Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
Added missing SBLanguageRuntime.h to lldb.xcodeproj, set to Public (fixed compile error in TestPublicAPIHeaders)
Removed reference to (temporarily) missing gtest.xcodeproj
Fixed TestDeadStrip compile error
XFAIL TestPublicAPIHeaders - test passes but teardown command 'settings remove target.env-vars DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH' fails
XFAIL TestCModules - use of undeclared identifier 'MIN'
XFAIL TestModulesAutoImport - clang: error: unknown argument: '-gmodules'
XFAIL TestObjCNewSyntax - expr -- @((char*)"Hello world" + 6) cannot box a string value because NSString has not been declared
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9643
llvm-svn: 237085
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
r219978 fixed this test to work on Darwin, and removed the expected
failure decorator, but it then started running (and failing) on FreeBSD.
I'd think @dsym_test should skip the test on all non-Darwin operating
systems. It seems not to be the case, so for now skip it the same way as
done for other @dsym_test tests.
llvm-svn: 220219
The following two tests showed up as XFAIL even though they should
always be skipped on Linux, due to the @unittest2.expectedFailure
annotation appearing above the @dsym_test annotation:
TestObjCNewSyntax.ObjCNewSyntaxTestCase.test_expr_with_dsym
TestBlocks.BlocksTestCase.test_expr_with_dsym.
For those two, I simply moved the @dsym_test annotation to the top so
that it would be marked for skip ahead of being marked for XFAIL.
TestObjCNewSyntax.ObjCNewSyntaxTestCase.test_expr_with_dwarf I marked
as @skipIfLinux since my understanding is that isn't a valid test to
run on Linux. So rather than categorize as a fail (i.e. something
wrong to be fixed), just skip it. (My recent changes to Linux tests
have been following that model: if it could never work, skip; if it's
broken, mark XFAIL so we can easily track, fix, notice the fix and
adjust accordingly).
TestDeadStrip.DeadStripTestCase.test_with_dwarf I had previously
marked as XFAIL but this would never work on Linux with the current
linker AFAICT. Marked it as skip.
llvm-svn: 202788
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
the option to print the runtime-specific description has been modified in the frame variable, memory read and expression command.
All three commands now support a --object-description option, with a shortcut of -O (uppercase letter o)
This is a breaking change:
frame variable used --objc as the long option name
expression used -o as a shortcut
memory read uses --objd as the long option name
Hopefully, most users won't be affected by the change since people tend to access "expression --object-description" under the alias "po" which still works
The test suite has been tweaked accordingly.
llvm-svn: 169961
boxed expressions returning numbers and strings.
I also added boxed expressions to our testcases, and
enabled boxed expressions when libarclite is linked into
the inferior.
llvm-svn: 157026
This takes two important changes:
- Calling blocks is now supported. You need to
cast their return values, but that works fine.
- We now can correctly run JIT-compiled
expressions that use floating-point numbers.
Also, we have taken a fix that allows us to
ignore access control in Objective-C as in C++.
llvm-svn: 152286
Sean Callanan