In CombineToPreIndexedLoadStore, when the offset is a constant, we have code
that looks for other uses of the pointer which are constant offset computations
so that they can be rewritten in terms of the updated pointer so that we don't
need to keep a copy of the base pointer to compute these constant offsets.
Unfortunately, when it iterated over the uses, it did so by SDNodes, and so we
could confuse ourselves if the base pointer was produced by a node that had
multiple results (because we would not immediately exclude uses of the other
node results). This was reported as PR22755. Unfortunately, we don't have a
test case (and I've also been unable to produce one thus far), but at least the
mistake is clear. The right way to fix this problem is to make use of the information
contained in the use iterators to filter out any uses of other results of the
node producing the base pointer.
This should be mostly NFC, but should also fix PR22755 (for which,
unfortunately, we have no in-tree test case).
llvm-svn: 237576
This is a less ambitious version of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236546
because that was reverted in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236600
because it caused memory corruption that wasn't related to FMF
but was actually due to making nodes with 2 operands derive from a
plain SDNode rather than a BinarySDNode.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
llvm-svn: 237046
The bug showed up as a compile-time assertion failure:
Assertion `NumBits >= MIN_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too small"' failed
when building msan tests on x86-64.
Prior to r236850, this bug was masked due to a bogus alignment check,
which also accidentally rejected non-byte-sized accesses. Afterwards,
an invalid ElementSizeBytes == 0 got further into the function, and
triggered the assertion failure.
It would probably be a good idea to allow it to handle merging stores
of unusual widths as well, but for now, to un-break it, I'm just
making the minimal fix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9626
llvm-svn: 236927
1) check whether the alignment of the memory is sufficient for the
*merged* store or load to be efficient.
Not doing so can result in some ridiculously poor code generation, if
merging creates a vector operation which must be aligned but isn't.
2) DON'T check that the alignment of each load/store is equal. If
you're merging 2 4-byte stores, the first *might* have 8-byte
alignment, but the second certainly will have 4-byte alignment. We do
want to allow those to be merged.
llvm-svn: 236850
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
There are 2 structural changes here:
1. The main diff is that we're preparing to extend the optimization
flags to affect more than just binary SDNodes. Eg, IR intrinsics
( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21290 ) or non-binop nodes
that don't even exist in IR such as FMA, FNEG, etc.
2. The other change is that we're actually copying the FP fast-math-flags
from the IR instructions to SDNodes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8900
llvm-svn: 236546
This patch makes ReplaceExtractVectorEltOfLoadWithNarrowedLoad convert
the element number from getVectorIdxTy() to PtrTy before doing pointer
arithmetic on it. This is needed on z, where element numbers are i32
but pointers are i64.
Original patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236530
For little-endian, the function would convert (extract_vector_elt (load X), Y)
to X + Y*sizeof(elt). For big-endian it would instead use
X + sizeof(vec) - Y*sizeof(elt). The big-endian case wasn't right since
vector index order always follows memory/array order, even for big-endian.
(Note that the current handling has to be wrong for Y==0 since it would
access beyond the end of the vector.)
Original patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236529
At the least it should be guarded by some kind of target hook.
It also introduced catastrophic compile time and code quality
regressions on some out of tree targets (test case still being
reduced/sanitized).
Sanjay agreed with reverting this patch until these issues can be
resolved.
llvm-svn: 236199
This is a compromise: with this simple patch, we should always handle a chain of exactly 3
operations optimally, but we're not generating the optimal balanced binary tree for a longer
sequence.
In general, this transform will reduce the dependency chain for a sequence of instructions
using N operands from a worst case N-1 dependent operations to N/2 dependent operations.
The optimal balanced binary tree would reduce the chain to log2(N).
The trade-off for not dealing with longer sequences is: (1) we have less complexity in the
compiler, (2) we avoid unknown compile-time blowup calculating a balanced tree, and (3) we
don't need to worry about the increased register pressure required to parallelize longer
sequences. It also seems unlikely that we would ever encounter really long strings of
dependent ops like that in the wild, but I'm not sure how to verify that speculation.
