The range of SCEVUnknown Phi which merges values `X1, X2, ..., XN`
can be evaluated as `U(Range(X1), Range(X2), ..., Range(XN))`.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43810
llvm-svn: 326418
This is a slight reduction of one of the benchmarks
that suffered with D43079. Cost model changes should
not cause this test to remain scalarized.
llvm-svn: 326221
All SIMD architectures can emulate masked load/store/gather/scatter
through element-wise condition check, scalar load/store, and
insert/extract. Therefore, bailing out of vectorization as legality
failure, when they return false, is incorrect. We should proceed to cost
model and determine profitability.
This patch is to address the vectorizer's architectural limitation
described above. As such, I tried to keep the cost model and
vectorize/don't-vectorize behavior nearly unchanged. Cost model tuning
should be done separately.
Please see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120164.html for
RFC and the discussions.
Closes D43208.
Patch by: Hideki Saito <hideki.saito@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 326079
of turning SCEVUnknowns of PHIs into AddRecExprs.
This feature is now hidden behind the -scev-version-unknown flag.
Fixes PR36032 and PR35432.
llvm-svn: 325687
There are too many perf regressions resulting from this, so we need to
investigate (and add tests for) targets like ARM and AArch64 before
trying to reinstate.
llvm-svn: 325658
This change was mentioned at least as far back as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26837#c26
...and I found a real program that is harmed by this:
Himeno running on AMD Jaguar gets 6% slower with SLP vectorization:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36280
...but the change here appears to solve that bug only accidentally.
The div/rem costs for x86 look very wrong in some cases, but that's already true,
so we can fix those in follow-up patches. There's also evidence that more cost model
changes are needed to solve SLP problems as shown in D42981, but that's an independent
problem (though the solution may be adjusted after this change is made).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43079
llvm-svn: 325515
Summary:
If -pass-remarks=loop-vectorize, atomic ops will be seen by
analyzeInterleaving(), even though canVectorizeMemory() == false. This
is because we are requesting extra analysis instead of bailing out.
In such a case, we end up with a Group in both Load- and StoreGroups,
and then we'll try to access freed memory when traversing LoadGroups after having had released the Group when iterating over StoreGroups.
The fix is to include mayWriteToMemory() when validating that two
instructions are the same kind of memory operation.
Reviewers: mssimpso, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: hsaito, fhahn, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43064
llvm-svn: 324786
Summary:
Loops with inequality comparers, such as:
// unsigned bound
for (unsigned i = 1; i < bound; ++i) {...}
have getSmallConstantMaxTripCount report a large maximum static
trip count - in this case, 0xffff fffe. However, profiling info
may show that the trip count is much smaller, and thus
counter-recommend vectorization.
This change:
- flips loop-vectorize-with-block-frequency on by default.
- validates profiled loop frequency data supports vectorization,
when static info appears to not counter-recommend it. Absence
of profile data means we rely on static data, just as we've
done so far.
Reviewers: twoh, mkuper, davidxl, tejohnson, Ayal
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: bkramer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42946
llvm-svn: 324543
The type-shrinking logic in reduction detection, although narrow in scope, is
also rather ad-hoc, which has led to bugs (e.g., PR35734). This patch modifies
the approach to rely on the demanded bits and value tracking analyses, if
available. We currently perform type-shrinking separately for reductions and
other instructions in the loop. Long-term, we should probably think about
computing minimal bit widths in a more complete way for the loops we want to
vectorize.
PR35734
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42309
llvm-svn: 324195
This will cause the vectorizers to do some limiting of the vector widths they create. This is not a strict limit. There are reasons I know of that the loop vectorizer will generate larger vectors for.
I've written this in such a way that the interface will only return a properly supported width(0/128/256/512) even if the attribute says something funny like 384 or 10.
This has been split from D41895 with the remainder in a follow up commit.
llvm-svn: 323015
Summary:
This method is supposed to be called for IVs that have casts in their use-def
chains that are completely ignored after vectorization under PSE. However, for
truncates of such IVs the same InductionDescriptor is used during
creation/widening of both original IV based on PHINode and new IV based on
TruncInst.
This leads to unintended second call to recordVectorLoopValueForInductionCast
with a VectorLoopVal set to the newly created IV for a trunc and causes an
assert due to attempt to store new information for already existing entry in the
map. This is wrong and should not be done.
