Previously the specification was in a table in paragraph 14 of [container.requirements.general] but it has since been given its own sub section header, 24.2.2.4 [container.opt.reqmts].
This happened in 93ff092d1c
This update also includes misc. other cleanups of the spaceship projects sheet.
Reviewed By: Mordante, avogelsgesang, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131928
An issue I often see in codebases compiled for unusual platforms is
that header search paths are specified manually and are subtly wrong.
For example, people will manually add `-isystem <some-toolchain>/usr/include`,
which ends up messing up the layering of header search paths required by
libc++ (because the C Standard Library now appears *before* libc++ in
the search paths). Without this patch, this will end up causing
compilation errors that are pretty inscrutable. This patch aims to
improve the user experience by diagnosing this issue explicitly.
In all cases I can think of, I would expect that a compilation error
occur if these header search paths are not layered properly. This
should only provide an explicit diagnostic instead of failing due
to seemingly unrelated compilation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131441
While working on D129964 I noticed some code hadn't been uglyfied, this
rectifies the issue.
Depends on D129964
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131834
Since we branched LLVM install Clang 16 and remove Clang 12.
Currently our Docker installs 4 versions of Clang so our CI can use the
same image for both the main and the release branch. This wasn't done for
the other Clang tools so they always use the same version for testing
the main and the release branch. Instead install 2 versions for the
tools.
However it seems the default for Clang and its tools were the latest
released version instead of the ToT. To lessen the risk of breaking the
release CI, version 14 is installed hard-coded as a temporary solution.
Updating the main branch to use the Clang 16 compiler will be done in a
separate patch.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131324
This changes makes it easier to update the Unicode data files used for
the Extended Graphme Clustering as added in D126971.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129668
Warns on potentially unintended use of C++17 Class Template Argument
Deduction. Use of this feature with types that aren't intended to
support it may may future refactorings of those types more difficult -
so this warning fires whenever the feature is used with a type that may
not have intended to be used with CTAD (the warning uses the existence
of at least one explicit deduction guide to indicate that a type
intentionally supports CTAD - absent that, it's assumed to not be
intended to support CTAD & produces a warning).
This is disabled in libcxx because lots of the standard library is
assumed to provide ctad-usable APIs and the false positive suppression
in the diagnostic is based on system header classification which doesn't
apply in the libcxx build itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131727
Increasing the constexpr evaluation limit breaks this clang-tidy test
for GCC. As discussed in D131317 disable the test in GCC.
Reviewed By: philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131835
The new operator<=> is mapped onto the existing functions
__libcpp_thread_id_equal and __libcpp_thread_id_less. Introducing a
new __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way might lead to more efficient
code. Given that we can still introduce __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way
later, for this commit I opted to not break ABI. If requested, I will
add __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way in a follow-up commit.
Implements part of P1614R2 "The Mothership has Landed"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131362
I accidentally wrote `testComparisons(...)` instead of
`assert(testComparisons(...))`. This compiled without issues, but
did not provide the intended test coverage. By adding a `nodiscard`,
we can make sure that the compiler catches such mistakes for us.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131364
This patch fixes the max_size.pass.cpp test for PowerPC targets, depending on
endianness.
We will exhibit the full_size() behaviour for little endian
(where __endian_factor = 2 ), and the half_size() behaviour for
big endian (where __endian_factor = 1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131682
Also, add missing tests for assertions in span constructors. Now I
believe that all of std::span's API should be hardened, and all the
assertions should have a corresponding test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131681
Since bb939931a1, the c++experimental
library is always built, so these tested files should always be built
(even if they aren't used in tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129399
While implementing `operator<=>` for `string_view` (D130295) @philnik
pointed out `common_type` should be `type_identity`. Since it was an
existing issue that wasn't addressed.
This addresses the issue for both the new and existing equality and
comparison operators. The test is based on the example posted in
D130295.
Reviewed By: philnik, #libc, huixie90
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131322
In D130295 @mumbleskates wondered why `std::strong_ordering::equal` had
special code since it's the same as `std::strong_ordering::equivalent`.
This is indeed the case so the special case can be removed.
Reviewed By: mumbleskates, #libc, avogelsgesang, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131419
D131234 marked the ranges papers as complete, but it didn't set the
feature-test macro.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131326
When back-deploying to older platforms, we can still provide assertions,
but we might not be able to provide a great implementation for the verbose
handler. Instead, we can just call ::abort().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131199
Kent Ross