FWIW, I see no perf difference for test-suite running on btver2 (x86-64) with -ffast-math
and this patch.
We can extend this patch to cover other associative operations such as fmul, fmax, fmin,
integer add, integer mul.
This is a partial fix for:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17305
and if extended:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21768https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23116
The issue also came up in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8941
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9232
llvm-svn: 236031
This is a preliminary step to using the IR-level floating-point fast-math-flags in the SDAG (D8900).
In this patch, we introduce the optimization flags as their own struct. As noted in the TODO comment,
we should eventually share this data between the IR passes and the backend.
We also switch the existing nsw / nuw / exact bit functionality of the BinaryWithFlagsSDNode class to
use the new struct.
The tradeoff is that instead of using the free but limited space of SDNode's SubclassData, we add a
data member to the subclass. This means we don't have to repeat all of the get/set methods per flag,
but we're potentially adding size to all nodes of this subclassi type.
In practice on 64-bit systems (measured on Linux and MacOS X), there is no size difference between an
SDNode and BinaryWithFlagsSDNode after this change: they're both 80 bytes. This means that we had at
least one free byte to play with due to struct alignment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9325
llvm-svn: 235997
[DebugInfo] Add debug locations to constant SD nodes
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235989
This adds debug location to constant nodes of Selection DAG and updates
all places that create constants to pass debug locations
(see PR13269).
Can't guarantee that all locations are correct, but in a lot of cases choice
is obvious, so most of them should be. At least all tests pass.
Tests for these changes do not cover everything, instead just check it for
SDNodes, ARM and AArch64 where it's easy to get incorrect locations on
constants.
This is not complete fix as FastISel contains workaround for wrong debug
locations, which drops locations from instructions on processing constants,
but there isn't currently a way to use debug locations from constants there
as llvm::Constant doesn't cache it (yet). Although this is a bit different
issue, not directly related to these changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9084
llvm-svn: 235977
right scaling.
In the function canFoldInAddressingMode, VT is computed as the type of the
destination/source of a LOAD/STORE operations, instead of the memory type of the
operation.
On targets with a scaling factor on the offset of the LOAD/STORE operations, the
function may return false for actually valid cases. This may then prevent the
selection of profitable pre or post indexed load/store operations, and instead
select pre or post indexed load/store for unprofitable cases.
Patch by Francois de Ferriere <francois.de-ferriere@st.com>!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9146
llvm-svn: 235780
Patch to remove extra bitcasts from shuffles, this is often a legacy of XformToShuffleWithZero being used to combine bitmaskings (of float vectors bitcast to integer vectors) into shuffles: bitcast(shuffle(bitcast(s0),bitcast(s1))) -> shuffle(s0,s1)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9097
llvm-svn: 235578
This turned up after r235333, but was a pre-existing bug. The optimization
which transforms select(c, load, load) into a load of a select of the addresses
does not handle indexed loads (pre/post inc/dec). However, it did not check for
them either, leading to a crash if it tried to transform one of them.
llvm-svn: 235497
Summary:
This patch adds legalization support to operate on FP16 as a load/store type
and do operations on it as floats.
Tests for ARM are added to test/CodeGen/ARM/fp16-promote.ll
Reviewers: srhines, t.p.northover
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8755
llvm-svn: 235215
The only type that isn't an integer, isn't floating point, and isn't
a vector; ladies and gentlemen, the gift that keeps on giving: x86_mmx!
Fixes PR23246.
Original message (reverted in r235062):
[CodeGen] Combine concat_vectors of scalars into build_vector.
