Performing this check unilaterally prevented us from generating FMAs when the incoming IR contained illegal vector types which would eventually be legalized to underlying types that *did* support FMA.
For example, an @llvm.fmuladd on an OpenCL float16 should become a sequence of float4 FMAs, not float4 fmul+fadd's.
NOTE: Because we still call the target-specific profitability hook, individual targets can reinstate the old behavior, if desired, by simply performing the legality check inside their callback hook. They can also perform more sophisticated legality checks, if, for example, some illegal vector types can be productively implemented as FMAs, but not others.
llvm-svn: 177820
Thanks to Jakob for isolating the underlying problem from the
test case in r177423. The original commit had introduced
asymmetric copy operations, but these turned out to be a work-around
to the real problem (the use of == instead of hasSubClassEq in PPCCTRLoops).
llvm-svn: 177679
This implements SJLJ lowering on PPC, making the Clang functions
__builtin_{setjmp/longjmp} functional on PPC platforms. The implementation
strategy is similar to that on X86, with the exception that a branch-and-link
variant is used to get the right jump address. Credit goes to Bill Schmidt for
suggesting the use of the unconditional bcl form (instead of the regular bl
instruction) to limit return-address-cache pollution.
Benchmarking the speed at -O3 of:
static jmp_buf env_sigill;
void foo() {
__builtin_longjmp(env_sigill,1);
}
main() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
if (__builtin_setjmp(env_sigill)) {
goto done;
} else {
foo();
}
done:;
}
...
}
vs. the same code using the libc setjmp/longjmp functions on a P7 shows that
this builtin implementation is ~4x faster with Altivec enabled and ~7.25x
faster with Altivec disabled. This comparison is somewhat unfair because the
libc version must also save/restore the VSX registers which we don't yet
support.
llvm-svn: 177666
Although there is only one Altivec VRSAVE register, it is a member of
a register class, and we need the ability to spill it. Because this
register is normally callee-preserved and handled by special code this
has never before been necessary. However, this capability will be required by
a forthcoming commit adding SjLj support.
llvm-svn: 177654
The old code used to lower FRAMEADDR tried to replicate the logic in the real
frame-lowering code that determines whether or not the frame pointer (r31) will
be used. When it seemed as through the frame pointer would not be used, the
stack pointer (r1) was used instead. Unfortunately, because the stack size is
not yet known, this does not work. Instead, this change introduces new
always-reserved pseudo-registers (FP and FP8) that are replaced during prologue
insertion with the real frame-pointer register (either r1 or r31).
It is important that this intrinsic always return a valid frame address because
it is used by Clang to store the frame address as part of code generation for
__builtin_setjmp.
llvm-svn: 177653
NEON is not IEEE 754 compliant, so we should avoid lowering single-precision
floating point operations with NEON unless unsafe-math is turned on. The
equivalent VFP instructions are IEEE 754 compliant, but in some cores they're
much slower, so some archs/OSs might still request it to be on by default,
such as Swift and Darwin.
llvm-svn: 177651
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.
llvm-svn: 177467
A node's ordering is only propagated during legalization if (a) the new node does
not have an ordering (is not a CSE'd node), or (b) the new node has an ordering
that is higher than the node being legalized.
llvm-svn: 177465
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
llvm-svn: 177462
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 177429
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
Remove an accidentally-added instruction definition and add a comment in the
test case. This is in response to a post-commit review by Bill Schmidt.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177404
The ARM backend currently has poor codegen for long sext/zext
operations, such as v8i8 -> v8i32. This patch addresses this
by performing a custom expansion in ARMISelLowering. It also
adds/changes the cost of such lowering in ARMTTI.
This partially addresses PR14867.
Patch by Pete Couperus
llvm-svn: 177380
PPC64 supports unaligned loads and stores of 64-bit values, but
in order to use the r+i forms, the offset must be a multiple of 4.
Unfortunately, this cannot always be determined by examining the
immediate itself because it might be available only via a TOC entry.
