I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
With the "wasm32-unknown-unknown-wasm" triple, this allows writing out
simple wasm object files, and is another step in a larger series toward
migrating from ELF to general wasm object support. Note that this code
and the binary format itself is still experimental.
llvm-svn: 296190
This just adds the basic skeleton for supporting a new object file format.
All of the actual encoding will be implemented in followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26722
llvm-svn: 295803
This changes locals from being declared by the emitLocal hook in
WebAssemblyTargetStreamer, rather than with an instruction. After exploring
the infastructure in LLVM more, this seems to make more sense since
declaring locals doesn't use an encoded opcode.
This also adds more 0xd opcodes, type encodings, and miscellaneous
binary encoding bits.
llvm-svn: 285040
This creates the initial infrastructure for writing ELF output files. It
doesn't yet have any implementation for encoding instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15555
llvm-svn: 255869
Derek Schuff