Combine something like:
(v8i8 concat_vectors (v2i8 bitcast (i16)) x4)
into:
(v8i8 (bitcast (v4i16 BUILD_VECTOR (i16) x4)))
If any of the scalars are floating point, use that throughout.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8948
llvm-svn: 235072
Combine something like:
(v8i8 concat_vectors (v2i8 bitcast (i16)) x4)
into:
(v8i8 (bitcast (v4i16 BUILD_VECTOR (i16) x4)))
If any of the scalars are floating point, use that throughout.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8948
llvm-svn: 234809
In case of different types used for the condition of the selects the
select(select) -> select(and) normalisation cannot be performed.
See also: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7622
llvm-svn: 234763
We already do:
concat_vectors(scalar, undef) -> scalar_to_vector(scalar)
When the scalar is legal.
When it's not, but is a truncated legal scalar, we can also do:
concat_vectors(trunc(scalar), undef) -> scalar_to_vector(scalar)
Which is equivalent, since the upper lanes are undef anyway.
While there, teach the combine to look at more than 2 operands.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8883
llvm-svn: 234530
The bug manifests when there are two loads and two stores chained as follows in
a DAG,
(ld v3f32) -> (st f32) -> (ld v3f32) -> (st f32)
and the stores' values are extracted from the preceding vector loads.
MergeConsecutiveStores would replace the first store in the chain with the
merged vector store, which would create a cycle between the merged store node
and the last load node that appears in the chain.
This commits fixes the bug by replacing the last store in the chain instead.
rdar://problem/20275084
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8849
llvm-svn: 234430
This patch attempts to fold the shuffling of 'scalar source' inputs - BUILD_VECTOR and SCALAR_TO_VECTOR nodes - if the shuffle node is the only user. This folds away a lot of unnecessary shuffle nodes, and allows quite a bit of constant folding that was being missed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8516
llvm-svn: 234004
DAGCombiner::ReassociateOps was correctly testing for an constant integer scalar but failed to correctly test for constant integer vectors (it was testing for any constant vector).
llvm-svn: 233482
This patch adds supports for the vector constant folding of TRUNCATE and FP_EXTEND instructions and tidies up the SINT_TO_FP and UINT_TO_FP instructions to match.
It also moves the vector constant folding for the FNEG and FABS instructions to use the DAG.getNode() functionality like the other unary instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8593
llvm-svn: 233224
Reverts the code change from r221168 and the relevant test.
It was a mistake to disable the combiner, and based on the ultimate
definition of 'optnone' we shouldn't have considered the test case
as failing in the first place.
llvm-svn: 233153
This is very related to the bug fixed in r174431. The problem is that
SelectionDAG does not include alignment in the uniquing of loads and
stores. When an otherwise no-op DAGCombine would increase the alignment
of a load or store, the original node would be returned (with the
alignment increased), which would cause the node not to be processed by
any further DAGCombines.
I don't have a direct testcase for this that manifests on an in-tree
target, but I did see some noise in the tests for other targets and have
updated them for it.
llvm-svn: 232780
Targets which provide a rotate make it possible to replace a sequence of
(XOR (SHL 1, x), -1) with (ROTL ~1, x). This saves an instruction on
architectures like X86 and POWER(64).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8350
llvm-svn: 232572
We have an increasing number of cases where we are creating commuted shuffle masks - all implementing nearly the same code.
This patch adds a static helper function - ShuffleVectorSDNode::commuteMask() and replaces a number of cases to use it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8139
llvm-svn: 231581
This patch fixes the logic in the DAGCombiner that folds an AND node according
to rule: (and (X (load V)), C) -> (X (load V))
An AND between a vector load 'X' and a constant build_vector 'C' can be folded
into the load itself only if we can prove that the AND operation is redundant.
The algorithm implemented by 'visitAND' firstly computes the splat value 'S'
from C, and then checks if S has the lower 'B' bits set (where B is the size in
bits of the vector element type). The algorithm takes into account also the
'undef' bits in the splat mask.