In order to get around this issue, we additionally predicate the
selection of the r+i form on the alignment of the load or store
(forcing it to be at least 4 in order to select the r+i form).
llvm-svn: 177338
Hal Finkel recently added code to allow unaligned memory references
for PowerPC. Two tests were temporarily modified with
-disable-ppc-unaligned to keep them from failing. This patch adjusts
the expected code generation for the unaligned references.
llvm-svn: 177328
Apparently my final cleanup to use a relevant suffix for these tests before
committing r176831 caused them to stop running since lit wasn't configured to
run tests with that suffix in those directories (why don't we just have a
global suffix list?). So, add the suffix to the relevant directories & fix the
test that has bitrotted over the last week due to my debug info schema changes.
llvm-svn: 177315
This commit fixes an assert that would occur on loops with large constant counts
(like looping for ((uint32_t) -1) iterations on PPC64). The existing code did
not handle counts that it computed to be negative (asserting instead), but
these can be created with valid inputs.
This bug was discovered by bugpoint while I was attempting to isolate a
completely different problem.
Also, in writing test cases for the negative-count problem, I discovered that
the ori/lsi handling was broken (there was a typo which caused the logic that
was supposed to detect these pairs and extract the iteration count to always
fail). This has now also been corrected (and is covered by one of the new test
cases).
llvm-svn: 177295
Because the initial-value constants had not been added to the list
of instructions considered for DCE the resulting code had redundant
constant-materialization instructions.
llvm-svn: 177294
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
llvm-svn: 177239
This change cleans up two issues with Altivec register spilling:
1. The spilling code was inefficient (using two instructions, and add and a
load, when just one would do)
2. The code assumed that r0 would always be available (true for now, but this
will change)
The new code handles VR spilling just like GPR spills but forced into r+r mode.
As a result, when any VR spills are present, we must now always allocate the
register-scavenger spill slot.
llvm-svn: 177231
I was too pessimistic in r177105. Vector selects that fit into a legal register
type lower just fine. I was mislead by the code fragment that I was using. The
stores/loads that I saw in those cases came from lowering the conditional off
an address.
Changing the code fragment to:
%T0_3 = type <8 x i18>
%T1_3 = type <8 x i1>
define void @func_blend3(%T0_3* %loadaddr, %T0_3* %loadaddr2,
%T1_3* %blend, %T0_3* %storeaddr) {
%v0 = load %T0_3* %loadaddr
%v1 = load %T0_3* %loadaddr2
==> FROM:
;%c = load %T1_3* %blend
==> TO:
%c = icmp slt %T0_3 %v0, %v1
==> USE:
%r = select %T1_3 %c, %T0_3 %v0, %T0_3 %v1
store %T0_3 %r, %T0_3* %storeaddr
ret void
}
revealed this mistake.
radar://13403975
llvm-svn: 177170
Unaligned access is supported on PPC for non-vector types, and is generally
more efficient than manually expanding the loads and stores.
A few of the existing test cases were using expanded unaligned loads and stores
to test other features (like load/store with update), and for these test cases,
unaligned access remains disabled.
llvm-svn: 177160
In preparation for the addition of other SIMD ISA extensions (such as QPX) we
need to make sure that all Altivec patterns are properly predicated on having
Altivec support.
No functionality change intended (one test case needed to be updated b/c it
assumed that Altivec intrinsics would be supported without enabling Altivec
support).
llvm-svn: 177152
For spills into a large stack frame, the FI-elimination code uses the register
scavenger to obtain a free GPR for use with an r+r-addressed load or store.
When there are no available GPRs, the scavenger gets one by using its spill
slot. Previously, we were not always allocating that spill slot and the RS
would assert when the spill slot was needed.
I don't currently have a small test that triggered the assert, but I've
created a small regression test that verifies that the spill slot is now
added when the stack frame is sufficiently large.
llvm-svn: 177140
Justin Holewinski