Fixes PR35773.
Reviewers: dorit, Ayal, mssimpso
Reviewed By: dorit
Subscribers: RKSimon, dim, dcaballe, hsaito, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41913
llvm-svn: 322473
canVectorize is only checking if the loop has a normalized pre-header if DoExtraAnalysis is true.
This doesn't make sense to me because reporting analysis information shouldn't alter legality
checks. This is probably the result of a last minute minor change before committing (?).
Patch by Diego Caballero.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40973
llvm-svn: 321172
Changes to the original scalar loop during LV code gen cause the return value
of Legal->isConsecutivePtr() to be inconsistent with the return value during
legal/cost phases (further analysis and information of the bug is in D39346).
This patch is an alternative fix to PR34965 following the CM_Widen approach
proposed by Ayal and Gil in D39346. It extends InstWidening enum with
CM_Widen_Reverse to properly record the widening decision for consecutive
reverse memory accesses and, consequently, get rid of the
Legal->isConsetuviePtr() call in LV code gen. I think this is a simpler/cleaner
solution to PR34965 than the one in D39346.
Fixes PR34965.
Patch by Diego Caballero, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40742
llvm-svn: 320913
D30041 extended SCEVPredicateRewriter to improve handling of Phi nodes whose
update chain involves casts; PSCEV can now build an AddRecurrence for some
forms of such phi nodes, under the proper runtime overflow test. This means
that we can identify such phi nodes as an induction, and the loop-vectorizer
can now vectorize such inductions, however inefficiently. The vectorizer
doesn't know that it can ignore the casts, and so it vectorizes them.
This patch records the casts in the InductionDescriptor, so that they could
be marked to be ignored for cost calculation (we use VecValuesToIgnore for
that) and ignored for vectorization/widening/scalarization (i.e. treated as
TriviallyDead).
In addition to marking all these casts to be ignored, we also need to make
sure that each cast is mapped to the right vector value in the vector loop body
(be it a widened, vectorized, or scalarized induction). So whenever an
induction phi is mapped to a vector value (during vectorization/widening/
scalarization), we also map the respective cast instruction (if exists) to that
vector value. (If the phi-update sequence of an induction involves more than one
cast, then the above mapping to vector value is relevant only for the last cast
of the sequence as we allow only the "last cast" to be used outside the
induction update chain itself).
This is the last step in addressing PR30654.
llvm-svn: 320672
VecValuesToIgnore holds values that will not appear in the vectorized loop.
We should therefore ignore their cost when VF > 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40883
llvm-svn: 320463
CreateAddRecFromPHIWithCastsImpl() adds an IncrementNUSW overflow predicate
which allows the PSCEV rewriter to rewrite this scev expression:
(zext i8 {0, + , (trunc i32 step to i8)} to i32)
into
{0, +, (sext i8 (trunc i32 step to i8) to i32)}
But then it adds the wrong Equal predicate:
%step == (zext i8 (trunc i32 %step to i8) to i32).
instead of:
%step == (sext i8 (trunc i32 %step to i8) to i32)
This is fixed here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40641
llvm-svn: 320298
As a new access is generated spanning across multiple fields, we need to
propagate alias info from all the fields to form the most generic alias info.
rdar://35602528
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40617
llvm-svn: 319979
This patch adds a new abstraction layer to VPlan and leverages it to model the planned
instructions that manipulate masks (AND, OR, NOT), introduced during predication.
The new VPValue and VPUser classes model how data flows into, through and out
of a VPlan, forming the vertices of a planned Def-Use graph. The new
VPInstruction class is a generic single-instruction Recipe that models a
planned instruction along with its opcode, operands and users. See
VectorizationPlan.rst for more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38676
llvm-svn: 318645
This patch is part of D38676.
The patch introduces two new Recipes to handle instructions whose vectorization
involves masking. These Recipes take VPlan-level masks in D38676, but still rely
on ILV's existing createEdgeMask(), createBlockInMask() in this patch.
VPBlendRecipe handles intra-loop phi nodes, which are vectorized as a sequence
of SELECTs. Its execute() code is refactored out of ILV::widenPHIInstruction(),
which now handles only loop-header phi nodes.
VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe handles load/store which are to be widened
(but are not part of an Interleave Group). In this patch it simply calls
ILV::vectorizeMemoryInstruction on execute().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39068
llvm-svn: 318149
This patch implements Chandler's idea [0] for supporting languages that
require support for infinite loops with side effects, such as Rust, providing
part of a solution to bug 965 [1].
Specifically, it adds an `llvm.sideeffect()` intrinsic, which has no actual
effect, but which appears to optimization passes to have obscure side effects,
such that they don't optimize away loops containing it. It also teaches
several optimization passes to ignore this intrinsic, so that it doesn't
significantly impact optimization in most cases.
As discussed on llvm-dev [2], this patch is the first of two major parts.
The second part, to change LLVM's semantics to have defined behavior
on infinite loops by default, with a function attribute for opting into
potential-undefined-behavior, will be implemented and posted for review in
a separate patch.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-July/088103.html
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118632.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38336
llvm-svn: 317729
single-iteration loop
This fixes PR34681. Avoid adding the "Stride == 1" predicate when we know that
Stride >= Trip-Count. Such a predicate will effectively optimize a single
or zero iteration loop, as Trip-Count <= Stride == 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38785
llvm-svn: 317438
This is no-functional-change-intended.
This is repackaging the functionality of D30333 (defer switch-to-lookup-tables) and
D35411 (defer folding unconditional branches) with pass parameters rather than a named
"latesimplifycfg" pass. Now that we have individual options to control the functionality,
we could decouple when these fire (but that's an independent patch if desired).
The next planned step would be to add another option bit to disable the sinking transform
mentioned in D38566. This should also make it clear that the new pass manager needs to
be updated to limit simplifycfg in the same way as the old pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38631
llvm-svn: 316835
Summary: There are certain requirements for debug location of debug intrinsics, e.g. the scope of the DILocalVariable should be the same as the scope of its debug location. As a result, we should not add discriminator encoding for debug intrinsics.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, bjope, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39343
llvm-svn: 316703
When ignoring a load that participates in an interleaved group, make sure to
move a cast that needs to sink after it.
Testcase derived from reproducer of PR34743.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38338
llvm-svn: 314986
Instead of trying to keep LastWidenRecipe updated after creating each recipe,
have tryToWiden() retrieve the last recipe of the current VPBasicBlock and check
if it's a VPWidenRecipe when attempting to extend its range. This ensures that
such extensions, optimized to maintain the original instruction order, do so
only when the instructions are to maintain their relative order. The latter does
not always hold, e.g., when a cast needs to sink to unravel first order
recurrence (r306884).
Testcase derived from reproducer of PR34711.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38339
llvm-svn: 314981
When type shrinking reductions, we should insert the truncations and extends at
the end of the loop latch block. Previously, these instructions were inserted
at the end of the loop header block. The difference is only a problem for loops
with predicated instructions (e.g., conditional stores and instructions that
may divide by zero). For these instructions, we create new basic blocks inside
the vectorized loop, which cause the loop header and latch to no longer be the
same block. This should fix PR34687.
Reference: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34687
llvm-svn: 314542
The 1st attempt at this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314117
was reverted at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314118
because of bot fails for clang tests that were checking optimized IR. That should be fixed with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314144
...so try again.
Original commit message:
The transform to convert an extract-of-a-select-of-vectors was added at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL194013
And a question about the validity of this transform was raised in the review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D1539:
...but not answered AFAICT>
Most of the motivating cases in that patch are now handled by other combines. These are the tests that were added with
the original commit, but they are not regressing even after we remove the transform in this patch.
The diffs we see after removing this transform cause us to avoid increasing the instruction count, so we don't want to do
those transforms as canonicalizations.
The motivation for not turning a vector-select-of-vectors into a scalar operation is shown in PR33301:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33301
...in those cases, we'll get vector ops with this patch rather than the vector/scalar mix that we currently see.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38006
llvm-svn: 314147
The transform to convert an extract-of-a-select-of-vectors was added at:
rL194013
And a question about the validity of this transform was raised in the review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D1539:
...but not answered AFAICT>
Most of the motivating cases in that patch are now handled by other combines. These are the tests that were added with
the original commit, but they are not regressing even after we remove the transform in this patch.
The diffs we see after removing this transform cause us to avoid increasing the instruction count, so we don't want to do
those transforms as canonicalizations.