Unfortunately, the algorithm only worked under the assumption that the size of S
is a multiple of the vector element type. With this patch, we conservatively
avoid folding the AND if the splat bits are not compatible with the vector
element type.
Added X86 test and-load-fold.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8085
llvm-svn: 231563
This patch attempts to convert a SCALAR_TO_VECTOR using an operand from an EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT into a VECTOR_SHUFFLE.
This prevents many cases of spilling scalar data between the gpr + simd registers.
At present the optimization only accepts cases where there is no TRUNC of the scalar type (i.e. all types must match).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8132
llvm-svn: 231554
This is based on the following equivalences:
select(C0 & C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, select(C1, X, Y), Y)
select(C0 | C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, X, select(C1, X, Y))
Many target cannot perform and/or on the CPU flags and therefore the
right side should be choosen to avoid materializign the i1 flags in an
integer register. If the target can perform this operation efficiently
we normalize to the left form.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7622
llvm-svn: 231507
This is in preparation for changing visitSELECT to normalize towards
select(Cond0, select(Cond1, X, Y), Y);
select(Cond0, X, select(Cond1, X, Y)) which perfom an implicit and/or of
the conditions.
The factored function contains all DAGCombine rules which reduce two values
combined by an And/Or operation to a single value. This does not include rules
involving constants as visitSELECT already handles that case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8026
llvm-svn: 231506
Currently shuffles may only be combined if they are of the same type, despite the fact that bitcasts are often introduced in between shuffle nodes (e.g. x86 shuffle type widening).
This patch allows a single input shuffle to peek through bitcasts and if the input is another shuffle will merge them, shuffling using the smallest sized type, and re-applying the bitcasts at the inputs and output instead.
Dropped old ShuffleToZext test - this patch removes the use of the zext and vector-zext.ll covers these anyhow.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7939
llvm-svn: 231380
When trying to convert a BUILD_VECTOR into a shuffle, we try to split a single source vector that is twice as wide as the destination vector.
We can not do this when we also need the zero vector to create a blend.
This fixes PR22774.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8040
llvm-svn: 231219
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
We were missing a check for the following fold in DAGCombiner:
// fold (fmul (fmul x, c1), c2) -> (fmul x, (fmul c1, c2))
If 'x' is also a constant, then we shouldn't do anything. Otherwise, we could end up swapping the operands back and forth forever.
This should fix:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22698
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7917
llvm-svn: 230884
have the debugger step through each one individually. Turn off the
combine for adjacent stores at -O0 so we get this behavior.
Possibly, DAGCombine shouldn't run at all at -O0, but that's for
another day; see PR22346.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7181
llvm-svn: 230659
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:04:28 2015 +0000
Fix based on post-commit comment on D7816 & rL230177 - BUILD_VECTOR operand truncation was using the the BV's output scalar type instead of the input type.
and
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 22 18:17:28 2015 +0000
[DagCombiner] Generalized BuildVector Vector Concatenation
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
as the root cause of PR22678 which is causing an assertion inside the DAG combiner.
I'll follow up to the main thread as well.
llvm-svn: 230358
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
llvm-svn: 230177
DAGCombine will rewrite an BUILD_VECTOR where all non-undef inputs some from
[US]INT_TO_FP, as a BUILD_VECTOR of integers with the conversion applied as a
vector operation. We check operation legality of the conversion, but fail to
check legality of the integer vector type itself. Because targets don't
normally override operation legality defaults for illegal types, we need to
check this also.
This came up in the context of the QPX vector entensions for PowerPC (which can
have legal floating-point vector types without corresponding legal integer
vector types). No in-tree test case for this yes, but one can be added once
the QPX support has been committed.
llvm-svn: 230176
This allows sharing of FMA forming combines to work
with instructions that have the same semantics as a separate
multiply and add.
