only a
start. We should have pretty printers for different languages.
Recommit after being reverted in r315299.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36993
llvm-svn: 315316
This patch adds printing for DW_AT_type DIEs like it is already the case
for DW_AT_specification DIEs. This is a rather naive approach and only a
start. We should have pretty printers for different languages.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36993
llvm-svn: 315297
Summary:
When reinserting debug values after register allocation, make sure to
insert debug values after each redefinition of debug value register in
the slot index range. The reason for this is that DwarfDebug will end
the range of a debug variable when the physical reg is defined. For
instructions with e.g. tied operands this result in prematurely ended
debug range.
This resolves pr34545
Patch by Karl-Johan Karlsson and Bjorn Pettersson
Reviewers: rnk, aprantl
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: bjope, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38229
llvm-svn: 314974
Summary:
This should fix a regression introduced by r313786, which switched from
MachineInstr::isIndirectDebugValue() to checking if operand 1 is an
immediate. I didn't have a test case for it until now.
A single UserValue, which approximates a user variable, may have many
DBG_VALUE instructions that disagree about whether the variable is in
memory or in a virtual register. This will become much more common once
we have llvm.dbg.addr, but you can construct such a test case manually
today with llvm.dbg.value.
Before this change, we would get two UserValues: one for direct and one
for indirect DBG_VALUE instructions describing the same variable. If we
build separate interval maps for direct and indirect locations, we will
end up accidentally coalescing identical DBG_VALUE intervals that need
to remain separate because they are broken up by intervals of the
opposite direct-ness.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37932
llvm-svn: 314819
Issues addressed since original review:
- Avoid bug in regalloc greedy/machine verifier when forwarding to use
in an instruction that re-defines the same virtual register.
- Fixed bug when forwarding to use in EarlyClobber instruction slot.
- Fixed incorrect forwarding to register definitions that showed up in
explicit_uses() iterator (e.g. in INLINEASM).
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 314729
Summary:
This code iterates the 'Orders' vector in parallel with the DbgValue
list, emitting all DBG_VALUEs that occurred between the last IR order
insertion point and the next insertion point. This assumes the
SDDbgValue list is sorted in IR order, which it usually is. However, it
is not sorted when a node with a debug value is replaced with another
one. When this happens, TransferDbgValues is called, and the new value
is added to the end of the list.
The problem can be solved by stably sorting the list by IR order.
Reviewers: aprantl, Ka-Ka
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38197
llvm-svn: 314114
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
There already was code that tried to remove the dbg.declare, but that code
was placed after we had called
I->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(I->getType()));
on the alloca, so when we searched for the relevant dbg.declare, we
couldn't find it.
Now we do the search before we call RAUW so there is a chance to find it.
An existing testcase needed update due to this. Two dbg.declare with undef
were removed and then suddenly one of the two CHECKS failed.
Before this patch we got
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i24* undef, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.prog_src_register* undef, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !15
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)), !dbg !15
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15
and with it we get
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)), !dbg !15
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15
However, the CHECKs in the testcase checked things in a silly order, so
they only passed since they found things in the first dbg.declare. Now
we changed the order of the checks and the test passes.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37900
llvm-svn: 313875
Wolfgang Pieb