Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
Also:
- refactor out `__voidify`;
- use the `destroy` algorithm internally;
- refactor out helper classes used in tests for `uninitialized_*`
algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115626
Defined in [`specialized.algorithms`](wg21.link/specialized.algorithms).
Also:
- refactor the existing non-range implementation so that most of it
can be shared between the range-based and non-range-based algorithms;
- remove an existing test for the non-range version of
`uninitialized_default_construct{,_n}` that likely triggered undefined
behavior (it read the values of built-ins after default-initializing
them, essentially reading uninitialized memory).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115315
Detected by evil-izing the widely used `MoveOnly` testing type.
I had to patch some tests that were themselves using its comma operator,
but I think that's a worthwhile cost in order to catch more places
in our headers that needed comma-proofing.
The trick here is that even `++ptr, SomeClass()` can find a comma operator
by ADL, if `ptr` is of type `Evil*`. (A comma between two operands
of non-class-or-enum type is always treated as the built-in
comma, without ADL. But if either operand is class-or-enum, then
ADL happens for _both_ operands' types.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109414
Also, improve tests for std::destroy and std::destroy_n so that they
check for array support.
These changes are part of http://wg21.link/p0896 (the One Ranges proposal).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106916
Arthur O'Dwyer