This is expand by default, and only formed post legalization
so it shouldn't have much impact on targets that do not want it.
llvm-svn: 230070
First, don't combine bit masking into vector shuffles (even ones the
target can handle) once operation legalization has taken place. Custom
legalization of vector shuffles may exist for these patterns (making the
predicate return true) but that custom legalization may in some cases
produce the exact bit math this matches. We only really want to handle
this prior to operation legalization.
However, the x86 backend, in a fit of awesome, relied on this. What it
would do is mark VSELECTs as expand, which would turn them into
arithmetic, which this would then match back into vector shuffles, which
we would then lower properly. Amazing.
Instead, the second change is to teach the x86 backend to directly form
vector shuffles from VSELECT nodes with constant conditions, and to mark
all of the vector types we support lowering blends as shuffles as custom
VSELECT lowering. We still mark the forms which actually support
variable blends as *legal* so that the custom lowering is bypassed, and
the legal lowering can even be used by the vector shuffle legalization
(yes, i know, this is confusing. but that's how the patterns are
written).
This makes the VSELECT lowering much more sensible, and in fact should
fix a bunch of bugs with it. However, as you'll see in the test cases,
right now what it does is point out the *hilarious* deficiency of the
new vector shuffle lowering when it comes to blends. Fortunately, my
very next patch fixes that. I can't submit it yet, because that patch,
somewhat obviously, forms the exact and/or pattern that the DAG combine
is matching here! Without this patch, teaching the vector shuffle
lowering to produce the right code infloops in the DAG combiner. With
this patch alone, we produce terrible code but at least lower through
the right paths. With both patches, all the regressions here should be
fixed, and a bunch of the improvements (like using 2 shufps with no
memory loads instead of 2 andps with memory loads and an orps) will
stay. Win!
There is one other change worth noting here. We had hilariously wrong
vectorization cost estimates for vselect because we fell through to the
code path that assumed all "expand" vector operations are scalarized.
However, the "expand" lowering of VSELECT is vector bit math, most
definitely not scalarized. So now we go back to the correct if horribly
naive cost of "1" for "not scalarized". If anyone wants to add actual
modeling of shuffle costs, that would be cool, but this seems an
improvement on its own. Note the removal of 16 and 32 "costs" for doing
a blend. Even in SSE2 we can blend in fewer than 16 instructions. ;] Of
course, we don't right now because of OMG bad code, but I'm going to fix
that. Next patch. I promise.
llvm-svn: 229835
This is a follow-on patch to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
That patch canonicalized constant splats as build_vectors,
and this patch removes the constant check so we can canonicalize
all splats as build_vectors.
This fixes the 2nd test case in PR22283:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22283
The unfortunate code duplication between SelectionDAG and DAGCombiner
is discussed in the earlier patch review. At least this patch is just
removing code...
This improves an existing x86 AVX test and changes codegen in an ARM test.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7389
llvm-svn: 229511
test.
This was just a matter of the DAG combine for vector shuffles being too
aggressive. This is a bit of a grey area, but I think generally if we
can re-use intermediate shuffles, we should. Certainly, given the test
cases I have available, this seems like the right call.
llvm-svn: 229285
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
Also, add `Function::getFnStackAlignment()`, and canonicalize:
getAttributes().getStackAlignment(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex)
=> getFnStackAlignment()
llvm-svn: 229208
We used to do this DAG combine, but it's not always correct:
If the first fp_round isn't a value preserving truncation, it might
introduce a tie in the second fp_round, that wouldn't occur in the
single-step fp_round we want to fold to.
In other words, double rounding isn't the same as rounding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7571
llvm-svn: 228911
Add new token factor node and its users to worklist if alias analysis is
turned on, in DAGCombiner::visitTokenFactor(). Alias analysis may cause
a lot of new token factors to be inserted into the DAG, and they need to
be optimized to avoid significant slow-downs.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 228841
nodes when folding bitcasts of constants.
We can't fold things and then check after-the-fact whether it was legal.
Once we have formed the DAG node, arbitrary other nodes may have been
collapsed to it. There is no easy way to go back. Instead, we need to
test for the specific folding cases we're interested in and ensure those
are legal first.
