Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
Refactored TestInitializerList to not be an inline test.
Refactored Makefiles to use USE_LIBCPP instead of adding FLAGS directly
Fixed copy/paste error in TestDataFormatterUnordered class name
Differenttial Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9426
llvm-svn: 236401
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
The reason why one mechanism is so much faster than the other (as in, ~10 seconds vs. ~1 minute) is quite baffling to me at the moment, but these are not process handling tests, so do what's faster
llvm-svn: 226730
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
(I didn't take a guess at the Linux names, as these tests are currently
skipped with the comment "No standard locations for libc++ on Linux.")
llvm-svn: 190307
Adding data formatters for std::set, std::multiset and std::multimap for libc++
The underlying data structure is the same as std::map, so this change is very minimal and mostly consists of test cases
llvm-svn: 183323
Sean Callanan