The changes from the One Ranges Proposal amount to adding:
- a constructor that takes a `default_sentinel_t` and is equivalent to
the default constructor;
- an `operator==` that compares the iterator to `default_sentinel_t`.
The original proposal defined two overloads for `operator==` (different
argument order) as well as `operator!=`. This has been removed by
[P1614](https://wg21.link/p1614).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119620
`<filesystem>` header has been around for a while now, so we can safely remove
`<experimental/filesystem>` header. `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM`
suggests we were going to remove `<experimental/filesystem>` in llvm 11 release,
but we never did. So, remove the experimental header now, its associated tests,
and the `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM` macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119603
`{back,front}_insert_iterator` and `ostream{,buf}_iterator` effectively
fully implement the One Ranges Proposal already, so mark them as done:
- the change to `difference_type` was made by D103273;
- default constructors and the associated default member initializers
were removed by wg21.link/P2325 (implemented by D102468).
Also fix a stale template signature in the `<iterator>` synopsis.
We are moving away from building the runtimes with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS,
however the documentation was largely outdated. This commit updates all
the documentation I could find to use LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES instead of
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS for building runtimes.
Note that in the near future, libcxx, libcxxabi and libunwind will stop
supporting being built with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS altogether. I don't know
what the plans are for other runtimes like libc, openmp and compiler-rt,
so I didn't make any changes to the documentation that would imply
something for those projects.
Once this lands, I will also cherry-pick this on the release/14.x branch
to make sure that LLVM's documentation is up-to-date and reflects what
we intend to support in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119351
Standalone build have been deprecated for some time now, so this
commit removes support for those builds entirely from libc++, libc++abi
and libunwind.
This, along with the removal of other legacy ways to build, will allow
for major build system simplifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119255
Previously, _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE would be used interchangeably with
_LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION >= 2. This was confusing and creating unnecessary
complexity.
This patch removes _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE -- instead, the LIBCXX_ABI_UNSTABLE
CMake option will result in the LIBCXX_ABI_VERSION being set to '2', the
current unstable ABI. As a result, in the code, we only have _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
to check in order to query the current ABI version.
As a fly-by, this also defines the ABI namespace during CMake configuration
to reduce complexity in __config. I believe it was previously done this
way because we used to try to use __config_site as seldom as possible.
Now that we always ship a __config_site, it doesn't really matter and
I think being explicit about how the library is configured in the __config_site
is actually a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119173
Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was an ABI break. We
still left a knob for users to turn it back on if they were broken by
the change, with a note that we would remove that knob after one release.
The time has now come to remove the knob and clean up the std::nullptr_t
emulation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114786
Note that most changes to `strings` and `views.span` from the One Ranges
Proposal are no longer applicable:
- free `begin` and `end` functions taking `basic_string_view` and `span`
were removed by [P1870](http://wg21.link/p1870);
- `span::const_iterator` was removed by [LWG3320](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3320).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118687
There is no practical difference between `_VSTD` and `std` so we should just remove `_VSTD`. This is the first step.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jeroen.dobbelaere, wmaxey, EricWF, lebedev.ri, __simt__, dim, mgrang, sstefan1, wenlei, smeenai, libcxx-commits, #libc_vendors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117811
This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
Each "Nothing To Do" issue only changed nits in the English wording,
not anything to do with the code.
Each "Complete" issue was completed already, as far as I can tell.
I tried to err on the side of caution: I didn't mark a few issues
whose P/Rs were very invasive and would take time to verify, and I
didn't mark a lot of issues involving features we haven't even started
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117960
I had a look at the changes since the last release and updated the
release notes with interesting changes.
It seems this time the release notes were already rather up to date :-)
If there are more interesting changes, please let me know and I'll
update the patch. I'd like to commit these changes latest next weekend
so they land before branching the 14.0 release.
I've added most active libc++ contributors. If I forgot anybody please add them.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117948
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
This explains stuff that most contributors already know, but it's always
good to write down explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118278
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
Louis Dionne