This could in theory make this less powerful for bitcasting from an
integer to some vector type, but AFAICT, that can't actually happen in
the SDAG so its fine. Now, we *only* whitelist specific int->fp and
fp->int bitcasts for post-legalization folding. I've added the test case
from the PR.
(Also as a note, this does not appear to be in 3.6, no backport needed)
llvm-svn: 228656
The combine that forms extloads used to be disabled on vector types,
because "None of the supported targets knows how to perform load and
sign extend on vectors in one instruction."
That's not entirely true, since at least SSE4.1 X86 knows how to do
those sextloads/zextloads (with PMOVS/ZX).
But there are several aspects to getting this right.
First, vector extloads are controlled by a profitability callback.
For instance, on ARM, several instructions have folded extload forms,
so it's not always beneficial to create an extload node (and trying to
match extloads is a whole 'nother can of worms).
The interesting optimization enables folding of s/zextloads to illegal
(splittable) vector types, expanding them into smaller legal extloads.
It's not ideal (it introduces some legalization-like behavior in the
combine) but it's better than the obvious alternative: form illegal
extloads, and later try to split them up. If you do that, you might
generate extloads that can't be split up, but have a valid ext+load
expansion. At vector-op legalization time, it's too late to generate
this kind of code, so you end up forced to scalarize. It's better to
just avoid creating egregiously illegal nodes.
This optimization is enabled unconditionally on X86.
Note that the splitting combine is happy with "custom" extloads. As
is, this bypasses the actual custom lowering, and just unrolls the
extload. But from what I've seen, this is still much better than the
current custom lowering, which does some kind of unrolling at the end
anyway (see for instance load_sext_4i8_to_4i64 on SSE2, and the added
FIXME).
Also note that the existing combine that forms extloads is now also
enabled on legal vectors. This doesn't have a big effect on X86
(because sext+load is usually combined to sext_inreg+aextload).
On ARM it fires on some rare occasions; that's for a separate commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6904
llvm-svn: 228325
This commit creates infinite loop in DAG combine for in the LLVM test-suite
for aarch64 with mcpu=cylcone (just having neon may be enough to expose this).
llvm-svn: 227272
This patch resolves part of PR21711 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21711 ).
The 'f3' test case in that report presents a situation where we have two 128-bit
stores extracted from a 256-bit source vector.
Instead of producing this:
vmovaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm0, 16(%rdi)
This patch merges the 128-bit stores into a single 256-bit store:
vmovups %ymm0, (%rdi)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7208
llvm-svn: 227242
This is a 2nd try at the same optimization as http://reviews.llvm.org/D6698.
That patch was checked in at r224611, but reverted at r225031 because it
caused a failure outside of the regression tests.
The cause of the crash was not recognizing consecutive stores that have mixed
source values (loads and vector element extracts), so this patch adds a check
to bail out if any store value is not coming from a vector element extract.
This patch also refactors the shared logic of the constant source and vector
extracted elements source cases into a helper function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6850
llvm-svn: 226845
This solves PR22276.
Splats of constants would sometimes produce redundant shuffles, sometimes ridiculously so (see the PR for details). Fold these shuffles into BUILD_VECTORs early on instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
Fixed recommit of r226811.
llvm-svn: 226816
This solves PR22276.
Splats of constants would sometimes produce redundant shuffles, sometimes ridiculously so (see the PR for details). Fold these shuffles into BUILD_VECTORs early on instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
llvm-svn: 226811
The problem occurs when after vectorization we have type
<2 x i32>. This type is promoted to <2 x i64> and then requires
additional efforts for expanding loads and truncating stores.
I added EXPAND / TRUNCATE attributes to the masked load/store
SDNodes. The code now contains additional shuffles.
I've prepared changes in the cost estimation for masked memory
operations, it will be submitted separately.
llvm-svn: 226808