Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Blaikie f333dc9571 Reorder the DIFile field in DILexicalBlock to become a prefix common with other DIScopes
llvm-svn: 177703
2013-03-22 05:47:44 +00:00
David Blaikie 0d7d62e4b2 Move the DIFile in DISubprogram to the beginning to be a common prefix along with other DIScopes
llvm-svn: 177674
2013-03-21 22:29:36 +00:00
David Blaikie cc8d090163 Remove unused field in DISubprogram
llvm-svn: 177661
2013-03-21 20:28:52 +00:00
David Blaikie efb0d65ed7 Debug info: refactor the first field of DICompileUnit to be a raw file/directory pair
This removes the DICompileUnit special case from DIScope.

llvm-svn: 177610
2013-03-20 23:58:12 +00:00
David Blaikie 3b88852a2d Debug Info: Swap the 2nd and 3rd parameters to DICompileUnit to match the common DIScope prefix
llvm-svn: 177595
2013-03-20 22:52:54 +00:00
David Blaikie 43a729d165 Remove unused field in DICompileUnit
llvm-svn: 177590
2013-03-20 22:34:33 +00:00
David Blaikie 200b6ed80f Refactor the DIFile (2nd) parameter to DITypes to be an MDNode reference to a raw directory/file pair
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.

llvm-svn: 177467
2013-03-20 00:26:26 +00:00
David Blaikie abec74b38e Move the DIFile operand to DITypes from the 4th operand to the 2nd.
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).

llvm-svn: 177462
2013-03-19 23:25:22 +00:00
David Blaikie 8fb8224578 Split out filename & directory from DIFile to start generalizing over DIScopes
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.

llvm-svn: 177239
2013-03-17 21:13:55 +00:00
David Blaikie 0d221159a0 Remove the unused 4th operand for DIFile debug info metadata
llvm-svn: 176983
2013-03-13 22:05:21 +00:00
David Blaikie 1ca2f36289 Refactor filename/directory in DICompileUnit into a DIFile
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.

llvm-svn: 176913
2013-03-13 00:01:35 +00:00
David Blaikie 452c3ff649 Remove unused "isMain" field from DICompileUnit
llvm-svn: 176910
2013-03-12 22:43:04 +00:00
David Blaikie a4f770d51c Update debug info test cases with empty SplitDebugFilename field.
This could be 'null' or the empty string, DIDescriptor::getStringField
coalesces the two cases anyway so it's just a matter of legible/efficient
representation.

The change in behavior of the DICompileUnit::get* functions could be
subsumed by the full verification check - but ideally that should just be an
assertion if we could front-load the actual debug info metadata failure paths.

llvm-svn: 176907
2013-03-12 22:25:36 +00:00
David Blaikie 33111dfea0 Remove the (apparently) unnecessary debug info metadata indirection.
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.

llvm-svn: 174266
2013-02-02 05:56:24 +00:00
Eli Bendersky e6abe83258 Now that llvm-dwarfdump supports flags to specify which DWARF section to dump,
use them in tests that run llvm-dwarfdump. This is in order to make tests as
specific as possible.

llvm-svn: 173498
2013-01-25 21:44:53 +00:00
David Blaikie 800a916f99 Emit DW_TAG_formal_parameter for unnamed parameters.
This change essentially reverts r87069 which came without a test case. It
causes no regressions in the GDB 7.5 test suite & fixes 25 xfails (commit
to the test suite to follow). If anyone can present a test case that
demonstrates why this check is necessary I'd be happy to account for it in one
way or another.

llvm-svn: 171609
2013-01-05 07:43:02 +00:00
Eric Christopher 3a3d529e0d Only emit DW_AT_object_pointer if this is a definition.
llvm-svn: 164326
2012-09-20 22:51:57 +00:00
Eric Christopher e341776c1e Recommit, with fixes:
Add some support for dealing with an object pointer on arguments.

    Part of rdar://9797999

which now supports adding the object pointer attribute to the
subprogram as it should.

llvm-svn: 163754
2012-09-12 23:36:19 +00:00
Eric Christopher c44e973a36 Revert "Add some support for dealing with an object pointer on arguments."
This should be done on the subprogram, not the variable itself.

llvm-svn: 163734
2012-09-12 18:42:31 +00:00
Eric Christopher 97c0fdd116 Add some support for dealing with an object pointer on arguments.
Part of rdar://9797999

llvm-svn: 163667
2012-09-12 00:26:55 +00:00