The motivation for not turning a vector-select-of-vectors into a scalar operation is shown in PR33301:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33301
...in those cases, we'll get vector ops with this patch rather than the vector/scalar mix that we currently see.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38006
llvm-svn: 314117
This patch fixes pr34283, which exposed that the computation of
maximum legal width for vectorization was wrong, because it relied
on MaxInterleaveFactor to obtain the maximum stride used in the loop,
however not all strided accesses in the loop have an interleave-group
associated with them.
Instead of recording the maximum stride in the loop, which can be over
conservative (e.g. if the access with the maximum stride is not involved
in the dependence limitation), this patch tracks the actual maximum legal
width imposed by accesses that are involved in dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37507
llvm-svn: 313237
These are changes to reduce redundant computations when calculating a
feasible vectorization factor:
1. early return when target has no vector registers
2. don't compute register usage for the default VF.
Suggested during review for D37702.
llvm-svn: 313176
When converting a PHI into a series of 'select' instructions to combine the
incoming values together according their edge masks, initialize the first
value to the incoming value In0 of the first predecessor, instead of
generating a redundant assignment 'select(Cond[0], In0, In0)'. The latter
fails when the Cond[0] mask is null, representing a full mask, which can
happen only when there's a single incoming value.
No functional changes intended nor expected other than surviving null Cond[0]'s.
This fix follows D35725, which introduced using null to represent full masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37619
llvm-svn: 313119
Summary:
When the MaxVectorSize > ConstantTripCount, we should just clamp the
vectorization factor to be the ConstantTripCount.
This vectorizes loops where the TinyTripCountThreshold >= TripCount < MaxVF.
Earlier we were finding the maximum vector width, which could be greater than
the trip count itself. The Loop vectorizer does all the work for generating a
vectorizable loop, but in the end we would always choose the scalar loop (since
the VF > trip count). This allows us to choose the VF keeping in mind the trip
count if available.
This is a fix on top of rL312472.
Reviewers: Ayal, zvi, hfinkel, dneilson
Reviewed by: Ayal
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37702
llvm-svn: 313046
Summary:
Improve how MaxVF is computed while taking into account that MaxVF should not be larger than the loop's trip count.
Other than saving on compile-time by pruning the possible MaxVF candidates, this patch fixes pr34438 which exposed the following flow:
1. Short trip count identified -> Don't bail out, set OptForSize:=True to avoid tail-loop and runtime checks.
2. Compute MaxVF returned 16 on a target supporting AVX512.
3. OptForSize -> choose VF:=MaxVF.
4. Bail out because TripCount = 8, VF = 16, TripCount % VF !=0 means we need a tail loop.
With this patch step 2. will choose MaxVF=8 based on TripCount.
Reviewers: Ayal, dorit, mkuper, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37425
llvm-svn: 312472
This change simplifies code that has to deal with
DIGlobalVariableExpression and mirrors how we treat DIExpressions in
debug info intrinsics. Before this change there were two ways of
representing empty expressions on globals, a nullptr and an empty
!DIExpression().
If someone needs to upgrade out-of-tree testcases:
perl -pi -e 's/(!DIGlobalVariableExpression\(var: ![0-9]*)\)/\1, expr: !DIExpression())/g' <MYTEST.ll>
will catch 95%.
llvm-svn: 312144
We were handling some vectors in foldSelectIntoOp, but not if the operand of the bin op was any kind of vector constant. This patch fixes it to treat vector splats the same as scalars.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37232
llvm-svn: 311940
Original commit r311077 of D32871 was reverted in r311304 due to failures
reported in PR34248.
This recommit fixes PR34248 by restricting the packing of predicated scalars
into vectors only when vectorizing, avoiding doing so when unrolling w/o
vectorizing. Added a test derived from the reproducer of PR34248.
llvm-svn: 311849
Store operation takes 2 UOps on X86 processors. The exact cost calculation affects several optimization passes including loop unroling.
This change compensates performance degradation caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458 and shows improvements on some benchmarks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35888
llvm-svn: 311285
Added a separate metadata to indicate when the loop
has already been vectorized instead of setting width and count to 1.
Patch written by Divya Shanmughan and Aditya Kumar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36220
llvm-svn: 311281
Renato Golin